(Updated - see end, below)

If you've ever wanted to play around with sodium acetate, but you're too much of a nerd to simply go online and buy some from a chemical supply house - noooo, that'd be too easy, you want to make it, from scratch - then this instructable is for you.

Inside, I show the whole process, from baking soda and vinegar, through concentration and filtering, to final crystallization.

(Please note that you, not I, explicitly assume all risk associated with playing with chemicals, fire, or hot things. Use common sense. If you're not an adult, enlist the help of a parent. If you're an idiot, close your browser now before you burn yourself. And regardless, by reading any of the suggestions contained herein, you implicitly assume full responsibility for any and all accidents, burns, lacerations, ruptured spleens, loss of consciousness, death, shin splints, hangovers, spurned advances, or insolvency that may result. Seriously... use your brain.)


Update: When I first wrote this Instructable, I somehow got it in my mind that acetic acid had a boiling point that was slightly lower than water - this is incorrect! Acetic acid (ethanoic acid) has a boiling point of 118.1 C. This may change some steps and I may amend the instructions after I've had a chance to play with a few things; for now, though, when I talk about acetic acid boiling off in some of the steps, take it with a grain of salt (or at least sodium bicarbonate). :-)

Step 1: Preparation

We'll be making approximately 330 mL (or 11 fl oz) of supersaturated solution.

You will need the following items:

- One 16 oz box of baking soda (sodium bicarbonate)
- One gallon jug of distilled white vinegar (acetic acid)
- Clean pot for boiling (5.5 Qt or larger)
- Another clean pot for filtering (4 Qt or larger)
- Pack of coffee filters (basket style, not funnel shaped)
- Small wire mesh strainer (big enough to hold a coffee filter)
- One cup measuring cup for pouring hot solution through filter
- Large clean cooking spoon for removing samples while boiling
- Small clean dark dish (e.g. custard cup) for holding samples
- Clean jar to hold final solution
- Distilled water (in case you over-boil the final solution - see step 14)

Optional Items - this is for a purification step that I found I needed (see step 6 for an explanation). If you decide to do this too, you'll need:

- Two cups granulated activated charcoal (from drug store or pet supply)
- Lab stand with burette clamp (if you have this)
- Funnel (if you have a lab stand; should be big enough to hold folded coffee filters - see step 10)
OK, I'll bite. Just why would I want to make this?
<p>for fun.</p>
*You*? I've no clue. *Me*? I was talking with some kids about the vinegar and baking soda reaction, and when we looked up the formulas, I realized that the product was sodium acetate - never realized that before. So I decided it would be interesting to see if I could produce it from scratch to a sufficient degree of purity to be able to show the crystallization of a solution. It took more than a month to get it right (not full time, mind you...), and meantime I worried a neighbor was going to call the police on me, thinking I was cooking meth in my kitchen, owing to all the glassware and so forth visible through my window. :-)
<p> I think the most of the Dark Color your Getting is because of the Formation of Iron Salts with your pot... Aluminium, Glass or Teflon should work without that effect...</p><p>It is just a thought but is supported by a claim by a prior comment here, and I quote: </p><p>&quot;I just made some 1/9/11 and I boiled over a medium heat and it came out clearer. I did 2 batches the first one I added the vinegar to the baking soda and that batch seemed darker, but the second batch I slowly added the baking soda to vinegar and it was clearer and a different consistency of crystal formation too. Give it a try and see what happens. Good luck. I did boil about 90 percent off too.&quot;</p><p>I believe he got a better result the second time because he more fully neutralized the acid reducing Iron salt formations...</p><p>Just a theory but it might help...</p>
ok im going to sound really stupid but why do the crystals get hot when they crystalise im wondering?
it has to do with &quot;supercooling&quot;<br />
<p>And Exothermic raection...</p>
About at what temp. should i boil this?
I just made some 1/9/11 and I boiled over a medium heat and it came out clearer. I did 2 batches the first one I added the vinegar to the baking soda and that batch seemed darker, but the second batch I slowly added the baking soda to vinegar and it was clearer and a different consistency of crystal formation too. Give it a try and see what happens. Good luck. I did boil about 90 percent off too.
<p>I believe because when their is still acid in the Vinegar it make salts with the iron giving it a dark huegh...</p>
But yours did crystallize like it should, right? Not just dehydrate and turn to mush in the pot? My stove has numbers so to me med high is a little over 3.<br>Heres how 4 attempts ended in my case, help me please.
nice one
hi i just did yet another batch, as my vinegar had sediment in it, i filtered it and it did crystalise afterwards, but still a bit mushy. I recharged it by boiling it down, and have a bottom layer of milky white slimey substance - the brown amber liquid sits on top - what is this?
hi i have asked a few questions on other instructables, i know all experiments are done differently but following nurdrage he uses 1litre vinegar to 3tbls bicarb soda. i have converted yours and you use 1 gallon (3.7l) vinegar to 12 oz ( 20 tbls ) bicarb soda. <br>Why do you use so much more bicarb soda? and is this why with me using 3 tbls my hot ice is not solidifying but going mushy? thanks
Can anyone tell me the prime use for this chemical,as it appears to have slipped my mind? Thanks.
this is used in re useable heat pads, the ones that crystallise and heat up when you snap the little metal disc.
Why not use washing soda, sodium carbonate?&nbsp; It has twice the sodium content.
If the chemical formula is different it could change the reaction. It may give the same product in the same quantities, but you would have more waste material, or you would get a bit more product but using alot more vinegar. I don't know the chemical formula for washing soda, but these are some reasons why it might not be used...
I've used washing soda for this. <br> <br>Checked it, the formula: Sodium Bicarbonate Decahydrate <br> <br>So it's no problem.
Is This Used To Make Hot Ice????
maybe you had trouble seeding &quot;supersaturated solution&quot; because it wasnt supersaturated, if u attempted to seed after using the activated charcoal, which may adsorb your desired product? Just an idea. <br><br>I'm skimming, appreciate the cool instructable :)<br><br>--PC
hey, i was just wondering. you said if you heated the crystals, water would be driven off and it would produce a white powder (anhydrous sodium accetate). but how would you go about doing that? could i just put the crystals in a pan on low heat?
can this be done as a school project? can you do the prep at home and then have a deminstration of some sort at school? How would that work,,,,,,any suggestions?
I thought that once all impurities and contaminates are removed it would turn into a slightly tinted clear solution, not stay amber colored.
At least, that's what pure, lab grade sodium acetate should look like....Is there a way to achieve that?
If you look at store bought manufactured hot packs that use Sodium Acetate, they are almost always amber too. Don't know why but they are, so I think its safe to say that it doesn't matter if you can get it clear or if it stays amber colored.
buy pure lab grade sodium acetate
I was just screwing around and wrote out the vinegar and baking soda reaction equation and realized you could make hot packs with the product. Then I checked Instructables to see if anyone had done it, and they had. Darn, thought I had a really good, original idea too...<br><br>Good 'Ible though! :D
Good, clear and simple. Thanks
Always struggling to find coins and keys in the bottom of your <a href="http://www.coachshandbags.com/" rel="nofollow"><b>Coach Purses</b></a>? Struggle no more, this cute little Coach purse has a key fob attached to it, so you can keep everything in one place. As it is small, you can attach it to the strap of your <a href="http://www.coachshandbags.com/coach-jewelry-c-89.html" rel="nofollow"><b>Diacount Coach Purses</b></a>, or one of the inner pouches, there&rsquo;ll be no more rummaging to content with, either! From <a href="http://www.coachshandbags.com/" rel="nofollow"><b>Coach Handbags On Sale</b></a>.
As summer comes, I think that you may do not want to wear <a href="http://www.ugglinks.com/" rel="nofollow"><b>UGG Boots</b></a>. It is said that if you want to put your ugg boots up, you had better place a support plate into the <b><a href="http://www.ugglinks.com/ugg-bailey-button-c-66.html" rel="nofollow">UGG Classic Boots</a></b>, if not, you may also use newspaper. The general newspaper is the best choice. When you use it, you can feel that it can help you avoid moisture and odor. You don&rsquo;t need to fill up, you just need to hold up slightly and to leave gaps. From <a href="http://www.ugglinks.com/" rel="nofollow"><b>UGG Boots Outlet</b></a>.
All other sodium acetate I've seen dissolves clear in water... is there any way to achieve this? I&nbsp;need it to look like plain ordinary water.<br />
For a &quot;water&quot; look, you will need either: laboratory grade chemicles or to buy it online. About 500 grams is like $25 If you need help, consult youtube :)
<p>can you eat it?</p>
<strong>Do we HAVE to have activated charcoal?</strong>
No, look at NerdRage's video.
i followed the directions, but some how i just have yellowish-gold substance that wont melt all the way and theres chunks of the krystals that i cant get rid of.&nbsp; Your stuff was clearish, mines not. what did i do wrong?
Cool!&nbsp;But I'm not &quot;too much of a nerd&quot; so I bought the sodium acetate of ebay. For some reason, mine was like 20 times faster than yours, and it would go off w/o me putting a crystal in it. I made this like a year ago and kept some in my fridge. Do you think I&nbsp;can bring it to school to show my teacher? Or will it go off in my backpack?<br />
I Just wanna ask if i can use Paper towels instead of coffee filters!!! I'll comment again if I am successful P.S. If i misspelled successful or misspelled its because i'm Greek!&nbsp;
For 1 gallon of white vinegar, what's the yield of dry sodium acetate? Assuming vinegar has a density of 1 g/mL, I'm getting a theoretical yield of about 250 g sodium acetate.
Water is 1g/ml; acetic acid is 1.049 g/ml; distilled white vinegar (in the US) is 5% acetic acid - easy math: 1.00245 g/ml (close enough to 1 for government work).<br /> <br /> <strong>Sodium Acetate</strong> is C2H3NaO2, molar mass 82.03g; density 1.528 g ml ^-1<br /> <strong>Acetic Acid</strong> is C2H4O2, mm is 60.05, density already given above.<br /> <strong>Sodium Bicarbonate</strong> is CHNaO3, mm 84.01, density 2.173<br /> <strong>Water</strong>: If you<em> (anyone, not ryguy428)</em> don't know formula or density of water, you're NOT ready to try chemistry. Or graduate from secondary school. Or vote. Molar mass is trickier - it's <em>about</em> 18.0152833 - depending on a few things... ;-)<br /> <br /> <strong>Rxn</strong>: CH<sub>3</sub>&ndash;COOH + Na<sup>+</sup>[HCO<sub>3</sub>]<sup>&ndash;</sup> &rarr; CH<sub>3</sub>&ndash;COO<sup>&ndash;</sup> Na<sup>+</sup> + H<sub>2</sub>O + CO<sub>2<br /> <br /> </sub>Do the molar balance, substitute for density, and you'll get theoretical yield.<br /> (Hint: 84g of soda should give about 82g of sodium acetate. If you were using 8% vinegar, you'd need about 750ml. If you can make that calc come out right, do it for 5% and you'll have your answer.)<br /> <sub><br /> </sub>
Nice explanation of the sums! Very clear.<br /> <br /> A tad harsh about the assumed knowledge though, there are lots of bright and creative people who don't need that info.<br /> <br /> What things did you have in mind for the water that would affect the mass within the accuracy limits and significant figures of your other data?<br />
A) Thanks!<br /> <br /> B) I'm reminded of the story that someone asked Einstein what the quadratic equation was and he (supposedly) said &quot;I know where to look it up - why should I bother memorizing it?&quot; <br /> <br /> &lt;inappropriate political rant&gt; I shudder to think, though, that one can get through high school without knowing that water is H2O, and the absolute *basics* of the metric system (i.e., that mass, length, and volume (and, in fact, temperature and energy, by extension) are tied together by the single, simple fact that 1 cc of water weighs <em>(masses, actually)</em> one gram. Now, I was being a wee bit sardonic, but -- heck, the U.S. makes people applying for citizenship learn all kinds of stuff that (generously) 40% of voters couldn't answer. I sure don't want people voting on global warming, stem-cell research, and energy policy, if their scientific knowledge base doesn't include the absolute scrapings from the bottom of the barrel... ;-) &lt;/ inappropriate political rant&gt;<br /> <br /> More fairly - I liked Heinlein's quote (Google &quot;specialization is for insects&quot;). IMHO, and <em>only&nbsp;</em>my opinion, no adult in the modern world should be considered educated without a grasp of <em>some </em>plurality of <em>some</em> basic knowledge set. Defining that is politically 'difficult' - but I stand by the concept:<br /> <br /> Things are made of atoms. The earth is round and goes around the sun, because of gravity. Traits that help survival get passed on. Wood burns, which gives light, warmth, and tasty food. Men and women think and prioritize differently. (Some) germs cause (some) diseases. Too much sunlight is bad for you (as is not enough). Stay away from wild animals. Seeds grow into plants, which need light and water. Don't eat wild mushrooms, or build a fire in an enclosed area. Yadda yadda. And water is H2O.<br /> <br /> C) Nothing - given your stated constraints. Hence my smiley-face. I was winking at those who'd say something about &quot;well, that's liquid phase - it's more like 0.917 as solid - you have to say at s.t.p. (or, more accurately, at the triple-point). And - what about deuterium content? And never mind supercooling, or allotropic forms....<br /> <br />
A : You're welcome :) It's great to see someone apply some real analysis instead of just spouting second hand partially realised facts.<br /> <br /> C : I know, and apologise. <br /> <br /> I was baiting you a bit about showing off your (absolutely correct, by the way) knowlege.&nbsp;&nbsp; :)<br /> The constraints in fact were outlined by your good self in terms of the sig. figs., phase and isotopic accuracy you supplied for the other reagents.&nbsp; Naughty of both of us, I apologise. ;)<br /> <br /> B : (sorry about the chaotic order, this reply is harder to compose since it's more subjective than A or B!)<br /> <br /> An interesting one and, as you say, very subject to opinion.<br /> <br /> Being a real &quot;science geek&quot; (also with degree level chemistry) at heart myself I hear and understand everything you're saying about basic knowledge.<br /> However, being in the education biz myself tends to steer me away from giving particular importance to my own skill set and knowledge base.<br /> <br /> <br /> Indeed, to quote your own words <em>&quot;no adult in the modern world should be considered educated without a grasp of <em>some </em> plurality of <em>some</em> basic knowledge set.&quot;</em>, which I agree with but for the sake of argument we could go with the knowledge set allowing us to create works of art or music.<br /> <br /> Neither of these knowledge sets requires the formula for water, but I don't think we can eliminate some of our great creative individuals from the voting process just yet! <br /> <br /> Having said that, if you have a look at www.senseaboutscience.org.uk you'll see a wonderful teardown of some science &quot;facts&quot; put forward by some our of leading &quot;celebrities&quot; <br /> <br /> <br /> I certainly grant that most visitors to this site will also veer towards the science geekdom side of things so perhaps your argument stands in many cases, but I still think not all.&nbsp; Perhaps I'm just playing devil's advocate!<br /> <br /> So there! *puts away his own soapbox for the time being*<br /> <br /> Apologies to anyone I've bored with my own rant :)<br />
Oh, we're having fun now! &gt;;-) Good responses, every one.<br /> <br /> &quot;also with degree level chemistry&quot; -- whoops! I never said that. In fact, I've had only 2 chem classes, and that's generous - one was junior high and the other high school, and I didn't excel at either. I'm self-taught over the last 4 years or so, with some help from a PhD friend or two and a lot of journal articles....<br /> <br /> I agree fully about not eating too much of one's own dog food. My educational and work background is management (MBA) and IT, so my criteria also include basic computer &amp; Internet skills, balancing a checkbook, a rudimentary grasp of economics <em>(&quot;supply and demand&quot;, as Father Guido Sarducci's 5-minute University had it)</em>, and how interest works.<br /> <br /> People ought to have some clue about atoms, electricity, magnetism, light/EM radiation, the Big Bang, stars, and the universe. Ditto nutrition, what a liver's for, vitamins (esp. folic acid), and first aid. Ditto basic literacy, numeracy, and communication skills. Ditto basic geography, history, political science, philosophy, literature, art, and music.<br /> <br /> I'm also a big fan of ideas like: everyone should learn to speak another language, play a musical instrument, (try to) get good at a sport, travel to foreign countries, hike/camp in the wilderness, go sailing out of sight of land, summit a mountain, be able to cook one good meal, etc. <br /> <br /> OK - I've now fully digressed into a complete rant about how the entire human race should conduct its affairs. So - I'll see your apology, and raise you. ;-) I realize this is not the forum for my opinions on this -- I'll take it offline henceforth.<br /> <br />
LOL...I'm calling &quot;stalemate&quot; on this one since we've both gone a touch off-topic, but it's been fun for me too. :)<br />
Rereading my comment, I think I might have been unclear - I wondered what the ACTUAL yield was so I could figure out the efficiency of the reaction and purification. I knew how to get the theoretical yield, I just didn't have a balance at home to measure the actual mass of the sodium acetate that I made. :-)<br /> <br /> But thanks for working out the stoichiometry anyway!<br />
No clue. :-) I haven't tried to do the calculations!
Alright, so would this help me out any way in making a replica of Miss Vickies Salt and Vinegar chips? Or would the resulting precipitate be unfit for human consumption? =P<br />

About This Instructable


265 favorites


More by indigoandblack: Crystallization of homemade sodium acetate
Add instructable to: