Cheap lo-fi wireless audio performance system

Cheap lo-fi wireless audio performance system
Wireless audio performance systems free the performer from being tied directly to the amplifier, allowing them to perform some pretty awesome leg kicks and righteous spin moves. But how cool is it to spend all your beer money on equipment? I would say, pretty damn uncool. These systems are very expensive. For example, the Shure PG14 Performance Gear Wireless Guitar System costs $450.00 for a receiver, transmitter, and instrument cable. $450.00? Personally, if I spent $450.00 on something, I would damn sure want to be able drive it in a destruction derby. I was pondering these thoughts the other day, and I'm here to tell you, dear reader, that your old pal Aimless J. Lackluster has come up with a solution for the performer on a budget. It may not sound as clean as the $450.00 version, but it works, it's simple, and you'll save enough money to feed the habits which feed your creativity. Clean, pure sound is for the Phil Collinses of the music world. Personally, I have no use for that type of "perfection."

DISCLAIMER: This is a lo-fi wireless audio system. In my mind, the sound quality and the freedom of motion is worth way more than what could be expected from about $5 and ten minutes of work, but these things tend to be subjective. If you want pure clean sound, you discriminating virtuoso you, save your pennies and spring for the $450+ professional version.

DISCLAIMER. Part II: Yes, I did actually make it, and it works. Sheesh...

-

 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up
 

Step 1Get your materials

Get your materials
Things you'll need...

1. A set of walkie-talkies. Just about any variety in good working order will do. I found my "kiddie" style National Geographic walkie-talkies, batteries included, at the swap meet for a paltry $5. I'm sure I could have gotten a cheaper pair if I had been more patient, but I was rearing to try my idea out, and $5 seemed reasonable.

2. Two 1/4" audio plugs, male or female, depending on your preference. I actually just cut a guitar cable in half, and that worked out pretty clean. Doesn't really matter, basically you just want to run the signal from the guitar to the "transmitter" unit and from the "receiver" unit to the amp.

3. Solder, flux, soldering iron, maybe some hot glue. You know, the usual junk.

4. Might be good to have a Churro around, just to nibble on something between steps.
« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
114 comments
1-40 of 114next »
Oct 9, 2007. 3:19 PMmung says:
This is cool and all of the money you save will help to pay for the huge fine you will get from the FCC if you get caught. First of all the FCC rules say that you can't transmit music on FRS. Second the rules say you can't modify these radios. If you were going to do this you need to reduce the output power so that it is around .01 watts to be even close to legal. So watch out with this and make sure that you know of the FCC rules before doing it.
Jun 2, 2011. 9:52 AMKaosKIdd says:
Having done this instructable, it's not bad at all. the FRS bands do limit the quality of the sound, but it does work. However, if you happen to have one of the little things from Radio Shack that plugs into your mp3 player and transmits it to your radio, the frequency response would be much better, as the author points out as "fair game". The reason why I suggest this is the band it transmits on, and the power it transmits with is within ALL FCC regulations, thus no one can get into trouble. For a better explanation the rules about the FRS bands please see:
http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/index.htm?job=service_home&id=family
The modifications as listed in the FCC are based on the transmitter and antenna of the transmitter: meaning power, frequency, radiated power and peak envelop power. The actual radio, outside of these restrictions, are open for development and experiment as long as you do not modify these parameters. Lastly, as depicted in the page from the FCC, the FRS bands CAN be used for business related work; which includes the transmission of music. For other bands under the FCC control, it is expressly stated that business can not be transacted, also expressly stats music can not be the purpose of the transmission from the operating station. The FRS bands differ from most if not all of the other bands in their operations.
Jan 11, 2011. 12:25 AMadrian09 says:
meaning change to another switch?
Jan 6, 2011. 10:19 PMadrian09 says:
but why is there another 'call' button on ur walkie talkie? the one above the speaker?
Jul 31, 2010. 6:01 AManand sharma says:
how will u connect guitar plug in walki talkie...help me out
Jul 25, 2010. 12:43 AMPbyrd says:
Would this work with a bass guitar? I'm not sure if the walkie talkies would pick up the bass sound too well.
Feb 26, 2010. 11:24 AMGlockenator says:
stupid question here: whats a churro?
Dec 21, 2009. 9:26 AMcapth00k says:
 Mmmmmmm Churro's.  To the Aussie -- if your country has no Churro action - then perhaps it's time to consider a country with guns and Churro's ; like the USA
Sep 27, 2009. 7:28 PMramcorsolerto says:
Great Instructable!!! Mine works quite well, but if my guitar's volume is turned to 10 makes a lot of gain... How can I reduce the gain? Changing the resistor (Brown, Green, Orange, Gold) maybe? Thanks.
Oct 26, 2009. 3:47 PMNipmeow says:
yea you could add a resistor to the transmitter, i havent built one yet soo i cant recommend what size resistor to use
Sep 28, 2009. 4:23 PMramcorsolerto says:
By the way, it is a 15k...
Sep 5, 2008. 1:54 PMpakidood says:
yo man my version is giving me too much static how do i reduce it ps awesome hack
Sep 20, 2009. 11:23 PMramcorsolerto says:
Thats why it is called a LO-FI signal, but by covering the female jacks with electric tape will do just fine, but be carefull, don't cover the male jack pathway.
Sep 19, 2008. 11:30 PMchevyboy666 says:
that first pic is Ace Frehley right?
Aug 24, 2009. 5:41 AMxrobevansx says:
I was thinking the same thing, so I looked to see if anyone else thought that too....Back in the NY Groove!
Aug 24, 2009. 8:22 AMchevyboy666 says:
Have you heard about Anomaly? Ace is back & he told you so!
Nov 13, 2008. 3:18 PMChucklesProductions says:
I do love a good churro.
Jul 2, 2009. 5:03 AMAgroking says:
They don't have churros here in Australia. What should I eat?
Aug 24, 2009. 2:55 AMdaulef says:
oh yes we do! else i wouldnt reside here ;) hehe
Jul 9, 2009. 1:40 PMRelaxedSoup says:
Try a banana.
Jul 23, 2009. 9:50 PMtimheppner says:
Just found this and I think this is a sweet idea. I have tried it on my bass (active pickups) and can't seem to get any sound coming through the FRS radio. I have tried it with my ipod, and it's working, so I know it's not the FRS. I'm wondering if a guitar will work better. I'll try it with a friend's guitar and see how it goes. Also, I'm using the FRS's mic jack, so I don't need to rig up something to keep the talk button pressed down, so there was no need to open up the radio and mod it. As soon as the jack is plugged in, it automatically transmits. Something that may be useful for someone else. I'll let you know how it goes with the guitar.
Apr 18, 2009. 2:05 PMMetal4God says:
ok, i read how you said "put it on your studded belt" well...what if you want to swing it over your sholders? wouldnt it make more sence to put it on your strap? or take out the componans and put it in one of thoes hallow box things from radio shack?
Feb 16, 2009. 7:40 PMPuddleOfMudd25 says:
Is this supposed to seem ridiculously easy, or am I missing something? Defiantly going to try it, even though I don't need it :P.
Dec 27, 2008. 12:14 PMdrmjj55 says:
CHUROS R GOOD
Aug 30, 2008. 5:03 PMninjabob7 says:
So will this give better sound quality than an iPod-style FM transmitter? Because I already have one that I got for $10 bucks at Grocery Outlet, and it's pretty clear for mp3's if you can get the dials adjusted just right.
Oct 31, 2008. 7:49 PMpeterpan73 says:
Yes it does. the iPod style FM Transmitters are broadcast band 88-108Mhz types which implies that some mobile dude might pass by your neighbourhood with his broadcast Mp3 TRansmitter and you'd prolly hear JLo on your amps rather than your guitar riffs. Same goes with the CB transmitters. They have good freq stability no doubt but interference is inevitable and tweaking them is a tad difficult. So stick to FRS and GMRS people. YOu're better off that way.
Oct 31, 2008. 7:55 PMpeterpan73 says:
And anotther thing. Those iPod transmitters won't transmit more than 10 meters prolly more with an external wire propped as an antenna to say 20m max. They're around 50mW output so they're too weak for any decent use, let alone using them on stage especailly a bif stage area. You're risking blind spots there.
Oct 31, 2008. 9:39 PMninjabob7 says:
Yeah, that's kinda what I thought. I wasn't planning on using it "for real" - just wondering. Also, I'm fairly certain it's illegal to boost power on a transmitter like that... Not sure if simply adding an antenna would qualify though...
Nov 1, 2008. 2:49 AMpeterpan73 says:
Of course its illegal in the US. Hope u understand that its something I've done does not mean you can do it everywhere in the wqorld. I live in a country where it can be done though, beyond FCC jurisdiction.
Nov 8, 2008. 7:53 PMninjabob7 says:
Yeah, for a "free" country, we sure have a lot of dumb laws here in the US of A. Not FCC specifically - radio has to be regulated somehow, but DMCA sucks.
May 27, 2008. 2:32 PMRishnai says:
I'm working on a cell phone hack right now so that I can take RCA or 1/4 inch signal and transmit it hi-fi via the cell phone's hands-free attachment port. My band has a lot of over-the-cell-phone practice and songwriting sessions, but we're tired of the crappy sound. Bluetooth might work better, but whatever. If it works, I might make an instructable. In the meantime, I guess I'll have to build one of Lackluster's creations.
Oct 31, 2008. 9:50 PMninjabob7 says:
Bad idea. Phone sound is compressed. That means that any frequency outside "normal speaking range" is chopped, meaning the bass guitar will be cut completely, and any notes that make it through will be missing their harmonics. BTW, that's why phones sound tinny - not quality of parts.
Feb 6, 2008. 1:21 PMrbstic says:
i did this 24 years ago.
Oct 31, 2008. 8:14 PMpeterpan73 says:
and lemme guess .. using rigid crystal oscillators or the VFO types.
Jan 3, 2008. 8:44 PMspinner000 says:
hey man i love the idea im actually workin on one right now and ive run into a problem; whenever i plug in the receiver i get a very high piutched sqeak the gradually gets louder and higher pitched any ideas on a fix
Oct 31, 2008. 8:12 PMpeterpan73 says:
Sounds like feedabck to me. loosen up the audio gain and try again if it doesn't work check for audio signal at every audiostage of the circuitry. Often this squealing could be from a leaky coupling capacitor.
May 27, 2008. 2:23 PMRishnai says:
You're getting feedback. Treat it like any other microphone feedback: move. But you've probabl fixed that by now, I bet.
Oct 28, 2007. 8:16 AMcallmeshane says:
Hi I am Gay and Christian, and ...... no sorry wrong flashback... I am just Gay.... yeah... Pickled brains don't make for innovation... Kudos for getting off your arse and having a go.... And what Peterpan73 says...... I hate armchair experts, or barstool intelectuals.... In Straya - a while back.... TAG Hyer?? watches left the factory for $150 each. Importer onsells them to retailer for $750 each. Retailer sells them to customer for $3500 each.... $3500 watch still only comes with a 12 month warranty. LOL Me thinks with my limited experience that wireless guitar setups, really are not that brilliant, and one is paying more for presteige and "Tha Name" than technical wizzardry. And me also thinks that QUALITY electronics, properly configured and robustly assembled and fitted, should not cost very much at all.... But if your NOT a technical wizard, and you have to pay some one to make this for you.. or to reconfigure a cheapie setup into a permanent installation within the guitar..... I feel that this is where the higher price of the ready to run system may have be better than the cheapie system... For instance, if I am playing a gig, the quality system should switch on and give a fairly reliable signal for X hours on a set of fresh batteries. But if paying patrons get a lame show because of poxly fitted up electrics, then who loses.... I am all for efficient use of the resources, but they MUST be properly done, to make them absolutely reliable and good quality.
Jul 5, 2008. 10:48 PMmarcocen says:
i agree with you...partially. i do think that most of the money you pay for one of those high-end wireless thingies and you're paying for the brand. but i think that if you're using this in a gig, you have two reasons: 1) you perfected it, tested it and know the system is reliable or 2) you're not proffesional enoeugh to pay for a branded product and if you're just starting, i don't think it really matters if equipment fails in the middle of a song. perhaps the same would happen with a 450 dollar wireless setupanyway!
Oct 31, 2008. 8:08 PMpeterpan73 says:
Marcocen is right. Paying $450 + for the reliability is nice but what if it fails midway during a performance. How do you compensate the $1 million that the punters paid to see your act? Will Shure or Senheiser reimburse what they paid to see? So I concur with the testing and perfecting. Trial runs are what you need. If space shuttle Challenger went down in flames anything could happen to its equivalent hobby rocket.
1-40 of 114next »

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
4
Followers
2
Author:Aimless J. Lackluster
I'm here to impart and gain wisdom.