Opposite of a resistor

So a resistor reduces the current, what would increase the "speed" of the current? Is there such thing?

sort by: active | newest | oldest
1-10 of 16Next »
mwaits4 years ago
i am looking for something simliar.
my application is kinda like a pressure sensor

basically im trying to design a device that the harder some one presses on the "pressure sensor" the faster an array of dc vibrators rotate.

so its transfering pressure into vibrations by increasing energy to the motors.

any ideas?
kelseymh mwaits4 years ago
You posted this as a question -- did you see Steve's response?

What you're looking for is a transducer, which will convert some mechanical signal (in this case pressure), into a varying quantity like voltage.
NachoMahma7 years ago
.  There is no opposite of resistance. There is the seimen (mho, for us old guys), but that is the reciprocal of resistance, not its opposite.
.  I don't think gmoon's transconductance applies here (I've only seen the term used in reference to amplifiers), but I don't know enough about transconductance to say that with any confidence.
Siemen surely?

.  Yes. Thanks.
Conductance is 1/R, and it's also resistance (E/I) flipped, or I/E. Transconductance is a ratio of the input voltage to the output current. Devices with transconductance are "active," and complex compared to a resistor, and a small input change can control (amplify) a large amount of current.

Transconductance is perhaps too limited a description of the "opposite of resistance" because it describes only one aspect or metric of "amplification," rather than amplification in general.

I still stand by "the opposite of a resistor is something that amplifies current."

If the range of all possible resistances is from infinite resistance (so far below unity that it's unmeasurable) to zero resistance (unity), then the opposite is "above unity" -- or a device that amplifies. At least how I look at it ;-)
.  That sounds good, but something about it just doesn't feel right to me. But, as I said, I really don't understand it. I'd say there's at least a 50/50 chance that we are both wrong. ;)
.  Doesn't really matter. Looks like the OP is really worried about power and not resistance or current, per se.
The problem with my "solution" is it's a "practical opposite," not a purely conceptual one.

It's like saying the opposite of gravity is the force of kinetic energy in an opposing vector. Yes, kinetic energy can counteract gravity, but it's not it's theoretical opposite.

If we could figure out what "opposite" means here, that would help.

It's the best I can do, though, sorry.

On the other hand, mathematically you could model the "opposite" (depending on your definition) and build a "transconductor" from a transistor and a couple discrete components. Neither the "transconductor" or the resistor is completely "enclosed" in the circuit. The "transconductor" would need a separate current source to achieve "above unity", and the resistor achieves "below unity" by dissipating heat externally...

The actual electrical response of resistors isn't "pure" either--their characteristics change with heat, etc. And you could "complex up" the resistor--a POT, for instance.

Just musing, at this point ;-)

lemonie7 years ago
Your problem is that you're not storing enough charge. Suggestions:
Increase capacity with bigger capacitor(s)
Increase charge time
Can you give us a circuit diagram for this device?

jaketheman987 (author) 7 years ago
 Thanks guys for all your comments! The reason I was wondering is because in my engineering class, we are making solar powered cars that run on a basic DC motor and a .42 volt solar panel. I tried using capacitors to hold a charge for the shade spots(it like an obstacle course) and its not very fast so that why I was wondering if there was a way to "speed up" the current.
And thanks again for not calling me a "noob" or novice, even though I am. Im only 16 so yeah, Thanks again though!
1-10 of 16Next »