3 Simple Ways to
Share What You Make

With Instructables you can share what you make with the world — and tap into an ever-growing community of creative experts.

PhotosPhotos

Share one or more photos of a project, recipe, or whatever you've made, quickly and easily.

Step by StepStep-By-Step

Share your step-by-step photos with text instructions of what you made so others can do it too!

VideoVideo

Share your how-to video. You'll need your embed code from a video site such as YouTube.

Build a foundry and sand-cast aluminum.

Step 8Destroying your aluminum cans.

Destroying your aluminum cans.
It is important to seperate the parts of the can, as they all produce different amounts of dross (trash in the metal which has to be removed), and should be melted at different points in each smelting.

The 3 sections which have to be seperated are the top, the sides, and the bottom of the can.

My favorite method for destroying the cans is illustrated in the pictures. Unfortunately, I can't get the image notes to work, so you'll have to read the procedure up here and follow along with the pictures below.

1. Cut or rip the can in half.
2. Make a slit in the top half, perpindicular to the lid.
3. Tear along the slit and pull the siding off of the can top.
4. Make a slit in the bottom half of the can, at an angle to the bottom.
5. Tear as close to the bottom as you can, and remove siding.

This goes much faster if you form a production line with some friends in which one person has one of the steps above assigned to him/her.

I sort the cans into boxes of halves, siding, tops, and bottoms, with the occasional box for cans with painted tops or bottoms.

Once you're done with your cans, it's time to ready your foundry.
« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
20 comments
Jun 18, 2011. 9:45 AMTimmyMiller says:
what if you just removed the paint from the cans?
Apr 20, 2009. 11:29 PMpfred2 says:
I just smash the cans and pack them into my crucible as they melt. I do get a lot of dross but cannot imagine how tearing cans apart changes that any. Cans are drossy because they have a lot of surface area so they have a lot of oxide on them to begin with. Now someone suggested to get a puddle of molten aluminum then plunge the cans into that in order to cut down on further oxidization. If you do that though the cans had better be 100% dry or it'll blow up in your face!
May 19, 2009. 8:49 PMjtobako says:
I'm sorry for the argument going on below. This is a much better instructable on the subject than others here. I'll shut up now : X
Apr 21, 2009. 4:40 AMjtobako says:
(removed by author or community request)
Apr 21, 2009. 8:13 PMpfred2 says:
Then they cannot be too wet. Water and extremely high temperatures usually don't mix too well. I have had it happen even with molten lead, which is half the temperature of molten aluminum.
Apr 22, 2009. 3:20 AMjtobako says:
(removed by author or community request)
May 18, 2009. 6:00 AMsharpstems says:
I am going to violate the "be nice" policy. This is a stupid and dangerous thing to say. Adding water to molten aluminum is extremely dangerous. -And very different than adding aluminum to wet greensand.

Anyone who knows anything about metal work - or elementary physics - can explain why -and explain why all of your examples are foolish. There is no need to debate the question here. Just because you havent gotten hurt yet dosen't mean you should tell amature metalcasters not to worry about adding water to their crucible.
Before you run your mouth off anymore, read "PREVENTING MOLTEN ALUMINUM-WATER EXPLOSIONS" at http://www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/aluminum/pdfs/explosions.pdf

Have a nice day.
Apr 22, 2009. 7:17 PMpfred2 says:
That must be why they never tried dumping water on the outside of steam engine cylinders. Don't you think? You want steam energy you have to confine it, then things get interesting. Water plunged under the surface of most molten metals becomes confined steam real fast.
Apr 23, 2009. 5:43 AMjtobako says:
(removed by author or community request)
May 18, 2009. 7:36 AMsharpstems says:
Good idea. A bad idea would be to replace the water with MOLTEN METAL (a thick liquid) And to replace the air hoses -around 120psi?- at 8bar which means it will expand about eight times ---- with water that expands sixteen-hundred times as it flashes into steam.

Why on earth would you compare sticking an air hose in a bucket of water -- to steam expansion in molton metal?

"be nice"
Apr 26, 2009. 8:33 PMpfred2 says:
Good luck to you. Liquid metal is hardly a bucket of water, nor is compressed air spontaneous steam. But whatever.
Apr 29, 2009. 1:16 AMjtobako says:
(removed by author or community request)
May 18, 2009. 6:08 AMsharpstems says:
No, we can't. However, I can post some information from people who actually know what they are talking about. This is from an Alcoa publication.

During casting operations, there is a risk of a sudden release of molten metal due to process upsets onto casting equipment, pit walls or the pit bottom where water accumulates. As molten aluminum contacts the water, a steam film forms on the surface of the metal. The steam film can destabilize as the molten aluminum contacts other surfaces in the pit. When this occurs, the water spontaneously transforms from a liquid to steam leading to a high pressure steam explosion. While these explosions are infrequent, the possible consequences are a major concern for safe aluminum casting.
Apr 21, 2009. 11:35 AMzimmemic25 says:
if you put water into liquid metal, it gets very hot very quickly. this produces very much steam very quickly. if it was enough water to get under some of the metal the steam can accellerate them like if they would explode.
Apr 22, 2009. 3:24 AMjtobako says:
(removed by author or community request)
Apr 22, 2009. 7:36 PMpfred2 says:
When water changes into steam it expands in volume 1,600 times. Do the math. It wouldn't take too many drops to throw your entire crucible into the air!

I wouldn't plunge anything into a puddle of molten aluminum that had a sweat of moisture on it, let alone actual liquid.

The puddle of metal is a seal. You can pop the top of your can and it won't make any difference at all. I can only guess that so far you have been lucky and have not trapped any steam in molten metal.

An epic steam explosion?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1883_eruption_of_Krakatoa
Apr 23, 2009. 5:52 AMjtobako says:
(removed by author or community request)
May 18, 2009. 6:55 AMsharpstems says:
Good point. How long does it take for a drop of water stuck to a piece of beer can to turn into steam when you submerge it in MOLTEN ALUMINUM....? It happens immediately--That's why pfred2 left it out of the equation. THere's not really a time delay And your equation "left out" how much time it takes for the average city to receive the equivalent energy of an atomic bomb from sunlight. --It's about a year. The whole point of that example is that IF the energy was released instantaneously (kind like water turning to steam)- THEN it WOULD be catastrophic. Yes, it's all a mater of scale. And that scale is 1600/1
May 18, 2009. 8:34 AMjtobako says:
(removed by author or community request)
May 18, 2009. 12:56 PMpfred2 says:
How much time do you think it takes to heat up an aluminum can at 1600F ? Darwin is waiting for you!

http://www.darwinawards.com/
May 18, 2009. 3:36 PMjtobako says:
(removed by author or community request)
May 19, 2009. 12:54 AMpfred2 says:
Is this how you always argue, by putting words into others mouths? Maybe it works with your friends but not with people like me. You do wish you lived in my world, but we have a minimum IQ requirement. OK then so just how much water is safe to plunge into molten aluminum? And if anyone is hurt by your sage advise just who are you exactly so that you can be held accountable? Backpedal faster, I am a busy individual. The simple fact is most of us have better things to do than count the dew drops in our beer cans.
May 19, 2009. 5:48 AMjtobako says:
(removed by author or community request)
May 19, 2009. 6:26 PMpfred2 says:
You can copy and paste, congratulations. Now where did I say (water sinks in a heavier liquid) I was discussing materials plunged into a puddle. Or (temperature change is instantaneous) it does not need to be. Or (where gas cannot escape a liquid)? Your words again! It escapes and can take molten metal with it, that is the problem. Where did I say from above? Your words not mine. I did not say any of those things. Maybe you should work on your reading comprehension skills? P.S. There are many different kinds of IQ tests. Apparently your only experience is with fake online tests. Real ones do not typically even involve text. Spooky huh? And no, you don't want to know how I know. It'd be more bad news for you. (something to do with me actually taking real IQ tests and my results I'm sure!) From here on in I am going to have to consider the source and ignore you. You have absolutely no credibility left. I'm sorry but that is just how it is.
May 19, 2009. 8:45 PMjtobako says:
(removed by author or community request)
May 27, 2009. 2:02 PMme835 says:
these are only answers to the questions that you pose above. How does the water get under the aluminum for the steam to push it upwards if it does not sink? the water is contained on bends and curves on your can pieces that are being pushed under the molten metal. How do you assume a buildup of gas pressure in a liquid without undue speed in temperature change? both aluminum and water have exceedingly high thermal conductivities, transferring heat very quickly. then, that expansion of water into steam generates a considerable amount of kinetic energy, which, according to a principle whose name i can't remember, is transfered by the fluid (steam) equally to the surrounding matter (aluminum). most of this energy passes through the aluminum into the crucible walls and bottom, but the upward energy from the steam will fling the aluminum upwards, although how much and how high will depend on the amount of moisture involved. again, I am only addressing the questions that you yourself posed.
May 27, 2009. 9:42 PMjtobako says:
(removed by author or community request)
May 27, 2009. 10:43 PMjtobako says:
(removed by author or community request)
May 27, 2009. 11:30 PMme835 says:
i didn't realize the 'steam jacket' thing, so thank you for pointing out something i didnt know before. however, i assume nothing even remotely close to this 'aluminum shell' concept you propose here. i know that that is impossible. i am not assuming an explosion in its truest sense, but more a high speed shove from the newly expanded steam. that's all. and, check out this link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steam_explosion

see the second paragraph, second and third sentences. it describes this perfectly. the rest of the article is semi-relevant as well.
May 29, 2009. 4:44 PMpfred2 says:
Two reasonable points of view are required for an argument so that is not going on here. Lacking an argument invalidates bickering. Happy now? It really is all about semantics isn't it?
May 27, 2009. 5:40 PMpfred2 says:
Thanks I lost the will.
May 22, 2009. 4:47 AMpfred2 says:
Proof that William Deresiewicz is right!
May 27, 2009. 9:42 PMjtobako says:
(removed by author or community request)
May 29, 2009. 5:03 PMpfred2 says:
how many standard deviations part us? The more you know the more you know that you don't know.
May 5, 2009. 1:35 PMcvandeve says:
I sometimes work with a small commercial aluminum smelter making 60lb ingots. If you get water in them, they will throw molten metal many feet. It is a lot hotter. If you throw an aluminum can into it, the can vaporizes before it hits the bottom. Always be careful around hot metal, it can set fires or melt stuff before you can react.

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
33
Followers
1
Author:Fenris The bbw