Print PDF
Favorite
Email
What are the resources?
What are the tasks necessary to make 100% of humanity a success?
How can we ever do so without ever advantaging one human at the expense of another?
How may we render all the world and all its treasures enjoyable available to all men without having one interfering with or trespassing upon the other?
How may we reform the environment so that the integrity of all society is not violated by the free initiatives of the individual nor the integrity of the individual violated by the developing welfaring advantage and happiness of the many?
- R. Buckminster Fuller
Aloha Yall
OK. I know you came here to find out my recipe for an extremely (almost free) cheap, easily constructed by joe average fuel saving and emission reduction device that will cut your fuel bill by a huuge amount AND almost eliminate smoke WHILE cleaning your engine components. And you will. In abit.
First though, I wish the story to be known. Well ok, my story. If you don't feel like reading this right now, I understand, though I hope you will get curious later. You can get the recipe at
Quit your yakking and just gimme da #$$%^! recipe. (link recipe)
The reason behind this technology and the way I choose to make it massively and easily available is that it has the potential to actually make a difference in air quality worldwide. The use of oil though, notwithstanding the increase in fuel efficiency due to this device, I don't anticipate will decrease. People will simply drive more or blow more leaves.. Remember when we all thought computers making us more efficient will reduce our work? Turns out we just used the freed up time to work more. Like that.
No, I anticipate the major impact will be a tangible and almost instantaneous improvement of your local air. I mean your local local air like your garage when you warm up the car; the truckpark at your diner; the bus station; the ferry; your construction site; your leafblower (admit it, you have one of these mega air polluters). This is the way I hope it will happen. Some people will notice the results of them and their network implementing an actual proactive act of enviromental remediation by making and installing an emission control and fuel efficiency device in their engines. Perhaps this might, I hope, lead to a change in thinking viz. A) I can actually make a difference (not just claim to be a currently trendy "green") B) It is good economics (in your wallet, not on some TV ecopundits's chalk board). A massive rethinking on an all planet over local level is needed to change things. That is my goal behind my passing on the info. Maybe people can feel some hope again amid the gloomy outlook being shilled by mass media. Maybe even revival of the idealism and zeal we once had when we were young? (I am referring to my own age group of B/IPPIES (Boomers/ex hippies) and our tarnished hopes here). This is my own motivation. Goes to show you can take the hippie out of the commune but you take the commune(ity) out of the hippie. Some of us simply refuse to cut our hair (even if it is getting a bit thin :-)
I do get a selfish (sorta) and beautiful benefit doing this. You know how you feel when you help someone or do a good deed? I hope you remember anyway. yeah you do. Otherwise you wouldn't be reading this, heheheh. For me I always got off on coaching Little League. The feeling I get when I do, is, for me, right up there in the feelings leaderboard. This I have figured out lately (from energy cultivation studies-see below) is because FEELINGS ARE REAL AS GRAVITY. Now it don't take much of a genius to figure that the cadillac of feelings is Love. The rest is merely static. It is so simple to me now. I feel great when I coach kids because they love me!! Kids are pure and innocent and their love is pure and innocent and static free. We feel this most easily and acutely. I know I am not wrong when I say - Everybody knows this (yadayadayada rational mind schrational mind...). Oh some of us (too many) go through some period where we let life kick us around so much we think this is not true. Rerealize the truth. Please.
My mentors taught me that if I generate useful new information, Universe will bestow benefits and blessings tenfold upon me. This is always been true and remains so. There are many people who follow this credo and I admire them as a class. I wanted to continue to do this. I still have many ideas and developed projects in the works as I enjoy Designing (in the Bucky Fuller definition) and I wanted to get them out there. The real world business bit has never been a pleasure for me. So I decided to just give the designs away. No strings attached. Go for it. Run with it. Make it . Use it. Give it. Sell it. Tell it. Spread it. Link it. Translate it. Mirror it. Facebook it. Google it. Just please mention the E.L.V.I.S. site (as a way of furthering the distribution).
I want many millions to use this information, build this device, reduce personal air pollution, save lotsa dough, make a business, rekindle hope, feel enpowered, feel just plain good to do something. I want the most love vibes possible. I want to feel, in my deepest soul body the cascade of resplendence. And get wiped out in the laughing tumble cycle of the goodvibes tsunami already approaching. I trust Universe to bestow appropriate blessings upon me. :-D
I give you the Electrochemical Liquid Vortexing Ionization System. E.L.V.I.S. Hey I think its cute and memorable while paying due respects to The King. Its actually TM in the Philippines where I currently live on a small island with my family cultivating bamboo, organic food and reefs.
E.L.V.I.S. TM
Electrochemical Liquid Vortex Ionization System.
An inline catalytic device that electrochemically charges fuel to enhance dispersion through self repulsion resulting in more complete combustion. E.L.V.I.S. reduces soot; dissolves deposits; increases horsepower; cleans emissions and improves fuel economy. E.L.V.I.S. makes your old engine rock like new.
The Science
Certain metals, under special environments can be persuaded to donate electrons (negatively charged subatomic virtual particles). These free electrons will attach themselves to molecules of any conductive fluid or gas with which they are in contact. This causes these molecules to become cationic (acquire a negative electrical charge). Since like charges repel, when this fluid (say hydrocarbon fuel) is atomized into a spray, this tendency results in a more finely and widely dispersed cloud.This allows more contact with oxygen molecules and increases the efficiency of combustion. This increases the total amount of heat energy (BTUs) available, preventing soot (unburned fuel) formation as well as consuming any previous soot. This translates immediately to more clean horsepower from less fuel.
These principles of electrochemistry (over a century old) have been applied in devices both common, (ex. batteries), and classified (ex. rocket engines). Jet Propulsion Lab's 1984 report for NASA - NPO 15715 - REDUCING SOOT IN DIESEL ENGINES - on the effect of charged fuel on soot reduction concluded that charged fuel produced less soot during combustion. Their 1998 report, NASA - NPO 20219 - ELECTROSTATIC DISPERSION OF FUEL DROPS TO REDUCE SOOT - comparing electrostatic ionization vs. atomization of fuel concluded - "Electrostatic charging is superior to mechanical centrifugation for combined soot nucleation reduction and enhancement of evaporation"
Exclusive to E.L.V.I.S., the outbound fuel stream is spun into a high speed vortex that braids the liquid inwardly into a higher energy imploded state. When released by the fuel pump this pent up energy causes an extra outward impetus to the fuel molecules in addition to the self repelling effects of like charges.
Electrostatic fuel ionization technology has been extensively tested and is currently being used by corporations, government agencies and military forces all over the world. Affordable consumer level devices using this principle have not been widely available until the E.L.V.I.S.
For all the details go to www.the-elvis.info
Remove these ads by
Signing UpStep 1Ingredients
Whether it is to be Utopia or Oblivion will be a touch-and-go relay race right up to the final moment. . . . Humanity is in 'final exam' as to whether or not it qualifies for continuance in Universe. It is the integrity of each individual human that is in final examination. On personal integrity hangs humanity's fate
- R. Buckminster Fullerý
How to make your own E.L.V.I.S.
Personal and commercial models
Personal model.
All small engines, marine/autos/pickups, gas or diesel. Not LPG.
Ingredients:
Copper beads
Aluminum beads
Zinc or Stainless steel beads
Ordinary plastic inline fuel filter
small piece of aluminum or stainless steel mesh
Optional
fancy metal screw type cleanable fuel filter
small Neodymium (rare earth) magnet
Small piece of aluminum
- R. Buckminster Fullerý
How to make your own E.L.V.I.S.
Personal and commercial models
Personal model.
All small engines, marine/autos/pickups, gas or diesel. Not LPG.
Ingredients:
Copper beads
Aluminum beads
Zinc or Stainless steel beads
Ordinary plastic inline fuel filter
small piece of aluminum or stainless steel mesh
Optional
fancy metal screw type cleanable fuel filter
small Neodymium (rare earth) magnet
Small piece of aluminum
| « Previous Step | Download PDFView All Steps | Next Step » |
Will be filling up over the weekend and running her dry to set a benchmark and then installing the E.L.V.I.S. and testing it out.
I have worked with NASCAR on all levels, and they are also trying to lower the emissions. Though harder to do, not impossible. You seem like the man with the thinking out of the box and who cares if you do not like me idea, help the environment while we can or shut up.
Just reading the comments, i like you even more, and i can bet safely there is alot more coming, or your just storing the knowledge away for another time.
Ionization i have been fascinated with from kids age. I know the bennies and flaws, i must admit, never thought of it this for this application, but all brilliant.
Keep up the good work for humanity.
I am building on that you can put inline that would surprise you and the ppl that have it. Something that looks like it belongs there, so please send me your info, would love to be collaborative with you on this for all of us.
Not trying to be rich, just want to keep what i work for, no more high gas prices.
kai
let's talk.
aloha
kai
I need more details before I can offer any opinion as such.
reach me at yahoo in canada. my moniker is makena_kai
aloha
kai
I'm thinking about leaving the metal in bar form, and placing them perpendicular to the stream of fuel within the filter, just to make sure there was no restriction added from the balls getting stuck against the filter or opening.
aloha
,kai
I looked at your test results.
There's only one baseline measurement, so it's really not possible to statistically know the true baseline values, but the ELVIS tests have an average CO% of 0.86 and a standard deviation of 0.25%. This excludes the two measurements with 0.00 CO%, as those should almost certainly be taken as outliers. The baseline CO value is 1.7 standard deviations from the average ELVIS CO measurement.
Given the variation in your data, if you test 50 times you would expect 5 results that are at least 1.7 standard deviations from the mean. Typical statistical significance of a difference between the two conditions - with and without ELVIS - would be assigned if the distance is 1.96 standard deviations or more.
Regarding the hydrocarbons, your baseline is only 0.32 standard deviations from the mean of the ELVIS tests. By all measures, the two conditions can be statistically assumed to be identical.
Do you have more baseline data? That would help firm up the interpretation - it could even help your case.
The easiest way to prove it is to build one for 5 bucks, install it in an old engine or one that failed the smogcheck.
I am not trying to make any case or money. This is an offer of valuable info to anyone who wants it. I have a lot of similar info and its time I just gave them away since I am never gonna make businesses out of them - I am retired (though not from creating and thinking...).
aloha
kai
i cam across NASA data on glyserides and ionization and it does. also no explosive potential since it is a passive small effect like plating or battery.
check out www.rentaria.com they sell thier's for 1200+ same principle. ..i want the world to know. this secret, :-)
cheers
kai
Rentar's system is not the same principle. They do not ionize the fuel, only polarize individual molecules. Or so they claim; I don't know if it's true or not. But it's more plausible because creating dipoles is much easier than ionizing, in the absence of ions or electrons in the environment.
They also create hydrogen gas, via catalysis, which speeds up the flame and allows the engine to be run at leaner conditions. All the independent verification looks compelling to me.
Whether or not all their principles are sound I can't say, but on first scan I'm much more inclined to think that they've got something real.
New innovations in this area involves the use of charged crystalline lattices as molecular sieves. The idea is to position molecules in a certain geometric way, via charged binding sites, that certain ones get knocked off easier.
HOH generators appear very promising.
aloha
kai
Passive ionization is the key. Its the reason why undersea wrecks get coral growth before they rust. The different metals in a ship create varying ionization effects that create a small potential difference. This is enough to create a current and we know that small currents stimulate coral growth. Google electric reef building.
aloha
kai
Namaste Kai,
I have built one using a transparent filter.we will start testing on my friend's Honda 100cc 4 stroke, 1994 model bike. i made an excel sheet from the images you put up. will run for 15days with testing every day.
Will post build pictures this weekend.
I think rentaria also gets carbon credits from sales using their test results as carbon saving projections . Just a wild guess..
Greetings from India,
Anil
namaste
kai
Mahalo!
your Chem prof is not very good... Its not my theory. it is a well established principle that has been used for almost a century - batteries are based on this. metals give up electrons in a conductive medium. Its called Ionization Potential. The conductive fluid aquires a negative charge from the free electrons. check out the NASA studies at my links. google this area. wikipedea is also good. cheers
kai
www.rentaria.com is the company selling the same thing for 1000's of dollars.
http://www.goodforgas.com/documents/appnotes/PID_Gas_Table.pdf
It's a gigantic table of Chemical ionization potentials for various chemicals.
And if you don't mind reading Harvard literature, they have a great dissertation on ionizing hydrocarbons here:
http://www.chem.harvard.edu/mass/ion_selection/hydrocarbons.html
I figure this should help all the "Hydrocarbon isn't acidic" arguments. Btw, Acids are used mainly because the Hydronium Ion reacts with various substances to release the hydrogen, oxidize the material it's combining with, thus releasing the negative charge and creating electricity. Other compounds and such do the same thing, just without all the chemistry. Try buffing your socks on the carpet. No acid to be found there, but plenty of electricity generated.
thanks for answering the comments succinctly and correctly.
You should notice an immediate improvement.
The Ionization potentials of metals are well known and on wikipedea where i found it. bimetallic differential potentiation is the reason why shipwreaks don't corrode fast enough to prevent coral formation, indeed, there is a new technology using small currents to induce accelrated coral grwoth, its called BIOrock. google it.
its a lo tech application of hi tech principles. its the principle behind batteries ...
cheers
Drasser - You would put it before the fuel pump (low pressure) but after the filter. I would really not recommend putting it right on the high pressure line as you say it will go pop and spray fuel over your nice hot engine, Now that is a recipe for disaster
Savagesmith - It is not the PH of the fuel that causes the catalytic reaction, it is the properties of the metals. The Fuel is being used as a conductor for the metals which when is passed thought fuel the polarisation occurs. The process could easily be achieved by the use of an electrical input through anodes and cathodes (positive and negative plates) BUT Who in their right mind would put electricity in to the fuel line, look what a spark does in the combustion chamber!!!!!
If you read this site about the Deionization of water http://www.freedrinkingwater.com/water-education2/49-water-di-process.htm you can start to get an understanding of what is going on. Though all reports say that it is a true catalyst, there is a tiny bit of erosion at the molecular level of the material, so if it was to run constant for 100 years then there might be erosion evidence (but do not quote me).
I will try to put it into layman’s terms for you as I see it (I welcome any corrections by Chemists and Physics people out there as I am electrical based) this is going to be a very simplified version of what is going on. Ok here we go. The fuel is a complex hydrocarbon molecule primarily neutral in charge (having equal positive and negative ions), the metals are dissimilar and are biased in a certain way (positive or negative). They are trying to pass their ions on while taking from another, think of it as three people in a triangle passing 3 balls, the object is not to have any balls, A passes to B but receives C, B passes to C but receives from A, C passes to A but receives from B, and around it goes. Thinking of that process, it can only be done in a conductive solution, in this case the fuel. The fuel acting as a carrier for the ball (positive ion) becomes charged so to neutralise itself it rips a negative one off the next hydrocarbon molecule as it passes through the materials causing the change (the metals). As there is a flow of the fuel the molecules will emerge as some positive and only a few negative, but now cant swap fully with their opposites as they are not enough of them to do so. These molecules are primarily positively charged like poles on a magnet, they want to get away from the others like themselves (similar repel). So when they are atomised in the chamber they are easier to separate into a finer mist. This mist is burnt more evenly and efficiently and thus giving the wanted results of better fuel efficiency and better horse power.
This is the theory behind it, I hope it helps you. Though I have seen loads of hearsay and conjecture about its effectiveness, both from “Eye witnesses” and “Official bodies”, I have yet to be convinced that it will do anything and that the results seen are nothing more than a placebo effect. I hope that it does work as I intend to fit one to my car. I drive a 97 Ford Mondeo 1.8 Diesel Turbo. I know how much I get out of her and how responsive she is as I regularly do a 250 mile round trip. For those that are interested I get 45mpg (UK gallon), and she is a slow beast, but keeps on plodding (201,000+ on the clock)
Articas – Unfortunately some people are just negative lol