3 Simple Ways to
Share What You Make

With Instructables you can share what you make with the world — and tap into an ever-growing community of creative experts.

PhotosPhotos

Share one or more photos of a project, recipe, or whatever you've made, quickly and easily.

Step by StepStep-By-Step

Share your step-by-step photos with text instructions of what you made so others can do it too!

VideoVideo

Share your how-to video. You'll need your embed code from a video site such as YouTube.

Build A Fusion Reactor

Step 7Fire It Up (and cross your fingers)

Fire It Up (and cross your fingers)
Time to turn it on (don't forget to cover any viewports/cameras with lead! Also x-rays can pour out of ceramic feedthroughs so point them away from people. It is a good idea to be monitoring for x-rays where any people are present). The basic procedure is:

-Turn on the roughing pump and wait for sufficient backing pressure, turn on the diffusion or turbo pump and wait for it to fully warm up or achieve running speed
-Throttle the chamber back (with the valve between the diffusion/turbo pump and the chamber)
-Ever so slightly open the needle valve to the deuterium tank
-Turn up the high voltage until either plasma establishes on the camera, or you've reached 40kv and nothing has happened (don't forget, you only get one chance in your life to screw up with voltages of this degree)
-If nothing has happened, keep admitting more gas and the pressure should keep going up. Plasma should form around 40kv at about 10-15 microns of deuterium.

If all goes well, you should see on your camera the image below, and you should be detecting neutrons at this point.

Operation is quite a balancing act, since the voltage is controlled by both the power supply, but also by Paschen's Curve and Ohm's Law relating to the pressure in the chamber. Great patience is required to "Get the hang of it", but after doing so it becomes quite simple to run. Operation can be aided by an ion-gun which will not be discussed in this article.
« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
37 comments
Apr 19, 2012. 1:01 PMpwnag3 says:
Would Hydrogen obtained via electrolysis work in this?
Jul 16, 2011. 10:19 AMNuclear_Ninja says:
Nice Project I would like to give it a try myself. What inspired you to build this?
Can you give me an estimated cost to build what you did?
Also do you have to TIG weld the parts or can another type of welding work?
One last question what type of shielding other than the lead did you use?
Jul 16, 2011. 12:53 PMNuclear_Ninja says:
on what scale are you talking like what counts were you getting off the neutron detector?
and thank you for the information
Jul 17, 2011. 6:15 PMNuclear_Ninja says:
Ok what are you currently using your neutrons for or are you just running it for the sake of running it? and if you dont mind me asking are you in college if so what degree are you working on
Jul 18, 2011. 4:45 AMNuclear_Ninja says:
ok and congrats on the MIT thing I an studying nuclear engineering at nc state. hints at my intrest in a reactor. thank you for all the information. If I end up building one of my own I will post pics.
Once again thank you for the info
Dec 26, 2010. 5:19 PMcrash landing says:
any chance your next project could be a table top model of the hadron collider? I started on mine but my wife wanted her washing machine back so the project is on hold for the moment.
Jul 17, 2011. 11:23 AMmunkey906 says:
oooo yes... table top hadron collider, that would be sweet!
May 6, 2011. 6:59 PMA good name says:
My particle physics are a bit hazy, isn't it currently impossible to run a fusion reactor without incinerating everything within a two mile radius?
Jun 5, 2011. 7:11 PMwberry says:
no you can do it, they did it over about a 30 year period, but they never could get it to sustain the reaction on its own, and you can fuse nuclei at room temperature, the controversy is simply how its done, nobody in the US patent office will listen, and so they proclaim it bs when its legit
May 18, 2011. 1:05 PMkaitheninja says:
Yep, Is where too atoms fuse, i think its hydrogen, and produce energy, its only been done once by man, and that was for like 0.000000001 of a second!
Jun 5, 2011. 7:12 PMwberry says:
nope, they got it to work with the bombs, they just cant find a practical way to get it to fuse and become self sustaiend
Jun 5, 2011. 8:21 PMA good name says:
I can tell you one thing, it doesn't work with bombs. It occurs in bombs as a byproduct, but the energy is produced via fission.
Jul 16, 2011. 5:00 PMsquiggy2 says:
actually the fusion mentioned for bombs is the "H-Bomb". It uses nuclear fission so compress deuterium and tritium enough to fuse into helium, which in turn releases enough energy to split more uranium or plutonium, and repeats.

and as for fusion plants, actually it's been done a number of times.
The leading design so far is the tokamak type generator.
The record for the longest fusion reaction so far is 0.5 seconds, and produced 1997 produced 10mW of power (65% of the input).
United States, China, the European Union (EU), India, Japan, the Russian Federation, and South Korea. are currently building a new reactor which hopes to sustain a fusion reaction for several minutes.

This January, scientists in Italy produced a "cold fusion" nickel-hydrogen fusion reaction, which could turn out to be a very promising step forward
Jan 24, 2011. 8:57 AMLefrançois says:
What is the usefulness?
Mar 11, 2011. 7:39 PMechaa says:
When you built it, did you intend for it to be anything other than a neutron source? Would it be possible to get power out of it, and to get more power output than input?
Mar 24, 2011. 12:51 AMelih says:
It is not yet possible to get more power out of a fusion reactor than it takes to run it. That would be a Nobel Prize discovery haha.
Mar 12, 2011. 3:38 PMvincent7520 says:
If I build one and press the switch,will be the Master of the World ?… or is it not worth the pain ?…
Jan 28, 2011. 5:31 PMWhales says:
Is there a way you can record a video about this? not like a replacment for this, just of this thing working and a few other things. Just so i know for sures your not trying to get me on a terrorist watchlist
Jan 2, 2011. 8:06 PMburpreynolds says:
Who are you?
Jan 5, 2011. 11:22 AMthalass says:
You're an absolute champion, that's who you are. Now i just need a Mr Fusion to power my electric car...
Jan 27, 2011. 2:54 PMCobalt59 says:
Obviously you've seen back to the future.
Jan 3, 2011. 3:09 AMmario59 says:
Hi christensent ! ! !
but... what a *BAD* LAST SHOT you did for such demanding homebuilt project!
You did lots of detailed photos... but the last one, which should be the "cake's cherry atop" if the really worst one ! ! !
If I could make ask you, could you post (one o even more) better shots of the running chamber? Mayb also the neutron counter running, would be nice to see!
Anyway CONGRATULATIONS ! ! !
Jan 2, 2011. 11:38 PMMKD says:
What an interesting project. What is the practical end of this? Is this more of a back yard science experiment or does it have an application? Forgive my ignorance on this topic; I presume that this project is fundamental for other more elaborate constructions.
Jan 2, 2011. 10:23 PMaqwiz says:
Now how am I gonna top THAT for the epilog Challenge, Gee Thanks :P
Jan 2, 2011. 9:34 PMwesley93 says:
alright i really dont have the recources nor the desire to conduct a project this large so could someone tell me, is this forreal or just a bunch of bs?
Jan 2, 2011. 6:54 PMgfwhell says:
As soon as the plasma is established ,I would expect to see the primary current jump up, would that not be an indicator of a healthy plasma?
Could this process be obtained usinfg a couple of Magnetrons?

GFWHELL
Dec 29, 2010. 1:54 PMUKtheBUNNY says:
Does anyone know if a refrigeration compressor would create a strong enough vacuum?
Jan 2, 2011. 5:04 PMeggmcmffn says:
A 'refrigeration compressor' will pull down low 10^-2 to 10^-3 Torr, for just making a plasma its okay, but for a plasma 'experiment' you want to evacuate enough neutrals as not to interfere with your reactions. So 10^-6Torr would be a good place to start. Turbo-pumps (turbine pumps) are fairly inexpensive but some controllers are prone to suffer around electrical noise and the turbine cannot handle high pressure surges. Cryo-pumps on the other hand, require a compressor and work by cryogenically freezing neutral particles to a sub-strait. Those are more robust but costlier.

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
28
Followers
1
Author:christensent