P1010090.JPG
Ever wanted to build a highly dangerous, inefficient, yet awesomely retro piece of electronics? Well, I have. That's pretty much what a tube amp is. Vacuum tubes are old electronic components that act like transistors, controlling a lot of current with a little current. You usually hear about tubes being used in guitar amplifiers, because they distort in a way that suits guitar playing. However, tubes can also be used to amplify a stereo signal from another audio source such as a CD or MP3 player. Tube amps, unfortunately, aren't the most practical things in the world; they consume a great deal of power, get very hot, and are big. That being said, they look damn cool, and some people seem to think they sound pretty nice, too.

You can learn a lot about electricity and electronics from a project such as this. Going through the process of purchasing parts, planning, and executing is a useful experience for any maker. Keep in mind that I am just a dude on the internet - take everything I say with a grain of salt. Except, of course, for these next few sentences. This project is dangerous in a very serious way. It involves high voltages and a lot of current that can make you feel decidedly unpleasant or even decidedly dead. If you decide to work on it with the power on, be careful. Some of the capacitors in this amp will hold onto a charge for a long while after the power has been switched off. Discharge all capacitors through a resistor connected to ground, preferably with a voltmeter across it to be absolutely sure the cap has completely discharged. When testing the amp out for the first time, use something like a twelve volt power brick instead of plugging directly into the wall, just to be safe, as well as to prevent things from exploding or melting. An old trick is to keep your left hand in your back pocket all the time, so if you do get shocked, it hopefully won't reach your heart.

Also, you'll need to know how to read a schematic, solder, and use a hand drill.

****UPDATE****: Kits are now available on my site!
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: First Things First: Tubes

BasicDiode.jpg
BasicTriode.jpg
BasicTetrode.jpg
BasicPentode.jpg
Quick Intro to Tubes

A project such as this one can teach you a lot of about electricity and electronics. In order to appreciate what more or less goes on in this amplifier, we need to take a look at how a few things work, and first up are the vacuum tubes themselves.

A vacuum tube is just a glass tube that's had all the air sucked out of it. A good example is the early lightbulb, inside of which a filament was subjected to a current which caused it to produce energy in the form of light and heat. If the interior of the lightbulb were not a vacuum, the filament would experience combustion due to the high temperature in the presence of oxygen and be destroyed.

The Diode

The most basic vacuum tube is a diode, so named because of the two electrodes which it contains. Vacuum tubes are said to be thermionic, meaning that heat is used to encourage the emission of electrons from an electrode. If a negatively charged electrode (as in it has an excess of electrons, in tubes it's called the cathode) is heated by a filament, the electrons in it become 'excited' and, if a sufficient electric potential difference or voltage is present, they will actually be emitted from the electrode. The potential difference is due to another electrode, called the anode or plate, which is positively charged and therefore exerts an attractive force on these enthusiastic little particles, causing them to whip across the vacuum from the negatively charged cathode. Since electric current flows from negative to positive and never the other way around, the current can only flow one way in a diode. However, this isn't much good for amplification, so let's move on to the next step in the vacuum tube hierarchy: the triode.

The Triode

In a triode, there is a third electrode in addition to the anode and the cathode, called the grid. The grid carries a negative voltage and is connected to an input source, which, in the case of this amp, is a fluctuating audio signal. The negative voltage on the grid repels a certain amount of the electrons leaping off of the cathode, and how many electrons it repels depends on how negative it is, which in turn depends on the amplitude of the audio signal. This is by definition amplification: using a small amount of electricity to control a large amount. The audio signal is quite small, and it is effectively controlling the flow of however many electrons we choose to saturate the cathode with. The base voltage of the grid, the voltage that is present whether there is a signal or not, is referred to as the bias voltage. The bias determines how much current the tube draws when there is no input signal.

The Tetrode

Add yet another electrode and you get a tetrode. This new electrode is called the screen or shield. Basically, the screen prevents the flow of electrons across the tube to be affected too much by the anode, and instead be totally controlled by the changes occurring in the grid. It has a smaller positive voltage than the anode. When the electrons initially break free from the cathode, they can only 'see' the screen, and so they rush towards it, and upon reaching it notice the anode and continue on towards that.

The Pentode

Now we come to the pentode. In a pentode there is, obviously, a fifth electrode that wasn't there before. This is the suppressor. The suppressor sits between the anode and the screen and is somewhat negative in charge. Its purpose is to make sure any electrons that might bounce off the anode don't escape for too long by repelling them back into it.

Note

Pentodes are not the end of the road when it comes to tubes, there are many other kinds, and if you're interested in them, check out the links step. There are two kinds of tubes used in this amp: triodes and tetrodes. The triodes are used in the preamplifier stage, where the audio signal is stepped up to a certain level suitable for further amplification by the tetrodes of the main amplifier.

Also, check out this fantastic old-fangled movie about tubes and how they are made:


1-40 of 129Next »
fender-electric-guitar says: Apr 6, 2012. 1:54 PM
nice job I was looking online for a push pull schematic this one is the one for me, the others online were using parts that all together costed <$500
thanks for posting,
John
p.s. when all said and done i will upload some pics of the amp
lloydrmc says: Mar 22, 2012. 1:15 AM
Sweet! Fantastic job! Well done, end to end.
robot797 says: Nov 27, 2011. 2:53 PM
AAA GOBBLE GOBBLE


me want that amp
to bad i cant order most of the parts (i am dutch)
and the shipping would be to expencive

somone help?
pfred2 says: Nov 27, 2011. 1:45 PM
Thank God for William Shockley that we don't have to play with infernal tubes for much today. Certainly not for audio amplification. Tube audio amplifiers belong in museums next to the stone knife and bear skin display!
lesizz says: Jul 7, 2011. 11:27 AM
Regarding tubes vs digital/solid state distortion discussion from early on in this forum:
Tubes certainly do distort the signals they amplify. But the two mediums distort the signal differetnly, and to many music lovers, the tube type of distortion is less offensive. For example, tube electronics generally produce more harmonic distortion than SS/digital. But, our ears themselves have harmonic distortion. The sound your brain percieves has some harmonic distortion produced by the ear drum and its likages. So, you could say that harmonic distortion is a sort of "natural" distortion and is less offensive than other types. Digital/SS electronics is good at throwing a lot of random hash into the signal. Think scraping fingernails on the blackboard. Not a musical or natural form of distortion.
MP3 is a whole other deal. These super-compressed audio flles mash the life out of music. (Never use the "MP" word around a self-respecting audiofile.)
wirving in reply to lesizzJul 9, 2011. 1:41 PM
It's not that simple! Harmonic distortion measurements typically are stated as "THD," or "Total Harmonic Distortion." What exactly IS harmonic distortion? It is called "harmonic" distortion because it is the addition - by the audio gear - of multiples or "harmonics" of the original fundamental tone. For example, an "A" of 220 Hz will be amplified as desired, but the amplifier will add its own artifacts or "distortion products" to the original, including the multiple of two - 440 Hz, the multiple of three - 660 Hz, four - 880 Hz, five - 1,100 Hz, six - 1,320 Hz, etc., etc. - all the way up to the limits of human hearing and beyond. Conventional tube and solid state amplifiers add greater or lesser amounts of harmonic distortion to any signal fed to them. Most people can tolerate higher amounts of distortion from tube amps because tube amps mostly add low-order, even harmonics. That is, the harmonic distortion consists almost entirely of second, fourth, sixth and eighth harmonics, which are musically related to the signal; they represent octaves and fifths above the original tone, which blend musically with the original tone. They make the original sound "richer," to many peoples' ears, even pleasing. On the other hand, solid state amps - besides the low-order even harmonics - add more of the higher-order odd harmonics; seventh, ninth, eleventh, thirteenths, fifteenths, etc. These are often NOT musically euphonious; they represent dissonant intervals of seconds, fourths and sevenths. And the higher in frequency they are, the more AUDIBLE they are. SO, a person may listen to a tube amp with 2% low-order even harmonic distortion and not be irritated by it - may not even notice it. But that same person listening to a solid state amp with 2% high-order odd harmonic distortion will be driven from the room holding his ears! Double-blind listening tests have shown that a wide cross-section of people can detect high-order odd harmonic distortion at MUCH lower levels than low-order even harmonic distortion. In fact, the difference is greater than TWO whole orders of magnitude! A factor of ONE HUNDRED! And with all respect, your statement, "Digital/SS electronics is good at throwing a lot of random hash into the signal" is mostly hogwash! Whatever "hash" there is is certainly NOT random. Well... MOST of it isn't. As I explained, "harmonic" distortion" is related to the signal in a very precise and mathematical way. Likewise, the other kind of distortion plaguing amplifiers, "inter-modulation distortion," is ALSO related to the signal in a very precise and mathematical way. The ONLY random thing (technically, even this is not mathematically truly random) is the white noise that all electronic equipment adds to any signal. This white noise is all around us; it is literally the background echo of the Big Bang, the very explosion that created the universe as we know it today. As for MP3's, your statements about those are also a bit misinformed. "Mash the life out of music"? What the hell does THAT mean? I would agree with you that "super-compressed" MP3's sound bad. But not all MP3's are "super-compressed." Most that one would buy online ARE highly compressed, with bit-rates typically 128 Kb/s to 192 Kb/s. But MP3's can be encoded up to 320 Kb/s. In controlled listening tests - on MOST musical material - even self-appointed "golden-eared audiophiles" can't reliably and consistently hear the difference between uncompressed audio and 320 Kb/s MP3's. I can hear the difference MOST of the time, but the difference is not that huge, not night-and-day - not even over a good audio system. Well-ripped and encoded MP3's CAN sound quite reasonably good except with the most critical program material that is particularly sensitive to digital compression artifacts. For example, classical music with lots of high percussion. Things like triangle, wood block, snare drum, xylophone, can display digital pre-echo very noticeably under some conditions. But at higher bit-rates, even this effect is usually unnoticeable except rarely. But I will give you that "super-compressed" MP3's (I've seen some music MP3's encoded at the abysmal 64 Kb/s) as well as typical Apple iTunes MP4's, are awful and for that reason, I don't buy stuff online very much. But there ARE places online that do sell decent quality MP3 downloads as well as lossless FLACs. Now, let's talk about digital electronics - specifically digital "class D" amplifiers. They introduce their own kinds of distortion, but most of them aren't "random hash" either. Like with all things human-made, some Class D amplifiers are well-designed and executed, others are not. They tend to get a bad name because they are used in things like cheap portable MP3 players and the like. Why are they used in cheap things like this? Because they are not only inexpensive to make, they consume very little power - an important consideration with battery-powered devices. Class D amplification is - by its nature - EXTREMELY efficient; for every 100 watts in, you get 95-97 watts out. I have listened to good class D equipment, built by dedicated DIYers who know what they are doing and use the very best quality components for their builds. These amps are VERY impressive, especially for their relatively (compared to comparable quality tube amps) low cost. Categorical and sweeping statements like yours are misleading at best, propagating even more mythology among the buying public than there already is. The bottom line is, LISTEN!! Regardless of what kind of media are being played, or what kind of electronics is in the box driving your loudspeakers, what SOUNDS good, IS good!
MolecularSandwich says: May 13, 2011. 11:15 AM
what was the total cost of this build?
MolecularSandwich says: May 12, 2011. 3:42 PM
what was the total cost of build?
onlinemastering says: Feb 27, 2011. 12:15 PM
Looks like a beautiful project, something, tubes/valves certainly have special something when it comes to sound I use a tube compressor myself.

SafeandSound Mastering
mastering
redstarsrbija says: Aug 10, 2009. 11:49 PM
wtf people! tube amps have NO quality loss when amplifying audio signals thats why there so great. digital amplifiers turn nicely rounded sound waves into nasty square-like sound waves, tube amps do not do this, the sound reproduction is perfect.
zvillesurfer in reply to redstarsrbijaDec 18, 2010. 10:46 PM
I don't think that's necessarily true. There may not be quality loss, but I do think the sound is modified, in a good way though. I understand the whole thing about digital amps turning perfect sine waves into square waves, but each little step is so small that it's impossible to hear. It's kind of like the difference between a digital photo and an analog film photo. Yes, technically the resolution of the digital photo is limited, while the analog photo is infinite, but digital photos can be taken at such a high resolution that you can't actually tell. And if the vacuum tube is superior because it recreates the sound perfectly, then there is absolutely no point in listening to an ipod or any other digital media through a tube amp. The vacuum tubes cant turn that digital sound back into analog sound. Also, there are amplifiers that are analog but are not tube. So why do people still insist that tubes sound better? I'm not arguing that tube amplifiers don't sound better. I'm just saying that they aren't perfect. In fact, I think it's the imperfections that make it great.
Xellers in reply to redstarsrbijaApr 25, 2010. 4:39 PM
Incorrect.
uberchoob in reply to XellersJun 8, 2010. 6:42 AM
I'm not gunna be dogmatic about it, but I think red is correct. Distortion and poor sound quality comes when tubes are overdriven. This doesn't usually happen with a quality stereo amp with plenty of headroom, but is intentionally done with guitar amps in order to achieve a specific sound.
Xellers in reply to uberchoobJun 8, 2010. 12:31 PM
There are many types of distortion - wave clipping is not the only kind. For example, if you look at any audio tube datasheet, you will notice a "THD" or "Total Harmonic Distortion" percentage listed as a property.
uberchoob in reply to XellersJun 8, 2010. 7:36 PM
Thanks for the info :D So is it that tube systems reproduce certain frequencies that digital typically does not and so its a tradeoff between different freq. reproduction profiles, or is it that some people just plain like the distortion that tubes produce in all their music?? I guess it could also have to do with the sampling rate required with digital compared to the more steady current produced from a tube system?
redstarsrbija in reply to redstarsrbijaAug 10, 2009. 11:52 PM
they're*
zebrahum says: Nov 10, 2010. 4:14 PM
Sorry if I missed it in the comments already, but I assume that I will need to use a preamp if I am to hook this up to a turntable. Is this accurate?
hiphopapotomas says: Oct 29, 2010. 7:12 PM
How much did this cost to make, along with how many hours did you put into it.
Thanks, Austin
thobson (author) in reply to hiphopapotomasOct 31, 2010. 4:35 PM
The cost was somewhere in the region of $250 - $400 all told. It took me about a weekend to make.

thanks for your interest!
radiorahim says: Jul 10, 2010. 10:58 AM
I have some questions about the power supply 1. Why does it need to be grounded to earth? 2. I noticed that the positive supply only uses 2 diodes. Why not 4? The negative Supply uses 4.
gato.chan says: Mar 28, 2010. 6:51 PM
Very nice job.  I'm looking into building a similar amp and have a question.  The schematic shows 2x 5965 tubes and 2x 6V6 tubes.  Where are the other 2 6V6 tubes used?
thobson (author) in reply to gato.chanMar 28, 2010. 7:12 PM
That's just one channel of the amplifier. What looks like a pair of 5965 tubes is actually a single tube - 5965's are double triodes. The two 6V6s are a differential pair that together amplify a single channel. So, each channel has one 5965 tube (which contains two triodes) and two 6V6s. I hope that helps!

thanks!
Xellers says: Feb 11, 2010. 6:55 PM
I know that this might seem like a fairly obvious question, but I just built a vacuum tube amplifier and my tubes' plates glow a slight red when the music is playing. Is this normal operation, or am I putting too much power through them? The particular tube that I am using is the 13EM7, thank you!
thobson (author) in reply to XellersFeb 11, 2010. 7:16 PM
Well, all tubes are supposed to glow, but if the actual plates themselves are doing it that might be a little bit worrisome. If that is the case then you probably are giving them a bit too much juice. Just go carefully through the schematic and check your circuit. One way to troubleshoot is to plug in a wall wart type power adapter (~12V or so) and check your circuit at various points with a multimeter. There are also lots of good websites and forum threads online about this sort of thing. Maybe check out this as a start.
Xellers in reply to thobsonFeb 17, 2010. 4:46 PM
I think I've tracked the problem down - I didn't have the funds to buy any sort of output transformer, so I instead used a 120VAC step-down transformer - the voltage drop across the transformer is too low, so the plate gets too much voltage, the tube becomes overbiased, and the plate reddens.
lucek says: Jan 28, 2010. 5:29 PM
I always wanted to make a vacuum tube computer, but I know it would cost an arm and a leg not to mention a ton of time to make a calculator.
yauch701 says: Dec 3, 2009. 8:23 PM
The hammond 125d seems to be a bit cheaper here www.tinyurl.com/ylza2kq 
Don't know about the shipping.. How much did everything cost for the build?
thobson (author) in reply to yauch701Dec 6, 2009. 8:52 PM
That's a sweet deal! I'm not really sure of the exact cost of the build. I think I estimated somewhere in between $150-$300 to someone once, but really it's probably a bit more when you account for shipping, mistakes, repairs, etc. Let's say between $250 and $400, depending on how you source your parts.
cerwinthedoc says: Oct 26, 2009. 3:00 PM
I'm sure I'm missing something here, but I just wanted to get a clear answer. This instructable appears to be geared towards using the tube amp for playing music from Ipods, CD players, etc.

but would you say the sound quality would be suitable for guitar? sure, I'm open to the idea of altering the design to make it suitable for guitar (adding an EQ, distortion, etc) but what do you think?
thobson (author) in reply to cerwinthedocOct 26, 2009. 6:33 PM
Unfortunately this amp is not suitable for guitar. The signal coming from an electric guitar pickup is very weak, and would not be sufficient. CD players and ipods have a little more oomph to them, so the amp has to do much less work than it would for a guitar. You will hear something, but it won't be very loud. There are some really good instructables on guitar tube amps, as well as a ton of information available from the Google machine.
cerwinthedoc in reply to thobsonOct 27, 2009. 9:21 AM
Crap. Well, back on the hunt. There's another tutorial on here for building a tube amp for guitars, but the author was a little unclear on some parts. But hey, thank you anyway. You made a great tutorial.
Xellers in reply to thobsonOct 26, 2009. 7:09 PM
Actually, all that you would need is a preamplifier of some sort to bring the signal from the guitar up to line level. A small tube preamp can be built with instructions from this site, or you can buy a small solid state one for a rather trivial price.
minimustangs in reply to XellersDec 23, 2010. 7:35 AM
If you were thinking of putting a guitar through this amp,the stereo feature would get lost in most cases. Now if you had something like a guitar processor (some of the Line6 products for example come to mind) might be the ticket... tone shaping AND preamp - with adjustable output. I just might have to try this.

Roughly, as a stereo amp, how many watts per channel is this design capable of delivering, with a decent preamp?
iamtoats says: Oct 20, 2009. 7:18 PM
If you rotate the adjacent transformers so they're perpendicular to one another, there will be less noise in the circuit. 
Xellers says: Oct 2, 2008. 6:42 PM
(removed by author or community request)
redstarsrbija in reply to XellersAug 10, 2009. 11:53 PM
digital amps will cause a further loss in audio quality
wupme in reply to XellersOct 11, 2008. 5:35 PM
You know, thats exactly what i asked myself when i saw commercial iPod Tube Amps... What a waste..
REA in reply to wupmeOct 12, 2008. 5:53 PM
Thats apple! Ripping people off since the iPod!
thatonekid in reply to REAAug 10, 2009. 7:10 PM
it has nothing to do with apple its just that compressing music into mp3 format looses lots of quality, you can easily convert tracks off of a cd to .wav files that sound much better but are ten times the size of an mp3. apple doesnt rip people off.
wupme in reply to thatonekidAug 11, 2009. 8:47 AM
No it is apple. Other Companys create MP3 Players that sound better, have more features and no Copyprotection. Of course you can't compare an MP3 to an actual CD, but there is still a hughe difference on how the same MP3 sounds on an iPod or lets say an iRiver Player. Apple products is 50% of the price just for being Apple, to have some kind of symbol that you can show of with.
1-40 of 129Next »
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!