Five "solutions" for global warming

Who needs to worry about cutting back carbon emissions or sequestration when you can just launch a rocket into the atmosphere loaded with sulfur to simulate a volcanic eruption? Or what about making trees shinier? Then again you can always try to cover the glaciers.

These are all ideas that have been put out there to save us from ourselves, but almost sound like we're trying to kill ourselves off even faster. Especially that sulfur rocket bit.

Check out these five techniques on the green fringes. Where do you think any of this effort should be going?

5 Strange Stop-Gap "Solutions" to Climate Problems

Picture of Five
sort by: active | newest | oldest
1-10 of 17Next »
Kiteman9 years ago
Of the ideas, the paint and the mirrors are least risky - We could just move the mirrors or re-paint the roofs if the effect was too powerful.

As Eric pointed out, actually changing the way the atmosphere works has too many unpredictable knock-on effects.
When we consider the butterfly effect, we have to be responsible enough not to make something better locally, but end up killing of the rest of the planet...., so I agree on your last point especially.
Global Warming would be halted by one thing..... Economics. It needs to be financially rewarding to change the way we do things...... our universe runs on money..... anyway you look at it.....people don't make decisions....money does. or entire world is consumer consumption..... if people keep buying it, others will keep making it. If its easier, and accepted by all..... people will want it. The desire to have the big house and the fast car and the twice annual vacations and to "Keep up with the Jones' " is what will destroy this planet. The American Dream is the planetary Nightmare (we as a planet are all responsible, I say American Dream because its the most recognizable way of putting it)
So true. And these are the people who are complaining about global warming. And when they dont have a big house/car anymore, they basically wont be able to survive (ITS CALLED EXAGERRATION)
Actually, Global warming research is a multi trillion dollar a year business. The ideas presented in Fungus Amungus' post were funded by free government and international grants. We cant solve this problem because many people would lose millions of dollars for coming up with ideas that do not need to even be proven to work. So if there are millions to be made from a business based on perception, keeping that perception up is the main goal. Hence if its warm in the northern states in January its global warming. If its really down in the Southern states in January its global warming. The historical annual average temperatures show that we "cooled" down after WWII thru the 70's when we were polluting like crazy. After we put emission controls in place we heated up....whats up with that?????
Lextone Lextone9 years ago
OOOps....I meant to add this to my post. You can find it on NOAA's site
graph-Jan2413 21 221715698242.gif
Well said I dont believe in GW but It still good to make things better
To deal with global warming, the government needs to immediately plant more trees, and stop cutting them down. It is a major problem they need to deal with. The importance of trees has been understated by "scientists" that truly don't understand the relevance of trees. Don't criticize the importance of the concept until you know all the facts. On top of deforestation, we are polluting the environment. Another contributing factor is modern day energy systems rely on explosion rather than implosion, and this generates heat. Every systems need to be more efficient and work on implosion, so they stay cool. The non-profit energy research organization at http://www.universalsymbiosis.org (also http://www.genuinewinner.com) is active in these areas which will help reverse effects of global warming. I suggest everyone also read "Living Energies" by Callum Coats which explains the work of Victor Schauberger and the importance of trees to our planet. Don't rely on information from the authorities as their advisors don't fully understand the life cycle of the planet. We need to push the authorities to develop forest management and sustainability plans, and this will solve at least part of the problem.
Yeah but with deforestation, people are doing it for A REASON. Its for wood!. Im not supporting deforestation but its basically impossible to entirely stop. If every logging company listened to all the complaints, the price of wood would go up 1000x. Then people will start complaining about that, so logging companies are back in the business. Then people complain about that....
"The Government", eh?
1-10 of 17Next »