Step 18: 2BEIGH3 3D Printer Operaton

I have posted some videos of the operation of the printer and CNC.
I will address NYLON as it uses a modified process from ABS.  You can view hundreds of ABS time lapse printing videos on YT and I would suggest watching these to get an idea as to how these units work.

Here we Go!
Make sure all steppers work.
Do not load NYLON yet....let's make sure all the motors work together.
Load the 2BEIGH3 gcode test file into Mach3.
Center the nozzle on the table and about 2" up.
Zero all 4 axis as we did earlier.
Hit "Cycle Start" and watch to make sure everything is doing what it should.
All four axis should be doing something during the first layers.
Reset and rezero
Place a sticky note paper under the nozzle
Move the nozzle down till it touches the sticky note paper.
The nozzle should "just" rub the paper, just enough to know it's there.
Zero the "Z" axis
Move Z up 5mm and over so the nozzle is not going to drip NYLON on the table as we prime the tip.
Load the NYLON
Make sure our 4th axis is pushing the NYLON rod thru the tube.  The Numeric "+" key and "-" key control the 4th axis
Install the output end of the material tube into the top of the hot-end.
Pres the + key and watch the long tubing.  When the NYLON get's to the cold tip, it'll shake the long tube a bit...you have active pressure in the long tube at this point.
Now, turn on the light dimmer to lowest.
Turn the dimmer up to 15%
You should watch the thermocouple temp start to rise. 
If not, check your wiring and meter settings.  DO NOT Touch the Alum block to see if it's warm.....it may be HOT!
Keep increasing the dimmer knob at 4 min intervals at ~5% till the temp reached 250 c
Nylon may start to drip out of the nozzle....this is a good sign.
Caution here, not all thermocouples are the same.
What we're after is a nice pile of NYLON thread on the table from the nozzle.
We're not going to print just yet.
As you approch 250C keep tapping the + key.....a tap...don't hold it.
You will hear the sound of what sounds like boiling plastic.
At this point, you're close to the right temp.
Remember, once we get to the right temp, we need to "Mark the Dimmer Knob" so we know where to set it the next time.
When the NYLON starts to run out in a thin line, you're there.  You can hold the + key for 2 sec and a stream of NYLON should come out the nozzle.
Here's how to tell if your temp is right.
First, stop worrying about wasting NYLON....if you waste the whole $3.00 rod, it's worth it
As the NYLON comes out of the nozzle, it will look one of three consistencies.
1. Very clear and shiny like toothpaste.  It's to cold
2. Very clear, yet with lots of what looks like bubbles in the stream.  This is correct.
3. A dull stream with a foam like texture.  This is to hot.
When you get a good stream, it's time to clk the Mack3 Cycle Start button.
If all goes as it should "Welcome yourself to a new world of creativity".......!

Because the Hot-End is designed to handle very high  temperatures (450 c), I have ordered both Delrin and Polycarbonate in 3mm rods!
Delrin is considered to be the work-horse of machined/tooled plastics.   I have been told that Delrin may not be usable as it should loose a binding component in the thermoplast process, but a rod is only $2.50, and worth the effort.
Polycarbonate has similar properties along with its translucent qualities.
I'll add instuctables and refer to the 2BEIGH3 as these efforts progress.

One last safety tip.  Find a way to add a limit switch that will turn off the heater power at the end of a print.  Look at my slic3r config file under gcode and you'll see I send the X axis off about 8" in one direction.  There's a limit switch at that location that turns heater power "OFF".

The Linear Bearing noted earlier is up on the Autodesk123D gallery.  This is a good test part to determine if retraction can work in your configuration.   Remaining threads should be "out" of the BB raceway.
The file or part is called "Linear Bearing 912" by taulman

Update - Printing with Clear Acrylic
Below is a video of the 2BEIGH3 printing with 0.125” Dia Clear Acrylic Material
As you might imagine, there are several differences in printing this type of material as compared to ABS, PLA, NYLON, etc.…
This printing is made possible by the taulman 4 orifice Hot-End.  This Hot-End is more complicated to build, than the already documented taulman NYLON Hot-End.  I have designed it in such a way so you can easily get the parts from our present list of vendors.  I won’t document the 4 orifice Hot-End here as this Instructable is already very large.  If there are enough requests, then I will write a sub-instructable…(if they have those?).
I will point out a few items of interest to those that may want to print in acrylic.
First, the performance of the Printer and Hot-End for Acrylic:
1. Resolution - While the resolution of the 2BEIGH3 is fine for other 3D printing materials, the optical properties of acrylic are such that it will amplify any positional anomaly.  With ABS and PLA, we get nice straight lines of plastic.  This is due to a how each thread cools as it is printed.  With acrylic, the material cools so quickly that every step in the stepper motor, every jar of the print table, slack in the belts, backlash in the pulleys and maybe the neighbors kid crying will modulate the oval reflections of a thread as it is positioned.  And because the threads are oval and optically clear, they will amplify these artifacts.
To understand this, you need to know that round optics, or spherical optics have little or no DOF.  And because of this, become more of a reflective device than an optical collimating device.  The best example I can give you is a laser level, one that puts out a thin laser line.  The laser is just any laser diode.  The optics to convert the beam to that fine line…..is a simple glass or plastic (acrylic) cylinder.  The internal reflections of the laser becomes reflective and transition out in all directions along the cylindrical axis, i.e a thin line.
2. Impurities – read “bubbles” – As you watch the video, you’ll see that the initial thread of acrylic from the Hot-End has bubbles.  Unacceptable, of course.  The material must be modified and bubbles eliminated just prior to the material leaving the tip, otherwise, the end part would not only look visually unappealing, but it would have tiny dangerous sharp edges and be easily crushed.  The 4 orifice Hot-End takes care of this and after the first 40-60mm during a print, bubbles cease.
3. Optical properties – I doubt that you will ever be able to print usable optics with this method.  Even perfectly round fibers arranged in any configuration do not lend them selves to any type of collimating ability.  You may be able to print refraction gratings, but even those would be unacceptable to any higher end optical systems.
4. For those with existing 3D Print experience:
A heated table is not used or required
Any masking tape with wax on the back, blue, white, grey…. will secure the part
Requires a Higher temp than ABS
3mm material will shatter on a storage roll
3mm material cost is ~ $0.20 a meter or less than a dime for 12”

Now, back to the 2BEIGH3……

<p>I am curious about the taulman 4 orifice hot end. I've had a lot of issues with bubbling and filaments that vary in size slightly. How does the hot end address these issues?</p>
I'm interested in building your 2beigh3 printer. As I was looking into the software mention, I found that the mach3 seems to not be supported or recommended anymore as the mach4 is out with usb output. Also the lazycam is no longer available or supported. <br>So I have been looking into options. And as a novice it looms very bleak as construction of the 2beigh3 is close to $1000 and the software can easily run $1600. <br>I think I'm missing something! What software should I be looking at that can draw, convert (is it to gcode?) and then will 'print' and is not be limited in function/time/trial or break the bank? (Separate software is ok not just an all in one package)<br>I'm not having luck finding such a product. I hope you have some encouraging words for this newbie.
<p><em>NOTE (for anyone building their own 2BEIGH3 who - understandably - doesn't make it through all of my (rather verbose) post): The BOM and images all specify <strong>3/8&quot; rods</strong> for the high res table, but cutting the parts from the DWF files (and using 1.25&quot; rollers as pictured in the files) results in a roller arrangement that requires <strong>1/2&quot; rods</strong>. Considering how much flex even the thicker rods have, this is a good thing... but it might save a trip to the hardware store to know in advance.</em></p><p>Since I finished the low res machine some time ago and have the high res table very nearly finished, I figured it was about time that I set up an account here, say thanks, and report a little on my progress (and to beg for some help from anyone else who made it this far... and makes it to the bottom of the post).</p><p>I put a lot of thought &amp; research into picking a design before I started, and the 2BEIGH3 won hands-down - not only for versatility, but because it seemed like a platform where I could start off knowing absolutely nothing and learn enough through the process to eventually build it into a reasonably powerful machine, all on a low enough budget that I could afford to pick the wrong components the first time around, to break parts I was trying to modify, and generally just to make as many mistakes as possible before eventually moving on to buying/building a &quot;real&quot; (or real expensive) machine once I knew what I was doing &amp; what I actually needed it for... And, out of all the nifty things I've so far made with this contraption, mistakes are certainly the most prolific. So, while mine is still a long way from evolving into the hoped for &quot;reasonably powerful machine&quot;, so far it's fulfilling it's purpose admirably well - and considering I still haven't quite figured out just why I <em>need</em> a CNC rig or 3D printer (aside from the obvious: &quot;to make <em>parts for </em>my CNC rig/3D printer!&quot;) I figure I've still got time for a few more mistakes before I'm done.</p><p>Over the six(ish) months I've been working on it, I've made a lot of tweaks to my build (some of them minor, some ill-advised, and some probably downright unsafe), but I think my most notable deviations from the plan were : </p><p>1) After seeing reports of headaches with the assorted cheap driver boards, I splurged on a Gecko G540 right from the start (with the reasoning that it's the one piece that would almost certainly carry over to the next machine I'd buy/build, and that it would be cheaper to buy the Gecko than to buy a cheap Chinese board and <em>then</em> a Gecko). So far I've had absolutely no regrets (aside from the huge sucking sound coming from the black hole that used to be my wallet), and no problems with/relating to that end of the operation at all. Very possibly the <em>only </em>part of the project I can say that about. Right now I'm running it off 24V from a pair of ATX PSUs running (after severing the chassis ground on one) in series. The G540 and KL23H256-21-8B steppers (from circuitspecialists.com) could handle the 48V of another pair of PSUs on the stack, but seeing as the machine's structural limitations are already keeping me from maxing out the current speeds, I haven't seen the need for more power yet.</p><p>2) I replaced the 1/4-20 threaded rods on the X &amp; Y axis with 5/16-18, because with any bend at all or any radial/angular misalignment with the motor (more on my coupling woes later) the thinner rods would whip around enough to cause further bending (and a whole hell of a lot of noise). This wasn't the panacea I'd hoped for, but it did show some improvement (and it was far easier to find <em>straight </em>5/16&quot; rod than 1/4&quot; in the hardware store). To reduce the whipping a bit more I screwed some crude supports (basically just blocks of wood with leadscrew-sized holes in them) onto the top (for the Y screw) &amp; bottom (for the X screw) of the X plate, to restrain the movement of the free ends of the screws. Again, it still didn't solve the problem (and didn't do anything to stop the bucking when the nut would get close to the misaligned stepper) but it helped preserve the leadscrews and cut down on the vibration &amp; noise.</p><p>3) For a spindle I'm currently using a $25 Harbor Freight trim router (#61626) and $20 speed control (#43060). I started out using a cordless Dremel, but, while it performed better than I expected, it wasn't a viable long-term solution, and I wanted the ability to use 1/4&quot; shank bits. Unfortunately it turns out the HF router <em>only </em>supports 1/4&quot; bits - no one makes alternate collets for it, and all of the the 1/8&quot; &quot;adapters&quot; I've found (essentially bushings with slits) introduce enough runout that I can only get away with the very shortest bits. That said, for 1/4&quot; bits it's not bad at all <em>- </em>especially at that price point - and the runout is negligible relative to the tolerances of the rest of the machine. The nice cylindrical shape also means that it's much easier to design &amp; cut mounts for than something like a Dremel or Rotozip, and having a securely mounted spindle (whatever tool you're using) makes a big difference.</p><p>4) Added a PS3 controller for jogging &amp; job control (with <a href="http://joakim.dk/joypad/ " rel="nofollow">http://joakim.dk/joypad/ ) </a>- I can't imagine working without it anymore. The software isn't designed with the DS3 in mind, so it requires some awkward remapping and it's not a choice I'd recommend if you're going to buy a controller, but if you've got one kicking around it makes life <em>much </em>easier than being tied to the keyboard.</p><p>5) I've rebuilt and/or redesigned the Z axis at least four times - soon to be five, once I finish the new XY table. (Tip: Poplar is really cheap at Lowes/Home Depot. Don't use it. It flexes all over the place, and was giving me some nasty deflection along the Y axis). I added additional bracing to the Z axis support pipe (the triangular beams visible in the picture - I believe I ended up using 1/8&quot; thick 3/4&quot; aluminum L-channel) to try to reduce some of the tool deflection I was seeing along the X axis. While there <em>is</em> some wiggle at the end of the pipe, I've come to suspect that most of the problem is the result of play in the Z axis drawer slides (Tip: Avoid full-extension slides - the 3-piece construction seems to make the ends much less stable than the 2-piece 3/4 extension versions, even when only extended a couple inches).</p><p>6) Shaft couplings. The bane of my existence. These have been giving me headaches pretty much since day one. I started out with the rigid couplings specified in the BOM (McMaster 6412K11), but unless I managed to get the motor shaft &amp; leadscrew aligned <em>perfectly </em>they'd cause the end of the rod to whip around, and the motor to try shaking the whole contraption off the workbench. Eventually this would be followed by the setscrews working loose and the shaft decoupling. This was compounded by the fact that tightening a setscrew onto a threaded surface seemed to inevitably skew the alignment, so any time I had to change screws/motors or remove/replace/adjust the table I'd find myself spending the next hour or two battling to get things running smoothly again. I tried threadlocker, grinding flats on the screws, and drilling holes for the setscrews to mate into, but a large part of the problem seemed to be that to avoid wobble the shaft has to be precisely the same diameter as the bore of the coupling, or else tightening the setscrew will force it off-center - and the <em>nominal</em> 1/4&quot; threaded rod (measured at .225&quot; actual) was never going to be a close enough fit with the 1/4&quot; coupling (.246&quot;). I've since tried to work around the problem with various flexible couplings. The helical variety work well for angular &amp; axial misalignment (not parallel/radial), but introduce a <em>lot</em> of backlash, and even using Mach3's backlash compensation I still see some distortion from it. Lovejoy couplings - two metal hubs with a rubber &quot;spider&quot; in between (allowing you to mix &amp; match hubs to mate different shaft sizes) allow for a fair bit of angular &amp; just a little parallel misalignment, but have nothing holding the two ends together. A number of the other coupling designs (like Oldham or Schmidt) share this property - obviously they're intended for systems where the leadscrew is axially fixed and can't slide in &amp; out, but I have yet to work out an easy way of converting the 2BEIGH3 to function like that. The flexible disc design looks promising, since it seems to avoid all of these issues, but the cost has kept me away. So far the best solution (read: &quot;ugly hack&quot;) I've found is to sink a ring of four(ish) screws or posts into each hub of a Lovejoy coupling and then zigzag several small (~3/4&quot;) rubber bands back and forth between them. It keeps the ends from pulling out (unless there's a <em>lot</em> of drag on your table - it can also act as a safety valve if you crash into something solid, rather than destroying your motor mount/leadscrew/nut) and retains flexibility, without introducing any measurable backlash... but god is it ever <em>ugly</em> (see attached closeup). The wider diameter of the couplings (made even wider by the screws) also meant that I had to carve sections out of the stepper mounting brackets and depressions in the underlying wood. If anyone else has come up with a great alternative, I'd love to hear it.</p><p>7) I made a spoilboard to bolt onto the top of the Y plate out of 12x12x1&quot; oak with a 1&quot; grid of 1/4-20 threaded holes, which allowed me to use bolts with nuts and/or washers in place of clamps (which, with the narrow space above the X plate getting even more crowded by shims that I needed for the Y plate, often weren't practical) for securely holding small/medium workpieces down. Unfortunately another other long-standing problem I've had has been a skewed X/Y alignment. Despite much effort, it was always difficult to get the axes square to each other - something that, like the couplings, comes back to bite me any time I remove/rebuild/adjust the table. I thought I'd gotten this corrected before drilling, but the misalignment still came through in the grid, so, while it was a great help for holding pieces down, I wasn't able to use it for alignment. The <a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/2BEIGH3-3D-Printer-Update-and-call-for-Testers/" rel="nofollow">2BEIGH3 Update</a> says there's a &quot;shear&quot; command to compensate for this (in Mach3? in CAM? in CAD/modeling software?), but I haven't been able to find it mentioned anywhere else. I was hoping to finally sidestep this issue altogether by moving on to the high res table - indeed, the fact that the upgraded table design promised to inherently resolve the issue was one of the main reasons I went ahead with it, rather than risk repeating the issue while trying to build something custom with fancy linear bearings &amp; pillow blocks.</p><p>That brings me to my current quandaries... Aside from the mis-sized rods mentioned up top, <em>most </em>of the high res table has gone together smoothly. Cutting the acrylic took some experimentation - I was surprised to find that a relatively high spindle speed/low feed worked best (maybe 10-15k rpm, or about half-power on the setup described above, and 10-20ipm - just adjust the rpm down to the make sure the plastic isn't liquifying), but the results are awfully nice looking - I wish I could've made cuts like this when I was working on my last batch of PC case mods. I did run into a couple problems, however...</p><p>A) I'm a little confused by the nuts. I had used the diagrammed Delrin nuts (as pictured in Step 11) on the low res table without issue (well, aside from having to blow a big wad of cash o̶n̶ ̶a̶ ̶f̶a̶n̶c̶y̶ ̶n̶e̶w̶ ̶t̶o̶y̶ on a drill press, because I had to struggle to drill <em>a</em> hole - never mind a <em>straight</em> hole - in the stuff... but without <em>major</em> issue - they also worked well when tapped for the 5/16-18 rod). This instructable and the update both read like the same ones are meant to be used for the high res table... but they don't seem to fit. I could use the thinner Y axis nut under the X axis, but without significantly raising the 1/2&quot; guide rods the nut would have the leadscrew running into the side of the right leg of the pipe frame. The Y axis has the opposite problem - even with the Y plate sitting flush on top of the struts, using either one of the Delrin nuts aligns the leadscrew significantly <em>above</em> the level of the motor shaft (and lifting the whole axis, like on X, isn't an option). The <a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/2BEIGH3-3D-Printer-Update-and-call-for-Testers/" rel="nofollow">2BEIGH3 Update</a> says &quot;There is a new dwg in the hi res section for this part&quot;, but all I could find were the two JPGs (the same than I used successfully for the low res table). The maintable* 3DM files from <a href="http://www.taulman3d.com/2beigh3.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.taulman3d.com/2beigh3.html</a><br> were helpful in understanding how a lot of pieces were meant to fit <br>together, but they're still based around the cut plastic &amp; T-nut <br>version. Is there something I'm doing wrong, or do the pictured nuts simply not fit &amp; I need to make my own? (I probably <em>will</em> make my own, at least to get up and running again, but I'm interested in knowing what the intended design was, and/or what viable alternatives other people have come up with)<br>.</p><p>B) Step 10 says &quot; <em>We will brace the X Axis as it's hard to believe how much a 3/8 &quot; rod will bend in just 28&quot; &quot;. </em>This would definitely be helpful (while th<em>e </em>1/2&quot; rod bends less than the 3/8&quot;, it still <br>seems to have at least as much flex as the aluminum U-channel from the <br>low res table), but I couldn't find anything else in the text, images, or comments discussing it. My only thought is to drill holes for vertical posts in the center - although the fact that my machine is currently supported on a pair of 2x4s laid across sawhorses would mean building some sort of fixed understructure to attach to and, while it would help with Z (vertical) flex, I'm not sure how much it would do for Y (horizontal) flex. Has anyone else come up with a useful method of bracing/reinforcing the rods?</p>
<p>Been reading and rereading this tutorial and it looks doable although I feel it skips some explanations/steps here and there. At least for my total novice level.</p><p>The above aside, this machine seems to Work by moving the &quot;table&quot; around while a lot of other CNC/3printers I've looked at Works by moving the cnc part above the board around.<br>Is there any reasons for going either way, or is it just coincidal how this particular machine ended?</p><p>Anyone made this in the EU with metric Measurements, or maybe even found Places to easily buy the items needed?</p>
<p>Hey dintid, the instructable builds on </p><p><a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/Building-a-drawer-slide-CNC-machine-for-under-200/" rel="nofollow">http://www.instructables.com/id/Building-a-drawer-...</a></p><p>Helped me a lot, and I started out with very little knowledge, and no tools other than a mate's drill press(and the mate). Take it slow and buy the tools and components over time.</p><p>About the metric conversion, i spent a few hours at a big hardware store and found metric equivalents for everything. However, for the low-res table I chose 1/4&quot; threaded-rod for a bit more accuracy than 8mm, and a (tiny) bit more strength than 6mm. 6.35mm couplings are easy to get. Having said that, it's easier to find STRAIGHT 8mm threaded-rods than 1/4&quot; ones. Oh well.</p>
<p>Wow! Very nice, very professional. And, what is that CAD software you use to create the drawings, please?</p>
<p>First off, i can't make to make and hack this. one question though, did you seriously manage to build this for about $1000?! that is incredible. Also, is it truly capable of running the cnc router with an aluminum block?</p><p>Cheers to an incredible build!</p>
<p>I'm partway through and my cost so far including some tools is au$600. Estimate another au$200 by the time I've made the accurate cnc table, print table and print head. At current exchange rates that's about US$650 all up.</p>
<p>I can't believe this! I'm designing my own 3d printer/cnc mill and came up with the idea to use iron pipe as a low cost rigid framing material while installing a natural gas heater at my buddies dads house. I was 1&quot; off and was surprised how non pliable even 6 foot runs are, I had to move the heater! lol I googled iron pipe frame 3d printer and find my idea was already in use as a framing material. So cool! I'm building one with 24&quot; x 24&quot; x 24&quot; travel and also want to use a 400 watt liquid cooled spindle motor for some CNC mill/cutting/engraving action. Eventually I want to experiment with printing in carbon fiber by impregnating carbon fiber snippets 3 to 8mm long into both the hardener and resin then pumping them through a standard style mixing tube/extruder but designed in 2 halves made of highly polished stainless steel for easy cleanup. A laser cutting attachment would be nice as well but that is way down the road. Anyway, Great video, glad to see someone else had my pipe idea. Take care and keep experimenting. That's how progress is made... </p>
<p>any luck?</p>
<p>Can you use USB to lpt1 converter?</p>
<p>Canberra, Australia. Just starting out. </p><p>As I go I'll list the _metric_ BOM's</p><p>MOTORS: ebay - au$219 delivered: 4-axis ctlr/4nema23(283oz/in) steppers, PS &amp; parallel cable. Worried that these will be too powerful, but we shall see.</p><p>The only local who can supply the frame components is &quot;metalmart&quot; who will cut and thread but need a week's notice. </p><p>QTY; Desc; Thread<br>2;600mm pipe; m-m<br>3;300mm pipe; m-m<br>5;150mm pipe m-m<br>3;Elbow; f-f <br>1;Tee; f-f-f <br>3;Union; f-f - Unavailable - got 'sockets' which seem functionally equivalent.<br>2;End caps; f<br>1;Flange; f - could not get 4-bolt version, had to settle with 2-bolt.</p><p>frame: au$118:</p><p>metalmart minimum dia threaded rods are 10mm. Still looking but might just couple to the 6.35mm stepper shafts. Anyone think that's a bad idea?</p>
<p>Problem with my z-axis.</p><p>I have the nema 23 7.6kg.cm 6 wire from circuit specialists. 57BYG081</p><p>I'm using the Univelop tb6560</p><p>My wiring is A:R A-:G B:Y B-:B</p><p>About 15.5 volts and 12 Ohm across the pairs.</p><p>This is working well for x and y axis</p><p>I think that I burnt out the z motor because I'm getting R between pairs. I swapped out my 4 motor (for the extruder) but I'm not getting movement. I swapped for the spare driver board, but when I try to jog the z motor, I get a clacking noise and no movement.</p><p>I took the load off of my z-axis to make sure that it wasn't a power issue.</p><p>Is there a good way to isolate the problems. I think that my controller is okay. I swapped cables for y/z and the z-job moved the 'y' axis. When I connected the z driver/motor to the y controller cable I still got the clacking noise.</p>
<p>On the basic CNC table, I'm noticing a bit of flex in the y-axis. The lack of a rigid bracket and the wood extension from the y-plate seem to be limiting factors. I have backed off the velocity and acceleration of the y-motor to keep the movement smoother, but mounting the motors has been the most frustrating.</p><p>I notice that you mounted the X-axis directly to the pipe rather than to the aluminum brackets as the smaller source project did. Trying to bolt a plate tangent to the pipe and level was also a challenge.</p><p>Lining up the threaded rod with the motor shaft and the guide nuts fastened to the platform left me wishing that I had a way to make micro adjustments. I used some set screws to position the z-axis nut because I don't have tools precise enough to create that cut-out on the z-nut (At least until I get the CNC tuned).</p><p>This has been a great project, so thank you much for sharing it. </p>
<p>@taulman,</p><p>I am in the preliminary stages of planning my 2BEIGH3. I was curious if there is any more information on the new and improved Threaded Rod Nuts. In your update it says you have uploaded a dwg of them. I can not seem to find them. Any help would be appreciated.</p><p>Thank you,</p><p>Ryan</p>
<p>Thanks, thanks, THANKS !!!</p><p>I am wondering if I want to;</p><p>a) Go with the low precision table, then the higher precision, then the 3D printer in the standard size all on 1 inch pipe.</p><p>b) As above, but larger, perhaps MUCH larger on 1 1/4, 1 1/2 or even 2 inch pipe.</p><p>Are there any rules of thumb for this ? I suppose torsional stiffness &quot;matters&quot; somewhere along the line, but I'm thinking that MASS might also help a LOT.</p><p>c) Do the low precision, then the higher) precision tables, then do the 3D printer as a SEPARATE set of hardware, i.e. have both available at all times with no need to switch.</p><p>Part of my reasoning is that prints can take a long time, even a VERY LONG TIME and as an impatient fellow... I just might wanna MAKE something on a 2D table.</p><p>I know, more hardware takes more space and more money. This is probably something I should decide before I start, there are probably places to optimize for 2D CNC if I am not going forward with 3D printing on the same platform.</p><p>d) Fancy hardware; Are linear bearings THAT expensive ?</p><p>Are they worth it ?</p><p>================================</p><p>Thanks (yet) again.</p>
<p>I found linear bearings on amazon for $18 per 12 pack, which doesn't seem unreasonable (in the total scheme of things).</p><p>LM8UU - they seem to be packaged and marketed specifically for home built 3D printer projects.</p><p>http://www.amazon.com/Linear-Bearings-Printer-Mendel-reprap/dp/B00ED150S4</p>
<p>It's great!</p>
<p>Its superb<br><br></p>
Very creative. I'll build your system as soon as I have your design in <strong>Autodesk Inventor 2014 </strong>as a <strong>parametric model</strong>. Do you happen to have that? :-)
If anyone is having problems downloading the DXF files just right click on them, click save as and then add a &quot;.dxf&quot; at the end then press save.
If anyone is having problems downloading the DXF files just right click on them, click save as and then add a &quot;.dxf&quot; at the end then press save.
Ok, I have a question.... If the point of changing the XY table and drive methods is to exchange speed for torque, then aren't we making life way harder than it has to be? In my design, I can see a way to actually run both drive methods on the same table at the same time... well sorta. I could add a belt drive to both X and Y axis, which would be permanently connected. Then, give myself a way to disconnect the drive screw from the table and the X-carriage. It would then be run from the belt drives at high speed and low torque. The screw drives could be re-attached to run high-torque/low speed. The belt drives would not have to be disconnected at all. They would only have to have the power removed so the steppers can freewheel. The screwdrives would have no problem dragging the belt drives in tow, and I can't foresee any reason why it would hurt them as long as power was removed. <br> <br>Can your table be modified in this way? If it could, then, assuming you run dual parallel controllers, you could simplify the transition to inserting 2-4 bolts and the flip of a switch.
I too started with the same simple frame in mind with the intention of simply 'upscaling' it. However, mine morphed into something completely new and different. I also have the intention of switching back and forth between 3D printer and mill/router. I would also like to add the ability to do PCBs and laser. I didn't plan for mine to switch motion/axis to optimize motion for the different modes though.... bravo. I figured when mine didn't move on the X and Y fast enough, I would make some linear trucks for each, and switch to belt drive. I built it with that future upgrade in mind, and should be able to do it easily. Right now, I have a fried X stepper, and I'm awaiting the replacement..... <br> <br><div><a href="http://s1179.photobucket.com/user/thasatelliteguy/library/CNC%20Build%20as%20of%2011_3_2013" rel="nofollow"></a></div>
<a href="http://s1179.photobucket.com/user/thasatelliteguy/library/CNC%20Build%20as%20of%2011_3_2013?sort=3&page=1" rel="nofollow">http://s1179.photobucket.com/user/thasatelliteguy/library/CNC%20Build%20as%20of%2011_3_2013?sort=3&amp;page=1</a>
I dont understand why this hasnt been done. <br>Once you have you device with XYZ movement and a well thought out tool space, you can interchange any tool from router to engraver to extruder. <br>If your frame is rigid enough to handle router cutting a extruder will be nothing
Very nice instructable! <br> <br>Do you have any 3d cad models of the whole assembly? It would be nice to bring up a .step file to better understand how it all fits together.
Looks kike an idea whose time has come: <br>http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/327919589/the-microfactory-a-machine-shop-in-a-box
I have been following your Instructible for about 3 months and have constructed a low res cnc to cut parts for the high res table.
Congratulations, M D A..! You'll be pleased to know you're in good company. There are about 80+ (that I know of) makers around the world building or using/hacking the design. I will mention, that once I had the lower res unit working that I ended up actually cutting more parts on it, than I did when the higher res unit was up. Again, congratulations as I, and a lot of others here know, it takes interest and study to make these units work!<br>taulman
It has been a while since I posted so I will give another update. Hopefully this info will help with anyone who is having difficulties like I am. Here is what I have found in the past few weeks. <br>Missed steps: I scoped the outputs of the parallel port and the input to the stepper board. There was no missed steps at all. In my parallel interface board, there is a HC244 level converter connected to the lines of the parallel port. This does the 3.3V to 5V conversion so the rest of the downstream electronics are getting full 5V. Since this was not the problem I had to do some more hunting and found the decay mode drastically affected my stepper motors when running at higher RPM. I was running at 50% decay but I changed it to 100% decay and my &quot;missed steps&quot; problem went away. I hope this proves useful to anyone facing a similar aggravating situation. <br> <br>Drive rods: I have been having frustrating problems with my threaded rod coming loose from the motor couplers or the couplers coming loose from the motor shaft. It is extremely annoying. Everytime I try to cut the thicker plastics, the rod decouples and I ruin my part. I tighten the set screws as tight as possible. I have already rounded out the hex keys on two or 3 of the set screw because I am tightening them so much and so tight. The lateral forces just seem to be way to high and are pulling things apart. I actually ordered some of the special CNC shaft couplers that are helically slit to help with misalignment issues. They help to smooth out the motion but the helix acts like a spring and creates a big dead zone when you reverse direction just like backlash but worse. They clamped around the shaft instead of set screws so they held much better but I had to remove them because of the dead zone. I am not sure what I am going to do about this. Until I can get this solved, I am dead in the water! <br> <br>Slides: These have been a major thorn in my side. I know the slides were not going to be very precise but the ones I have are ridiculous. I already mentioned on my first post about the use of a tension spring on the Z axis slide. Well I had to do the same on one of the X axis slides. I noticed when I reversed direction in the X axis, they would shift in the Y axis as well!!! The farther they were extended, the greater the shift. At near full extension the Y shift just by looking at it was 0.050&quot; or more!!! This was showing up on all of my test prints when there was an X axis direction change. I &quot;solved&quot; this problem just like the other. I put a tension spring from the end of the slid and attached it to the opposite slides aluminum U channel via a nylon zip tie. This created a nylon loop that would &quot;slide&quot; up and down the channel as the X axis moved and provided a constant force in the Y axis and greatly reduced if not eliminated the problem. <br> <br>Plastics: When I was purchasing my raw materials, I was having a hard time finding the 0.220 acrylic so I went with 6mm polycarbonate from Amazon. Since it is a harder plastic, it is also harder to mill. I have checked out online for some tips on cutting this stuff and everything I read indicates you need low rpm and high feed speed. Wellllll, this setup is just not rigid enough to handle those kind of forces and my motors top out at around 22 in/min which is waaaaay below the recommended feed speeds of anywhere from 50 - 90 in/min from what I have read. The bit also seems to catch alot and pull into the plastic or pull the plastic up. I have these same problems with acrylic too. I have tried milling thinner acrylic and polycarbonate and these really cause a lot of problems because they ride up the helix of the bit and cause the thin plastic to vibrate a lot in the Z axis and just make a mess with the edge. I am experimenting with trying to do a 2 pass cut of the 6mm polycarb. If my threaded rod will keep from coming apart this might be a viable solution. Higher feed speeds seem to cause a lot more slop in the X and Y axis so I have been trying to keep everything running at 150mm/min or less. <br> <br>Dremel: I have been dissatisfied with my generic dremel. I don't know if the name brand will be better but I am unwilling and unable to spend the cash to find out. I am convinced that a generic &quot;rotozip&quot; or compact router is a way better option to get more torque at lower rpms. Mine has stalled out too many times when I turn down the rpms to keep from melting the edges of the plastic. Plus you get a 1/4&quot; bit capacity and likely a much better collet system to hold the bit. Anything has to be better than the one I have. It is a Genesis rotary tool from Amazon. Works fine as a dremel but the supplied collets don't hold worth a darn when you have high pull-out forces. <br> <br>Well that is enough for now. I hope this helps anyone else that may be running into brick walls like I am. If anyone has any ideas please let me know. One of these days or months I will get this thing working!
Hi, rt, First, excellent detective work on the driver board and drivers. That is the single point of issues with all of the electronics I've seen. <br>Next, on the coupler, while I didn't have any issues, I talked to one user that bulit a larger unit and he user a zero backlash from MMCarr <br>Coupling Hub 1/4&quot; Bore, 3/4&quot; Outside <br>PN 9845T102 using a red Durometer spider <br>Next is the speed of the dremel....Seems I lucked out finding the right speed to cut acrylic with mine, but it eventually died from over use: ) <br>I bought a cutout saw (dremel like) from Harbor Frieght But it didn't have speed control like the dremel. Runs way to fast. <br>I found that there's a certain speed for each type acrylic, so I bought a autotransformer that allows me to change voltage/speed $50.00 <br>http://www.mpja.com/500VA-0-130VAC-Variable-Autotransformer/productinfo/15162%20TR/ <br>Works great. But it does take time to dial in the speed. Both RPM and cut speed. <br>I found that the 1/8 bit got hot so the plastic melted to easy. I got a blower nozzle for my air comp and put it on to cool off the cutting bit. That really helps. <br>mail me on my website and I'll see if I can find any other tips. <br>taulman <br> <br> <br>
Update 2: <br>Tried the different motors. They give about 3x linear feed as expected. After trying to cut some test parts, I think I am going to reverse my thoughts on missed steps. The output with the new motors is all over the map. I think the missed steps weren't as obvious with the slower rpm motors but the higher frequency signals for these new motors is making the missed steps much more obvious. Parallel port card here I come!

About This Instructable




Bio: is an Engineer with a background in electronics, optics, mechanical designs, chemistry, plastic injection molding and plastic die tooling.
More by taulman:Is 3D Printing Safe? or  DIY Testing for HCN from ABS and Nylon 3D Print Material 2BEIGH3 3D Printer Update and call for Testers Nylon Printable 608 Ball Bearing 
Add instructable to: