We recently installed new compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) in our workspace. They use less energy and last longer, but they're painfully bright...so I adapted Dan's Instructable for CFLs using heat resistant photo gels. This custom build attaches directly onto the end of the bulb so no extra materials are needed.
A lot of offices have been replacing silver tipped incandescent bulbs with CFLs w/o taking into the account the harsh effect the bare bulb has. This idea hopefully solves that. Oh yeah and its all open source. So steal this idea and make it better!
Production by Simon Jolly
Soundtrack by I Am Jen (iamjen.com)
SteveTouch(TM) by Steve Lambert
Project by Michael Mandiberg and the Eyebeam OpenLab
http://www.eyebeam.org/project/cfl
Remove these ads by
Signing UpStep 1: Materials: What You'll Need
For the lamp shades we used to two materials commonly used by the photo industry to diffuse light without risking fire:
Rosco Cinegel #3000 - Tough Rolux : reduces overall glare by diffusing the harsh direct light into a glow.
Rosco Cinegel #3403 - Rosco N.6 : for the front most panels reducing the glow (by 2 stops on a camera)
Both materials are available from B&H in sheets or very long rolls. Unless your making a huge amount of these we recommend you just get a sheet of each.







































Visit Our Store »
Go Pro Today »




- there is more than one designer who makes claim to that concept.
- copyright doesn't protect concepts or ideas, it allows one to protect the execution of that idea.
- we changed the design in several substantial ways (size, purpose, including a mounting hole for the CFL bulb, the tinted covers) thus creating a new work.
- our design does not impact the market for Holger Strøm's work.
And to answer your question, Creative Commons "licenses provide a flexible range of protections and freedoms" and there are several licenses available. Some specify that you can't use the execution of the idea for profit (you can always use the idea – thanks again founding fathers) but the license we used only requires attribution to the OpenLab. Creative Commons licenses allow the creator to specify whether people are free to share, remix, or reuse commercially or non commercially, with or without attribution, and whether or not they can be "remixed" or create derivative works with the original.
Here's some good links for more info:
http://fairuse.stanford.edu
http://creativecommons.org/
This is one of the frustrating things about copyright; that fair use can only be determined in court. Weighing those four factors, and having talked to an attorney that specializes in these things, we're pretty sure we're in the clear. But even in the most obvious cases, no one can know for sure unless it went to court and a judge ruled on it.
I'm guessing, but it sounds like you're identifying with the original designer a bit and I understand. No one wants to feel like they've been ripped off. But I will leave you with a quote from Ben Franklin, who had a hand in founding the patent office, but never patented anything.
"as we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously."
[http://ylighting.com/brs-lj-col-drop.html http://ylighting.com/brs-lj-col-drop.html]http://ylighting.com/brs-lj-col-drop.html says this:
"Design by Francisco Luján, 1999"
AND
"based on the original 1964 modular construction system by Antonio Carrillo"
http://www.iqlight.com/http://www.iqlight.com/ IQLight says:
"The IQ light system was designed in 1972 by Danish designer Holger Strøm"
All of this is separate from Steve's discussion of copyright determination.