loading

Experimental High Power Rocketry is an extreme sport which offers makers a variety of opportunities to utilize their skills, obtain new skills, and explore...well, rocket science! In this Instructable I will introduce one method of making nozzles for Experimental High Power Rocket motors. I will also show a bit about the construction of the motor itself. The attached images of an in-flight rocket are the results of flying with a custom made nozzle following the steps I will outline. That rocket, it's motor including the nozzle, it's propellant, and all of the constituent parts other than the electronics were 100% made from scratch.

Disclaimer and Plea

As I outlined in my previous Instructable on characterizing rocket propellant, High Power Rocketry is dangerous. In some places it is illegal. Please DO NOT experiment with High Power rocketry without first following all applicable laws and safety practices! If you intend to produce your own rocket motors, first join the Tripoli Rocketry Association and obtain your level 2 certification. Then and only then will you be able to fly experimental motors at Tripoli insured launches. Work with others that have experience in this hobby. You will find most are happy to mentor and guide you through this exciting part of hobby rocketry. Understand that safety reigns supreme! Your accident can endanger the entire hobby! All bad publicity for the sport puts it in constant jeopardy, potentially cutting off millions from the hobby they love, and the education they need to become aerospace leaders of the future. Our local school rocketry programs depend upon volunteers from NAR and Tripoli, whose sport depends upon the good will of the community and authorities having jurisdiction. Land owners willing to support our hobby are difficult to find. It is imperative that we retain a high safety record.

With that said, be advised that I will not disclose any propellant formulas in this Instructable. If you can prove a level-2 Tripoli certification and association with other experimental rocketry enthusiasts, you will have access to the necessary formulas, or you can contact me and I can point you to forums where such formulas are disclosed to certified members.

Not everything has to be made...

It is also important to note that while I will provide details on making rocket nozzles, as with all other aspects of High Power, Mid Power, and Model Rocketry, the components can be purchased by many reputable and committed vendors. If you are new to rocketry, don't start by making nozzles, or your own propellant! Start by working with a local club, and buying kits and parts from vendors. If you don't have access to all of the tools needed, many of the vendors will custom make parts such as nozzles to your specifications. Prior to making my own nozzles, I have purchased several from Tru-Core. I also have one or more nozzles from Gorilla Rocket Motors provided by another vendor.

Step 1: Raw Materials...

Most High Power Rocket Nozzles are made from graphite. Graphite is an excellent material for nozzles for many reasons. Graphite rods come in many sizes and densities. I recommend purchasing lower density graphite to learn on! Then, when you are confident in the machining process, step up to higher quality graphite.

Becker Graphite

The nozzle shown in the in-flight photos was made from a 2.75" diameter JC3 graphite rod obtained from Becker Graphite. At the time I purchased it, 24 inches of 2.75" diameter JC3 graphite rod cost $88 with shipping. This will make several 75mm nozzles.

Graphite Store

Another excellent source of graphite or nozzles is the Graphite Store. Medium density graphite will work fine for learning to build nozzles and can even be used for a few flights and for test motors. Step up to the superfine isomolded graphite rods for longer lasting production nozzles. Graphite is subject to erosion. The better the graphite you use, the less erosion you are likely to see.

Selecting the size

When selecting a diameter I recommend that you find the one closest to the inside diameter of your motor tube. For a 75mm motor, 2.75" diameter is the best. 3" diameter may be less expensive in some cases, but you will have to do more work to cut it down to size. For 54mm motors, you will likely have to start with 2" diameter rods.

If you have successfully used other materials for multiple-use nozzles, please comment on your experiences.

Caveat

One additional note about working with graphite: Graphite is messy. You'll notice the latex gloves I wear in the photos. It saves a lot of scrubbing! A good, strong shop vacuum is mandatory for working with graphite. Always position it so that as much of the dust as possible is immediately sucked away. Use a vacuum bag designed to catch fine particles. Remember that graphite also conducts electricity! If you allow the dust to collect inside the motor of your lathe, you may short it out! From personal experience I can warn you that it will cling to everything if not vacuumed away as it is cut. It will stick to your shoes! Your wife will not appreciate you dragging it into the house!!!

Step 2: Required Tools - Hardware...

A lathe is required for making rocket nozzles. You can get by without a lot of the tools I will use, but not without a lathe. I own two lathes, but because of the mess made by graphite, I only use the cheap Harbor Freight 7 x 10 mini-lathe for making rocket nozzles. Despite what you may have heard or read in forums, a 7 x 10 mini lathe is perfectly adequate for making nozzles for 75mm motors. Obviously smaller nozzles, such as those for 54mm and 38mm are even easier on a small lathe.

The 7 x 10 lathe chucks will open just wide enough to grip a 2.75" diameter graphite rod. If the rod is only a few inches long (e.g. 3" long) the 7 x 10 works great.

If you are working with 98mm motors or even with 3" rods for 75mm nozzles you may need a larger lathe, or you can use a jig to hold the graphite. (e.g. A smaller diameter rod of aluminum or steel with a center hole through which a bolt can extend through it and through the graphite rod to hold it tight. The smaller diameter rod is held in the chuck jaws.) This will require you to mark and drill a hole through the center of the graphite rod. A drill press will be required, along with a drill bit long enough to go all the way through the blank.

While it not necessary to have a larger lathe, it will make some things easier. Though I use my 7 x 10 for making nozzles, I always drill out the throat (the entire core through the center of the rod) on the larger lathe. It is easier than using the drill press for nozzles too large to be drilled on the 7 x 10.

Other required tools:

  1. Drill bits
    • Nozzles throats are usually measured 1/64". Select a set of bits that covers the full range you may need to drill, and which are long enough to cut through the length of the nozzle if possible. I spent just under $120 for a 32 piece set of Silver & Deming drill bits on e-Bay, ranging from 38/64" to 1". These have a 1/2" shank for use in the chuck on my larger lathe.
  2. Cone Cutters or boring bars
    • In the next step I will include a video on how to make the custom cone cutters. Without these or commercial end-mills, the cones will need to be cut with a boring bar and the lathe set to cut at the proper angle (which is far more time consuming.)
  3. Parting Tool
    • The parting tool is especially useful for cutting o-ring grooves.
  4. Band saw or hack saw
    • A band saw (metal cutting) is ideal for cutting the graphite rods. A hacksaw could be used instead.
  5. Drill Press
    • A Drill Press may be required depending on the size of the lathe used.
  6. Measuring tools
    • Calipers and other measuring tools are a must
  7. Masking tape
    • This will be helpful in marking cutters to obtain the proper depths
  8. Turning Tools
    • Turning tools will reduce the outside diameter or the graphite rod to the proper size and will be used to face the ends.
  9. A powerful shop vac
    • Mine is a 14 gallon, 6.0 HP peak RIGID vacuum with the best available dust collection bag.

Step 3: Custom Cone Cutters...

As seen in the previous step, I made custom cutters to cut the divergent cone and convergent cone of the nozzles. The convergent cone cutter cuts a 45 degree half-angle and the divergent cone cutter cuts a 15 degree half-angle.

Commercial end mills are available for this purpose too, and they will cut much faster than the custom made cutters, but they are very expensive and come in a variety of sizes. It is difficult to find one that can produce the full range of exit diameters needed or that end in a fine point. If you have a better source please leave a comment!

This video will demonstrate how my custom made cutters were made. It shows the 15 degree half-angle cutter, but the process is identical to that used for the 45 degree half-angle cutter -- with the exception that I used a 1/2" shank on the 45 degree cutter and a 1" shank on the 15 degree cutter.

Step 4: Designing the Nozzle - Prerequisites...

Propellant Characteristics

In order to design an optimal nozzle there are certain pieces of information that are necessary. First details of the propellant to be used must be known. This includes its theoretical "Specific Heat" and density. The propellant will have to have been previously characterized in order to obtain average ISP, Burn Rate Coefficient, and Burn Rate Exponent. For more information on characterizing rocket motors and capturing and processing data from test burns please see my Instructable on that topic. That data is used by BurnSim to design a flight motor. The Specific Heat of "Chamber CP/CV" of the formula is also needed to design a nozzle.

Motor Design

In addition to propellant characteristics, a motor must be planned and designed. BurnSim is the author's tool of choice for designing a rocket motor. Once propellant characteristics are entered, the number of propellant grains can be entered along with the core size (and shape). To calculate the expected initial and maximum Kn and pressure of the motor BurnSim needs to know the Nozzle throat diameter. You use Burnsim, and adjust throat diameters until your motor will function as desired. The most important issue is the maximum case pressure (Max Pc). Exceeding the pressure capabilities of your hardware will result in a CATO (catastrophic failure of the motor, a.k.a. an explosion). The nozzle throat diameter, along with the amount of burn surface area in the grain design will have the biggest affect on pressure. Some propellants burn faster than others, and some with higher pressure sensitivity. Almost all APCP propellants burn faster under higher pressure, and this in turn can lead to out of control pressure.

Though this is a somewhat controversial topic, the author prefers to keep pressure well under 1000 PSI. Others will say that less than 1000 PSI is a waste. Due to the possibility of erosive burning (which further increases surface area and pressure), and the highly pressure sensitive nature of most APCP propellants, I prefer to reduce the risk of a CATO by keeping pressure closer to the 600 to 700 PSI range, with some variations depending on the propellant used. My hardware for 75mm motors does not use snap rings and could theoretically handle much higher pressures, but I find that I get suitable performance for my targeted altitudes running at lower pressures. Note that our testing has shown that with 54mm hardware, snap rings are prone to failure when pressure exceeds 1200 PSI.

It is also important to have sufficient pressure for the motor to start and run without chuffing. Characterization of the propellant will help to identify the minimum Kn required for the motor to start without chuffing. Generally speaking, propellants with a small percentage of lampblack or other char added have proven to start more readily at lower pressures. Also formulas containing copper compounds tend to start easily but they burn rapidly and tend to be more pressure sensitive.

Collecting Data

With all of this in mind, design your motor in BurnSim. (See the attached photos for details on the motor used for the in-flight photos shown on the Intro page.) The following information from Burnsim will be needed to calculate the nozzle:

  • * Max Case Pressure (Pc) called - Max Pc in BurnSim
  • * Atmospheric Pressure (Pe) or use 14.7 PSI - called Ambient PSI in BurnSim
  • * Nozzle Throat Diameter - labeled Nozzle Throat Dia in BurnSum
  • --Note that BurnSim can also calculate the "best" Exit Diameter but details of that calculation are not provided.

In addition to this information from BurnSim, the following information from the propellant formula is needed:

  • * Specific Heat (k), called Chamber CP/CV in ProPEP 3

ProPEP 3 can calculate the Specific Heat based on the formula. The attached images show this information from ProPEP 3. You will notice that the formula is blocked out for purposes outlined in the introduction.

Step 5: Designing the Nozzle...

The Theory

With the information obtained in the last step you are now ready to calculate the dimensions of your nozzle! For details on the science behind how the nozzle works and how these calculations are made I recommend reading Chapter 3 of the 8th Edition of Rocket Propulsion Elements by George P. Sutton and Oscar Biblarz.

The Pragmatic Approach

For the sake of simplicity, and because I am no math or physics genius I will forego a detailed discussion of the math involved in designing your nozzle. Instead note that a formula is used to calculate the optimal nozzle for a rocket that will operate under 10,000 feet above ground level. The results of this formula will allow us to derive the nozzle's exit diameter. Given the diameter of the throat from the previous step, the exit diameter, and the angle of the cone we can determine the length of divergent cone and where it intersects with the nozzle throat.

Similarly, given the diameter of the nozzle, the width of the shoulder which determines the inside diameter of the convergent cone, and the diameter of the throat we can determine the depth (or length) of the convergent cone as well as the point where it intersects with the throat.

These two lengths (or depths) added to the desired depth of the throat will give us the overall length of the graphite rod we will use to make the nozzle.

Note that the throat depth ideal is kept to a minimum. Most commercially available nozzles will have some depth to the throat. You will likely find as you machine nozzles that having some room allocated to the throat alone will cover any mistakes in cutting the divergent or convergent cones slightly too deep. Otherwise you may end up expanding the throat diameter.

Most nozzles have a divergent cone with a approximately a 15 degree half-angle. Most also have a convergent (or entrance) cone with either a 45 degree half-angle or a 60 degree half-angle. The 60 degree half-angle cone is shallower and is used to keep the overall length of the nozzle shorter. When I make nozzles though, I stick with 15 degrees for the divergent cone and 45 degrees for the convergent cone because as you've already seen, I've made cutters for these two half-angles.

The Nozzle Designer App

Rather than explain and require you to work out all of the math behind the nozzle design, I've written a program for designing nozzles. It is available on the Windows 10 Store at the following URL:

https://www.microsoft.com/store/apps/9NBLGGH68GFZ. This app will work on all Windows 10 devices. It will allow you to enter all of the parameters we've discussed and will calculate the dimensions of your nozzle. You can then print those dimensions out and machine your nozzle, or send it to a machinist such as Ed Romani at Tru-Core to have a custom nozzle made.

The Alternative

If you do not have access to Windows 10 device (e.g. desktop, phone, or tablet), borrow one or upgrade! Alternatively, I have attached a spreadsheet produced by my friend and mentor in all things Rocketry, Raymond Kinsel. This is the spreadsheet that I used to make the nozzle shown in the in-flight photos. I made the Windows 10 universal app only in preparation for this article. I selected Windows 10, because as a programmer I had not yet written a Windows 10 Universal App in C++. At some future point I may back port this to Windows 8 or even to OS X or iOS, but for now this is it! Producing an App, regardless of the platform takes a substantial amount of work, no matter how simple the application. There are always gotchas with UIs, always. Printing under Windows 10 is not as straightforward or simple as it should be -- or as it is with Win32 GDI printing, because it seems to be designed to print screen content without knowledge of device characteristics such as DPI. Of course, that will likely improve in time -- or else my knowledge of how it is supposed to work will improve and so someday I may even be able to produce one-to-one drawings in the printouts.

Step 6: Cutting the Blank...

With all of the measurements needed in hand it is time to cut the blank. For this I use a metal cutting bandsaw which allows me to clamp the graphite rod in place to make the cut. The blank should be slightly longer than the "Overall Length" determined by the High Power Rocket Nozzle Designer app. This will allow some excess material to be removed while facing the ends.

Step 7: Facing and Turning...

The next step is to secure the blank in the lathe chucks, face each end, and then turn down the outside until it is the correct diameter. The video attached to this step attempts to speed up the playback a bit and shows facing and turning of a 75mm nozzle. (My apologies for the wobble in the first minute.)

After turning down the outside diameter, turn one end to make the shoulder that will fit into the liner tube.

Step 8: Cutting O-ring Grooves...

This step as with the remaining steps do not need to occur in any certain order, but it is a good idea to cut your O-ring grooves before investing a lot of other work. Why? If you cut too deep and have no space for additional grooves you have to start over at the beginning. And it is very easy to cut the grooves too deep.

The grooves must be deep enough that the nozzle with the rings can slide into the motor tube with effort, but not so deep that the nozzle moves freely. The rings need to form a seal between the nozzle and the motor tube.

A parting tool usually works well for cutting grooves. Use calipers on a commercial nozzle to get an idea of what is needed for your nozzle. If you don't have a commercial nozzle, buy or barrow one -- or simply experiment until you get good fit. Each groove should be wide enough for the o-ring to fit inside, no wider, and about half of the width of the ring deep -- maybe more depending on your motor tubes and the O-rings you select.

If you go too deep on one and have enough space left, add another one or two grooves. In the 75mm nozzle I made for the flight shown in the video, I cut the second groove too deep and so added a third. A 54mm nozzle or smaller usually only has one groove.

After cutting the grooves, use a file to lightly round the edges of the cuts. This is not shown in the video.

Step 9: Drilling the Nozzle Throat

Using the lathe and a center drill bit, mark the center of the nozzle with a pilot hole. If you have a large enough lathe to hold the nozzle and the drill bit and chuck simply drill through the entire length with the bit that is the same as the desired throat diameter.

If you don't have a large enough lathe, use a drill press to drill all the way through the nozzle blank using the pilot hole as a guide.

In the video I am using a larger lathe for this task.

Step 10: Cut the Divergent Cone...

Cutting the divergent cone can be a very time consuming task. You can use a boring bar with the lathe's compound angle set to the appropriate half-angle, or you can use an end-mill with the correct half-angle, or you can make a tool like that shown in the video which will cut the cone at the correct angle.

The most expensive and fastest cutting tool will be the end mill, but it is difficult to find these large enough for 75mm and up nozzles.

If you make a tool like that shown in the video, go slow. The tool cuts quickly through medium density graphite, but slowly through higher density material. In the video you will see at least once where the lathe stopped because I pushed it too hard and had to shut it off and restart it.

A piece of masking tape is showing in the video to mark the stopping point. Not shown in the video was the need to run a piece of sand paper briefly though the cone to smooth it slightly. There is some initial chatter in the video as the cutting starts, but that subsides quickly.

Step 11: Cut the Convergent Cone...

Cutting the convergent cone is almost identical to the process of cutting the exit or divergent cone. The same types of tools can be used. The video will show this being done (partial-speed-up and partially cut) using a homemade cutting tool with a 45 degree half-angle.

The cut is made until only the "Shoulder Width" remains.

It is a good idea to use sandpaper to round the edges between the convergent cone and the throat as well as the that of the divergent cone and the throat. If you did not allow for a "throat depth" be careful not to increase the throat diameter while rounding or cutting the cones.

Step 12: The Final Product

You can use some 600, 800, or finer sandpaper to polish the nozzle gently while turning it in the lathe. After this the nozzle is complete. Double check the fit in the motor tube and if necessary *carefully* deepen the O-ring grooves.

The photos attached to this step show the nozzle that is now complete as well as how it is used to measure the liner tube and the motor tube. An inside view of the motor is provided as well.

Step 13: Flight...

Though the remaining details of building a motor are beyond the scope of this Instructable, I've added this step to show photos of the flight that utilized this nozzle that was made for this article.

Enjoy, and please always practice safety in all rocketry and making endeavors!

<p>I have found a cheaper, easier and a whole lot cleaner way of making these nozzles.</p><p>the forms can be made of wood or metal. As can be seen. They work just fine.</p>
<p>I know this is an old 'ible but for the benefit of those who haven't read it before...</p><p>Nozzles made with Durham's water putty work okay with &quot;sugar&quot; propellant and blackpowder. They do NOT work well with ammonium perchlorate composite propellant, especially if the propellant contains any metal as a fuel. Sugar propellants burn at about 3000F; APCP with aluminum, in excess of 5000F. And exhaust from APCP contains a lot of hydrogen chloride (hydrochloric acid= hydrogen chloride dissolved in water). You can imagine what 5000F hydrochloric acid does to almost anything...</p><p>FWIW I have attempted nozzles for APCP motors using water putty, plaster of paris, portland cement, clay (molded to shape and kiln-fired before use), graphite powder mixed with epoxy, and a number of other materials and mixtures. With APCP, fired clay erodes but not too badly if the propellant doesn't contain aluminum or magnesium. Graphite powder mixed with a resorcinol glue is about as good as commercial phenolic nozzles (e.g., Aerotech), though the glue shrinks a lot.</p><p>Bottom line: for APCP, machined graphite is far and away the material of choice.</p><p>Best regards -- Terry</p>
<p>Very interesting. I'd like to try this at some point possibly. Do you load your cardboard tubes into aluminum tubes with closures, or just use the putty for a forward closure and load the cardboard tube directly into your rocket?</p>
<p>Interesting. Are you using it with APCP or sugar propellants? And what size of motors? For example, the nozzle made in the Instructable can be reused time and time again and was designed for an L, M, or N motor.</p><p>Similarly, are your forms generic, or do you make the convergent length, exit diameter, and etc. according to the characterization of the propellant? If not, it will still work but isn't going to get the same results.</p><p>What are you using to make the entrance cone / convergent cone?</p><p>You should write an Instructable with details! :)</p>
<p>I have used both types of fuel plus a black powder fuel, of course all were not successful. the good part of this is You can make any design you like if You have a wood or metal lathe. the ones shown are 15 X 30 degree. No the motors are not reusable, the forms can be reused thousands of times. because of the simplicity and cost You can turn these motors out at a very fast rate.As shown the motors are made of durhams water putty, four holes are drilled 90 degrees apart into the motor casing at the junction of the divergent/convergent cones The casing shown is a cardboard tube with 1/4 inch walls and a 2 inch inside diameter. the putty is mixed with water and injected into the drilled holes using a baster or other type of injector and left overnight to set up. The next day the two halves of the form are pulled apart and there You have it. I don't know about You but I have an aversion to dust especially graphite dust.</p>
<p>Well, thanks for the feedback. I don't like graphite dust, but I also trust it and like the reusability. I'll stick with graphite.</p><p>Just curious, are you cutting o-ring grooves in the nozzles after removing from the forms?</p>
<p>I don't think You understand the concept. In the pics I show the cardboard tube with nozzle, THIS IS THE MOTOR. The nozzle does not come out of the cardboard tube. The nozzle is cast insitu. No need for any type of &quot;O&quot; ring. The fuel is then put into the cardboard tube which is the motor. The form is the two piece shape shown with 1/4 inch all thread rod holding them together. when water putty is set You unscrew the two parts and remove from motor casing. The nozzle stays in the casing. I have never had one blow out. I've had the casing split but never had a nozzle blow out of the casing. If You ever try this method I'm sure You would think twice about using graphite. Just saying.</p>
<p>No, I understand what you are doing, and I can see it working with pressed BP or Sugar propellant, but not with cast APCP grains, unless you have casting tubes that fit inside of your motor tubes. It that is the case, where to you find such thick tubes with matching casting tubes for APCP grains?</p><p>Are you putting your completed motor + nozzle tube into an aluminum casing with closures? If not how can you keep APCP from burning through?</p><p>For those not following or not familiar with Ex high power rocketry, notice the photos in the 2nd to last step of the article. Propellant grains made from a rubber base (R45) and Ammonium Perchlorate based propellants are cast into tubes that have a mandrel running through the center to form a core. The core, along with the separation of the grains increases the burning surface, producing more thrust (etc.) Because of this, the propellant is not pounded or poured into a motor tube. Doing so would not only require drilling out a core, but would also require cutting space between grains -- not easy. So the typical design is to have an outer liner which slightly overlaps the nozzle and a forward closure. The cast propellant grains fight snuggly inside the liner, and since they are cast in cardboard tubes they provide an extra layer of protection from burn through. The liner is greased and loaded into a 6061-T6 aluminum tube with enough thickness to handle all of the pressure produced by the motor with a very large safety factor. The nozzle is held in place, in part by the O-rings which are there to form a seal between the case and the nozzle, but more so by a closure of some type -- snap rings with a thrust washer on top, or a bolted-in ring. On the forward end, the forward closure must also have O-rings that form a seal and a closure to hold it in place and withstand all of the pressure inside the motor. (Otherwise the forward closure or nozzle would become a bullet.)</p>
<p>Whatever you do, if you build a homemade <br>rocket, make REAL sure it is balanced properly, with the Center of <br>Gravity over the Center of Pressure, or Force. I built one back some <br>decades ago when I was a teenager, and I thought I had a stable craft, <br>but I was wrong. After ignition, it went up about 50 feet, looped and <br>came back down and nearly hit me in the head, and then screamed off over<br> the neighborhood, lost. If I hadn't ducked when my friend Peter yelled,<br> the thing would have hit me for sure, as it left a smoke trail right <br>where my head was. </p><p>Here's some reading material on the subject:</p><p><a href="http://ryerson.ca/content/dam/aerospace/rocketcompetition/technicalguide/pdfs/Model%20Rocket%20Stability.pdf" rel="nofollow">Model Rocket Stability:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/VirtualAero/BottleRocket/airplane/rktstab.html" rel="nofollow">More, from Nasa:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/K-12/VirtualAero/BottleRocket/airplane/rktcg.html" rel="nofollow">Still more, CG:</a></p><p>So yeah, do your homework, or at least write <br>your own obituary before you launch. SAFETY FIRST! Also, check the local<br> laws- you may need a permit.</p>
For any who know the answer, would it be possible to increase velocity on an air/spud gun with one of these things? From the research I have done it seems like it would. Also, does the exact shape of the nozzle matter a whole ton? Or would it still work to simply constrict the airflow with a shape somewhat like this? <br>After all, it's not rocket science right? :-)
<p>As I said, first join Tripoli Rocketry Association and get at least a LEVEL 2 certification. They will NOT let you fly unless you can demonstrate that you know how to build a &quot;balanced&quot; rocket.</p><p>The rocket you see in the photos for this article weighed 30 pounds on the pad! If that came down on top of someone the results would be disastrous. Safety officers at sanctioned Tripoli and NAR launches will not let you fly if you can't show them that your rocket will be stable.</p>
<p>Try a barrier cream on your hands, the graphite washes off with soap easier than without. Don't wear gloves near a lathe. </p>
<p>Sorry I put the comment in wrong place.</p>
<p>I appreciate the comment and recommend it to others that will make nozzles, etc. Just because I wasn't worried about the thin latex glove being caught in the lathe doesn't mean that was smart or safe. Be safe!</p>
<p>Swiffer electrostatic type cloths will make cleanups a LOT easier and quicker. I used them to take care of toner powder spills, and it even removed the powder from my hands.</p>
<p>Its not like a jet engine that burns continuous. the burn (depending on size of motor) is only a short time, Besides as you pointed out having a core burning grain the burn is from inside out. Card board tubes with thick walls can be found on ebay or any seller of fireworks.. what I do to cast the grains is use pvc tubing of the appropriate size. in the case shown I have used 2 inch pvc. I put several raps of 20 pound paper inside the pvc pipe pour in the AP fuel after the fuel is cured the grain slides out easily. Remove the paper and now you have a grain that will fit snuggley into the cardboard tube. The wraps of paper act like a shim making the grain slightly smaller then 2 inches allowing a nice fit into the cardboard tube. </p>
<p>I don't build rocket motors, I was commenting about using electrostatic dusting cloths (&quot;Swiffer&quot; brand type) to remove graphite dust from one's hands, or anything else. I stumbled upon this when I had a laser toner cartridge spill the powdered toner inside the machine, and on my hands. The only cloth I could find in the office was a swiffer cloth that went to a floor duster, and it worked like a charm, absorbing all the dust and leaving my hands spotless. </p>
<p>There are rules for cutting slots for O rings, trial and error is not needed. The cut should be so deep, that the ring is compressed 15 to 20%. For this application where nothing is moving I recommend 20%.</p>
Thank you, that feedback is appreciated!
<p>Nicely done, Andrew!!!</p><p>The Prfesser ;-)</p>
<p>Great rocket project.</p>
<p>Thanks. Let me add a comment here that was pointed out to me elsewhere. Using gloves with a lathe can be dangerous. Make sure you know what you are doing. You will note that I used skin-tight latex gloves that wouldn't catch on anything and even if they did would immediately tear away.</p>
looks great I did not understand step 12 very well. What burn time and altitude did you get?
Great question. The altitude was IIRC 4980 feet of the Rocksim predicted ~5100 feet. For me that is closer than I usually get with EX or commercial motors. The burn time I could not measure during flight, but I suspect it matched what Burnsim predicted. Six single-grain test motors were used to obtain the a &amp; n and average ISP, so BurnSim had good data to work with I believe.

About This Instructable

36,496views

275favorites

License:

Bio: I've been writing software since I was in the 6th grade, and working with mostly-digital electronics since High School. These days my career consists ... More »
More by als_liahona:DIY 3D Printer Kits – Woes and Wonders Delta 3D Printer Heated Bed - Heavy Duty 3D Printed Funnels for Rocket Motor Propellant Casting 
Add instructable to: