Reverse Global Warming the DIRTY way
1) We are put carbon into the air by burning fossil fuels.
What are fossil fuels? Plants that were buried eons ago.
How can we reverse the trend? By burying plant matter, thus sequestering CO2 from the air.
Fortunately, there is a convenient way to do so. Put lawn waste and paper in a landfill.
Paper is mostly made from tree farm trees. They'll replant to grow more. New trees absorb CO2 from air.
a) Bury paper. Don't recycle it.
b) Bury lawn waste, don't mulch or compost.
2) Since people do burn stuff to keep warm, travel, and do stuff in general, is there a way to do this without as much effect on climate?
Yes.
Global COOLing happens when particulates (smoke) reflect some sunlight.
So the laudable efforts to produce cleaner emissions from cars, powerplants, etc, also prevents the effect of global cooling.
Ironic that a filthy smoke belching 1800s smokestack which lead to respiratory problems, etc, would also put out particulates that block some sunlight.
a) make smoke, not clean exhaust.
I welcome responses whether you agree or disagree. To be perfectly honest, I'm not sure if I agree myself ! Just putting it out there.
What are fossil fuels? Plants that were buried eons ago.
How can we reverse the trend? By burying plant matter, thus sequestering CO2 from the air.
Fortunately, there is a convenient way to do so. Put lawn waste and paper in a landfill.
Paper is mostly made from tree farm trees. They'll replant to grow more. New trees absorb CO2 from air.
a) Bury paper. Don't recycle it.
b) Bury lawn waste, don't mulch or compost.
2) Since people do burn stuff to keep warm, travel, and do stuff in general, is there a way to do this without as much effect on climate?
Yes.
Global COOLing happens when particulates (smoke) reflect some sunlight.
So the laudable efforts to produce cleaner emissions from cars, powerplants, etc, also prevents the effect of global cooling.
Ironic that a filthy smoke belching 1800s smokestack which lead to respiratory problems, etc, would also put out particulates that block some sunlight.
a) make smoke, not clean exhaust.
I welcome responses whether you agree or disagree. To be perfectly honest, I'm not sure if I agree myself ! Just putting it out there.

















JUNE 2013 Build Night - 3D Printing with 123D & Tinkercad
Instructables Build Night w/ Bare Conductive @ Noisebridge
Embed a 3D viewer in your Instructable
Maker Faire 2013 Slide Show!
Fried Contest Launches 5/13, HQ Celebrates with Fried Day Friday
MEH! :D A Build Night at Montana Ethical Hackerspace!
Got contest ideas? Want to help HQ staff?
Large Instructables Robot head made out of driftwood, check it out!
Call for pre-made parts!
The Instructables Green Design Contest is starting on Earth Day!


Visit Our Store »
Go Pro Today »




Have you any ideas of where to bury this stuff?
L
As for where, I recently heard that 200 yrs of U.S. landfillage at the current rate of volume would only be 200 feet high by 30 mi by 30 mi. That's for the entire country.
Seems that if it's ok to dig up coal to power your computer and mine, it should be ok to bury some carbonaceous recyclables.
-Is this actually going to achieve anything?
L
If I burn 1 ton of fossil fuels while recycling all carbonaceous stuff, like paper+ tree branches, then I have contributed to global warming.
That's about as simple a calculation as I can make.
-Have you any ideas about doing that?
L
It's not unusual to produce several bags of grass clippings from a suburban lawn every couple weeks.
I'm not sayin burying this stuff is THE singular solution, or anything. But landfill has been demonized. I'd like to see those grass clippings turned into alcohol fuel or somethin, if it's convenient and clean. But meanwhile...
Where do people who live in cities bury stuff?
L
But feel free to recycle if you feel like it.
I wonder how many tonnes of books there actually are in the world's libraries?