tackett_kathy_nighttime_photos.JPG
Ever wonder how photographers create perfect exposures in nighttime photos without losing details in the sky?  Read on to find out how they do it!

Supplies
  • camera
  • tripod
  • cable release
  • flashlight
  • Photoshop (or similar editing program)

 

 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: Exposing

tackett_kathy_exposures.jpg
tackett_kathy_raw1.jpg
tackett_kathy_raw2.jpg
The first step is taking the initial photographs, (you'll notice that's plural).

In order to get the proper exposure for all three areas of the photograph, the background, mid ground and foreground, you actually have to take three separate photos.  The easiest way to do this is to use a tripod and cable release for your camera.

Once you have figured out the crop you want, first expose for the sky, or background.  This is where the cable release will come in handy.  Because the exposure time is going to be longer than a simple snapshot to capture all the details in the stars, you're not going to want your camera to move at all, and the cable release will prevent any vibrations or camera shake that might be caused by the user.  Don't worry about the rest of the photograph being underexposed, just concentrate on the exposure you want for the sky.

After you've exposed for the sky, get ready to take a separate photo for the mid ground.  Be sure not to move the tripod or lens in any way, the photographs need to be from the exact same positioning and crop for this to work. 

     *In this particular example that I am showing, I actually created some of the light on the mountain to lessen the exposure time for the mid ground.  To do this, I had a friend standing behind the van out of view with a flashlight shining it back and forth on the mountain to give it some shadows and brighten up the exposure.

Once the exposure for the mid ground is taken, continue on with exposing the foreground in the same way.  Be sure to expose for your main subject, which in this case, is the van.  

     *To make the tents in the background look like they are glowing, I had someone sit in each tent and flash a portable strobe a few times for each. 

Final result:  3 separately exposed photographs.

**Unfortunately I was unable to find my original "mid ground" photo, which is why there are only two exposures shown above.  :/
superdave5481 says: Nov 16, 2012. 12:32 PM
Hey Kathy, I have a few cameras and love to do photography. My best nighttime pictures came from my SLR film camera on a tripod with shutter release. But the cameras I use exclusively now are digital and have no shutter release port that I know of that a cable can attach to. Perhaps the button and the correct settings will do it well enough?
KathyTackettPhoto (author) in reply to superdave5481Nov 20, 2012. 4:26 PM
You're actually going to have to buy a special shutter release for a digital camera, but if you don't have a DSLR, you might not be able to use it. If all else fails, I find that the self timer usually works pretty well unless you're on bulb as you will be needing to hit the button to stop exposing.
djimdy in reply to KathyTackettPhotoNov 25, 2012. 1:43 AM
hitting the button isn't a problem if you use the "hat trick" and cover the lens with a hat before touching the button.
You should be able to do this same shot in one go and without Photoshop by timing the hat going on and off several times.
mr fat says: Nov 16, 2012. 3:53 AM
very good work!
pmann1 says: Nov 16, 2012. 2:54 AM
Nice work, Kathy. Beautiful photo, by the way! I always struggle with night-time photography. Mind you, I don't have a nice DSLR - just a small Powershot G7 Thanks for the pointers.
Rainh2o says: Nov 13, 2012. 6:27 PM
good instructible...you can also do it the old fashion way, before digital...you have to be quick and use a flash and paint the different parts of your shot...I use to do this with an old cannon AE1, never looked as nice though...
KathyTackettPhoto (author) in reply to Rainh2oNov 13, 2012. 6:59 PM
If only film weren't so expensive for us artists. :( I haven't used my film cameras in far too long...
MiltReynolds in reply to KathyTackettPhotoNov 15, 2012. 6:36 PM
I have a nice 35mm film SLR, and a so-so digital. Just this week I decided to dig up my SLR and shoot a couple of rolls. I sent them to mPix (postage free...kind of...$0.19 per frame includes the mailer), within a couple of days the digital images were available for download, no extra charge. Prints cost extra, of course, but I think it's a bargain...a good way to get digital images with a film SLR!

http://www.mpix.com/products/film/
KathyTackettPhoto (author) in reply to MiltReynoldsNov 15, 2012. 9:36 PM
The price of one roll isn't the problem, its how much I'm going to want to develop. I also tend to use a 4 x 5 from time to time and Polaroids are $80 for a box of 20.
nerdyH says: Nov 15, 2012. 12:33 PM
For those of us using the free GIMP instead of photoshop, there's no "blend" menu. Still, don't let that stop you! First, open your various layers open (I like to use Gimp's "open as layers" feature). Put the one with the middle ground on top, and the sky below that, and the foreground at the bottom of the stack. Now, add a layer mask to the top layer (the middle ground). Get your gradient tool, and set it to "Foreground to transparency." Now add a few gradients until the sky is showing through nicely. Apply the mask and merge down... then repeat the process from the ground up to blend in the foreground layer. Enjoy! :-)
DragonDon in reply to nerdyHNov 15, 2012. 9:09 PM
I was wondering about this very thing, thanks!
cstgwr says: Nov 15, 2012. 5:45 PM
Kathy, Thank you for the clear, concise instuctable. I've been experimenting with night sky time-lapsed photography but have not attempted something like this. Can't wait to try this out.
KathyTackettPhoto (author) in reply to cstgwrNov 15, 2012. 6:01 PM
Glad I can help, I'd love to see what you come up with when you get the chance. :)
tseay says: Nov 15, 2012. 3:29 PM
Hmmm..... what kind of lighting did you have for the car exposure? Looks like a spot light pointing down. Is it shopped that way?
KathyTackettPhoto (author) in reply to tseayNov 15, 2012. 6:01 PM
It's actually the overhead light from the car itself, which certainly was conveniant. :)
mediabeing says: Nov 15, 2012. 1:04 PM
Separate. Not Seperate. Remember a PARing knife. SePARate.
I'm being positive and constructive here.
KathyTackettPhoto (author) in reply to mediabeingNov 15, 2012. 3:04 PM
Thank you and corrected. :)
askjerry says: Nov 15, 2012. 7:40 AM
I would not have thought to to this... the final result is nothing less than stunning. I really must try it... I'm thinking a night sky with lightning would make for some pretty interesting images.
KathyTackettPhoto (author) in reply to askjerryNov 15, 2012. 12:02 PM
Sounds interesting! If you end up doing it, I'd love to see the results. :)
Satrek says: Nov 13, 2012. 12:22 AM
The result looks great, but ouit of curiosity, could you share the three pictures you used completely? I'd like to see what those parts with the "wrong" exposure look like.
KathyTackettPhoto (author) in reply to SatrekNov 13, 2012. 6:47 PM
Ok, as per your request, here are the original photos. This was a pretty old project though, so unfortunately, I was unable to find the middle ground exposure. I think it got lost somewhere in the abyss that is my external hard drive. :/
tackett_kathy_raw1.jpgtackett_kathy_raw2.jpg
Satrek in reply to KathyTackettPhotoNov 13, 2012. 11:55 PM
Interresting, at least for me as a photographically inexperienced person. It makes me want to experiment with exposure times and such, but I'm rather uncertain whether my digital camera (which was not exactly pricey) can handle that...
KathyTackettPhoto (author) in reply to SatrekNov 14, 2012. 8:39 AM
What kind of camera do you have? Most DSLR cameras are pretty good with long exposures of 5-7 minutes, (after that, they can get a little noise distortion). Point and shoots, maybe not so much.
KathyTackettPhoto (author) in reply to SatrekNov 13, 2012. 8:40 AM
Sure, I'll try to remember to put them up later tonight. :)
blkhawk says: Nov 13, 2012. 10:17 AM
Your final photo composition is amazing!
KathyTackettPhoto (author) in reply to blkhawkNov 13, 2012. 3:57 PM
Why thank you!
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!