Linkage for Linear Motion from Servo.
This was originally going to be a question on mechanical advantage and tinsnips but I've realised the answer during typing the question. So, my follow-up question is . . .
I'm looking to extend the throw of a servo and convert this to a roughly linear motion but still keep the whole mechanism compact. I'd like around a 4 to1 gearing (with corresponding loss of force, of course). Is there a simple linkage I should be looking at to get this?
14
answers
|
Answer it!
|
I think you're probably looking at some sort of crank mechanism. If you join Rob's site, you can download a model of a crank for free here. If you don't join, the model costs £2.50 to download.
Interesting site - I've signed up.
I find mechanical linkages hard to visualise for some reason, and the animations are a great help. I think a variation on the third order lever operating a push-rod at right angles is what I'm looking for.
For example this does what you want.
That's roughly what I was thinking of, Rick, but turning the servo arm by 90 degrees and having the fulcrum point on the servo, then a slotted arm (being the equivalent of your vertical arm from the fulcrum) operating a push-rod at the arm's end (the equivalent of your top horizontal arm), with a suitable guide at the top end. I think my original mention of a 4 bar linkage was misleading - I don't actually need that.
Gravity is what I had in mind for the return - The push-rod will actually be vertical. However, now I'm considering your rack and pinion suggestion as using a decent size pinion does give a good throw in a small footprint and it would be easier to mount. When you first mentioned it I was thinking steering rack ratios which would need multiple rotations.
Thanks Alex, but that doesn't give me the gearing I'm looking for. It needs to be positionable, which would need a stepper rather than a servo. A typical servo only has around 270 degrees of rotation.
Certainly, but only over 270 degrees or so (360 for winch servos) which would only . . .
Just twigged : Bigger cog = higher gearing!
(I said I had trouble visualising mechanical linkages #;¬)
Possibly, but I think the one I've mentioned above may be easier to implement and give a more linear response.
![]() |








































