Desulfator for 12V Car Batteries, in an Altoids Tin

 by kmpres
Featured
DSCF1411.JPG
Hello Everybody!

After a year or so of reading and drooling over other people's wonderful projects in these pages I decided to finally make one of my own. Here is my first instructable, a version of the ever popular Battery Desulfator, which I built in an Altoids tin.

First, some background:

My urge to build this project came when my wife's car refused to turn over after a three day weekend away. Here in Tokyo, during winter, the temperature can drop to the low 20's (F) at night and since we have no garage, her car just has to endure the cold as best it can. Many people don't realize that you don't have put up with repeated jump-starts or run to the nearest garage and plunk down 7,500 yen ($85) for a new battery every time this happens. Your old battery may just have built up a layer of lead sulphate crystals on its plates and that is preventing the acid from contacting them over their full surface area. This is caused by subjecting the battery to long periods of insufficient charge, as in the cases of unplugged golf carts over the winter, infrequently used automobiles, and PV systems that don't get enough sunlight to charge their batteries. The result is a great reduction in the battery's ability to produce electricity.

With a desulfator circuit you can reverse this process and rejuvenate the battery to like new condition. You can also save money and prevent water and ground pollution at the same time by keeping your old battery out of the local landfill. As long as nothing is seriously wrong with the battery it can last many times the two or three years that people typically use them. You can even get free batteries from garages that routinely throw them away, desulfate them, and never buy another battery again. Save money and help the environment - now there's a green ecology scheme I can get into!

Most DIY desulfator circuits in use today can trace their roots back to an article in issue # 77 of Home Power magazine written by Alistair Couper in June/July of 2000. Many versions were spawned by his design but they all accomplish the same thing, that is, they use various pulsing circuits to force the lead sulphate crystals back into the electrolyte thus rejuvenating the battery and restoring its lost capacity. The version I chose uses an NE555P timer chip for the multivibrator front end and two coils, a low ESR cap, a fast diode, and an N-channel MOSFET (hereafter referred to as a FET) to generate the high voltage (50V) spikes in the output. Credit goes to Ron Ingraham for changing the design to use an N-channel FET instead of the harder to find and more expensive P-channel types in the earlier versions. Along the way I couldn't resist adding a few tricks of my own to make the design more convenient. See this link for a description of the theory and other information on desulfators.

This circuit can be used three ways - as a standalone device powered by the battery under test; as a standalone device but used in parallel with a battery charger; or built into a charger so that the two work together as one. I chose the third option for my circuit but added a switch so I can use either device independently. Mounting the device onto my charger also allowed me to use the charger's output cables for both functions and avoid the tangle of wires that inevitably results at the battery.

Once properly adjusted, the desulfator can be left on permanently whenever the charger is charging. Just be aware that no matter what configuration you choose, the desulfator is powered by the battery under test so if you use it without a charger care must be taken to avoid deep discharging the battery.

High power versions of these circuits can be built for off-grid solar-cell systems as well where many batteries are typically arranged in series/parallel banks and attached to inverters to produce 120V AC. These battery banks can be desulfated en-masse while being charged by their solar arrays for a truly self-maintaining system minus the periodic checks for electrolyte level, as long as the desulfator circuit is scaled up in size sufficiently.

The Altoids can is the perfect box for this project as the circuit neatly fits inside it and the metal construction can shield much of the RFI that may be emitted by the output stage. You can't beat the price of these tins, and they even come with free mints, or do the mints come with a free tin, I forget... ?

So with the background out of the way, let's get to work!
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: Circuit Schematic and Parts List

Here is the schematic and parts list, along with some of my pencil notes.

The list is complete except for some parts (two pots, two resistors, two switches, a LED, a FET and some grommets and pop-rivets) that I salvaged out of my junk box. Feel free to do the same, just keep to the values on the schematic as much as possible. Please note that C4, a 100uf 25V electrolytic capacitor, must be a "low ESR" type (Equivalent Series Resistance) to limit its tendancy in this application to get hot. If you choose to use trim pots instead of resistors for R2 and R4, as I did, be careful with the adjustments as C4, D2, L1 and L2 can get very hot if the 555 chip is made to send too wide a pulse into the output stage. The resistor values in the schematic should program the 555 chip to output pulses of the proper width and limit any excess heat buildup, however. We'll discuss this further in the Smoke Test Steps.

The LED can be any standard type and will only turn on when pulses are present in the output. S1 should have at least a 3A rating, and if you use a DPDT type use both sets of contacts in parallel to reduce the contact resistance as much as possible. S2, at the output of the 555, isolates the 555 from the output stage allowing you to make adjustments to the front end without risking overheating Q1, D2, C4 or the inductors.

The inductors I chose are listed on the schematic at the bottom of the "Possible Inductors from Digikey" list. They fit the can nicely but will need to have one lead extended slightly to reach the bottom of the circuit board. In retrospect, an inductor with a slightly higher current rating for L2 might be better as the one I chose gets noticably hotter than L1 even though it has the same current rating of 2.4A. Digikey part number M8875-ND should fit the can, barely, and has a 3.6A rating, but the 2.4A coil that I'm using now really only gets hot if I get too aggressive with the pulse width adjustments.

D2 is a FRED (Fast Reacting Epitaxial Diode) and should not be substituted with any old diode in your junk box as the latter will probably not work well in this circuit. If it gets too hot you can use two in parallel to double the current capacity, but again, if you keep the pulse width on the conservative side it will only get slightly warm.

The FET listed works very well and is inexpensive. I mounted mine directly on the perf-board with a piece of stick-on copper foil (available from Digikey) under it to act as a heatsink. In this configuration it doesn't get warm at all so the copper foil may not actually be needed. Be aware that the metal tab on the FET is also attached to pin 2 (drain) so if you attach the FET to a heatsink you'll have to electrically isolate it from the rest of the circuit. I also used a TO-220 transistor socket to allow easy replacements but you can wire the FET in directly if you prefer. Just avoid touching pin 1 (gate) while handling it as it is very ESD (static) sensitive.

Also, I opted to use the "Turn-off Enhancement Circuit", shown in the schematic as Q2, D3, and R5, as it helps the FET to turn off more precisely. If you use these parts do not use C2 and R3.
1-40 of 263Next »
jamiemudry says: May 18, 2013. 11:53 PM
I'm curious to see a little more about the waveform that is transmitted to the battery, has anyone scoped this at all? I have this running on an AGM battery and it seems to be working, but I had to wind my own coils, substitute components, and it's currently built on a breadboard....
kmpres (author) in reply to jamiemudryMay 19, 2013. 5:41 AM
Deep down in the comments are two images I posted taken with a fast scope.
career707 says: Mar 30, 2013. 5:31 AM
OK, thanks kmpres, I've built the peak detection circuit, placed it in parallel with my desulfator and DVM, reads about 1.6v(mind you at one stage it did read 15.??v). now the batteries i'm testing are a 55A Optima Yellow Top AGM Type been desulfating for about 6 days Standing charge before was 12.22v, now has climbed to 12.55v taken off charge last night and left, then tested about 9 hours later.

The other battery is a wet lead acid 44A, peering inside the vents I see that the lead plates appear to be clean(dark brown), there is like a paper seperation sheet which has what looks like a grey powder on it this is also 12.45v standing charge (has been standing for a while).

Am i correct in saying that as the desulfation process continues the peak voltage declines as the lead sulfate disolves (I'm sure I read that somewhere).

Changed the 220uH 2.4 Amp to a different unknown type runs much cooler (less turns but thicker magnetic wire than the old one) the tone produced at 0.70A (as in smoke test 1) sounds more pronounced
career707 says: Mar 27, 2013. 7:07 PM
Gone to the trouble of rebuiling the circuit on a seperate board, dropped the Ampare output to half an AMP, The P600G Diode (D2 bought new rated at 6Amp) gets fairly hot, as does the 220uh inductor and the IRFZ44N Transistor everything else is cold, unit only on for a few minutes.

When I do a voltage test on the output section (eg on D2) of the circuit it never exceeds the voltage of the test battery being desulfated. I say this because other videos on youtube have had voltage output of inexcess of 46V(is this correct for this circuit also). Capacitor C4 (100UF Electrolytic LOWESR) did explode so replaced with a new 1000uF Electrlytic LOWESR type this is now cold.

R2 = 6.1K
R4 = 150K
AMPARES to battery as in smoke test 1 = 0.50A on multimeter.

Have tried to locate the diode noted in previous comments not found as yet, have also read your comment with regards to how the circuit works, makes excellent reading.

Any ideas from the overheating description i provide above. thank you for your help.
kmpres (author) in reply to career707Mar 28, 2013. 10:02 AM
Looks like you're in the ballpark. You won't read anything more than nominal battery voltage if you're using a voltmeter. Only a scope can see the high voltage spike as it has a very short duration, much too short for a meter to pick up. Even most lower end scopes won't see it because it is too short for them to pick up and display. You need a 200 mHz scope to see the spike. Some people have been able to use a peak detection circuit with a meter to measure the spike, but I've not tried this so can't advise further. It is normal for the diode, C4 and coils (especially the smaller one) to get warm. Just be sure to adjust R2 so they don't get hot as they will burn up if left on too long. Normal spike voltage is around 50 volts. Mine seems to operate well at 55 volts p-p, but the parts get very warm at anything higher.
career707 says: Mar 26, 2013. 6:30 AM
Thank you for your response, your build is excellent, unfortunately I do not have a scope (on my wish list), When I do a voltage test on the Positive side of the Diode (P600G/6A4) it reads between 12-13V, pin 3 of the NE555N reads only 1.60V I would have thought that this output would be higher,
Voltages on the Inductors also show only 13v max.
Parts used
Q1 = IRFZ44N
Q2 = 2N2907A
L1 = BOURNS - 2324-V-RC - INDUCTOR, TOROID V, 1000UH, 10%,2.4A
L2 = Inductor 220uH 2.4A Toroid Bourns 2116-V

Only been into electronics for a few months, a few small projects, this build certainly had me scratching my head a few times.
kmpres (author) in reply to career707Mar 26, 2013. 8:54 AM
I'm not sure how you can read the voltage off your 555 output pin without a scope.  The duty-cycle is short and far from sinusoidal.  A voltmeter would likely give you a low reading.  Also, your diode may not be fast enough.  It needs to be a fast reacting type. As explained in the instructible, any old diode from your junk-box won't do in this case.   Someone wrote in and said that the FR602 went out of production some while ago but he found a replacement and listed it in the Comments.
career707 says: Mar 25, 2013. 6:29 PM
Don't know if this instructible is still answered, but, I have built this desulfator, I have a few issues maybe you can help me with,

1/ smoke test 1, Ckecking the current with R2 as a Pot set at 15k, R4 Pot set to 270k, my multimeter is set at 10A, the reading is 0.07A, I was expecting 0.7A.

2/ I do get the tone once connected, I also get the Interference on my AM Radio.

3/ If I turn R2 Up to get 0.70A my 220Uh Inductor gets extremely hot so much so that I have had to fit a Cooling fan.

4/ I think that it is working a little as the battery I fitted it to has has had an increase in Standing charge/Voltage.

5/ the 220uH Inductor I have is rated at 3.4A, the 1000Uh inductor is rated at 2.4A both toroid inductors.

I have checked and rechecked the build against the schematic and I believe that I have done everything correct, I am not an electronic guru, just started about 3 months ago, can read simple schematics,
IMG-20130325-00272.jpg
kmpres (author) in reply to career707Mar 26, 2013. 4:43 AM
I can't tell for sure, but it looks like you built it correctly.  The currents can vary significant;y depending on component values and impedances.  I would adjust the current until the toroids get noticeably warm but not overheat after prolonged use. The cooling fan is a good idea but you should adjust the pots so the circuit does not burn up if it stops working.  Check the noise level of the signal going into the FET.  A noisy signal will make the FET, C4 and coils overheat.  Also be certain that C4 is a low ESR type.  Finally, the acid test to see if the circuit is working properly is to hook it up to a fast scope.  The spike will climb or drop very quickly in response to slight changes in R2.  Down in the Comments are some pictures I took showing the output spike and ring as it should look.        
Fozzy Vis says: Jan 16, 2013. 1:03 PM
Hi, Wanted to build this to try to revive some batteries I got in an old UPS. After going through the parts list, I've sourced all the components except for the coils. I found these two coils that seem big enough to carry enough current, but the values are not quite like they are in the schematic. As you seem to mention that the values don't have to be exact, I was wondering if I could use these:


First (round) one is has two windings, each half of the toroid and 2.33 mH, with a measured 0.17 ohms.

The U-shaped one has even bigger gauged wire, is a single inductor, 873 uH and 0.07 ohms.
Both resistances measured with a regular multimeter, so DC.

I have a couple of the pcb's where these came from, so could easily use the U-shaped for both L1 and L2.
Or should I search for some other coils?

Thanks!
DSC_0073.jpgDSC_0072.jpg
jbaker22 says: Sep 3, 2012. 3:34 PM
I only have a dc ammeter wiil that work for the tests? Also can I just use r3 and c2 instead of Q2? Thanks for your help :)
kmpres (author) in reply to jbaker22Sep 4, 2012. 3:42 AM
The instructible has instructions for using an ammeter, but an ammeter is of limited help in troubleshooting the circuit if it doesn't work properly. Not using Q2 will work only if your circuit is clean and has little to no noise. Noise will make the circuit overheat as others have found out. I have not built the circuit in this manner so can't comment on how well, or even if, it will work.
jbaker22 says: Aug 31, 2012. 2:59 PM
Do desolater rely on high voltage pulses, pulses, or current pulses? I built a simulation of the circuit and it is weird. https://www.circuitlab.com/circuit/n47wvv/desulfater-2/
kmpres (author) in reply to jbaker22Aug 31, 2012. 6:32 PM
It's all in the instructible.   The comments give you a wealth of other information as well.   The circuit you linked is nearly identical to mine.  All desulfators work by converting battery current into very short high voltage pulses.  These pulses are seldom higher than 55 volts peak-to-peak, so they're not really high, just a few times higher than the nominal voltage of the battery under test.  That's all the circuit needs to do its work.  If your pulses are higher, it means the duty cycle of the output from the 555 is too long and needs to be reduced.  Otherwise you'll run the risk of overheating your components.
kmpres (author) says: Jun 23, 2012. 12:30 AM
Excellent. I was just about to suggest you check your R values and wiring. A lot depends on the other components used, which is why I used pots for R2 and R4. Also, any cheap oscilloscope will let you see the pulse width from the 555 to the FET, but you'll need a fast one (100MHz or more) to see the spikes going to the battery. Some people have made peak detector circuits so they can at least tell how high the spikes go. As you adjust R2, the spike climbs or falls dramatically.
thermoelectric says: Jun 22, 2012. 9:50 PM
Testing my desulphator and it seems to get rather toasty hot (everything on the output side) with the 15k and 270k resistors, although I can hear the tone. Is it likely that I've made an error wiring up the timer? Dropping the size of R2 didn't seem to decrease the current all that much (seems to pull 15+A DC).

Cheers!
thermoelectric in reply to thermoelectricJun 23, 2012. 12:14 AM
Nevermind, was using a 270 ohm resistor rather than a 270k ohm, hah. Now it works better. :)
didyman says: Apr 29, 2012. 1:57 PM
Another working one! Thank You for the instructable! It's a prototype, so design will surely change later. Especially for the location of C4. At first, i have forgotten to connect the enhancement circuits' PNP Base to the rest of the circuit, so there was no fast turn off and everything got warm too quick-finally the IRF2807 has gone.. So replaced with IRFZ44N and noticing the missing joint and....Works everything well. C4 and C1 also is a Yageo SC. It's low-ESR type, not the best available here, but i have some in spare. Gets so hot, but not that much. Some interesting notice. 555 output is fine, and so the output pulse. Everything is fine, and not very warm to the touch with a single 54Ah car battery, but after i tried it in my vehicle, with a 75Ah one. And there, it runs much hotter. And from the sounds intensity, it just turns lover at once and then climbing up louder slowly, then again, turns down. This also affects heat dissipation. What is interesting, the peak voltage reading is around 43V in both case (a 1N4148-100nF single peak detector is placed at the cables very end near to the battery).
The car is a Peugeot 205, no ECU in it, and the Pioneer radio seems unaffected, no 1kHz signal from the speakers in any mode, exept AM receiving, certainly :-)) . Now it's cyclic desulfating, as i don't like to leave alone this proto. Results-i will come back and tell!
Ahm, LED. I got a white one, and that works only in reversed. It shows that the FET opens, and i think its enough to state that pulses are generating. But i will try red ones later.
desul.jpg
kmpres (author) in reply to didymanApr 30, 2012. 3:29 AM
Well done!  I'm glad you got it to work.  I have found that the circuit works best if attached to the battery with short cables, as you did.  In 1-2 months you should have a working battery again.

During the winter my car's three year old battery decided it wasn't going to start my car on a cold morning so I jump started the car and took it to a battery dealer for his assessment.  Naturally he said it was toast and that I'd better replace it. Hah! I said. I put it on the desulator and two months later it was good as new.  Even tested it by leaving the car parked unattended for a week while I went on vacation. The car started right up when I got back.
didyman in reply to kmpresApr 30, 2012. 5:03 AM
I have a client wich is an auto repair dept. I usually meet with this "don't think just throw it" mentality, but i always try to refuse. Original parts are horriblic in price, and the electronics aren't examples. And if it can be disassembled, there are good chances to repair (heh, cables, cheapo parts, relays, capacitors-everything that can go wrong in any regular product..). It's not only a value for-effort, but an environmental, too. And these batteries are take a much bigger toll than that the dealer asks for them at the shop. It's simply unbelievable, why there is no bigger efforts to save batteries with such a simple solution for a problem, that may be the main reason behind battery aging. I have measured 26V on the battery's terminals, 60V on the electronics (the measured 43V was on the fuse holder near the crocos) with the simple peak detector and the most voltage seems still loosing on the crocodiles, or on the wires attached to the battery-so further measures will take place, and maybe the mentioned ferrite ring will help more. Some not so important changes: I have BC556 at home for PNP, and BYW29F-150 for the FRED (as watching its forward characteristics, with 60A peak, developing only 1,2V on it, i can't believe it's enough for a red LED anyway with the currents the circuit is able to produce, but i will try it anyway-the FR602 has a noticably higher rdiff, so it easily can light up a lower Vf LED). Later, i will try to optimize circuit paths (but this probe-panel has two straight lanes in its middle, so i built up the higher current paths accordingly, and the FET's gate drive crosses it, but for this reason i placed the enhancement circ near the FET and let that crossing line see the low output impedance of the NE555. And it seems, as the peak is so narrow, the cabling has to be not only short, but free from narrow turns and parasite capacities. I think, these little thoughts may be useful, because we want to make sure the more energy reach the battery and not loosing on the path to it-again, some measurements will prove if they are valuable. And again, Your instructable is very kind, very practical and interesting, anybody could learn from it! And, some pics-may or may not interesting, but i show them :-) . It's a proto, so it looks like that (yes, i know: Things are made for temporary solutions tend to last for longer than anything else :-) ).
side.JPGback.JPG
2009ee195 says: Apr 18, 2012. 7:33 AM
Hi KMPRES

I've made and assembled the circuit, made my own inductors as they were unavailable in the market. I can hear humming sound from the inductors, but have to place my ears very close. the led is also glowing but when i checked voltages and ampere with multimeter the dc voltage was 15v as i think because of zener diode and the current is just 0.1 amp this is not good can you tell me where i m going wrong?
kmpres (author) in reply to 2009ee195Apr 19, 2012. 4:18 AM
The zener should clamp the voltage to the 555 to no more than 15 volts, but under normal circumstances it should never get that high.  R1 takes down some of the voltage from the battery and acts as a current limiter for the zener and 555.  The voltage between pins 1 and 8 of the 555 should read around 12.5 V with a fully charged battery and the charger attached.   I'd check your charger first, then the 555 and zener section with S2 off.  Once you're satisfied the 555 and zener are wired and working properly, turn on S2 and check the output using the Smoke Tests.  Use a scope if you have one, or if not, follow the Smoke Test instructions and adjust R2 carefully watching for heat buildup in the coils, Q1, D2 and C4.  Try testing with a known good battery, too, to make sure it isn't your test battery that is causing the trouble.
2009ee195 says: Apr 13, 2012. 11:46 AM
Hi Kmpres How r u?

Kmpres i was giving a look to charger section of your instructable, i was unable to to understand.

Did u attach the circuit parallel to charger and then attach it with battery?

If you attached parallely doesn't it affect the charger?

Or If u really attached parallely with charger can i use power diode to stop pulse going into charger, kind of insulating charger from the circuit output but on the same time using charger current as source?
kmpres (author) in reply to 2009ee195Apr 14, 2012. 5:46 AM
This is already well explained in the instructable and in the comments.  The circuit is powered by the battery under test.  You need to keep the charger on the battery in order to keep the circuit from draining the battery  while it does its work.  Both charger and circuit are attached to the same battery terminals so they work in parallel.

Use a 1.5 to 2 amp trickle charger and leave it on while the desulfating circuit is in use.  This will power the circuit and maintain the charge level at the same time.
2009ee195 says: Mar 31, 2012. 12:04 PM
Hmmmm. So i think i have to stick in this design and wait for recovery for long.....well any idea how much time it will take to refresh my 200 amps battery well theoretical results are far from the practical ones
kmpres (author) in reply to 2009ee195Mar 31, 2012. 9:59 PM
I don't think the size of the battery matters much. As long as it is a 12 volt wet-cell battery this circuit should work fine on it. As for how long it will take, a lot depends on the amount of sulfation in your battery. An accurate time prediction is therefore not possible. However, one or two months is generally enough time to restore a battery that has desulfated to the point where it won't turn over a car engine. I just today put a three year old battery back in my car after desulfating it for the past two months and it started my car with no problem. It read 13.18 volts no-load before attaching it to the wiring harness, an improvement of almost a volt from two months ago.  After starting the car, letting it  idle for two minutes, then turning it off, the battery read 13.12V while still attached to the car's wiring harness (meaning that it was lightly loaded with the clock and other standby components). It had refused to turn over the engine on a cold day last January and required a jump-start.  A local bettery seller said it should be replaced so I decided to prove him wrong.

I did make one change to my desulfating setup, however.  I replaced the Japanese charger you see in the pictures with a Schumacker 1.5 amp Battery Companion slow charger (available on eBay) and  attached 1 foot long leads and some simple battery clips to the desulfator circuit .  The shorter leads allow a higher spike to reach the battery with less loss occurring in the wires.    
2009ee195 says: Mar 30, 2012. 2:13 PM
Hi Kmpres
Bro, i want to test this circuit on a 12v 200a wet cell battery, what i want is to give it life again in a week, what certain changes do i needed to do in your circuit? can u help me out.

As i read your previous comments i think that this circuit can work on one ampere hour ratting. if i am right the circuit will take 200 hour to fully refresh the battery.

here i have a power break down issue and i want to use it as soon as it get refreshed minimum i can wait is one week. so please help me out.
kmpres (author) in reply to 2009ee195Mar 30, 2012. 8:46 PM
The process really needs time to do its work.  I don't believe anyone else has succeeded in speeding it up much beyond what the circuit already delivers.  Please be aware that the circuit's safety margin (55V spikes, low current consumption, ease of handling, etc) is compromised if you exceed its design parameters.  Anything beyond what it already delivers makes it, in my view, dangerous, so for that reason I cannot advise you what changes to make.  

jbaker22 says: Nov 19, 2011. 8:02 AM
I don't won't to devalue your instructible, but it seems like you payed double the price of a desulfater in your electric bill. There are desulfaters that run off a 12 volt float charger (550MAH).
kmpres (author) in reply to jbaker22Nov 19, 2011. 6:07 PM
The amount of electricity used is negligible. A one amp trickle charger in constant use over a year will cost you a few dollars, and that can be offset by a solar panel if you're interested in that sort of thing. A float charger won't charge your battery from a depleted state, at least not quickly. It can really only maintain a fully charged level once that level is reached by other means. Also, most people who use desulfators are trying to bring back a battery that has sulfated to the point where it can't hold a full charge to begin with. The real value in making your own desulfator is in learning how they work and being able to fine-tune it to your specific needs. To me that's priceless.
jbaker22 in reply to kmpresNov 26, 2011. 9:19 AM
So, how long did your desulfated battery last anyway?
kmpres (author) in reply to jbaker22Nov 26, 2011. 7:11 PM
The desulfator had performed well on that battery, but I found it can't fix all problems. After several months the battery in the pictures, which had been given to me by a friend, was nearly fully restored and I began using it to field-charge the high-current flight packs I use for my model airplanes. However, I found that a hairline crack underneath the negative terminal had caused some corrosion around the terminal and in the charger clip. My friend hadn't noticed this before because sulfation in the battery had effectively sealed the crack. After using the desulfator the sulfation disappeared clearing the crack just enough to allow acid fumes to do their damage. I sanded off the corrosion but when this happened again a month later I decided the battery wasn't worth saving. This is one of those rare cases where fixing one problem causes the re-appearance of another hidden one that can't be fixed. However, I've used the desulfator quite successfully on other batteries since with no corrosion problems so the concept is well proven.
Stefanovski says: Jul 2, 2011. 6:20 PM
Hi i was looking for desulfator who can desufate much quicker. I found that batterydoctors.com (my neighbor is on of them) have some technology that allow they to desulfate car batery for one day. I found that 3,26 MHz is optimum (magnetic resonance) and find this interesting schematic
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_X7IYGjOz8_0/SljTnoVMhPI/AAAAAAAAAII/8W4Q7qxwhfY/s1600-h/hi-low+charger.JPG
Because I rockie in eletronic, can you and other see and coment. This is the blog http://poormanguides.blogspot.com/2009/05/updated-chargerdesulfator.html
kmpres (author) in reply to StefanovskiJul 3, 2011. 8:43 AM

Yikes!  You're playing around with straight 120V AC with no isolation!  Touch one wire and you could receive a nasty shock, and if any hydrogen gas is around (as would be the case if any deeply discharged lead-acid batteries are nearby), one spark and an explosion is possible. If electrolytic capacitors are used and are wired up backwards, they can blow, possibly providing that spark.  That said, I can't comment on if or how well it works without building and testing it myself.  I can only take the author at his word that it does, and at the moment, I have no reason to doubt him. However, my circuit uses lower voltages and takes more time, but it is safer to build and use.  For those of you with little or no electronics background I recommend you seek professional help before attempting this circuit.

Stefanovski in reply to kmpresSep 18, 2011. 3:30 PM
I bild this http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_X7IYGjOz8_0/SljTnoVMhPI/AAAAAAAAAII/8W4Q7qxwhfY/s1600-h/hi-low+charger.JPG and using it like a charger for you're desulfator it gives around 1,6A 120Hz will it be ok to work in paralel with youre desulfator I conected there was no problem but I dont know for how long any sugestion ?
kmpres (author) in reply to StefanovskiSep 19, 2011. 2:51 AM
As I wrote in a previous post, I can't comment on another person's circuit except to say that circuits that tap directly off the house current are inherently dangerous, GFCI or no GFCI. I built my low voltage version exactly to avoid such dangers. Use this circuit entirely at your own risk.
kmpres (author) in reply to kmpresJul 3, 2011. 11:14 AM
I should point out that while the GFCI outlet (Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter) in the above circuit helps prevent deadly shocks, they are generally only installed in bathrooms and kitchens (in modern houses) and are not commonly available in other places around the house. The author is using it like a fancy circuit breaker by attaching a plug to the back end of the GFCI, which is a non standard use for the device. Do not skip this part of the circuit if you build it. Better, do as my old high school electronics teacher back in the 70s used to say: do not build 120V circuits at all without an isolation transformer.
Stefanovski in reply to kmpresJul 3, 2011. 4:46 PM
thanks for the advice
a_hakeem says: Sep 6, 2011. 4:31 PM
Dear Mr. KMPRES, You are the MOST kind person with big heart i ever met through web sites.

I am very glad to be a member among all cleaver and high educated members.


With regards to all

I am : asad al hakeem from IRAQ
fortunare says: Aug 30, 2011. 9:50 AM
Does anyone have a spare version of this desulfating charger that works which you'd like to sell? Haven't got the time or patience to build one myself but would like to try one. thanks, Mike. fortunare@cox.net
1-40 of 263Next »
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!