Adult Swim and Interference Inc - This NOT the work of the GRL
An advertising agency managed to shut Boston down with a guerrilla marketing campaign gone bad. Inspired by the GRL (the people behind LED Throwies), Interference, Inc, whose website appears to be blank right now, created some LED-based graffiti to promote a cartoon.
Our friends at the GRL were not impressed, and posted a response here.
Like a dog in heat, a producer/reporter from Inside Edition tracked me down earlier today hoping to find, and I quote, "a techie willing to explain these light-bulbs attached to magnets that are all over Boston." I tried to explain that the GRL and LED Throwies had nothing to do with it, but perhaps subtlety is lost when you're hot on the trail of a story. Carl, if you're out there, these are the links you weren't interested in getting from me.
The people who actually are behind this posted the video below (which was removed by the original author, but reposted by the GRL).
I grabbed it from here.
There are lots of very interesting questions around this whole issue: When does art become advertising; how can we as "techies" educate those around us as to what's a bomb and what's art; and who is responsible for actions like these that shut down a city? The artists? The corporation that put them up to it? The government for making itself and the public so paranoid?
In any case, join me in watching how this unfolds.
Our friends at the GRL were not impressed, and posted a response here.
Like a dog in heat, a producer/reporter from Inside Edition tracked me down earlier today hoping to find, and I quote, "a techie willing to explain these light-bulbs attached to magnets that are all over Boston." I tried to explain that the GRL and LED Throwies had nothing to do with it, but perhaps subtlety is lost when you're hot on the trail of a story. Carl, if you're out there, these are the links you weren't interested in getting from me.
The people who actually are behind this posted the video below (which was removed by the original author, but reposted by the GRL).
I grabbed it from here.
There are lots of very interesting questions around this whole issue: When does art become advertising; how can we as "techies" educate those around us as to what's a bomb and what's art; and who is responsible for actions like these that shut down a city? The artists? The corporation that put them up to it? The government for making itself and the public so paranoid?
In any case, join me in watching how this unfolds.

















Lomography Konstructor - World's First 35mm DIY SLR
Office Warfare Book on Sale Now
List of Upcoming Contests (updated 6/6)
Spanish translations of Instructables / Instructables traducidos al Espanol
JULY 2013 Build Night with SUGRU
High-current, electronic sword-fighting, fancy drink pouring, and more @ Makers Local 256 Build Night!
New Instructables Books for 2013
Souped Up: Projects to Make Everything Better [Book]
Backyard Rockets Book on Sale Now


Visit Our Store »
Go Pro Today »




Everyone needs to be held responsible for their respective actions under the jurisdiction of applicable laws.
--Berdovsky et. al for graffiti
--City of Boston - trigger happy reaction (they need to get the bill)
--Fed. Government agencies must realize that their "experts" must include pop (and cult) culture. Otherwise expect this to happen again.
Thank goodness the judge at the arraignment was clear headed and actually knew the usage and definition of "hoax." In my opinion, that has brought a shred of dignity to the system.
I say Boston (and respective authority) needs to pay the bill because of how this matter was handled. I'm not saying that no course of action should have been taken. I'm saying that their press releases to the media and post threat response is/are/was absolutely terrible. Don't send the bill to someone else because you screwed up. Try it next time you're at a restaurant without given an offer. Maybe you'll get a free appetizer (if offered) - but you can't leave without paying.
The infuriating part is the speculation and hype yesterday. This would not have blown up as it did if the media reported facts rather than experts pontificating possibilities. The whole "If they were going to do it, this is how they'd do it" scenario.
As you can probably tell, I really don't care about the mooninites campaign. That is not the problem here. It saddens me every time I hear "post 9-11 age" or variants thereof. Because the report should read...
In a post 9-11 age, we look over every shoulder, fear what we don't understand and assert ourselves onto others.
If I were a terrorism machine, that would be my strategy. Why spend resources causing damage when your opponent will do the damage all by themselves. Am I saying they won, no. But I'm sure as hell not saying they're loosing by any stretch.
I agree. Although I do believe in many major cities it has gotten to the point that "they" have almost won. Why use something "suspicious" when someone could hide a bomb (detonator) inside a light bulb (something completely innocuous and above suspicion). If we "make everything a bomb unless proven otherwise", we are doomed. I am not saying we must throw caution to the wind, but caution is one thing, unending paranoia is another.
http://wbztv.com/video/?id=28369@wbz.dayport.com
My Opinion: Boston will make this all quietly go away in the future. Either drop the charges or plea down to 6 months of probation or something stupid like that. They must know at this point that they are facing deep ridicule over the freak out.
All the other cities that were running this promotion handled it fine. Boston freaked for no apparent reason. Any reasonable person seeing the devices in question would not have thought "bomb" for a second.
The two guys in question are handling it well, and continuing to generate huge publicity for Adult Swim at the expense of the (legal)tards in Boston.
Regardless of the outcome, Turner broadcasting has to be happy. They have what prob amounts to millions in free advertising at the moment.