loading

Is Obama's Healthcare Plan Constituional?

Before you launch yourselves into a debate about politics, please read what I have to say, and only mention things relating to my question in your response. Thanks. I am a supporter of Barack Obama, but I was thinking about his mandatory insurance for children clause of the his health care plan, and it struck me as unconstitutional. Does the federal government have the power to mandate that insurance be bought for all people under the age of 18? The 9th and 10th amendments clearly assign all powers not specifically granted to the federal government to the states and the people. Seeing as our constitution doesn't say anything about health care, or imply it, as far as I've seen, do they really have the power to mandate it? The thing is, i've never really seen this argument against socialized health care in the united states, am I missing something? Thanks! p.s. I plan on asking this same question to my American History teacher tomorrow, i'll let you all know what she says.

sort by: active | newest | oldest
1-10 of 14Next »
Weissensteinburg (author) 8 years ago
So this is what my US History teacher said: It would be impossible for a president to make insurance mandatory for children, and unconstitutional for congress to make it mandatory. She related it to No Child Left Behind...they would take away funding from any state that didn't make it mandatory. That way it's the states enacting it, but it's nearly impossible to stop it from happening. Also, he would have to get it passed through congress, so who we vote into office this year will make a difference, too. Makes sense?
. W'burg 2028! . Better start thinkin' about who you want to be your VP.
I was going to mount a youtube campaign this year. I originally planned to run as a communist (to split the wacko vote). Now I think I'll have to run as a BLack Panther!
. That's what they did with the 55mph speed limit. "You can set your speed limit wherever you want, but, if it's over 55, you don't get any money."
. From Wikipedia:
"A uniform 55 mph (90 km/h) speed limit was signed by President Nixon on January 2, 1974, effective 60 days later by requiring the limit as a condition of each state receiving highway funds, a use of the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution"
. (There's the Commerce Clause that TUA mentioned.)
Weissensteinburg (author)  NachoMahma8 years ago
There really should be something making such behavior unlawful. Tommy J would so not approve.
skunkbait8 years ago
It's not really constitutional to mandate it, but they will bully their way into getting it passed. Healthcare is a big, BIG problem. But our constitution should be held "sacred". It has not been for man, many years (By either party.).
They'll just do what the gov't always does to justify anything, claim it falls under the "commerce clause".
I don't know if they can stretch it that far. Threatening to pull money is far more likely.
LinuxH4x0r8 years ago
Could always amend it
It wouldn't be the first law to be unconstitutional and still get passed
1-10 of 14Next »