6V6 Pushpull Calss AB Tube Mono Amp. by msholden
Picture 016.jpg
INTRODUCTION

Last time I touched vacuum tubes was around 1967 when I was repairing radios and TV. I remember this old radio HIFI that was stripped from a console back in the early 60s There was a 12 inch speaker and a smaller speaker I think mid range and a small sealed back cone tweeter. There was a huge power transformer on the chases and a bunch of tubes. I do not remember what the output tubes were but I do remember them being in a push pull configuration. The sound was amazing and through out the years that followed I was never able to match the sound quality with all of the solid state amps I have built or heard. Recently with the hype on the vacuum tube single ended amp hoopla I started getting the bug and turned to the Internet for research.

The transistor brought a new theory in the amplifier and speaker industries. The current fad in solid state amps was to through a lot of current at a speaker in a small sealed cabinet. I will not debate with anyone about lots or little bit of power and how they sound.

As an attempt I wanted to build a tube power amp to see if I could find that good sound I heard when I was young. The following document contains the tube amp I chose as my first tube amp. Please note that I have never liked single ended power supplies for audio amps so it was not used.

DISCLAIMER
While this document describes a plan to build an electronic device which has about 360 volts DC under the chases caution must be followed. I will not be held responsible for any injuries incurred from some one following this document.

MSH MODEL-1 POWERAMP (Michael S. Holden) make no representations about the suitability of this information for any purpose. It is provided "as is"
MSH MODEL-1 POWER AMP (Michael S. Holden) disclaims all warranties with regard to this information, including all implied warranties of merchantability and fitness, in no event shall MSH MODEL-1 POWERAMP (Michael S. Holden) be liable or any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortuous action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this information.

This information may include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors.

MSH MODEL-1 POWERAMP (Michael S. Holden) may make improvements and/or changes in the information at any time.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: Circuit Design History

Step 2 Circuit Design History.jpg
I did not design the power amp circuit. However I did design the power supply.

The origin of the power amplifier design came from the schematic below, which came from the 1959 RCA RECEIVING TUBE MANUAL Tech Series RC-19
robot797 says: Feb 11, 2012. 5:04 PM
that is a nice amp you have there

(no phun intended)
msholden (author) says: Feb 12, 2012. 7:04 AM
Thank you for the complement. Still using it daily.
johnnyjcap says: Dec 5, 2012. 10:26 PM
I "must " have these specific pieces of equipment in order to build this amp?
not the hand tools, the audio gen. &PC OSCILLOSCOPE?
i'VE GOT EVERYTHING ELSE. Please Advise?
msholden (author) says: Dec 6, 2012. 4:37 AM
Hi

Pleased to here from you.
If you build as shown the amp will work fine without an "O" scope and without a audio generator.
johnnyjcap says: Dec 5, 2012. 10:29 PM
Nice Handsome Amp.
johnnyjcap says: Dec 5, 2012. 10:17 PM
"thinks to himself" as realization sets in. 'how am I going to be able to solder this?" I will need 3 hands, thats it! 3 hands. Problem solved!
Or my son, with the promise of beer when finished. When finished! steadier hand before rather than after! If & when I get off my ass & build something like this.
You have, dear Sir, created what I will now dream about for many nights until I get off my butt & do something.
Thanks, Thanks so much! J.
MolecularSandwich says: May 13, 2011. 11:21 AM
What was the total cost of the build?
msholden (author) says: Sep 2, 2012. 6:00 AM
As I remember ti was around $500
Xellers says: Feb 12, 2010. 5:37 PM
Excellent instructable! I am building something similar at the moment and am very impressed by your work!
msholden (author) says: Feb 14, 2010. 3:54 AM
Hi Xellers,
Thanks for your observation.
Good to here from other tubies.  One thing you may or may not know is in the placement to the power transformer and the output transformer is you may reduce hum if you place one of the two bodies 90deg in respect to the other.  I think I will test this on my next project.  I think this was talked about here on this web site.
Xellers says: Feb 17, 2010. 10:43 AM
I just finished designing and building a single-ended amplifier using a 8FQ7 medium-mu dual triode and a 5AQ5 power pentode (Almost identical to the 6V6GTA) found inside of one very old TV. Surprisingly enough, even though the tubes are very worn, its works amazingly well and there is no hum whatsoever!
TV Tube Amplifier.jpg
msholden (author) says: Feb 17, 2010. 12:19 PM
Hi Xellers,
Interesting!  First I like to see an isolated power supply, good job.  You can also use the same idea less the rectifier circuit to make a bench isolated power supply.   This is real handy when working on tube circuits such as an American All 5, which has one side of the 120-vac line power to the chassis.  It seams that somewhere I saw a web sight, which premiered on using TV tubes for audio.
 
This is nice. Will you make this an instructable I am sure there would be interest in it.
Xellers says: Feb 17, 2010. 12:34 PM
Thank you for your kind comment! First of all, I would like to admit that the isolation transformer was actually not included in the original design; when I was testing this little guy, I used an enormous 1kW isolation transformer for safety, but when I tried eliminating it in the final version, the voltage multiplier circuit repeatedly gave me trouble, so I settled for the current version. Also, right now, the entire thing is wired up on my desk and performs beautifully, but I can't find a chassis for it! What sort of enclosures would you recommend (keeping in mind that I can't really afford to buy anything big at the moment)? Also, can you please explain (or link me to) how you did the metalworking in your design? I have never used an aluminum chassis and would like to learn how.

Once again, thank you!
-Xellers

(PS: an instructable will come as soon as I order new tubes and sockets to build a better stereo version - I might even try replacing the 5AQ5 with a 6V6 if I have the money!)
msholden (author) says: Feb 17, 2010. 3:56 PM
I have prepaired a small document which may help you in prepairing a chassis for your project.
Xellers says: Feb 17, 2010. 4:30 PM
Thank you so much! I never realized that this could be so easy - I always assumed that a big budget and a workshop full of professional tools was required!

Quercus austrina says: Feb 11, 2010. 7:56 PM

Have you tried a larger value input capacitor? I have seen the old schematics where the ("your") 0.1 uF is the standard for audio input, but this is usually very low level audio - between a detector stage and a preamp. Try a 1 uF (preferably a 10 uF) capacitor for the higher input levels you are dealing with. In my own designs, I have used 10 uF caps for inputs on both Mic preamps and power amps. This should help the situation.

Qa

msholden (author) says: Feb 12, 2010. 4:15 AM
Quercus Austrina,

Great catch!
Some times you cannot see the forest for the trees. The network of C1 and R1 form a High pass RC filter that has a cutoff frequency of 3 Hz. You are 100 percent correct the value of this component should be changed. I would like to keep the 470K resistor at its current value. By changing C1 to a 4.7MFD will improve the lower end frequency response considerably.
 
I will change the capacitor and then plot the frequency response on this page. I will also update the schematic
 
Thanks so much for your help
Quercus austrina says: Feb 12, 2010. 6:11 PM
You are very welcome. Always willing to help a fellow enthusiast. Can't wait to see the new plots.

Happy listening!

Qa
Quercus austrina says: Feb 17, 2010. 2:43 PM
"Some times you cannot see the forest for the trees."

Haha, just caught that one. Did you "Google" my nick? If not, check it out. You'll get a laugh out of it. :)

Qa
msholden (author) says: Feb 17, 2010. 4:08 PM
Quercus austrina,

No I am not that clever.  I had no idea yor nick is the name of a tree.
Re-design says: Jan 3, 2010. 7:06 AM
Excellent intructable.  Pro. quality build also.  Photos good and the freq. resp. graphs are a nice touch.  Shows us something we can't hear.

Very good job.
msholden (author) says: Jan 3, 2010. 9:06 AM
Re-design,
Thank you for your kind observations. "Re-design" interesting name.
cerwinthedoc says: Oct 27, 2009. 10:20 AM
Wow, great tutorial.

Just one question though, would this amp be suitable for guitars? I have been interested in building a tube amp for quite a while, but I would be using it mainly for guitar.
msholden (author) says: Oct 28, 2009. 6:31 AM

Hi! cerwinthedoc,
I do not play a guitar but I did apply one to this amp.  This power amp has more gain than a power amp normally has.  It sounded OK to me but you would need a pre amp to put between the guitar and the power amp.   This amp is more targeted toward HiFi applications.  When this amp starts distorting or overdriving the sound does change.  I cannot tell you if this is what you arte looking for.
Thanks for your intrest.

Normjr says: Aug 29, 2009. 6:57 PM
This has to be, so far, bar none, absolutely, positively, One of THE BEST Instructables that I have EVER been to. It is also the most professionally documented. The photographs are crisp and clear and are provided not only at the most important steps, but also many of the intermediate steps. The instructions are easily understood, easy to read, with proper grammar and correct spelling. It, in nautical terminology, “Blows all of those mint box instructables clear out of the water and sends them all to Davy Jones' Locker”. msholden you certainly have done one “bang-up” job, you are the only second instructor that I have subscribe to. This Instructable, in my not so humble opinion also deserves the “Grand prize of Grand Prizes award” if there is one.
msholden (author) says: Aug 31, 2009. 4:56 AM
Normjr, Thanks for the vote of confidence. This is my first attempt with an Instructables. I have several other projects which will be posted in the future. Hope to improve as I go. Thanks!!
student.mckinney says: Jul 21, 2009. 12:57 PM
I would imagine that the last time you touched vacuum tubes, you got a nasty burn on your finger....
msholden (author) says: Jul 21, 2009. 3:21 PM
It does not take me long to look at a hot tube.
msholden (author) says: Jun 30, 2009. 8:02 AM
gmoon, All amp components were chosen around the 6v6 tubes. The power supply will supply all that the 6v6 tubes can handle. Supplying 590 mv to the input of the amp will provide the maximum load the 6v6 tubes can handle. The 6au6 sharp cutoff tubes perform well in this amp. I have had no problems with microphonics. I am not an expert in vacuum tube output topology. I thought of this amps output topology as having two complementary darlinton out put.
gmoon says: Jul 1, 2009. 10:37 AM
The typical output for a cathode-biased, push-pull pair of 6V6's is 12 watts. A fixed-bias 6V6 PP amp could probably output 14 to 18 watts. The max output of the tubes has more to do with the B+ voltage and the bias voltage, than the input signal. Although choking off the input signal will reduce the output, but that doesn't seem to be the case here.

Remember, push-pull Class AB amps can output more current since one tube is usually "resting" sometime during the cycle (just check a 6V6 datasheet for PP output power.)

The output is certainly complementary (push-pull), but tubes are voltage-driven, not current-driven like a bipolar transistor. So a tube has high input impedance by nature--it's input impedance isn't dependent on the load. The gain stages in tube amps are voltage amplifiers, rather than a current amplifier like a darlington.

10 watts is a reasonable figure if the tubes are run at a lower voltage, of course.

Small-signal pentodes have a reputation for microphonics, (which is why they are generally not used anymore in guitar preamp stages.) I have a couple old "radio tube" guitar amps that use a 12AU6, and they sound great. But at higher volumes it might be a problem. I'm glad you're not experiencing any problems.

Your amp uses the second stage of the 12ax7 as a cathodyne phase inverter. Since the bottom half of the phase-inverter is is a cathode-follower, a cathodyne PI is a "unity gain" stage (no amplification.) Each phase of the PI is fed to a different 6AU6 for more amplfication before the power tubes...

This topology is very unusual. Generally the last stage before the power amp is the phase inverter. Your amp has a gain stage, the phase inverter, then a gain stage for each phase (the pentodes), after the phase inverter. Then the power stage, of course.


BTW--nice job, I like the build.
msholden (author) says: Jul 1, 2009. 2:36 PM
gmoon, Please bare with me. Step 14 has an attached PDF which I got the Graph and placed below. The pdf is quite large but all has much more resolution and all is clear. This amp will put out 13.7 RMS watts at max. The data sheet for the 6v6 for a class AB1 push pull says max out put 14w. The power supply is rated 150ma at 339v which exceeds the max plate voltage of 315vdc. Could you be thinking 6L6 instead of 6V6. I have reviewed other class AB1 push pulls and as you said the output topology is different in this amp. You have a great knowledge of vacuum tubes which I admire. I have a guestion for you. In this amp the plate voltage is suposto be the same on both 6AU6 plates and it is not. One is 231v and the other is 182v. I switched both 6au6 tubes and the problem follower the tubes. I bought two more 6au6 tubes and it appears that depending on the performance of each tube will affect the two plate voltages. All most like some thing is floating. Thanks your comments. Please keep in mind that this amp was designed for HIFI and when I rated the output I always select the point of the start of ringing as the out put. I do list max output (over-drive) for those who like to work with the distortion.
capture30.jpg
gmoon says: Jul 1, 2009. 8:05 PM
Please don't take my comments as criticism; I'm merely musing at an unusual design.

Although the datasheets spec 315V max, it's not too unusual to run NOS 6V6's at a higher voltage (and power output.) Back "in the day," if you had to replace the tubes every 4-5 months, it was no biggie (at least when searching for "that sound" with guitar amps.)

Would I recommend running so far out of spec? Nope, I'd stick to 12 watts max. (a cathode-biased 6L6 pair might output ~16-20 watts, depending on the B+ V.)

Re: the 6au6's--I'm sure there are differences, tube-to-tube (transconductance, etc.) Translating that to the PP power tubes, it's variations like that that call for "matched pairs" and POT adjustments of the bias voltage (if it's fixed.) A cathodyne phase-inverter isn't very symmetrical to begin with--so you're not necessarily feeding it a perfect signal to start. I suppose it's possible to carefully balance the 6AU6's (by adjusting the cathode-bias resistors, R16 and R17), but that might be fighting the very nature of the cathodyne PI...(and be defeated every time the 6au6's are replaced.)

That's what makes me wonder about the overall design--following a cathodyne PI with pentode gain stages. Small-signal pentodes are known for having even more gain than triodes, so a single pentode gain stage might be equal in gain to two triode stages. Since the phase inverter is so far away from the power stage, that could magnify any asymmetry. None of that would matter much for a guitar amp, but for hi-fi??

Since cathode-biased amps generally aren't as powerful as fixed-biased maybe they just figure anyone using it would just ease back off the input if it starts to distort, and that would enforce the 10 watt limit (?)

Here's a link to the Kalamazoo Bass 30, which has the same topology, although the PI halves are followed by a triode, not a pentode stage before the power tubes... (it's got a pot to balance the power tube bias, too. But that's probably more critical with fixed bias than cathode bias like yours.)
gmoon says: Jun 30, 2009. 5:18 AM
Interesting design. I have a Kalamazoo bass amp that also has two amplification stages after the phase inverter (which is not the usual way to do it)--although they are triodes, not pentodes like yours. Do you find that the 6AU6's are microphonic? (Based on my experiences, I don't think I'd have gone with a smaller OT. The 6V6s must be running cold with those cathode-bias resistors, and maybe that's keeping the power down.)
lemonie says: Jun 28, 2009. 1:47 PM
I love the "mess" in steps 7 & 9, reminds me of my old Cossor radio. Lovely. L
msholden (author) says: Jun 29, 2009. 5:26 AM
lemonie, I always say to my self that I will keep the wiring neat. As I start wiring neatness becomes less important as I continue wiring. By the end of wiring my mind has shifted to the testing phase and sometimes I look and wonder where my promised standard went to.
lemonie says: Jun 29, 2009. 10:40 AM
It's natural and it looks good. There maybe something nice about regimenting things into grids, but I like the functional arrangement of this old technology. L
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!