Has Google started charging people for searches?
This ain't rocket surgery, folks.
14
answers
|
Answer it!
|
My expectation would be that younger people should be even more inclined to use a search engine than I am, not less inclined. Maybe I'm just hopelessly out of touch, but I think a lot of information immediately is better than a little information with a built-in delay. This presumes that the information in question is readily available and not esoteric, i.e. "how to make mayonnaise" vs. "how to coat the internals of my paintball gun with teflon at home, using a microwave oven".
They even put "Google" in their bibliographies when doing research.
Maybe it's an attempt to teach the kids to have discretion about their sources. If you spend the time doing old-school library research, it may help you learn to recognize the hallmarks of a reputable article. It never fails to amaze me how many of RavingWife's students think Wikipedia is the be-all and end-all of information sources.
I may be off-base, but I think most who find these questions irritating probably grew up with parents like mine. Mom taught my sister and I to read at a very early age, and when posed with any question her response was, "Look it up. Remember how I taught you?" This, accompanied with frequent trips to the library, helped me to be a self-sufficient person; it didn't take long for me to realize that someone else had asked the same burning question long before me, discovered the answer, and wrote about it.
The irony is that it takes far more effort to create a user name and password for Instructables, log in, find the Answer page, type a question, and hit "Submit" than it does to visit Google (or better, use the browser's search box), type keywords, and hit "Enter". If only these children had seen a library organized by card catalog, they would understand the value of such a shortcut.
You'll get stung for your usage at the start of the next tax year, 1st Apr.
L
![]() |





































