Step 7: Fire It Up (and cross your fingers)

Capture.JPG
Time to turn it on (don't forget to cover any viewports/cameras with lead! Also x-rays can pour out of ceramic feedthroughs so point them away from people. It is a good idea to be monitoring for x-rays where any people are present). The basic procedure is:

-Turn on the roughing pump and wait for sufficient backing pressure, turn on the diffusion or turbo pump and wait for it to fully warm up or achieve running speed
-Throttle the chamber back (with the valve between the diffusion/turbo pump and the chamber)
-Ever so slightly open the needle valve to the deuterium tank
-Turn up the high voltage until either plasma establishes on the camera, or you've reached 40kv and nothing has happened (don't forget, you only get one chance in your life to screw up with voltages of this degree)
-If nothing has happened, keep admitting more gas and the pressure should keep going up. Plasma should form around 40kv at about 10-15 microns of deuterium.

If all goes well, you should see on your camera the image below, and you should be detecting neutrons at this point.

Operation is quite a balancing act, since the voltage is controlled by both the power supply, but also by Paschen's Curve and Ohm's Law relating to the pressure in the chamber. Great patience is required to "Get the hang of it", but after doing so it becomes quite simple to run. Operation can be aided by an ion-gun which will not be discussed in this article.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up
crash landing says: Dec 26, 2010. 5:19 PM
any chance your next project could be a table top model of the hadron collider? I started on mine but my wife wanted her washing machine back so the project is on hold for the moment.
crash landing in reply to agm88Nov 21, 2012. 12:18 PM
I was just looking for something to do in my retirement
munkey906 in reply to crash landingJul 17, 2011. 11:23 AM
oooo yes... table top hadron collider, that would be sweet!
Higgs Boson in reply to munkey906Aug 14, 2012. 10:33 AM
While that would be very cool, The LHC uses a bunch of pipe shaped superconducting magnets, and these would just not scale down well. The smallest cyclotrons consist of two hollow D shaped electrodes in a vacuum chamber oscillating between positive and negative charges within a very powerful magnetic field. They could maybe fit on a very large and sturdy table but for anything tabletop sized you would need a lower energy linear accelerator.
crash landing in reply to Higgs BosonAug 14, 2012. 12:05 PM
I have been working on a variation of the bitsco fignut separator. As you are well aware, this is the integral part of a bowling machine. I currently use it to rotate the stiltson fluid in the turn indicators on my wifes 1937 Packard. The replacement lenses,now being amber, have altered the color spectrum. Do you have any suggestions?
Higgs Boson in reply to crash landingNov 19, 2012. 8:21 PM
Nothing you just said makes any sense at all.
crash landing in reply to Higgs BosonNov 20, 2012. 7:06 AM
I had the same thoughts listening to the republican convention...
Higgs Boson in reply to crash landingNov 20, 2012. 3:24 PM
That's funny.
Nuclear_Ninja says: Jul 16, 2011. 10:19 AM
Nice Project I would like to give it a try myself. What inspired you to build this?
Can you give me an estimated cost to build what you did?
Also do you have to TIG weld the parts or can another type of welding work?
One last question what type of shielding other than the lead did you use?
christensent (author) in reply to Nuclear_NinjaJul 16, 2011. 11:14 AM
I was just looking for a science project online, found it, and it sparked my interest. I spent about $6000 on it, but it could be done for less with better planning. Yes, the parts need to be TIG welded. Other forms of welding are not completely vacuum tight. I used only lead. While it is possible to shield neutrons, it is extremely expensive and bulky, and isn't really necessary for the neutron levels produced by this device.
AlbinoMoose308 in reply to christensentFeb 28, 2013. 10:28 AM
$6,000?!?! That's half my upcoming mars mission budget!
(I'm planning the launch for ~2015)
Nuclear_Ninja in reply to christensentJul 16, 2011. 12:53 PM
on what scale are you talking like what counts were you getting off the neutron detector?
and thank you for the information
christensent (author) in reply to Nuclear_NinjaJul 17, 2011. 4:08 PM
At peak run a typical home built reactor will make one to two million neutrons per second. This may sound like a lot, but it is very few from a biological hazard. You could stand a few feet from it for days with effectively no risk.
Nuclear_Ninja in reply to christensentJul 17, 2011. 6:15 PM
Ok what are you currently using your neutrons for or are you just running it for the sake of running it? and if you dont mind me asking are you in college if so what degree are you working on
christensent (author) in reply to Nuclear_NinjaJul 17, 2011. 7:16 PM
I was pretty much running it for the sake of building it, tweaking it, and having fun with it... It is possible for it to be used as a useful neutron source for experimentation, however I lacked sufficient equipment to do that stuff. I no longer run it since I am not at home. I built this in high school, and am now at college at MIT studying electrical engineering and physics.
Nuclear_Ninja in reply to christensentJul 18, 2011. 4:45 AM
ok and congrats on the MIT thing I an studying nuclear engineering at nc state. hints at my intrest in a reactor. thank you for all the information. If I end up building one of my own I will post pics.
Once again thank you for the info
burpreynolds says: Jan 2, 2011. 8:06 PM
Who are you?
christensent (author) in reply to burpreynoldsJan 2, 2011. 9:07 PM
A college freshman... I'm not about to post my biography on here
agm88 in reply to christensentNov 21, 2012. 11:53 AM
freshman in college dude your flipin smart
love the instructable even thogh i cant build it
thalass in reply to christensentJan 5, 2011. 11:22 AM
You're an absolute champion, that's who you are. Now i just need a Mr Fusion to power my electric car...
Cobalt59 in reply to thalassJan 27, 2011. 2:54 PM
Obviously you've seen back to the future.
aliampolizzi in reply to Cobalt59Jul 26, 2012. 6:37 PM
Was that really necessary to point out?
pwnag3 says: Apr 19, 2012. 1:01 PM
Would Hydrogen obtained via electrolysis work in this?
christensent (author) in reply to pwnag3Apr 19, 2012. 1:29 PM
Only if you do it on heavy water thus getting deuterium instead of hydrogen.
A good name says: May 6, 2011. 6:59 PM
My particle physics are a bit hazy, isn't it currently impossible to run a fusion reactor without incinerating everything within a two mile radius?
wberry in reply to A good nameJun 5, 2011. 7:11 PM
no you can do it, they did it over about a 30 year period, but they never could get it to sustain the reaction on its own, and you can fuse nuclei at room temperature, the controversy is simply how its done, nobody in the US patent office will listen, and so they proclaim it bs when its legit
kaitheninja in reply to A good nameMay 18, 2011. 1:05 PM
Yep, Is where too atoms fuse, i think its hydrogen, and produce energy, its only been done once by man, and that was for like 0.000000001 of a second!
wberry in reply to kaitheninjaJun 5, 2011. 7:12 PM
nope, they got it to work with the bombs, they just cant find a practical way to get it to fuse and become self sustaiend
A good name in reply to wberryJun 5, 2011. 8:21 PM
I can tell you one thing, it doesn't work with bombs. It occurs in bombs as a byproduct, but the energy is produced via fission.
squiggy2 in reply to A good nameJul 16, 2011. 5:00 PM
actually the fusion mentioned for bombs is the "H-Bomb". It uses nuclear fission so compress deuterium and tritium enough to fuse into helium, which in turn releases enough energy to split more uranium or plutonium, and repeats.

and as for fusion plants, actually it's been done a number of times.
The leading design so far is the tokamak type generator.
The record for the longest fusion reaction so far is 0.5 seconds, and produced 1997 produced 10mW of power (65% of the input).
United States, China, the European Union (EU), India, Japan, the Russian Federation, and South Korea. are currently building a new reactor which hopes to sustain a fusion reaction for several minutes.

This January, scientists in Italy produced a "cold fusion" nickel-hydrogen fusion reaction, which could turn out to be a very promising step forward
Lefrançois says: Jan 24, 2011. 8:57 AM
What is the usefulness?
christensent (author) in reply to LefrançoisJan 24, 2011. 10:01 AM
It is a neutron source which can be used in neutron activation experiments
echaa in reply to christensentMar 11, 2011. 7:39 PM
When you built it, did you intend for it to be anything other than a neutron source? Would it be possible to get power out of it, and to get more power output than input?
elih in reply to echaaMar 24, 2011. 12:51 AM
It is not yet possible to get more power out of a fusion reactor than it takes to run it. That would be a Nobel Prize discovery haha.
vincent7520 says: Mar 12, 2011. 3:38 PM
If I build one and press the switch,will be the Master of the World ?… or is it not worth the pain ?…
Whales says: Jan 28, 2011. 5:31 PM
Is there a way you can record a video about this? not like a replacment for this, just of this thing working and a few other things. Just so i know for sures your not trying to get me on a terrorist watchlist
christensent (author) in reply to WhalesJan 28, 2011. 6:11 PM
Not sure what it has to do with YOU getting on a terrorist watchlist, but here are two videos:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XN8OCYwZ_7w
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFE6AukCB8I
mario59 says: Jan 3, 2011. 3:09 AM
Hi christensent ! ! !
but... what a *BAD* LAST SHOT you did for such demanding homebuilt project!
You did lots of detailed photos... but the last one, which should be the "cake's cherry atop" if the really worst one ! ! !
If I could make ask you, could you post (one o even more) better shots of the running chamber? Mayb also the neutron counter running, would be nice to see!
Anyway CONGRATULATIONS ! ! !
christensent (author) in reply to mario59Jan 3, 2011. 6:38 AM
The reason is at high power levels, all I put on the viewport is a cheap webcam because my nice cameras could be damaged by x-rays (dead pixels formed, etc).

A demonstration of my neutron counting system can be seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XN8OCYwZ_7w
MKD says: Jan 2, 2011. 11:38 PM
What an interesting project. What is the practical end of this? Is this more of a back yard science experiment or does it have an application? Forgive my ignorance on this topic; I presume that this project is fundamental for other more elaborate constructions.
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!