How to identify breaker for a currently dead circuit?

There is a circuit in my house which has become unpowered, but I can't find a breaker for it.  None of the breakers in the service panel are tripped (yes, I know what that looks like), and the two labelled "not in use" don't affect this unpowered line (I've cycled them both a couple of times). 

The circuit has two GFCI outlets on it; both are unpowered and the TEST buttons have no effect (I've tried RESET, of course).  The circuit also has an overhead fluorescent panel, and an outside security light, neither of which are working.

I thought I could use a circuit tracer (a.k.a. breaker finder) for this, but what I've read so far indicates that they only work on active lines (i.e., so you know which breaker to turn off).

Does anyone have a non-obvious suggestion for how I can find where this circuit is turned off?  Or could I use a circuit tracer for this, even though it's unpowered?

29 answers
sort by: active | newest | oldest
Nov 18, 2010. 11:58 AMNachoMahma says:
. When I was an Electrician/Instrument Tech, we used a unit that injected a high frequency signal onto the line (powered or not) which was picked up by a handheld receiver. Eg, this Amprobe unit. You should be able to rent a unit at a local tool rental place or an electrical supply house.
Nov 18, 2010. 12:02 PMNachoMahma says:
. Oh, yeah. Link is just an example. Not really a recommendation for Grainger or Amprobe (and I'm guessing you want to spend a lot less than $400 heehee), but I am a satisfied customer of both businesses.
Nov 18, 2010. 1:04 PMkeydogstony says:
If none of the breakers in the breaker panel are affecting the outlet, it must be a broken connection somewhere.
But is it possible these are going thru a light switch somewhere?
Nov 18, 2010. 2:22 PMorksecurity says:
+1.

Cheap versions are fairly widely available, but they require that the circuit have power. The pro units are able to inject a signal whether the wire is powered or not, so they're more useful for finding breaks.

(I had to use one early this year to find the place where a contractor accidentally cut a cable. They did make good once that was pointed out, but I shouldn't have had to find the problem for them. Especially after they had brought a pro in to look for it. Sigh.)
Nov 18, 2010. 3:21 PMorksecurity says:
The transmitter essentially uses the wire being tested as a low-level broadcast antenna. The detector is a directional pickup antenna and a receiver tuned to respond to that signal. Inverse-square law means that in most cases you can find some combination of location and amplifier level which lets you pick out which wire is involved and where it's going. The frequency used also tends to get filtered out by the circuit breaker's coils, so there isn't any significant amount of leakage into other circuits in the house.

To find the break, I traced the wire back from the light that wasn't working through the attic to where it went down to the basement, picked it up there (I was unduly lucky; it happened to be a relatively unusual color, which made that a bit easier), and then followed it back until I stopped getting signal. (Well, actually I first confirmed that the signal wasn't reaching the circuit breaker, so I knew the problem was definitely between breaker and switch.)

Nov 18, 2010. 3:38 PMNachoMahma says:
. Timing the reflection is commonly used in industrial settings where the wiring is likely to be in conduit and/or a very long run and/or 30' up in a pipe rack.
. orksecurity's directional receiver method is more common in a residential setting.
. Measuring the resistance/impedance sounds to me like it would require near perfect wiring, but I'm no engineer.
Nov 18, 2010. 6:18 PMframistan says:
look for something SIMPLE first. I would assume that the GFCI is failed or has moisture in/on it causing it to trip. That would cut voltage off of the line. Turn off the breaker feeding that line. LOOSEN the gfci out of the outlet far enough to do tests. Turn the breaker back on and see if you have power going to the input side of the GFCI. If you wire a GFCI, be aware that you must connect the INCOMING power to proper terminals and OUTPUT wires to the other ones. It will not work properly if connected backwards. Don't overlook the ON/OFF wall switch may be defective.
Apr 1, 2011. 7:09 AMinternethotspot says:
CFGI should not be used in series. One CFGI ahead of the other outlets will do the job for both. Two or more in series will be unreliable and trip more often.
Apr 1, 2011. 7:41 PMinternethotspot says:
I believe so. From the panel, one CFGI can have another outlet connected to it and be protected as well. This is generally how a kitchen is wired - one CFGI and perhaps several standard outlets that come after the CFGI.
Apr 1, 2011. 7:04 AMinternethotspot says:
Note, you should not wire two CFGI in series, as you will have problems. They are not designed to be in series, and will trip.
Apr 1, 2011. 7:01 AMinternethotspot says:
If you were to use a battery powered device and the power was still on, you might have a problem.

Other devices designed for cable tracing include telephone line and Cat5 type cable testers (from computer supply store - around $30), and there's also a tone generator for tracking telephone/ network/ cable lines, etc.

Maybe you could feed the signal through a big diode or at least a fuse, just in case the power is on or comes on when you flip the breaker. Would be best to make your own plug to fit in the receptacle, as you would not want to send the signal through the common wire (as it would connect to all breakers).
Nov 18, 2010. 12:29 PMlemonie says:

Maybe you should find out what the different 'breakers are connected to (anyway)?
Could any wire have been chewed by e.g. rodents?

L
Nov 19, 2010. 1:39 PMlemonie says:

The rodent explanation wokrs. If it's wired into any of the breakers they should either affect something also or they're not the problem?

L
Nov 18, 2010. 12:20 PMKiteman says:
US cables have two lines, yes?

With the mains off, maybe connect a 9V battery to the end of the cable that you can identify (one electrode to each line), then prod around the potential far-ends of the cable with an LED to see if you can make it light up (maybe use two LEDs with the opposite-polarity legs twisted together, to save a false-negative due to accidentally-reversed current).

Nov 18, 2010. 2:07 PMKiteman says:
What I meant was to poke at the end of every single wire in there until you got a light. There can't be that many, can there?

Oh, wait, US properties have a breaker per socket, don't they? No ring-mains?

(If the problem is inside the main fuse-box, UK regulations require the attentions of a properly-certified electrician, either to do the work or to certify the work you did as safe to connect to the mains.

Bloody safety elves...)


Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!