Geodesic dome construction has interested me since the 1960s, when I first became aware of that alternative to square box architecture. Buckminster "Bucky" Fuller popularized the idea, but as my quick research for this instructable finds, he was not the originator. That credit apparently goes to Dr. Walther Bauersfeld, who used the concept for the Zeiss Planetarium built some 20 years prior to Fuller's work. This is a Wikipedia link to Buckminster Fuller http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckminster_Fuller and to Walther Bauersfeld http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walther_Bauersfeld .

Credits out of the way, geodesic domes are beautiful structures. Spheres give the greatest interior volume with the minimum of material. Their basic geometry can be broken up into hexagons and pentagons, or further broken up into triangles. See the rotating geogedisic spheres on the Buckminster Fuller page.

This model is made up of triangle units, which I then combined into hexagons and pentagons. Those units were then combined to make the sphere. I used bamboo shish-kabob skewers from the supermarket (called pincho sticks where I live), and hot melt glue.

Credits out of the way, geodesic domes are beautiful structures. Spheres give the greatest interior volume with the minimum of material. Their basic geometry can be broken up into hexagons and pentagons, or further broken up into triangles. See the rotating geogedisic spheres on the Buckminster Fuller page.

This model is made up of triangle units, which I then combined into hexagons and pentagons. Those units were then combined to make the sphere. I used bamboo shish-kabob skewers from the supermarket (called pincho sticks where I live), and hot melt glue.

An equilateral triangle is a triangle composed of three sides of equal length. A flat hexagon (six sides) can be constructed out of six equilateral triangles. To more closely approximate spherical curvature, you want to raise the center of the hexagon a little. You do this by increasing the length two sides of each triangles, the sides that radiate out from the center of the hexagon. The longer you stretch the two sides, the more exaggerated will be the peak in the center of the hexagon.

In a flat pentagon (5 sides) the two sides of the triangles that radiate from the center will be shorter than the third side. To more closely approximate a sphere, you have to lengthen them also. As with the hexagon, the amount that those sides are lengthened will determine the height of the peak in the center.

I don't know the math for making triangles that result in a near-perfect sphere, but I find the idea of lumpy domes and peaky geodesic spheres more interesting anyway. Just playing it by feel, this is the design I came up with.

I used the same triangles for making the hexagons and the pentagons. The dimensions I used for the triangles are: 2 inches for the short side, 2 1/4 inches for the long sides. Whatever variations you do with sides that radiate from the center, the outer sides have to be the same so that the hexagons and pentagons will join correctly.

(I have plans for making a next-generation model with the hexagon peaks going inward and the pentagon peaks going outward, to make a pollen grain-like structure.)

In a flat pentagon (5 sides) the two sides of the triangles that radiate from the center will be shorter than the third side. To more closely approximate a sphere, you have to lengthen them also. As with the hexagon, the amount that those sides are lengthened will determine the height of the peak in the center.

I don't know the math for making triangles that result in a near-perfect sphere, but I find the idea of lumpy domes and peaky geodesic spheres more interesting anyway. Just playing it by feel, this is the design I came up with.

I used the same triangles for making the hexagons and the pentagons. The dimensions I used for the triangles are: 2 inches for the short side, 2 1/4 inches for the long sides. Whatever variations you do with sides that radiate from the center, the outer sides have to be the same so that the hexagons and pentagons will join correctly.

(I have plans for making a next-generation model with the hexagon peaks going inward and the pentagon peaks going outward, to make a pollen grain-like structure.)

<p>How many hexagons and pentagons are there in total?</p>

<p>You want me to count them for you? I wouldn't want to take away the fun of exploration you are having. </p>

<p>I'm making this exactly how you are, with 2 in pieces and 2 and 1/4 in pieces, but how do I know how pieces of each measurement to cut?</p>

You could figure it out, like I would have to do at this point in time. The hexagons and pentagons of a geodesic dome are divided into triangles. Legs of those triangles are lengthened that go to the centre points of the hexagons and pentagons. That raises the peak in the centre. The triangles are made separately, and each side of the triangle glues next to the side of another triangle, creating a double line. Each hexagon has six triangles, six two-piece lines leading to the center -- 12 of the long pieces. Each hexagon also has six single-piece lines along the outside, which will later join with other hexagons or pentagons -- six of the short pieces. <br><br>Each raised pentagon uses 10 of the long pieces and five of the short pieces. <br><br>Count the hexagons and pentagons you need to know the number of pieces you need of each kind. After you have all the raised hexagons and pentagons put together, assemble them into the sphere.

Very cool, I'm actually looking into building one but I need it to be as close to a sphere as possible. <br> <br>Do you think you could help? <br>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:G%C3%A9ode_V_3_1.gif <br> <br>Thanks

I don't know the math to give you numbers. Basically, mine is spikey because the centers of the hexagons and pentagons are raised by lengthening some of the legs of the triangles that compose them. Reduce those leg lengths and you would return the spikey hexagons and pentagons to flat hexagons and pentagons. If you want to make the flat shapes more rounded, you would lengthen them again, but not as much as I did.

I'm impressed. Great work, inspirational.

I just started a big sphere. I used 4inch and 4 1/2 for mine.<br />I'm just a little bit before step 6.<br />I did the first pentagon, 5 hex, and 5 pent. <br />Next layer will be 5 hex. Actually it stands at 12inch high.<br />I used popsicle stick I found in my old appartment. not sure I'll have enough though..

It looks like a good beginning. I would think that popsicle sticks would be more difficult to work with than the round shishkebab sticks, but aparently they work well for you. I hope you find enough sticks to finish it. <br />

Well, it is kinda hard to get them to fit... since they will never be always edge to edge, they aren't perfectly aligned.<br /><br />Added a Row tonight using all that was left of stick.<br />Then went to buy all the stick I will need to finish it. Plus all the glue...

http://www.desertdomes.com/domecalc.html <br> <br>Want to build one the size of a mouse or the size of a house heres the place you need <br> <br>I been playing with these for a long time...

It is looking good. <br /><br />If you want the corners to be more precise, try marking the end cuts with a pencil and then whacking it with a sharp chisel and a hammer over a block of wood to make the cut. It should be fairly fast and precise. <br /><br />You could calculate the angles with math or come close enough with trial and error. When you have your pattern stick you can easily cut copies of it. <br />

How would you feel about <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.instructables.com/id/5-Japanese-lamp-from-recycled-materials/">skinning your sphere with paper</a> and putting a lightbulb in the middle? :)<br/>

This sphere does suggest a lamp to a lot of people. I think getting a light bulb in or out through the triangles would be tricky, though. You would have to leave an opening at the bottom. Skinning all the facets with paper would be tricky, too. It might not be worth all the trouble.
It is cool geometry, and it's nice to be able to see through it to appreciate the lines on the back side.

If you put 2 or 4 coats of polyurethane on that geodesic frame you wouldn't have to worry about melting the glue plus it would make it nice and shiney if you decide to cover it on the inside with paper <br> <br>Just a thought i wouldn't go much hight than a 60 watt bulb with a paper cover anyway .....

Not to mention the fact that, depending on the type of bulb used, you may well melt the glue. Ive had something similar happen. Very disappointing.

If you do that, make sure you use an energy saver bulb. <br /> I made a similar structure a few years back (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_ditrigonal_icosidodecahedron" rel="nofollow">en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_ditrigonal_icosidodecahedron</a>) with hot glue and toothpicks -- and covered it with tissue paper. <br /> I hung it up as a lampshade (on an incandescent bulb) and within a few hours it had fallen down to the ground misshapen and somewhat concave... :(<br /> <br /> <br /> Very nice 'ible! <br /> Because you can model almost anything with small enough triangles (as in, for computer graphics) you can make non-regular shapes (like faces, etc.) too. I am however, quite partial to the regular sphere-like shapes.<br />

Wow, that looks really cool! Nice work.

Thanks.