loading

Pro suggestion: Priority Instructable/etc reviewing

A suggestion from me - where an instructable contravenes the secret submission guidelines (the ones that include words like 'guns' 'alcohol' 'set fire to' etc where the 'ible needs to be reviewed  should be pushed to the top of the pile.

Assuming others think that's fair?

sort by: active | newest | oldest
1-10 of 12Next »
lemonie7 years ago
You mean that the published date should be updated to the released date?

L
Kiteman lemonie7 years ago
I think he might mean "review the pros before you review the plebs".
I could not oppose that any more. It is not possible.

No. No, no, no, no, no.

We're paying for features - let our projects stand on their merits. No special treatment for our projects! The minute that changes, the instant you can pay for advantages for your projects, I really *will* go back to wikihow. Not even kidding.
Calm down, it's only a suggestion - the author got tangled in the filters recently.
I'm perfectly calm. :P

I'm just saying - whatever the actual change, once the line from pro providing more features to actually affecting our projects is crossed, for me it's over.
Don't you even think of leaving.

:D

lemonie Kiteman7 years ago
I wonder how big the pile is? I'm guessing it's not really but it's a job someone does periodically, rather than every day for half the day?

L
Kiteman lemonie7 years ago
I'd guess only a few minutes per day.  The difference of position in a pile wouldn't even be noticeable.
lemonie Kiteman7 years ago
Yep.
But being published a day or two after the datestamp drops them in further down the Recent "pile". It would help to have them released onto the top.

L
DJ Radio7 years ago
Why are the guidelines secret anyways?
1-10 of 12Next »