Distill Hydrogen Peroxide

 by spencer012

Step 2: Distillation

wfp-02-green-800.jpg
The First and only step is to pour about one teaspoon of salt into you cup. Next pour three teaspoons of Hydrogen Peroxide on top of it. This mixture can be enlarged but remember to keep the solution at a ratio of 1:4. 1 being the salt and 4 being the Hydrogen Peroxide. After you have added all ingredients stir them together inside the cup. After all or most of the salt is dissolved let your solution sit until you see two layers in the liquid. These will be the salt water and the Hydrogen Peroxide separating. I am pretty sure the top one will be the Hydrogen Peroxide and the bottom one will be the salt water. Comment at the bottom to tell me what you find. I would also like to know what use you have found for it.

Have fun and enjoy!

 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up
elementcollector1 says: Feb 8, 2013. 6:18 PM
This topic is an insult to chemists everywhere. Give me physical evidence that hydrogen peroxide *can* be salted out, and I'll give you a full apology. Until then, my mixture of saltwater and hydrogen peroxide remains a fully miscible mixture of saltwater and hydrogen peroxide.

Meanwhile, back to freeze distilling, like a regular person.
rocketguitarguy says: Oct 23, 2008. 12:19 PM
liquid Hydrogen Peroxide makes a wonderful rocket fuel. no need for an oxidizer tank for the Hydrogen Peroxide contains both the oxidizer and the fuel (hydrogen as the fuel, oxygen as the oxidizer)
waynesl in reply to rocketguitarguyOct 29, 2011. 1:55 AM
When H2O2 is used as a MONOPROPELLANT, there is no fuel nor oxidizer. The compound is broken down by catalytic action of a silver screen, evolving O2 and H2O and generating heat. The Bell rocket belt uses this method for relatively safe rocket thrust close to the body of the operator. The exhaust temperature and composition are safer than most other reactions would produce. The downside is a lack of specific impulse, because the reaction is relatively tame.
nitrous in reply to wayneslAug 2, 2012. 4:55 PM
I'd like to know if this fellow is still alive.
jpoopdog is confusing "I got away with it" with "it must be safe, because I got away with it".

Just for completeness, lead poisoning is generally an accumulate heavy metal poison. As such, it rarely kills immediately, unless of course the lead is provided as a soluble salt. The symptoms of lead poisoning are often found in cognitive dysfunction (children who ate lead based paint don't do so well in school).

I'm all for supporting inquisitive thought but draw the line when it puts the individual at serious risk of harm (including death). What fascinates me is that in today's climate of terror threats, much of what jpoopdog has admitted to would be considered a felony.

BTW, I'm saying this from the perspective of someone who has been both a chemist (doctoral program in physical chemistry many, many years ago) and a medical doctor. Many of the things I "got away with" as a high school student were never safe. I just "got away with it". No one was seriously hurt (although a friend has a keloid scar on his knee from a conc nitric acid bottle that he grabbed by the glass stopper and poured on himself. Bad luck - but it was MY bottle of conc acid.

Do you self a favor before it is too late. Stay away from energetic compounds (explosives and propellants) until you have formally studied them. Chemistry is a great field to study - I know - I did it for many years but you don't want to hurt yourself or others.

Much of what you have said in these posts will hurt someone. Waynesl gave you some good advice. If you're still alive (and not in jail), head it.

Good luck,
nitrous
PyromaniacDaniel in reply to rocketguitarguySep 16, 2009. 7:00 PM
wrong. The reaction of decomposing H2O2 is 2 H2O2 > 2 H2O + O2 + heat. This is not a Redox Reaction. However the O2 can then be used as a oxidizer. For instance a common liquid fuel rocket engine is to pass high concentrated H2O2 over a silver screen (catalyst to decompose the H2O2) into the combustion chamber and add kerosene to it. The heat of the decomposition is enough to cause the kerosene to burn with the O2 created. However the decomposition of the H2O2 would produce a thrust on its own given that it is going from a liquid to a gas and being heat to produce a pressure.
m0nk3yb01 in reply to PyromaniacDanielDec 2, 2010. 4:02 PM
Hydrogen Peroxide works as a stand alone fuel. Old torpedoes used h2o2 solely as a fuel (with a copper pellet as a catalyst to separate it into it's component gasses), complications of which caused the sinking of several subs. They're even still in use on modern satellites to control their orientation, because it's easy to precisely control the thrust.
PyromaniacDaniel in reply to m0nk3yb01Dec 6, 2010. 9:22 PM
yes that is true. I already said it would work by itself. see last sentence from above. I was merely pointing out that it is not a Redox Reaction as rocketguitarguy had stated but was instead a decomposition.
I_am_Canadian in reply to rocketguitarguyFeb 19, 2009. 2:55 PM
So, how do you make a rocket then?
waynesl in reply to I_am_CanadianOct 29, 2011. 12:36 PM
http://www.nar.org/
jlund says: Feb 2, 2012. 10:28 PM
None of this answer the question of which is water and h2o2 and I wana know too so Plc answer
waynesl says: Jan 4, 2011. 2:06 AM
Most of the people commenting here need to lay off the tinkering and confabulating until they've studied some real chemistry texts and learned the principles and calculations and methods, before they get hurt.
About 25% of these comments are spot-on, though wasted as pearls before swine. Another 25% are pure nonsense, and the last 50% or so are poorly-formed arguments in the right general direction but not effective. I've been building pyrotechnics and propellants for 50 years, and the nature of much of this drivel causes me to fear for the safety of the experimenters and their neighborhoods. I hope not to dampen your enthusiasm, but to direct you toward serious, effective study of this wonderful subject. It IS rocket science, but everything you've discussed here was settled and published before any of us were born. The method of concentrating posited in the instructible will actually work, but is very ineffective. The product is only slightly more concentrated than the source material, and contaminated with Sodium, Chlorine and Iodine. An interesting and harmless experiment producing a small but detectable change- suitable for an instructable, but NOT for munitions or propellants, as many readers supposed. When professional chemical engineers like http://www.peroxidepropulsion.com/ get involved, high concentration H2O2 is made by reduced-pressure fractional distillation in dedicated glass apparatus, or by freeze crystallization. There is a detailed discussion at: http://www.rsc.org/ebooks/archive/free/BK9780854045365/BK9780854045365-00001.pdf
If you really want to brew your own, and have a vacuum pump and can blow glass, then see the attached diagram of the temperature gradients you'll need to dance around for crystallization. Below 62% water freezes before hydrogen peroxide, but after 62% hydrogen peroxide freezes before water. So quite high concentrations can be achieved if you freeze it to 62%, throw out the ice and then freeze it again, this time keeping the ice which is now relatively pure hydrogen peroxide. Of course, The freezing points are just too close between 55% and 65% to be able to cross the barrier without massive losses.
Therefore one would Freeze concentrate, removing water ice until concentration reached a suitable 50ish% and then evap to 70ish% and then freeze concentrate collecting H.perox.Ice until 90+% and then distill till ya get the really scary stuff. By the time you get that process rolling, your buddy can have the silver-catalyst jet pack built, and it will be a wild ride home!
Phse%20Digrm.jpg
smatchett in reply to wayneslOct 28, 2011. 8:11 PM
exactly right i am a pyro and beleav that u cannot have fun without work wether calculations or preperation
jpoopdog says: Aug 25, 2010. 5:46 PM
(removed by author or community request)
niertap in reply to jpoopdogSep 29, 2010. 11:15 PM
Please never try to talk about chemistry ever again. I don't believe you said a single correct statement in your entire post.
dombeef in reply to niertapJan 2, 2011. 1:26 PM
And this can also make diamonds if the purity is at least 90%...
jpoopdog in reply to dombeefJan 2, 2011. 5:35 PM
how so?
also, i was wrong about the hydrochloric acid, it seems that the stuff i always use has some kind of agent in it that decomposes h202, or allows the hcl to react with it.anyways, i got a 12% jar of h202 and distilled it, then added it to some charcoal sulfur mix in the proportions 10/3/2 and when i lit it it exploded the jar it was it with a big bang plus made a large fireball and sprayed sulfury charcoal mud everywhere, and it wreaked.

but still, i dont understand how 90% can be used to make diamonds, do you mean the heat which it can generate, and the pressure to melt and compress carbon?
dombeef in reply to jpoopdogJan 3, 2011. 7:04 AM
I was joking, most of the stuff you said sounded fake
and the heat it generates is way too little along with the pressure it needs to make diamond
jpoopdog in reply to niertapSep 30, 2010. 7:01 PM
its probable, that means possible. ive done the simulations and it seems to work. as what i said was true about mixing a peroxide with a gaseous acid to make hydrogen peroxide, and it is made very pure, so long as you use sulphuric acid not hydrochloric, i just realised that hydrochloric acid reacts with h2o2 to make aqueous chlorine, but its not likely that youll get large amounts of the stuff.
never make such rash acusations without thinking something through
waynesl in reply to jpoopdogOct 29, 2011. 2:28 AM
This is me being nice, jpoopdog. As you found on Jan. 2nd, your ideas about chemistry are very mixed up. If you persist in this poorly-conceived activity, you'll probably wind up in hospital. Your theories are spun out of ignorance and hubris, making you a very dangerous person. I'm being as nice as I can when I suggest you stop posting nonsense which may inspire some gullible reader to do something dangerous. Instead, you should go to school and learn from a professional chemist, after which you'll be able to make propellants that propel instead of detonating.
jpoopdog in reply to wayneslNov 10, 2011. 1:42 PM
I am now better educated with the safer practices of chemistry.
But ill tell you why i was not discouraged by your warnings.

every time i was told not to do something because there was a 99% chance it would explode in my face and hospitalize me, and not do what i wanted it to, it worked fine, i keep my face. from experience, i learnt that when someones says its very dangerous and will definitely maim you, it actually meant, where gloves and glasses, and youll be fine.

I smelted lead, im not dead from lead poisoning. i had an allergic reaction to the lead oxides left behind after smelting, only to find i have a lead and silver allergy.
I opened a bag of aluminium powder, and it didnt burst into flames like everyone warned. I made HMTD and intentionally mishandled it just to see what its limits were, i smashed a small vial on the ground, and it didnt explode, i was told a slight bump would make it go off.
I asked around here if it was possible to distill ammonium hydroxide, without getting any soap form the soapy ammonia into the clean product. i wanted a simple yes/no answer, but people raved on about how its so dangerous and too risky that ill ruin my lungs somehow and it will explode and somesuch, and not to do it. i did it, and found out i was right, the soap didnt vapourize.


Anyway, now i cant find that post about the exploding mix, but ill have you know i did not post that, plus it would never happen unless its heat was raised spontaneously, and or pressurized.
I dont know how, maybe someone hacked my account, or a moderator just doesnt like me all that much, but i never wrote, nor did that. i highly doubt a 12% bottle of peroxide would make enough 90% for that to even happen at all, nor would i have the means to distill to that concentration and keep it from decomposing down to 60-50% where it is considered stable under standard conditions.
waynesl in reply to jpoopdogNov 10, 2011. 6:05 PM
I'm glad you're still healthy, jpoopdog, and that your curiosity and drive to learn are still healthy too.
niertap in reply to jpoopdogJan 21, 2011. 12:11 AM
A comma is not the same as a period.

Hydrogen peroxide can never be used like a solid oxidizer. It is very unstable and will react with most organic compounds and transition metals.

The word catalyst does not have an "i".

A catalyst only changes the speed of a reaction. They cannot be used to make energy out of nothing. 2 molecules of H-O-O-H decompose into 2 H-O-H and 1 O=O. This reaction gives off energy and heats the higher concentrations to steam and oxygen gas. You would have to add a very large amount of energy if you wanted to break the O-H bonds and make O-O and H-H bonds instead. This would also be stupidly redundant, as you would then be burning it and making it back into water.

Benzene is not a peroxide, it is an aromatic hydrocarbon.

Expoxy has epoxides in it, not peroxides. An epoxide is a cyclic ether that acts as a good electrophile in the polymerization of epoxy.

Sulphuric and nitric acids are liquids, while hydrochloric acid is a gas.

The reaction with the sulfur/carbon you mentioned earlier was most likely the oxidation of sulfur to sulfur dioxide. It's a foul smelling gas, but fairly useless. Why would you add the sulfur if you were trying a liquid oxidant? The sulfur is mainly to form a liquid phase and greatly speed up the reaction.

H2O2 will most likely not oxidize HCl. It's not powerful enough of an oxidizer. This will however work with the larger halogens as the X-H bond isn't as strong. HCl acid is aqueous. It has Cl- and H3O+ ions in solution. With a stronger oxidant it is oxidized to the non-aqueous chlorine gas.

As I said earlier; please never try to talk about chemistry ever again. I don't believe you said a single correct statement in any post.



m0nk3yb01 says: Dec 2, 2010. 4:21 PM
This is a pretty convenient method to concentrate h202, but I'm thinking cold distillation would be a better bet if purity is a concern, like if your h202 is an ingredient in any pyrotechnics. For example I'm trying to build a Flux Compression Gen (a MK-2, actually), and the explosive it calls for becomes extremely unstable with any impurities.
GlockLobster says: Jul 7, 2009. 2:33 PM
so what is the actual ratio-- I find it a bit confusing, or maybe I misread it... you say the ratio is 1:4 salt to H2O2, but you only put three tablespoons of H202 in. so wouldn't the ratio be 1:3?? I realize the salt concentration would be 1 in 4, and the HP concentration would be 3 in 4, but I'm sure the ratio would be 1:3. the only reason I ask to clarify is because you said to 'make sure you keep the same ratio'.... thanks for the clarity.
JimJong in reply to GlockLobsterOct 24, 2009. 1:18 PM
 I think that he means 1:4 as is 1 part salt to the entire mixture. as in there are 4 total parts and only 1 of them is salt.
Treknology in reply to JimJongMay 17, 2010. 3:30 AM
Glockbuster is correct.

The math varies, and the original figures need to be clarified, as does the "measure".

NaCl : H202 of 1:3 means the NaCl consistitutes 1/4 of the total, by volume.

To suddenly represent that as 1:4 now means the salt is only 1/5 of the total.

There is also no mention of how the reaction may be affected by additives in the salt.

FURTHER: Note that the container is plastic. Do not use metal containers or utensils.
steeldragonmaster in reply to TreknologySep 30, 2010. 2:18 PM
The solubility of table salt in pure water is 359g to 1 Kg(1L).
A ratio of 1:3 BY WEIGHT would be less wasteful of the salt and probably prevent a layer of undissolved salt at the bottom of the cup making it easier to extract the concentrated H2O2.
I think mixing 30-35g salt into 100cc of H2O2 would be best.
xxrd says: Sep 12, 2009. 10:11 AM
so is it the top layer or the lower one? H2O2 has a density of 1.5g/ml...
Romanader in reply to xxrdNov 13, 2009. 11:09 AM
Wiki says H202 is 1.463 gm/cm^3. (So yeah, you're pretty much right. A saturated solution of saltwater has a density of 1.2 gm/cm^3. I think the salt water will float on the top, being less dense. It's like seperating the phases in plant extractions. This would be super effective if you mix the salt and peroxide in a blender (Gets the most possible water-salt contact). All you need then is a seperatory funnel. It'd leave the excess salt in the bottom, peroxide above that, then saline on the top. ...that's what the math implies.
smuczerproductions says: Jul 14, 2009. 9:17 AM
um... how much is the consentration 90%
pyroguy123 says: May 23, 2009. 8:19 PM
how do you separate the H2O2 from the top?
nerdhero17603 says: May 17, 2009. 12:28 PM
wait how long do you leave it
nerdhero17603 says: May 12, 2009. 2:15 PM
so wait is this a subsitute for potassium nitrate or is it actually kno3??
DavidRobertson in reply to nerdhero17603May 16, 2009. 2:00 AM
no its a method of purifing H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide)
sixminus4is5 says: Jun 30, 2008. 11:53 PM
Pretty good, easier than cold distillation. Might get better results using non iodized salt.
___ in reply to sixminus4is5Feb 25, 2009. 5:53 PM
cold distalation?
sixminus4is5 in reply to ___Feb 26, 2009. 9:34 PM
Hydrogen peroxide freezes at -.41 C so a mixture of water and H2O2 can be frozen then the hydrogen peroxide is skimmed off the top. By repeating this method you can obtain fairly high concentrations.
Putzer says: Feb 22, 2009. 3:42 PM
A copper pellet used to be added to hydrogen peroxide to power torpedoes.
El Mano says: Jan 28, 2009. 6:41 PM
How would one use peroxide as an oxidizer?
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!