3 Simple Ways to
Share What You Make

With Instructables you can share what you make with the world — and tap into an ever-growing community of creative experts.

PhotosPhotos

Share one or more photos of a project, recipe, or whatever you've made, quickly and easily.

Step by StepStep-By-Step

Share your step-by-step photos with text instructions of what you made so others can do it too!

VideoVideo

Share your how-to video. You'll need your embed code from a video site such as YouTube.

Airline ultra light packing - Backpack replacement

Airline ultra light packing - Backpack replacement
«
  • parchute.gif
  • nylon.jpg
  • hmmk.jpg
  • Image001.jpg
  • Image002.jpg
  • Image003.jpg
  • Image004.jpg
  • Image005.jpg
  • Image006.jpg
  • Image007.jpg
  • last photo ←
»
Sometimes weight restrictions airlines impose for luggage can make life difficult for budget travellers and backpackers. Getting rid of extra weight can be an option. This is how I saved 8 kgs by ditching the bag itself.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up
 

Step 1Ditch the Bag

Ditch the Bag
Get a wrap of light weight 'parachute' nylon material
« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
13 comments
Jul 6, 2009. 4:06 AMPKM says:
This saves about 8 - 10 kgs. (the weight of the backpack itself)

Where on earth do you get your backpacks from? I have a 66 litre hiking rucksack with a metal frame, big enough to hold all the clothes I need for a week of skiing, two pairs of boots, sleeping bag etc. and that weighs perhaps 1.5 or 2kg. Even when full of clothes the whole thing often weighs in under 15, and it will hold several times the amount of stuff your wrap there appears to have.

This does sound like a useful technique under some circumstances, but I'll take the rucksack just because it has straps- I'd hate to have to hike 25 miles carrying a bundle like that.
Mar 19, 2010. 5:29 PMfrogmeetcog says:
Maybe he makes rope out of twisted food-wrap, and slings it over his back.... seriously, if you are this concerned about weight, just fly barefoot, in a loincloth, on an empty stomach. Beg for food on your arrival.
Jan 17, 2012. 4:59 AMchriszzz says:
Oh come on, there's alot to be said for travelling light. If you replace a 4 lb backpack with a near weightless bag, then you have just saved 4 lbs, which is a big deal for an older person with a aging bad back. When I travel, the contents of my bag is 8 lbs, and I definitely do not want to add another 4 lbs to it.

I would probably improve this by sewing it into a pouch instead of a big bundle, and making some holes for attaching straps to it. Then you can carry and use it like a regular bag, and save the $50 a ultralight backpack would cost you.
Jan 17, 2012. 5:31 AMPKM says:
There is a lot to be said for travelling light, but there's more to be said for carrying your load sensibly. I'm a little surprised you're invoking having a bad back as a reason to ditch a backpack and carry your stuff in a single bundle. Like I said, my not particularly expensive hiking rucksack weighs little, holds a lot and has a metal frame and hip straps. Sometimes I take the shoulder straps off completely (I have a broken collarbone that I don't like to rest a lot of weight on) and let the entire 10kg+ weight sit on my hips where I hardly notice it. I'd much rather carry 10kg strapped to my pelvis than 5 in a bundle in my arms, and I have a healthy back.

This all assumes we're talking about serious luggage, though- if this is for carry-on, which will be small and might have very strict weight limits according to your airline, I can see the case for economising to this degree. In that case, a large plastic shop bag would probably hold everything pictured and not weigh much more, and I don't think I could find a carry-on sized backpack that weighs more than 500g.  I can't argue with "Wrap your articles in ripstop nylon for a low-weight bundle", but the premise of the Instructable seems to be based on false economies and some very questionable weight figures.
Jan 17, 2012. 8:00 AMchriszzz says:
As I said, I'm for traveling light, and that's the perspective I'm coming from.

10kg in my opinion is NOT light. Hardly. I agree if you are lugging that kind of weight, you most certainly need a proper backpack with proper frame and hipstraps. Also, I think you are thinking of hiking, where you need to carry food, water, sleeping gear etc. I'm thinking more along the lines of travel, where I have the option of carrying only the bare essentials of clothes, toiletries and little else. Hence, a lightweight bag without support is viable.

I can see this instructable being improved to make a bag to carry light loads for travel, in a bag that weighs no more than 100-200g. I am in fact at this very moment experimenting with daypack travel ( ie, carrying everything I need for travel at lowest weight in a daypack, not a backpack nor suitcase ). This is inspired by the no-luggage challenge (google it), but I'm not willing to go without luggage though and will compromise with a really lightweight bag.

I'm currently looking at the Sea-To-Summit Ultra-Sil bag, which has NO support of any sort, and is essentially a shapeless lightweight rip-stop nylon bag good for maybe 3-5 lbs of weight. At such low weights, back support or proper straps are irrelevant.
Mar 26, 2010. 10:02 AMthatoneguydavid says:
where did you get the light weight 'parachute' nylon material?  do you have a more specific name for it?   (i.e. is it just rip-stop, or some thing different all together?)
Aug 5, 2009. 8:44 AMewalk says:
Where did you get the nylon?
Jul 7, 2009. 11:55 AMvalhallas_end says:
Unfortunately, they can detain you long enough that you miss your flight - at your cost. I had the bad luck to have an old, broken Swiss army knife caught in a backpack's internal webbing (the corkscrew had wound through it at the bottom, so I missed it when packing), and it they held me for an hour with questions until they decided I was accidentally carrying a broken knife...with no blades, scissors, or anything still attached, only the corkscrew and toothpick. The packing list is a good idea though, and frankly I'm surprised TSA doesn't require it...they could X-Ray and compare easily.
Jul 6, 2009. 7:59 AMtheRIAA says:
is that ripstop nylon? does it have little grid of strong fibers like those Glad trash bags? I've made a bunch of hammocks with ripstop nylon, best stuff there is. I've seen people make big cubes out of their clothes and shrink wrap. The maximum size for luggage is something like 60" when you add up length, width, and height. Any 5ht grader could tell you that is completely ridiculous and a 20" cube is the most efficient.
Jul 6, 2009. 5:53 AMvalhallas_end says:
I agree with PKM - even massive travel luggage tends to weigh a few pounds now - granted, the lightweight, large-capacity bags cost a lot more, but if you seriously have a weight problem, cough it up! I like your idea for small stuff though, but I'd be worried passing through airport security...the final product may look like a bomb to TSA or a drug shipment, plus many security guards will refuse your package if they can't open and search it in a moment's notice.
Jul 6, 2009. 4:53 AMmkoennecke says:
Hi,

nice try. Where to get the parachute stuff from?

You might want to look at furoshiki for improvements: http://www.env.go.jp/en/focus/attach/060403-5.html No cling wrap necessary then and a handle
comes as part of the wrapping.


Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
3
Followers
2
Author:gregsmithsays(gregsmithsays.com)
Internet evangelist and online writer