Numatic vs combustion

this is a discussion about the advantages and disadvantages about using nematic or combustion technicsto launch whatever.

sort by: active | newest | oldest
1-10 of 11Next »
Klive9 years ago
I think it is pretty obvious that pneumatics are the way to go (just in case it needed to be said :) )
Goodhart9 years ago
When I was into a bit of blacksmithing, I used pneumatics to "stoke" the pyro (fire) ;-) The flywheel blower or the home made bellows.
well i like pneumatics but i just can never think of a good cheap way to make a trigger to let the air out....(dont want to go to rona to get a valve).... i like the fact that pneumatics wont get the cops at your house cause there quieter but im also afraid of the air tank (a 2L bottle or w/e) blowing....then again a combustion has a chance to blow up completely and kill you....but w/e i like pneumatical
X_D_3_M_19 years ago
combustion FTW -Pyromaniac friendly -No pumps or compressors needed -Pneumatics have a harder to minimize concept (You can make mini spudguns, but mini pneumatics...?)
What's so hard about mini pneumatics? This is small, and I bet it could be made smaller.
hmm... ur right... still, wasted a perfectly good pen
A good trade - a 10p biro, a (non-medically) used syringe, a blob of glue and a few minutes of my time to entertain both my sons for a day.
How much is 10p? 10 pennies?
Yes, ten pence (about 20 cents US?).
Lftndbt9 years ago
I'm one for the Pneumatic! Oh so quiet... Bike pump + Air chamber + Trigger + Barrel.. So much fun to be had...
1-10 of 11Next »