COMMUNITY : FORUMS : COMMUNITY BLOG


The Laws - a rebranding for newer members.

Some of the regulars will remember that, nearly two years ago, I accidentally formulated a set of rules (which some people called "Laws") about posting on Instructables.

I have seen a few threads and posts recently that suggest some people need to be reminded about those Laws. I also think they need rebranding, so I present for members who have been around for only a year or so...

The Instructable Laws:


Zeroth Law

If an Instructable exactly like yours has not already been posted, then you shall post your Instructable.

Addendum to the Zeroth Law

If your Instructable has an identical goal to a pre-existing Instructable, but achieves that goal by a different or improved route, or in a different style, then you shall also post your Instructable.

Kelsey's Corollary;

It doesn't have to be hard to be worth making an Instructable.



First Law

On the Instructables website, the use of correct grammar and spelling (no matter what the language) shall be a constant criterion.

Second Law

An unsuitable thread, when isolated from replies, will descend the list into obscurity.

Addendum to the second law

Spam advertisers may be chastised through the Private Message system to prevent their thread's longevity.

Third Law

As the level of civility approaches absolute zero, the uselessness of an exchange of posts approaches infinity.

The original "Law"
The original formulation of the full set
Zeroth Law and notes.
First Law and notes.
Second Law and notes.
Third Law and notes.

kITEMAN COMMANDMENTS.jpg
THOU SHALT POST.jpg
sort by: active | newest | oldest
1-100 of 125Next »
santy22 says: Feb 25, 2010. 9:17 AM
Thou shalt not revive old/troll threads
Thou shalt NOT make a one word comment.
Thou shalt use the Save and Draft functions.
Langarulz in reply to santy22Jul 21, 2011. 8:03 PM
Definitely.
Millawi Legend in reply to santy22Jul 7, 2010. 9:07 AM
Yes.
dombeef in reply to Millawi LegendMar 21, 2011. 5:18 PM
Agreed
Millawi Legend in reply to dombeefMar 22, 2011. 8:05 AM
Thanks for 1300th comment.
dombeef in reply to Millawi LegendMar 22, 2011. 3:22 PM
Your welcome?
SpiroExDeus in reply to dombeefJan 16, 2012. 5:31 AM
What about his welcome?
dombeef in reply to SpiroExDeusJan 18, 2012. 2:32 PM
Sorry,
You're Welcome?
Derin in reply to santy22Jun 21, 2010. 11:03 AM
Word.
Kiteman (author) in reply to DerinJun 21, 2010. 11:05 AM
Up.
Derin in reply to KitemanJun 24, 2010. 10:03 AM
Down.
RMConstruction in reply to DerinJul 9, 2010. 10:16 AM
Left.
Derin in reply to RMConstructionJul 9, 2010. 1:08 PM
Right.
RMConstruction in reply to DerinJul 10, 2010. 2:30 AM
Diagonal left.
Derin in reply to RMConstructionJul 10, 2010. 3:13 AM
Dammit one word comments only.
SpiroExDeus in reply to DerinJul 31, 2010. 4:54 AM
indubitably
_Scratch_ in reply to SpiroExDeusMar 19, 2011. 8:31 AM
Purple
kelseymh in reply to santy22Mar 1, 2010. 12:43 PM
Thou shalt use unintentional irony to support the first point.
caitlinsdad in reply to kelseymhMar 1, 2010. 12:52 PM
...and if there is no point, and seemingly pointless or misunderstood by either party, argue the point to pointlessness.
Lithium Rain in reply to caitlinsdadMar 1, 2010. 2:04 PM
Um, what Save and Draft functions?
Kiteman (author) in reply to Lithium RainMar 1, 2010. 3:42 PM
How long is it since you wrote an Instructable?

>_<
Lithium Rain in reply to KitemanMar 1, 2010. 3:55 PM
Ah, I thought he meant for comments (but I don't know of a specific Draft feature...).
kelseymh in reply to Lithium RainMar 3, 2010. 2:08 PM
Draft is what happens when you leave Windows open.
Lithium Rain in reply to kelseymhMar 3, 2010. 5:35 PM
Oh, I thought that was called a BSoD.
kelseymh in reply to Lithium RainMar 3, 2010. 8:34 PM
Are you suggesting that I was, er, BSoDded when I wrote that?

And is anyone going to get the pun?
Lithium Rain in reply to kelseymhMar 4, 2010. 7:35 AM
Ha! 

I think so...
Goodhart in reply to KitemanMar 1, 2010. 3:47 PM
*chuckle*
smartish says: Apr 13, 2011. 5:57 PM
issac asimov i believe foundation series or perhaps one of the play offs.
Kiteman (author) in reply to smartishApr 14, 2011. 1:30 AM
Huh?
Lithium Rain in reply to KitemanApr 14, 2011. 8:35 AM
Allow me to translate - I speak fluent word salad:

"Ah! You are imitating Issac Asimov! I believe the inspiration was drawn from his Foundation series, or perhaps a spinoff of the same."
Kiteman (author) in reply to Lithium RainApr 14, 2011. 8:47 AM
Ah, then smartish is not smart enough to recognise a pastiche of the laws of thermodynamics.

It's a looong time since read any of the Foundation books, maybe thirty years...

And I am still having trouble getting used to seeing a face next to your name.
smartish in reply to KitemanApr 14, 2011. 4:54 PM
fact is but fiction in relation to all.
wenpherd says: Mar 3, 2010. 1:36 PM
This is good.
Matt21497 says: Sep 20, 2009. 3:13 PM
And what happens if one breaks such laws?
Kiteman (author) in reply to Matt21497Sep 21, 2009. 12:32 AM
Then you are doomed forever, sir, to a featureless life.
Matt21497 in reply to KitemanSep 21, 2009. 4:24 PM
Then what do I have to loose from where I am at?
kelseymh in reply to Matt21497Sep 21, 2009. 4:48 PM
You could loose the chains that bind you. You could loose your shoelaces. You could loose your buttons. Or you could tighten up your spellchecking.
Goodhart in reply to kelseymhMar 1, 2010. 3:49 PM
Just don't loose your mind....
kelseymh in reply to GoodhartMar 1, 2010. 9:48 PM
Goodhart in reply to kelseymhMar 1, 2010. 10:39 PM
I think most people have a mind,  it is more about whether they USE it or not  ;-) 

Some brains are gathering dust even as we speak   LOL 
Matt21497 in reply to kelseymhSep 21, 2009. 5:17 PM
Oh NO! Not the shoelaces they where nice and checkered
kelseymh in reply to Matt21497Sep 21, 2009. 5:29 PM
I'm glad your shoelaces are in a nice and checkered place :-)
Matt21497 in reply to kelseymhSep 21, 2009. 6:02 PM
A checker board?
Kiteman (author) says: Nov 17, 2009. 10:42 AM
Corollary bump.
caitlinsdad in reply to KitemanNov 17, 2009. 12:28 PM
Cartoon bump.
klaws.jpeg
Goodhart in reply to caitlinsdadMar 1, 2010. 3:48 PM

Yeah, and we like Kiteman too  ;-) 

The Ideanator says: Sep 21, 2009. 9:08 AM
Once familiar with these laws/rules, you must identify yourself.
Rock Soldier in reply to The IdeanatorNov 17, 2009. 12:31 PM
Wait what?! What does it say to you when you hover it?
Kiteman (author) in reply to Rock SoldierNov 17, 2009. 12:58 PM
That topic had its visible title edited to "junkie", but you can't edit the URL.
Rock Soldier in reply to KitemanNov 17, 2009. 5:18 PM
Oh okay. I was kinda confused for a second....
The Ideanator in reply to Rock SoldierNov 17, 2009. 6:31 PM
Yes, it was a wording snafu that was solved hastily.
Kiteman (author) says: May 11, 2009. 11:45 AM
>Bumped for the attention of newer members<
Lithium Rain in reply to KitemanMay 11, 2009. 11:47 AM
Bumped becuz you ignored me last time. :P
Kiteman (author) in reply to Lithium RainMay 11, 2009. 11:50 AM
It's a well-known and recommended tactic for dealing with stalkers...

Starve me, snog me... I'm starting to feel like I'm in a remake of Misery
Lithium Rain in reply to KitemanMay 11, 2009. 11:57 AM
See, you didn't have to pull out the oxyacetylene torch to burn me with... >Starts crying again<
Goodhart in reply to Lithium RainSep 21, 2009. 2:40 AM
Careful, you don't know where he got that from.....
kt3.jpg
Kiteman (author) in reply to Lithium RainMay 11, 2009. 11:59 AM
I'm ready this time... >pulls out industrial-strength Kleenex<
Goodhart in reply to KitemanSep 21, 2009. 2:28 AM
:-)
kleenex-billboard-lg.jpg
Doctor What says: Dec 7, 2008. 5:05 PM
Whta do you mena grammars?
Doctor What in reply to Doctor WhatDec 7, 2008. 5:06 PM
It is kind of annoying isn't it? Especially when someone breaks all of the laws of grammar in a single sentence. kindov liek when they posts or pMs and cannot spel or just dont care enoug'h
Derin in reply to Doctor WhatJun 14, 2009. 10:05 AM
a'greed whoolhartedly
killerjackalope says: Dec 7, 2008. 2:50 PM
I do suggest some other bylaws... One being that no other law shall be passed within the land of 'ibles... Mainly to stop terribly unfunny copycat threads, or simply foolish threads about people's laws.
Weissensteinburg in reply to killerjackalopeDec 7, 2008. 6:27 PM
That's a bit ironic. Making a law that breaks itself?
killerjackalope in reply to WeissensteinburgDec 7, 2008. 6:36 PM
The use of the word other means it doesn't break itself but consequently any other law that comes after the fact is unlawful, maybe a law about the creation of laws, appropriate channels and such makes more sense, though an "end law" seems like a pretty cool law...
Kiteman (author) in reply to killerjackalopeDec 8, 2008. 4:26 AM
"Rule four: there is no rule four"
caitlinsdad in reply to KitemanDec 8, 2008. 5:21 AM
"Rule five: refer to the zeroth rule"
Derin in reply to caitlinsdadDec 8, 2008. 12:29 PM
Rule Six:No other rules may be posted and validated,with the exception of this one.
kelseymh in reply to DerinDec 8, 2008. 1:11 PM
Rule 7: The winning team shall be the first team that wins.
DJ Radio in reply to kelseymhDec 8, 2008. 8:19 PM
Rule 8- DJ Radio pwns all. End of story.
whatsisface in reply to DJ RadioDec 9, 2008. 10:53 AM
Rule 9 - Disregard Rule 8 as it is a violation of the First Law.
Lithium Rain in reply to whatsisfaceDec 9, 2008. 4:24 PM
DNFTT please.
Chicken2209 in reply to Lithium RainDec 9, 2008. 4:31 PM
i think its a little too late dontcha?
Lithium Rain in reply to Chicken2209Dec 9, 2008. 4:44 PM
Eh, never too late to quit...
Goodhart in reply to Lithium RainDec 9, 2008. 5:15 PM
:-)
no_trolls.png
Chicken2209 in reply to GoodhartDec 9, 2008. 6:43 PM
trolls are people too!!! no wait, there trolls
Big Bwana in reply to Chicken2209Dec 9, 2008. 8:37 PM
And don't feed the trolls or they will follow you home...
DJ Radio in reply to whatsisfaceDec 9, 2008. 1:30 PM
Rule 10- disregard rule 9 as rule 8 does not violate the first law.
whatsisface in reply to DJ RadioDec 9, 2008. 3:01 PM
Yes it does, pwn is not a word. OED it if you must.
DJ Radio in reply to whatsisfaceDec 9, 2008. 3:47 PM
OED is not a word. Also, pwn is a real word, alternate short version of owned....
KentsOkay in reply to DJ RadioDec 9, 2008. 3:50 PM
Incorrect sir, it is a shortening of "pawned"
kelseymh in reply to KentsOkayDec 9, 2008. 4:01 PM
Hi, RS. I'm afraid DJ is half right on this one. It's a "leet" derivation of owned, as discussed here (I had to look it up myself the first time I saw it used).

DJ is, of course, trivially wrong about the OED. Perhaps he isn't familiar with the 20 volumes.
DJ Radio in reply to kelseymhDec 9, 2008. 5:52 PM
half pwn! but yeah, I aint familiar with the 20 volumes....
kelseymh in reply to DJ RadioDec 9, 2008. 6:03 PM
You could type "OED" into Google...
Chicken2209 in reply to kelseymhDec 9, 2008. 5:05 PM
didn't your teacher ever tell you to not to cite wikipedia as a source?
the use of the word pwnd as pawned was slightly used about 3 years ago (?)
alot of my WoW friends used to say it as pawned. One used to make fun of me because I pronounced it wrong =0
but pawned was slightly used, but not any more
look that up in your Funk'n'Wagnall (I just wanted to say that, sounds like...)
KentsOkay in reply to Chicken2209Dec 9, 2008. 5:10 PM
We always used it in Runescape.. along with Ko'ed i pwn u noob, teh kbd ko'ed me
KentsOkay in reply to kelseymhDec 9, 2008. 4:04 PM
Meh, I've always heard and used it to mean "pawned", and 0wnd or 0w3n or ownz for "owned"...
kelseymh in reply to KentsOkayDec 9, 2008. 4:06 PM
Don't know from my own experience, just what I read. Back in my day, this "leetspeak" stuff was just for newbies and script kiddies.
Spl1nt3rC3ll in reply to KentsOkayDec 9, 2008. 4:00 PM
I always thought it was "perfectly owned."
Dan Lynge in reply to Spl1nt3rC3llMar 1, 2010. 12:14 PM
<Old Geek>
Pwned was a mistype of the word Owned, which was used to indicate superiority during fast paced, first person shooters and MMPORGs. Since it was unweildly to try to correct after the fact, and the Ego trip of the "Pwn"-er could not admit a typo, it evolved into a more surreal version of "Owned", Indicating a Massive achievement of owner-ship.

The more you know... the more useless the info.
KentsOkay in reply to whatsisfaceDec 9, 2008. 11:14 AM
Rule 10 - Ignore all laws that aren't by Kiteman
whatsisface in reply to KentsOkayDec 9, 2008. 1:15 PM
Agreed. Except that one.
DJ Radio in reply to KentsOkayDec 9, 2008. 1:13 PM
Rule 11- Ignore rules 4-10
KentsOkay in reply to DJ RadioDec 9, 2008. 3:50 PM
You really need to learn when a joke ends...
DJ Radio in reply to KentsOkayDec 9, 2008. 4:26 PM
jokes on the Internet suck, it's hard to tell if someone is jk or not......
KentsOkay in reply to DJ RadioDec 9, 2008. 4:49 PM
That's not what I meant.
Perhaps this phrase may help:
First time funny
Second time silly
Third time annoying
Fourth time, "Where the hell is my shotgun?"
DJ Radio in reply to KentsOkayDec 9, 2008. 5:49 PM
you forgot fifth, sixth, and seventh
Kiteman (author) in reply to DJ RadioDec 10, 2008. 4:12 AM
DJ, read all the links.

Read all the comments with those links.

Now read your posts in this thread.

That is why Laws 1-3 are needed here.
Goodhart in reply to DJ RadioDec 9, 2008. 6:05 PM
after discharging the shotgun, there wouldn't be a fifth time, right? :-)
DJ Radio in reply to GoodhartDec 9, 2008. 6:15 PM
I took the bullets out of his gun and put in blanks. ;-)
The Jamalam in reply to DJ RadioFeb 25, 2009. 12:25 PM
Shotguns don't fire bullets. They fire shot, which is stored inside a shell. You, sir, have just been owned.
1-100 of 125Next »
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!