Build a Whisky Still

Step 6Poison!

Poison!
Some myths:

  • It is a popular myth that illicitly-distilled booze makes you blind.

Wrong.

Methanol (wood alcohol) makes you blind. If you hear about people being blinded by illicit booze, they did not actually distil it, they made some sort of punch with denatured alcohol or antifreeze.

  • Some people say that illicit booze gives you a bad hangover.

Unfortunately, correct.

Neglecting to watch the temperature, or heating the wash too quickly, can result in concentration of higher-order forms of alcohol called fusel alcohols or fusel oils (because they look oily). A small amount of fusel alcohols are naturally present in whisky, and can give a spicy, hot or solvent-like flavour. If you get those flavours in a distilled spirit, watch out for a hangover. Be aware: Very high concentrations (usually caused by incompetent distillation) can cause acute illness, including headaches, nausea, vomiting, clinical depression, or coma. Such liquor may be referred to as rotgut.

If in doubt, you can always pour what you have made so far back into the vat and distil it again.

Some people distil the wash twice. They throw away the residue of the first batch, and put the spirits through again. Second distillations should be done more slowly, and greater care taken to watch the temperature, as the temperature of the vapours will change more quickly.

  • Home-made still tend to explode.

No, they don't. They are open systems, there is nowhere for pressure to build up.



Disclaimer:

I have not actually distilled alcohol for quite some time, and then I used proper glassware. I used to work in a lab with a license to distil one litre per year, and not for human consumption. Do not rely solely on this Instructable to inform your distilling activities - do some research of your own, check the local licensing laws, and remember to take it easy if you actually dare to drink the resultant liquor.

Take plenty of water with it, and do not even think about driving or operation hazardous machinery, even after a small snifter or two, since you will not know the exact amount of alcohol you have consumed.
« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
22 comments
Jul 26, 2010. 8:21 AMcanadachris says:
if anyone needs any information about how to make your own homemade alcohol safely, Id be glad to help out, my grandfather owns vineyards in leamington, Ontario Canada and we have been making wine and all sorts of spirits for over a decade, its a simple process and Id hate to see someone get ill because of mistakes that could have been easily avoided,
Jan 16, 2012. 1:48 AMloyalsidhu says:
Hi
please let me know the whole process & quantity ratio of sugar, water, yeast etc for 40 litre.

Mail at sirnava@gmail.com

Thanks
Jan 10, 2012. 5:46 PMoregonredneck says:
I would really love some advise and help. If you or anyone could contact me that would be awesome. I made my first run and have a finished product but need some help on the hydrometer and fermenting questions as well. thanks emccally83@msn.com
Mar 18, 2011. 5:02 AMgeorogers says:
I have a copper still it lacks a "worm",however I'd like to know how to make brew and distill a clear potable spirit.For my first run I'd like to keep the process as simple as possible.Thanks , George Rogers
Jan 13, 2011. 3:23 PMJyssa says:
I want to make a liquor out of the plums that grow in my backyard. I'm from NZ so it's perfectly legal to do it here, but I just don't know how!
Dec 3, 2010. 12:29 PMsnakeeyes101 says:
Hello,

When first using my still, how do I calibrate the amount of methanol that will come off before I reach the ethanol? Thanks for your help.
Aug 6, 2010. 11:17 PMBearcat_Welding says:
I'm a first time starter and im wanting to do Wines and Brandies, My wife and I love the great fruit flaviors in both. I'm going to be doing every bit of it at home and i would like to know what you would recommand from start to end and the process, what is the best things to use not only in fruit but materials.. I would like to use, of course grapes,razzbries, and maybe oranges. If you have any other suggestions on fruit, please let me know. If we need to do this at a more private setting let me know and we will set-up something with e-mails Thanks Bearcat
Oct 5, 2011. 4:20 PMJavin007 says:
Plums make an excellent whiskey.
Oct 12, 2010. 7:21 PMMT-LB says:
Hey and if its undrinkable you could always use it as grease cutter
Jul 26, 2010. 6:04 AMcanadachris says:
well I drank the stuff I made, its got a nice taste and a hell of a kick, making spirits is easy and completely safe as long as you do it right, i noticed though that most people use too many chemicals when making homemade wines, beer and alcohol, i tend to lean toward different approach example: most would argue to use a chemical to make sure your bottles dont explode after bottling, hmm... lets look at this a bit, camden in use with a few other products most high in sodium and the other forms being toxic in some sort of way, although minute still toxic, well my grand father always taught me to just freeze your batch for A COUPLE DAYS in 2 liter pop containers once thawed it will promote any debris left in it to drop so the wine can be racked and it will also kill any yeast left over wow thats a simple chemical free solution..... i guess theyll do anything to push a market for something most things are free and poeple still pay another tip... when making your mash crush up and use a third of tablet of non flavored tums per quart or liter this will lower your acidity for pennies too and gives it a shelf taste
Oct 14, 2009. 10:51 AMbrb112988 says:
i recentlly fallowed this and made one i dident use the same materialsbut it seemed to work good for me i dident drink the product i wouldnever trust myself enough for that so i dumped it into the gas tank fora 5 hourse snowblower with a bit of gas seemed to work pretty well ranjust like it had a ful tank of gas in it
Apr 8, 2008. 9:35 AMSergei- says:
MMMMM

This guy puts new meaning in choose your poison!
A lot of no no's in this, worked in a lab ay? As a lab technician or janitor?

You can get lots of methanol from realy anything you distill including just a simple wash of sugar-water-yeast.

People going blind from a punch mmmm better stay away from wine champagne and beer.

Using a bed post as a column is a good idea if it's made from 304 or 316 foodgrade stainless steel or waterpipe copper tubing somehow i don't see that. You will get contaminents in your wash that will cause you harm in the long run from mostly anything else.

Things like using epoxy to seal up joints is bad you need to use lead free solder or silver solder for that.
It's lucky that you have never done any of this yourself or you might be writing this instructable in hospital.

If you realy want to build yourself a quick or complex still try this place for more info first http://homedistiller.org/
If you want to distill just small amounts glassware is the safest and most accurate way.

Serg
Jun 4, 2008. 8:32 PMDr_Stupid says:
It's not that people didn't read it properly, you simply didn't explain it properly.
Apr 8, 2008. 10:55 AMWarthaug says:
"(like the other people who think that yeast produces methanol in anything other than trace amounts)" I'm assuming this is a snide remark at my expense. I guess pointing out the biochemistry and science behind it was the wrong way to go. And here I thought it would resonate with someone who claims a scientific background. You can call it what you want - 'trace amounts' or whatever, it doesn't change the fact they are in there. I wont point out the irony that the whole idea behind distillation is to concentrate things that are present in trace amounts. In my average brandy run 3-5% of the total distillate is the sub-78C fraction, and most of that is methanol. Assuming 75% methanol in that fraciton, and assuming that the other 25% is non-toxic, including that fraction into the portion you drink that would be a high enough concentration that 1 servings (i.e. 1.5oz) would exceed what is considered a safe limit. You would hit a mildly toxic dose (i.e. possible blindness) around 6 servings in. For someone who claims to have the background you do, you're sure adamant about something which is both wrong, and a common/ widely reported problem in producing food-grade ethanol. The production of methanol during the fermentation process, and its concentration during distillation is the topic of a multitude of scientific and industrial reports. BTW, homedistiller.org is an excellent resource of home distilation, and I'd recommend it to anyone interested in the craft.
Apr 8, 2008. 12:11 PMWarthaug says:
"Poor quality home distilled spirit : methanol 0.0186%"

here's the full link, so everyone can see

As everyone can see, you're distorting what the webpage states. After a discussion of proper distillation techniques - incluiding throwing away the heads, they (correctly) point out that the methanol content will be minimal; even if you do a poor job. But that is with *throwing away the heads*, which is exactly what we've been saying you have to do all along.

But you're counseling people to not throw away the heads. If you do this the amounts of methanol are much, much higher.

For example, most wines have a methanol content of >0.1%; some fruit juices have methanol contents even higher then that - meaning, of course, if you distill them, and don't toss the heads, you'll concentrate them along with your ethanol. Even with grains you'll get methanol produced, although it'll be lower then fruit-based ferments.

As stated before, my personal experience with brandies is 3-5% of total distillate is methanol/other lower-boiling point compounds. I used to do a lot of sugar mashes, and even then I collected 1-2% the final volume of these lower temperature fractions.

"The lethal dose of methanol is at least 100 ml"

Firstly, that is out-and-out wrong. Methanol has an LD50 of ~1ml/kg, and since most of us aren't 100kg, you're toxic limit is way off.

Secondly, I never said anything about death. I specifically said "mild toxicity, i.e. possible blindness", not once did I say "death" or "lethal dose".

Blindness occurs at doses as low as 0.1ml/kg, and permanent eye damage occurs at doses about 1/5th of that. Meaning for me (at 65kg) I'd have to drink a meager 6.5ml of methanol to blind myself, and a minute 1.3ml to begin seeing minor damage to my eyes. That's not very much.

In the case of my Brandies, if I were to put those heads back in I'd have a methanol content of ~3%, meaning to get my 1.3ml worth (onset of eye damage) I'd have to drink a mere 43ml (1.45oz, just shy of 1 serving) to hit a point where damage is possible. 5 servings gets me upto 6.5ml; onset of blindness.

Lastly, there is a growing body of medical evidence that long-term exposure to minute amounts - parts per *billion* range - can have damaging effects of the neurological system, including the onset of a Parkinson's-like disease. Chronic higher doses have a large range of known effects - including, but not limited to - reproductive disorders, teratogenic effects, optic, liver, kidney, and heart damage.

But hey, its your life. If you'd rather continue on in your delusion, and poison yourself slowly, that's your business. But to falsely claim that there is no danger - when there is a well established danger - is just wrong.
Apr 8, 2008. 1:38 PMWarthaug says:
"Please point out where I say "do not throw away the heads"?" My bad, but you have repetitively commented that there is no risk of methanol poisoning, when there is. You specifically attributed methanol poisoning from moonshine to adulterants; which is also false. "First you recommend..." They're a great resource for how to distill properly, build a still, make a mash, etc. But I'll take the medical communities findings when it comes to toxological data. "According to the official MSDS" There is no such thing as an "official MSDS". MSDS's are produced by the manufacturing companies, and simply have to meet some rather weak standards. Take a look at Lilly's MSDS for methanol - they've got completely different LD50's listed compared to yours. And why use the rat standard, when the toxicity in humans is well established? its long been known us lowly primates are far more sensitive to methanol than are our rat brothers. My values - both the LD50, onset of blindness, and onset of optical damage, came from HUMAN data, published in "Medical Toxicology" by R.Dart, published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins in 2003. "Wikipedia agrees with those numbers" No, it don't. Direct quote, from your wikipedia link: "The usual fatal dose is 100–125 mL (4 fl oz)" That 1/5th of your "half liter". For myself thats 1.3ml/kg; just a hair higher than the 1ml/kg I quoted previously. And wikipedia does not state its an LD50, so we don't even know if the two values are comparable. Bryan
Apr 8, 2008. 12:04 PMSergei- says:
just read your new post about the methanol 0.0186%. You get more than that in a 25l wash of just sugar water and yeast just to make 4 liters of alcohol especialy if it's a pot still.
Apr 8, 2008. 12:15 PMWarthaug says:
'Then Warthaug's references are wrong." No, you mis-read what it was stating. The resource pointed out - correctly - that when the heads are disposed of the worst case scenario is a minute amount of methanol (0.0186%). You're telling people not to dispose of the heads - which is where the methanol is. That is plain wrong, and including those in the final product will greatly increase the methanol content.
Apr 8, 2008. 11:47 AMSergei- says:
I have been distilling for a few years now and have made a few stills from pot stills to offset head fractioning stills. I have a few gadgets and gizmows as well from this hobby one of them is a profession glass alcometer. When distilling pure spirits, i use sugar, water and yeast and thats all to make the wash. When collecting the pure ethanol it should be at the most about 95% when measured because you always get a little water with it and can't get a 100% perfect in a home distillation setup. When i don't take out the methanol it shoots up over 110%! Thats because the methanol weighs less than the methanol. I don't know about you but that seems a bit too much poison in my drinks for my liking. I might aswell go and buy metholated spirits and save the time and trouble of doing it the proper way. I think you should do a bit more research before doing an instructable that could do some harm to novices. I don't think anyone actualy said methanol is poison for your eyes! So the main point is it's better to tip some out than do unrepairable damage to them but a scientist would have known that unless your still in debate about it.
Apr 8, 2008. 12:27 PMSergei- says:
Looks like you need to brush up on the old goolge machine
I have one similar to this but better quality all glass no paper inside
http://www.hitimewine.net/istar.asp?a=6&id=777174!2338
Apr 8, 2008. 12:27 PMWarthaug says:
"Is an alcometer like an hydrometer or a Twadell meter*, but scaled in "proof"?" Depends. The cheap ones are just a hydrometer scaled to % alcohol in water. They do a descent job, but can be thrown off by the presence of other compounds (i.e. methanol) in the distillate. You can even use just a normal hydrometer, scaled in S.G. units, and calculate from there. I use a refractometer, which measures changes in a fluids reflective index. Its more accurate as its possible to differentiate between ethanol vs. other things dissolved in the mix.
Apr 8, 2008. 12:16 PMSergei- says:
Twadell meter? Are you talking about the alcometer ? Newbe hahahhhehehh thanks needed that. 1 piece of good advice build it rry it and find out since you haven't done it yet make one and see for yourself. And that debate thing was meant to be a joke eg scientists agrgue and debait over everything and anything. But you already knew that.
Oct 17, 2010. 9:26 AMyellowcatt says:
You may be interested in this edition of the Food Programme:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00pblv1

>>Sheila Dillon tastes her way through the long tradition of turning fruit into alcohol. She hears from eau de vie producers in the Alsace region of France and from cider brandy distillers in Somerset.<<

Apparently it is perfectly legal to own a still in the UK, it is just illegal to use one without a licence.
Apr 8, 2008. 11:55 AMSergei- says:
woops sorry meant to say methanol weighs less then ethanol. I wasn't talking about death i was talking about getting serious health issues like blindness from drinking something with that much methonal.
Apr 8, 2008. 9:40 AMSergei- says:
Oh 1 more thing i forgot to mention you don't need to pack your column unless you want fraction distill it for pure alcohol - if you want a simple whiskey still you are looking for a pot still, it keeps the aroma and flavoure of what you are distilling from.

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
790
Followers
141
Author:Kiteman(The Complete Kiteman Shop)
"Happiness is a shed full of power tools." If you need help around the site, or with a project, feel free to contact me.