Instructables
Picture of A simple bicycle frame jig
TheJigHTfitting.jpg
TheJigAngle.jpg
TheJigBBfitting.jpg
This is an instructable for building your own bicycle frame jig. It was designed by ideas2cycles for bonding, laminating, brazing and tack welding. Welding can be a bit tricky, since there are beams behind every joint which could be in the way.

The design is inspired by this instructable, but made with European aluminium profiles and SI units. The profiles and standard parts were provided to us by Movetec. CAD files for the standard parts are available at the manufacturer's website. Custom parts were turned in a lathe and all drawings are included in this report.

The jig is based on five interchangeable 1000 mm long profiles attached to each other orthogonally using angles. PowerLocks and CrossConnectors could be used for the joints as well. The head tube and seat tube fittings are held in place by angles also. The bottom bracket fittings and rear dummy axle are based on threaded rods.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: Design philosophy

Picture of Design philosophy
Coordinate.jpg
Equations.jpg
Coordinate2.jpg
This step describes the thought process when designing the jig. Since the construction is quite flexible, motivating some of the choices made could be useful for the modifiers. Skip to the next step if you just want to get on building the jig.

Why aluminium profile?
It is light, strong, stiff, robust, heat resistant, machinable, weldable, corrosion resistant, easily available and accurate. On the downside, it can be considered a bit expensive compared to wood or traditional metallic square profiles.

Why 1000 mm long?
For the sake of simplicity. One could manage with shorter ones and they don't all have to be equal in length. The wheelbase of regular bicycles is around 1000 mm, so with the front fork left out and the frame slightly rotated, 1000 mm is a suitable width. The height of the jig could be reduced, but we wanted to use integrated seat tubes on some of our designs and wanted to leave some room for that.

Why is the rear axle fixed and positioned like it is?
Making the bottom bracket fixed would have required space for adjustment at both ends of the jig. Fixing the rear axle saves space. In addition, attaching the profile holding the rear axle flush with the supporting (horizontal) profiles situates the centre line of the frame nicely relative to the planes of the rear drop outs.
The 250 mm position (from the bottom) for the rear axle is chosen because it allows ample room for bottom bracket height adjustment for all conventional frame geometries, but keeps the bottom bracket low for designs with long integrated seat posts.

Why an orthogonal configuration?
The seat tube and head tube do not have to be parallel to each other. The profiles can be fastened at an angle either using the same 45 GD angles or with clamps (called CrossConnector) from the same supplier. However, in most cases the orthogonal layout is sufficient and simpler to assemble because it requires no angle measurements, which can be cumbersome. Keeping everything square is far easier. It does require some calculations, but at least they are exact. The result is two coordinate systems: global and local. The global is the jig's coordinate where everything is orthogonal. The local coordinate is that of the frame, which can have tubes in any direction and the horizontal is defined by the ground. In the end, however, it comes down to getting the four points (head tube, seat tube, bottom bracket and rear axle) correctly positioned relative to each other. Frame geometry is traditionally thought of in the local coordinate, but the fittings can only be moved in the global coordinates. Therefore a transformation has to be made.

How is the coordinate transformation made?
The second picture shows the jig in its own (global) coordinate system. The blue triangle represents the known values of the frame (local coordinate):

BB = (Vertical) bottom bracket drop
CS = Chain stay length
Effective CS (CSeff) = Chain stay length parallel to the ground (horizontal)
ST = Seat tube angle relative to the horizontal.

The frame’s coordinate is simply rotated counter clockwise around the bottom bracket by the amount of the seat tube complementary angle. Hence, the seat tube runs vertical as do the profiles in the jig. The rear axle is fixed in the jig at a height of 250 mm from the bottom edge. We need to solve the position of the bottom bracket relative to the rear axle in the global coordinate, i.e. solve dx2, and dy1+dy2. We know the bottom bracket drop, chain stay length and seat tube angle. You might have designed your frame using the effective chain stay length to begin with, but in case you did not, it can be calculated using the Pythagorean Theorem. All equations are presented in the third picture.
The horizontal position DX of the profile holding the bottom bracket fitting can be measured using a tape measure. The vertical position DY can be measured with a calliper taking into account the radius of the fitting (Dbbfit/2). See fourth picture.

Why are the fittings dimensioned like they are?
One could probably get away with using some conical shapes and threaded bar for the fittings. Since we would have machined these cones anyway, we decided to make the fittings properly. On the downside, changing "standards" requires new fittings to be machined.

-Head tube fitting: The inner diameter (I.D.) of the head tube for 1" Professional headset is 30,05-30,10 mm, for regular 1,125" headset it's 33,90-33,95 mm  and for 1,125" semi-integrated 43,95-44,00 mm. The latter values are target values. These are the headsets we are using at the moment and therefore the O.D. of the head tube fittings are slightly less (see drawing).

-Seat tube fitting: The seat tube sizes we plan on using are standard 27,2 mm and 31,6 mm. A cone was made for frames with integrated seat tubes. Other diameters are listed in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seatpost

-Bottom bracket fittings: Dimensions are for the standard BSA 1,37" x 68 mm bottom bracket. In case you want to use other BB standards: the BB30 (http://www.bb30standard.com) is 68 mm wide and seats 42 mm O.D. bearings. The press-fit BB for road cranks is 86,5 mm wide and takes 41 mm O.D. cups (http://techdocs.shimano.com/techdocs/index.jsp)

How is the center plane of the frame determined?
The slots in the 45x90 angles allow adjusting the center plane. For ease of use, we are recommending to slide the seat post and head tube fittings to one extreme of the slots. When considering the rear spacing, it becomes clear that the outermost slot of the angle has to be used. However, to avoid an unnecessarily long dummy axle the inner edge of the outer slot is best. The inner edge of the outer slot is 54 mm from the base of the angle which, together with the 8 mm diameter bolt leads to a center plane 58 mm from the aluminium profile surface. The profile with the dummy axle is hence 58+45 = 103 mm from the center plane. With a maximum rear spacing of 135 mm, this leaves 103-135/2 = 35,5 mm for the drop out thickness and nuts. One might want to move the center plane further away from the profiles if room is needed for example for a welding torch.
rylandwb29 days ago

How can you set the headtube angle independent of the seat tube angle?

ideas2cycles (author)  rylandwb27 days ago
the angles used to join the profiles allow rotation around the tightening bolt if installed that way. The profile for the seat tube would be kept at a right angle and the head tube profile rotated. The length of the profile is sufficient even when fastened at a small angle.
mum19991 year ago
good
wolfgang641 year ago
I wil have to re learn my trig. but this is great!
ideas2cycles (author)  wolfgang641 year ago
It looks more complicated than it really is. The spreadsheet will do the calculations for you, but I think it's good to know what the connection is between frame geometry and jig setup. Especially if/when you want to modify something.
sciman12 years ago
awesome!
do you think this could be adjusted for producing gravity bikes,
or other style bikes. it seems very versatile.
ideas2cycles (author)  sciman12 years ago
That's an interesting question! I know barely nothing about gravity bikes but it seems that getting the rear axle aligned relative to the head tube would be enough and all that this jig can help with. In that case even a simpler jig would suffice. At least you would want to increase the length of the horizontal profiles to accommodate the longer-than-usual wheel base of gravity bikes.
rimar20002 years ago
Very interesting! Thanks for sharing.