I don't think that peice count should be a con for knex guns

I have seen too many guns with a peice count as a con.  I think that the cons should only be cons that acually detract from the guns performance, not a thing that limits its buildability.  (new word!)

sort by: active | newest | oldest
1-10 of 12Next »
heatblast7 years ago
I also disagree,for the fact that some guns use way too many pieces for their construction which in this case I would consider to be a con.Price Value would also be a con in my opinion.An example of that would be IAC'S Heavy Cannon.That monster uses less than 3,000 pieces,and it also costs anywhere from $500-$600 for construction and as a coverage for the quantity of parts.
sprout_less7 years ago
 I disagree because in other projects price is a con which is kind of like pieces for us.
Hiyadudez7 years ago
What was the point of this topic?
TheChemiker (author)  Hiyadudez7 years ago

To express my opinion.

Jesus.7 years ago
 Yeah, I think so to!
,,I also think you need a pet dead monkey
I agree.
TheChemiker (author)  Jesus.7 years ago
TheDunkis7 years ago
Oh sorry, every single k'nexer having huge stockpiles of K'nex was news to me.
TheChemiker (author)  TheDunkis7 years ago
You don't have to build every gun, and piec counts take a long time.
Mepain7 years ago
Uhh, you're partially right.

A gun's piece count is considered alongside its performance. If a gun that uses 3255236 pieces does the exact same thing as one with only 213 pieces, the piece count is overwhelming. When a gun of optimal performance can't possibly reduce the part usage, it becomes frugal.
1-10 of 12Next »