3 Simple Ways to
Share What You Make

With Instructables you can share what you make with the world — and tap into an ever-growing community of creative experts.

PhotosPhotos

Share one or more photos of a project, recipe, or whatever you've made, quickly and easily.

Step by StepStep-By-Step

Share your step-by-step photos with text instructions of what you made so others can do it too!

VideoVideo

Share your how-to video. You'll need your embed code from a video site such as YouTube.

Psychic Abilities: Mumbo Jumbo or Something Else? Scientific Discussion Only Please!

Right first thing: any statements made by me in this forum topic are to my knowledge completly true and un-exagerated.
Does anyone here believe that it is possible for someone to be psychic, or have "preminitions of the future"?
I for one believe it is entirely possible, or more correctly is true.
For I more or less have had preminitions of the future. Do't believe me? I will now describe one of the acourences and attempt to point out how it wasn't entirely a dream
Right, I'm in 4-H and one of the competions we have is called Food Show. All it is is that you have an interview with the judges and are asked questions about food and nutrition and the food item you have made.
Anyways, about a month prior to one of these Food Shows, I woke up after having a dream about it. Since I already had had helpful preminitions before, I quickley jotted down everthing. Any ways I dreamed about my interview and the judges, I dreamed that I walked down a hall, to a room I've never seen in my life, yet was exactly how it looked when I saw it for real. I then proceded with my interview, who I could distinctly see, yet I'd never met or seen them before. I had my interview (boring details of my questions and answers left out), and I walked back out. I woke up at that moment, for I had sleep-walked into my doorframe (this is the only preminision that I woke up from, all the others I would only fully remember until briefly before the event was ging to happen), and I quickley jotted down the details. So ayway fast forward to the day of the contest, I see for the first time one of the judges, who I had never seen before yet she was the exact same one from the dream. Anyways a little later I found myself heading down the same hall to the same never-before-seen-yet-recognised room and the same judges one who I never had seen yet recognised, and the one I had seen previously. We proceded with the interview, that went exactly as I dreamed, I even cracked a joke that I woud never have done if I hadn't "foretold" it's success. I wound up winning, so I must have done a good job. Has anyone esle had similar experiences? Are there any scientific explanations? Your input is greatly desired.
I AM NOT MAKING THIS STUFF UP

65 comments
sort by: active | newest | oldest
May 10, 2011. 9:17 AM563g says:
I have no dout that telekinesis is real I'm actually practicing it but befor you attempt this beware that you powers come from heaven or hell think about it first and be carfull
Sep 25, 2007. 11:58 AMGoodhart says:
How many are able to perform telekinesis in the forum ? Raise my hand ! LOL
Sep 26, 2007. 12:27 PMits a lion says:
i read that yesterday and didnt understand it. now it makes sense and im mad at myself for not seeing it sooner.
Sep 26, 2007. 2:55 PMGoodhart says:
Don't beat yourself up over it, it was really subtle and vague ;-)
Sep 25, 2007. 12:01 PMzachninme says:
ROFL I thought you were saying that YOU could, then I re-read it a few times :P
Sep 26, 2007. 2:58 PMGoodhart says:
I have a few cardboard trophies I won for being Punking and daubed Super-double entendre man LOL
Sep 15, 2007. 3:06 AMKiteman says:
Starting point to have your ability recognised:

When you have a dream that you recognise as precogniscent, write it down in as much detail as possible as soon as you wake. Focus on indicators to time, date and location. Date and sign the document, then lodge it with a dis-interested third party (such as a lawyer).

Come the pre-cog event occuring, write it down again, again in as much detail as possible, without referring to the original dream-notes. If possible, get a reliable co-witness to independently write their own account of the event.

Take both accounts to the lawyer, and, in his presence, compare the three. If there are any commonalities that cannot be accounted for by mere coincidence or foreknowledge, and they happen regularly, then you can contact either the CIA or James Randi.

For the record, though, it's all woowoo.
Sep 15, 2007. 5:06 PMzachninme says:
I heard how the James Randi thing, the Million bucks, is actually a sucky deal. Its mostly (all but $50,000 or $5,000, cant recall) were in bonds, and its paid out over time, and all this other sucky stuff that you had to go through. CIA on the other hand, would be better.
Sep 20, 2007. 2:57 PMlemonie says:
The prize is still on offer, but do check this applicant!

L

"9. At the formal test, in advance, an independent person will be placed in charge of a personal check from James Randi for US$10,000. In the event that the claimant is successful under the agreed-upon terms and conditions, that check shall be immediately surrendered to the claimant, and within ten days the James Randi Educational Foundation will pay to the claimant the remainder of the reward, for a total of US$1,000,000. One million dollars in negotiable bonds is held by an investment firm in New York, in the "James Randi Educational Foundation Prize Account" as surety for the prize funds. Validation of this account and its current status may be obtained by contacting the Foundation by telephone, fax, or e-mail."
Sep 20, 2007. 3:12 PMzachninme says:
Ah! So I was right!
I mean, of course I was right!

I don't like their setup. The part about showing a subject the list, then only calling it a successful test if they experience the effect that she was trying, and no other.
It seems that some subjects would placebo-effect themselves.
Sep 20, 2007. 3:20 PMlemonie says:
What's wrong with the protocol?
If she can "make people urinate themselves with the power of her mind" surely the volunteers/victims will report that? If they self-placebo themselves into Vomiting I'd be really interested...

L
Sep 20, 2007. 4:20 PMzachninme says:
No, they are only accepting it as a "good" result if they ONLY vomit. If say, shortness of breath, is on the list, and they report it, even if they vomitted, they will still call it a failure.
Sep 24, 2007. 11:09 AMlemonie says:
Yes, she's supposed to demonstrate an ability that she claims to have. L
Sep 24, 2007. 11:16 AMzachninme says:
Well, what I'm saying is, that the subject might have the placebo effect, and make themselves feel, say, sweaty. In that case, it is not her fault that the subject had the placebo effect, but it would be marked as a "bad" trial.
Sep 25, 2007. 11:53 AMlemonie says:
I should think that being sweaty wouldn't negate the result if she also demonstrated what she claims. The point being that something she didn't claim to be able to do wouldn't count instead.

L
Sep 25, 2007. 1:48 PMzachninme says:
"and the volunteer must feel *only* the effects of the talent Ms. Hunter was attempting to perform."
Sep 26, 2007. 11:52 AMlemonie says:
I suppose that I should check back there. 24th Sep (see previous link) "Ms. Hunter has agreed to allow us to air the test live via webcam. A loose date has been set for the first week of November." "Ms. Hunter will have fifteen minutes to paranormally cause Jeff Wagg to urinate himself. There will be no diapers involved. Mr. Wagg will empty his bladder beforehand, as per Ms. Hunter's instructions."
Sep 26, 2007. 12:15 PMzachninme says:
Wow! This should be fun!
Sep 26, 2007. 12:27 PMits a lion says:
i want to see the video of it afterwards. i do wonder though... how does one discover the fact that you can cause someone to urinate oneself?
Sep 26, 2007. 12:43 PMzachninme says:
Well, she could walk around town and realize everyone's wetting themselves as she walks past :P
Sep 15, 2007. 6:10 AMFirebert010 says:
Could this have anything to do with The Secret? I'm sure some of you know of the theory.
Sep 20, 2007. 3:21 PMGoodhart says:
I figure it this way, all true psychics should be rich out of their minds (stock market, lottery, being able to pick the horses, cards about to be played in poker, etc & etc. )...
Sep 20, 2007. 1:48 PMbowakowa says:
Only one occurrence I give credence to in my life. I was about ten and dreamed that I had climbed a ten foot tall flower, fallen off, bit my tongue, and looked to my left to see a boy in a yellow and black football jersey with the number 33. As my dreams don't usually involve strange things, other than flying, I told my mom about it. About two weeks later, we went camping with some family friends who'd brought their nephew I had never met. The campground had a park with large metal flowers for climbing. I did not recall the dream until I had fallen from one of the flowers, bit my tongue, and looked over to the see the nephew aforementioned in his 33 yellow football jersey. Quite strange.
Sep 15, 2007. 5:01 PMzachninme says:
I know these things are completely made up, and I'm not going to repeat anyone here...

However, what about "harnessing" (Boy do I sound New-Aged now!) the "power of our mind" (I'm scaring myself here...) Basically, if RedNeckOreo knew that that guy was psycho, smart, and his sister was sick, he didn't put it together consicously, but, I guess, his sub.c. did.

Looking back, its obvious, so is it obvious for Mr. Sub.C looking forward?

Again, there's accuracy problems. This phenomenon might be once-a-decade (maybe more, the more dreams you can remember, my friend remembers 3 dreams on a daily basis), so there's a bit of luck involved.

Basically what I'm saying is premonitions are technically possible, and they happen, but they're too rare to be called psychic. Its just taking what you know, and having your sub.c. ponder over it for 5 hours.
Sep 15, 2007. 3:20 AMKiteman says:
There are many psychics plying their trade, often for quite respectable organisations ("Police call in psychic..."), yet none of them actually have any evidence for their ability.

Some will advertise the fact that they "helped the police when they were looking for Child X". When you ask them if they actually found Child X, then sorry, no, the vibrations were bad, or the spirits were quiet that day.

One of the main excuses used by psychics who fail under proper scrutiny is that the sceptic attitude of the scientists interfered with their abilities somehow, and that they always succeed when surrounded by believers. Yeh...

One of the best-documented psychic events is the Out of Body Experience (OBE) during surgery. Patients claim to be able to describe surgical theatres, and surgeons accurately, even naming the music being played during the op.

Quite impressive at first glance, so a UK hospital did a simple test. When the procedure meant that the patient was unconscious before entering the theatre, they stood a large gaudy sign in the corner with a random message on it, or one of the staff wore something strange.

When patients later claimed to have had an OBE during the op, they took a statement describing the experience. None of the accounts included the oddities.

The incongruities then had to be dealt with. What about the patients who gave accurate descriptions of equipment or procedures? It turned out they either watched lots of medical dramas, or were the sort of people who liked to know what would be done to them, and had researched it beforehand. They were merely dreaming stuff they already knew.

What about the patients who could name the music being played? Hearing is the last sense to fade under anaesthetic, and sometimes doesn't go at all - they merely heard it and incorporated it in their dreams.
Sep 15, 2007. 11:12 AMNachoMahma says:
> Hearing is the last sense to fade under anaesthetic, and sometimes doesn't go at all . I've read that they are being much more careful about the "chatter" in ORs since finding this out. My sister, the nurse, tells a story about a patient that was able to recall most of what was said during surgery. I can't recall anything of my heart surgery - that must have done a good job of knocking me out.
Sep 15, 2007. 3:34 PMGoodhart says:
I had my hand worked on recently and because I was only out "twilight", semi-conscious I could hear music in the background and got this feeling I was in Kingdom Hospital (honestly, and I told them so afterwards too).
Sep 15, 2007. 3:44 PMGoodhart says:
you know, Stephen King Kingdom Hospital TV series. . .
Sep 15, 2007. 1:58 PMBran says:
Well, I never really believed in the whole psychic thing, but recently I had what you would call a "premonition." I won't go into details, but my sister was getting a divorce from a psycho (not psychic) husband. She had been sick, so he said, and couldn't even come to the phone. She had been laid up a day or so, when I had a dream one night that he was poisoning her. I didn't know how, just sensed something was wrong. I ignored this as one of my crazy dreams, of which I have many. A few days later, I get woken up, my mom says to watch my nephews, my sister has to go to ER, and they think her husband tried to poison her. True story, I don't lie about things as serious as that. Karma. Anyway, she's fine now, and he's two states away. So, I think premonitions are entirely possible, but talking to deceased people and spirits? Nah.
Sep 15, 2007. 3:10 PMNachoMahma says:
. Just guessing here, but I'd say: you knew this guy was a psycho well before the dream happened; you have had many dreams about him harming your sister, in various ways; if he had harmed you sister in any of those ways, you brain would have made that dream the "real" one. Plus, you had the clue that she was sick and you seem pretty bright, so that was already in the back of your mind and a frequent dream. . Not sure why the "I don't lie" disclaimer. If you were claiming to have started the General Lee with your mind, I might be suspicious. ;) . Hope things turn out well for your sister. She's probably gonna need a lot of hugs - give her one for me.
Sep 15, 2007. 2:03 PMGoodhart says:
and understand, I am not trying to convince you one way or the other, but giving you another option/point of view, as it were.
Sep 15, 2007. 2:10 PMBran says:
Well, I am fond of watching Detective shows, in which people get poisoned. But still, I guess I should of said something when I did have the dream. Still, if I have any more that put my family in danger, heck yeah I'm gonna mention it to my parents. Just to be on the safe side. ;)
Sep 15, 2007. 3:59 PMNachoMahma says:
> But still, I guess I should of said something when I did have the dream. . Don't beat yourself up for not saying anything. It was just a feeling. I'll bet that if you ask the other ppl close to your sister, they had similar feelings (and for the same exact reasons). . > gonna mention it to my parents. Just to be on the safe side. . Just don't become the boy who cried wolf. ;)
Sep 15, 2007. 4:19 PMBran says:
I don't feel too bad, you know, she's living. Nah, I won't mention a lot of things I dream, or my parents would take me to a psychiatrist. Ah, well, it's over now.
Sep 15, 2007. 4:42 PMNachoMahma says:
. Sounds like you have it under control - I'll stop playing Amateur Shrink. ;) . Can't help it! One more thing. It will probably be a while before your sister gets over it - do what you can to help. Sometimes just being there is enough, you don't even have to say anything. But I have the feeling you already plan on doing what you can. ;)
Sep 15, 2007. 2:25 PMGoodhart says:
Yes, your subconscious mind is a powerful tool if used correctly. It can do some pretty neat things once trained properly.
Sep 15, 2007. 5:03 PMzachninme says:
Hmm? Like what?
Sep 16, 2007. 2:51 PMGoodhart says:
Well, as mentioned, if you record dreams, "feelings" (especially bad, or 'not right' feelings) etc. One can tap more of that resource in figuring out problems. Remember Mr. Friedrich August von Kekule? He had a dream of whirling snakes, of the structure of benzene - the organic chemical compound made up of a ring of carbon atoms. Look what discovery that lead him too. One can train one's self to have "lucent" dreams also (the female population has the greater number of naturally occurring lucent dreams, but guys can learn it too), and thereby direct one's subconscious to solve problems the conscious mind has already given up on as a lost cause. But then, sometimes dreams are just information haphazardly thrown together that do not have any correlation. It never hurts to be more observant though, as long as it doesn't become an obsession.
Sep 15, 2007. 2:02 PMGoodhart says:
Your premonition can still be the rational of your subconscious "putting it all together". Consider the info laid out before your subconscious mind: Divorce from a "psycho", suddenly she is ill, and seems to be getting worse, what is making her ill ? Maybe she is being poisoned, and we know by whom. Your subconscious mind is really good at putting things together (sometimes things you would not consciously put together....this doesn't mean it is alway correct, but this is where we get "that weird feeling" from.
Sep 15, 2007. 7:08 AMGoodhart says:
Several "offers" have stood the test of time, from Houdini's to several others starting a trust fund for someone, anyone, that could scientifically demonstrate psychic abilities.

I once saw such a demonstration on TV years ago, where the "psychic" turned pages of an open book "with his mind alone" but when the one offering the money put a few light and fluffy packing peanuts in front of the book, he could no longer do it (he had been blowing on the pages).

Balancing a pencil on the edge of a table, he "supposedly" rotated it with his mind, but again, it was demonstrated that anyone could rotate the pencil like he was doing it, bringing their hands close and using the very very slight air disturbance to move the pencil.

It was all very informative, and certainly frustrating for the "psychic".

The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal
encourages the critical investigation of paranormal and fringe-science claims from a responsible, scientific point of view and disseminates factual information about the results of such inquiries to the scientific community, the media, and the public. It also promotes science and scientific inquiry, critical thinking, science education, and the use of reason in examining important issues.

The Skeptical Inquirer is published bimonthly by the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. Subscriptions should be addressed to SKEPTICAL INQUIRER, Box 703, Amherst, NY 14226-0703. Or call toll-free 1-800-634-1610. You may also visit the CSICOP Web site at http://www.csicop.org for more information.

Paranormal Challenge!
The North Texas Skeptics Paranormal Challenge Instructions
P.O. Box 111794, Carrollton, Texas 75011-1794

The persons named below ("challengers") will pay the sum of $12,000 ("the challenge prize") to any person ("claimant") who can demonstrate any psychic or paranormal power or ability under scientifically valid observing conditions. Prior to any demonstration or test, challengers and claimant will enter into a complete, written agreement called "the protocol", which will set out what power or ability is to be demonstrated, how it is to be tested, and what test results will constitute success or failure. These instructions and conditions alone are not an offer. No contract to pay the challenge amount is made with any claimant until the claimant and challengers have negotiated and entered into the protocol. The protocol must incorporate the following terms and conditions:

  • Claimant must describe the paranormal or psychic ability or power clearly and precisely. Claims must be specific enough to be scientifically testable. Claims must be clearly psychic or paranormal.
  • Claimant must specifically describe any proposed test procedures which will be used to demonstrate the paranormal or psychic power. Claimant and challengers must agree to the test procedures to be used before any tests are performed.
  • Claimant must describe exactly what test results will constitute success or failure. If success and failure will be described in terms of statistical results, such results must be significantly beyond chance expectation.
  • Claimant and challengers will each be responsible for their respective expenses, such as equipment, travel, accommodations, consultant fees, or other expenses.
  • In the event the claimant is successful under the terms and conditions of the protocol, challengers will immediately deliver the challenge prize to claimant or claimant's designee, in full settlement of all claims.
  • Claimant and challengers waive all claims, damages, and causes of action against each other arising out of the challenge, for any injuries or damages of every kind, whether to person, property, or reputation.
  • All agreements, protocols, correspondence, data, audio or video recordings, photographs or results made or obtained by either party during the challenge or negotiations leading up to the challenge may be used by either party in any way he or she may choose, including publication, and challengers and claimant both waive all exclusive rights to such information.
  • This offer is made by the challengers personally and not on behalf of The North Texas Skeptics or any other agency or organization, although others may be involved in the examination of claims.
After challengers have received claimant's offer to demonstrate a claimed psychic or paranormal ability or power, challengers will promptly enter into negotiations with claimant and attempt to arrive at a written protocol satisfactory to both parties. Neither claimant nor challengers shall have any right of action or damages against the other for failure to enter into the protocol or for failure to conduct any test or demonstration.

Signed: Gregory H. Aicklen John F. Blanton Prasad N. Golla Mike Selby John A. Thomas

Sep 15, 2007. 1:49 PMGoodhart says:
Well, as Kiteman suggested, write down the premonition(s) in detail then put it/them away in an envelope or lock box, and when "the event occurs", again, write down what happens in detail. Once written, compare the two. You may find a diversity you were not expecting.
Sep 14, 2007. 11:09 PMVIRON says:
A scientific discussion of psychic abilities inevitably concludes: MUMBO JUMBO! But nevertheless, it works. You know it does by your self. Why ask?
Sep 13, 2007. 11:42 AMNachoMahma says:
. I think Vendigroth and Goodhart are on the right track. . How good is the brain at "lying"? Put on a pair of those orange sunglasses and wear them for 5-10 minutes. Now, look at the sky. What color is it? It looks blue! And the bottom light on a traffic signal will still look green (a little darker than usual, but still green). . The brain does a pretty good job of seeing things the way it thinks they should be. I've read of experiments where they will have ppl wear glasses that turn everything upside down and after a few days the brain flips the scene over and ppl see everything rightside up again, even though the image on the retina is upside down. Take the glasses off and they see the world upside down for a while, until the brain re-adjusts. I tried searching for some sources, but can't remember what the effect is called. . Memory is terribly inaccurate. Not only do we remember things wrong, but the brain will fill in details (usually incorrectly) that we didn't even experience. Search for papers by Elizabeth Loftus (heehee helping my ex study for her PhD Psych finally paid off). Don't know, but am assuming that memories of dreams would be even more inaccurate. . I'm not gonna say that psychic phenomena such as premonition, thought transference, telekinesis, &c don't exist, but I've never seen any credible (to me) evidence. Just like UFOs. . For your particular situation, my guess is that several things could be happening, maybe more than one. You had more than one dream about the judging, only one was was in the forefront when you awoke, but you quickly recalled the most correct dream and it became the right one. I'll bet your notes are not very detailed and would fit many situations. You may actually have known more about the situation, beforehand, than you realize. Or, as Vendigroth said, you may have just been having an epiphany (I claim deja vu works in much the same way).
Sep 14, 2007. 7:10 AMits a lion says:
"I tried searching for some sources, but can't remember what the effect is called." perceptual adaptation? i dont know if thats the actual word, but my psychology book had a similar example under that section.
Sep 14, 2007. 1:49 AMVendigroth says:
did the cars smash together or touch together? see any broken glass? memory really is protean.
Sep 13, 2007. 4:47 PMGoodhart says:
Have you ever seen the Mind Control show ? It seem really freaky, but most of what he does is literally forced on the people he deals with, without their knowledge. Scary really...
Sep 14, 2007. 1:47 AMVendigroth says:
OMG DERREN'S DA PWNZ I've watched most everything he's made.
Sep 14, 2007. 7:26 AMGoodhart says:
Taking notes of his methods, then? ;-) Seriously though, look for patterns in His behavior, and you should be able to see "what" he is doing to achieve his ends.
Sep 14, 2007. 7:27 AMVendigroth says:
most of the time, i can see what he's doing
Sep 13, 2007. 1:00 PMlemonie says:
Another good one is to watch a film you saw once years ago. If you try to remember what happened in vivid detail, you can recreate some scenes. Do that and then watch the thing, and you realise how poor your memory is / or how good imagination can be. L (e.g. I couldn't remember what Charlton Heston looked like, so my recollection of Soylent Green had him replaced by Kirk Douglas. And I've just discovered a spooky connection in that Richard Fleischer has directed both of them...)
Sep 14, 2007. 2:26 PMlemonie says:
Yea, it's that sort of thing that has you doubting what you really remember / imagined. (who was fighting who?) L
Sep 13, 2007. 11:13 AMits a lion says:
deja vu? look at this, specifically deva vecu:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%A9j%C3%A0_vu

if only you could hone your skills, then the government could use you for remote viewing. too bad they canceled the stargate project.
Sep 13, 2007. 7:02 AMVendigroth says:
it's half-ironic, half spooky that i was looking at your page when this came up.... I'm a scientist, and accept that there are things i don't know. What i do know is that sometimes i reach to pick up the phone before it rings. A freind of mine picked up her mobile, then promptly recieved a text. There have been times when i'e seen something happen in my head, then, a fraction of a second later, it happens in real life, so, yes, i do believe it's real What i don't believe is that it's ghosts or god or the devil. I'll follow this topic and chip in where i can. I've got a lot to say.
Sep 13, 2007. 7:06 AMVendigroth says:
Ah, as for the scientific explanations.....maybe a spectacular but short-lived degree of insight, for example, your brain rapidly calculating interactions between objects and people, etc and then presenting you with what seems to be the most likely scenario for the situation. Oh, this thread's going to take off big style...
Sep 13, 2007. 10:17 AMGoodhart says:
Problem: our brains tend to make every attempt to "hook and link" things to already familiar things for the sake of easy memory.
While this happens, a certain amount of "fudging" goes on in the brain (not on purpose, but more of an autonomic reaction). This fudge factor can make something you have never seen before seem "strangely familiar", because some part of it is familiar (I found this to be very true when I was walking around downtown Philadelphia for the first time; so many places, shops, streets, looked familiar).
Memories can be "induced" artificially also (have you ever watched Mind Control ? http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/M/mindcontrol/ knowing how he does a lot of his "tricks" I can see him do this over and over again. It is freaky how easily we are fooled into thinking WE came up with an idea that was planted in the head by another person or event.
Sep 13, 2007. 7:12 AMVendigroth says:
Never had that myself, so i can't think of a theory ATM

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!