Challenge build my perpetual motion device this is the only one that makes sense PLEASE HELP

Guys please help me out i havent built this device yet but it has to work trust me read my instructable and it should make perfect sense thanks to all who contribute if you have any questions or theory of why it wont work shoot me an email

Picture of Challenge build my perpetual motion device this is the only one that makes sense PLEASE HELP
sort by: active | newest | oldest
1-10 of 23Next »
Rebreg5 years ago
Sadly perpetual motion is impossible ( because of friction)
Arano7 years ago
i don't want to say 'something like this is possible' but if all the inventors trusted in people who said 'that'S impossible' we would still be carving stones for knifes and reffering to it as 'high-tech' so don't tell the people 'thats impossible' they shall find out thru trying or proove us all wrong
there's a difference between scientists making a discovery that showed that something was possible, and scientists breaking the laws of physics. one can be done, the other cannot.

this isn't a matter of "dude that's stupid and you can't do it" it's a matter of "unless you find a way to travel to a parallel universe that has a different set of physical laws governing it, this won't work"
 Could Be wrong but are the laws of physics not just a thereon?
Didn't Nikola Tesla break several "Laws"  Isn't science buy definition a quest to prove wrong what others believe is right?  Progress Can't be made if all you ever do is fight to prove what you know is the only way. 

I don't think this does or doesn't work.

And every time a "Perpetual Motion" Machine is made its simply explained as using an alternate energy input.

Some guy in New Zealand made a motor that ran without energy input it was said the energy he used was the earths polarization.

Hertz "Discovered" Hertz and was renowned Tesla didn't understand so tried to reproduce Hertz's output and failed but discovered the real Hertz. Before that Hertz was Hertz and that was that no ifs buts or maybes.

Please also note that since were surrounded by potential energy what most people consider a Perpetual Motion machine is possible without breaking precious "Laws of (Insert Science topic here)" Gravity, Solar Energy, Polarization. either (If your a Tesla subscriber which i am)
"Some guy in New Zealand made a motor that ran without energy input..."

Have you noticed that everybody who believes perpetual motion is possible knows that somebody has done it, but is never exactly clear about who it was, and how?

Hertz didn't discover Hertz, he demonstrated radio waves, and a unit of measurement was named after him in recognition.  Tesla demonstrated radio communications the year Hertz died.

It doesn't matter how much energy you are surrounded with - you cannot use it if there is no energy gradient.

The simple fact is that there is no such thing as a perpetual motion machine.

 Actually It was late at night and sifting through my bookmarks was tedious.  I realised some one would want precise information.

I can't find the pertaining information i was speaking about Hertz.  So i cant clarify.  I just remember that the specific discovery was incorrect and tesla while attempting to observe the observations discovered what hertz believed he had discovered under different circumstances.  Hertz had obviously discovered something just not what he thought he had.

I still can't see any reason why a perpetual motion machine is impossible.  Only that to discover/create/invent one you would have to disprove theory and practical understanding.  

I don't see why a theory can't be proved incorrect or need correction.  I Only see that most of us are to simple to be able to break these "rules"  My Self included.

However i never condone an idea on the basis of breaking the "rules" 
.  Instead of searching for info on Hertz, Tesla, et al, find every instance where the Laws of Thermodynamics have been verifiably violated. Feel free to use any and all resources that adhere to the Scientific Method.
 My point isn't that is has been done although i believe the above example is plausible (The link i provided)  If the law was broken it would cease to be the law.  My point is to not exclude a possibility simply because some one else says it cant be done.  

People seem to get educated into stupidity.  I don't necessarily think it can or will be done.  I just don't discount it.  Even the guidelines of a scientific law don't make it a given.  Ill type some guidelines for you.  Please note the words like


These allow room for error since you can never prove a negative hence they can never be sure something NEVER happens.  So everything is possible just sometimes improbable.

Physical Law Characterizations

My point with Tesla and hertz was the fact that everybody assumed hertz was correct in his observations and ridiculed Tesla for doubting what hertz was actually observing.

I don't think i ever stated some one had broken laws simply that they are theoretically breakable. And I asked didn't Tesla break laws of his time.

Even the guy above quoting "Some guy from New Zealand" obviously didn't read the context.  As i specified it was explained, as harnessing the earths polarization.  i even put "perpetual motion" in quotations.

I have not said they exist all Ive said is science doesn't dismiss the possibility, People like you dismiss the possibility.

At least kite man used energy gradient to dismiss the argument.

I even stipulated myself that im "to simple" to break the rules.  My mind adheres to the known.  As i keep saying my point is i don't just dismiss things because they don't comply.  My comments are inline with Arano's feelings.
"Even the guy above quoting "Some guy from New Zealand" obviously didn't read the context.  As i specified it was explained, as harnessing the earths polarization"

I did read the context.  Everybody who has fallen for the idea of free energy or perpetual motion or cars that run on water know about "some guy" who has achieved their particular Holy Grail, but can never actually present them.

"Harnessing the earth's polarisation" is nonsense.  The only "polarisation" the Earth has is its magnetic field.  Nothing can extract energy from a magnetic field - instead something must move (either the field or the device) to utilise the magnetic field to convert kinetic energy into electricity.  It's called a generator.

You must remember that scientific Laws are not the same as legislative laws.  Legislative laws can be easily broken - that's why we have police and courts.

Scientific Laws cannot be broken.  They are the very small number of absolutes that exist in science.

No loop-holes, no semantic twists, no appeal to a higher authority.

There are no science police enforcing these Laws, because there is no need - they cannot be broken.

Arano Kiteman7 years ago
scientific laws are only the state of knowledge and as we know from history they changed often thru the centuries... they are nothing absolute and it is possible to proof them wrong
1-10 of 23Next »