Downloading NOAA satellite images cheaply and easily

 by sdobbie
Featured
DSCN0840.JPG
This will show you how to download weather satellite images really cheaply and easily using easy to obtain parts.

For this you will need:
RTL SDR USB software defined radio. It costs around 20 pounds.
get it here:http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/140803976327?ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1497.l2649
I have discovered a problem with this radio. It does not pick up weather satellites at all any more but it still picks up everything else very well. It seems to lose sensitivity to the signals over time.

SDR Sharp. You can search Google for this.

Audacity

APT Decoder
this is a free program.
There are many places to get it

2 metre long piece of wire

long pole to hold the wire

A small laptop computer that you can hold for 15 minutes at a time.

You can connect your radio to a USB extension cable and just hold the radio in your hand rather than having a laptop under your arm. If you do this, the USB cable sometimes causes noise and signal loss so it is best to have the radio plugged directly into the laptop.




Finally, if you have really enjoyed this or found it useful, please consider making a tiny donation trough Paypal here:
http://sdstuff.net76.net/Donate.html
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: The Setup

DSCN0839.JPG
I have modified my software radio that I bought by removing the existing connector and attaching a coaxial socket instead. I also covered it in foil which can help block noise in some cases.

You simply have to secure the wire to the central pin of the coaxial connection by soldering or making up your own connection. The other end of the wire is attached to the other end of the pole a bit like a fishing rod. Once you have the software at the right frequency, you close the laptop, hold it in your left arm and hold the antenna pole with your right hand until you can hear the satellite.

To set up the software so it detects the radio, you need to copy rtlsdr.dll into the same directory as SDR Sharp.
A better guide will be included with your radio or you can find it online.
In SDR Sharp, you have to set the front end option to your software radio. In my case it is RTL SDR/RTL 2832U.
You have to uncheck filter audio and you must set the bandwidth to 36 KHz. The mode should be set to NFM and the squelch off.

I find that my radio picks up NOAA 18 the best so go here to track it:
http://www.n2yo.com/?s=28654

It struggles with other satellites because there are noise spikes near the NOAA 19 and NOAA 15 frequencies. These spikes may be caused by the radio itself or USB power supply noise.


yo2ldk says: Nov 13, 2012. 3:04 AM
(removed by author or community request)
sdobbie (author) in reply to yo2ldkNov 15, 2012. 4:30 PM
Sorry, I do not speak or read Klingon.
Misac-kun says: Sep 25, 2012. 4:22 AM
Did you ever tryied using SSTV for decoding the signals?
sdobbie (author) in reply to Misac-kunSep 25, 2012. 5:20 AM
I don't know what that is.
sconner1 says: Aug 28, 2012. 7:32 AM
That's really cool.
Learndy says: Aug 28, 2012. 5:12 AM
NASA also publishes satellite images. They operate their MODIS high resolution multi band satellites which take images of the earth at pixel resolutions of 250m x 250m. This means that a pixel corresponds to an area of 800 ft x 800 ft on earth. They publish the MODIS image of the day which is mirrored by various web sites, e.g.: http://www.airspace-v.com/ggadgets/modis.htm where you can also find a Google gadget to get the current image of the current day.
khourig says: Aug 27, 2012. 9:05 AM
You know NOAA has a web site for this information, right?

http://www.nesdis.noaa.gov/SatProducts.html



Anyway, I appreciate the HAM aspect of getting this signal direct and decoding it. Good job.
jhitesman says: Aug 26, 2012. 10:44 AM
I've done this before with a number of "real" radios but just picked up a RTL dongle and have been trying to get anything usable. Same software and antenna config that's worked for me before but just can't get a decent image with the RTL - it's just not a strong enough signal. So I'm thinking that at least the dongle I got is a little less sensitive than I had been expecting. Need to find time to do more tests to confirm. I still have a blast with it as there are all kinds of interesting things in the range it can pull in (aircraft positions, land mobile users, commercial FM, weather stations,VHV/UHF amateur frequencies....) For as little as they cost I need to pick up another of a different brand and see if it's any better. As mine just seems a little deaf compared to most that I've seen.

Oddly enough with any of my radios I've had the best luck with my HF antenna for the NOAA sats, no clue why. I've been meaning to build a circularly polarized antenna for them for a couple of years but never seem to get around to finishing it.
sdobbie (author) in reply to jhitesmanAug 27, 2012. 8:52 AM
You should try soldering a large coaxial connection directly on to the circuit board on the radio.
Wazzupdoc in reply to jhitesmanAug 27, 2012. 4:35 AM
Try adding a pre-amp at the antenna. Ramsey makes one for about $20US. That should give your images a boost.
jhitesman in reply to WazzupdocAug 27, 2012. 9:26 AM
Well, like I said I have a number of other "real" radios that work just fine for receiving WX sats with my existing antennas. The RTL dongle just isn't very sensitive. I have a pre-amp but it if comes down to that I'd rather just dust off one of my real radios that have a more sensitive receiver. A pre-amp won't make the receiver in the RTL any better - it may just help mask the problem, or it could make it worse since a pre-amp will also raise the noise floor which is already really high on these little dongles. Building a better antenna will probably give more signal gain and have fewer drawbacks than a pre-amp. Plus I can build a good antenna out of things I have laying around without spending another dime ;)

Same deal for soldering a new connection, these boards are tiny, the traces are tiny, and they're really cheap so it's easy to break/lift a trace. Adding a new connector will help get a slightly better signal from the anteanna by removing a few db of losses from the adapters - but it's also going to create a whole host of it's own issues I'd rather not deal with.

Instead I just accept that the $20 dongle has it's place. It's a ton of fun for listening to strong terrestrial signals but just isn't great as a ground station for sat work. It's great for listening to the local repeaters - but can't decode 1200 baud APRS transmissions reliably either. I can hear lots of APRS activity - but it never gets decoded. Most likely the computer I'm using it on is a little underpowered as well which isn't helping. But I've got a shoebox full of softrock RX's that work great for HF. I just really wanted one of these for all mode VHF/UHF to complement my softrocks and for $20 I got more than my money's worth. But that isn't to say it's a great radio.
billgeo says: Aug 26, 2012. 11:21 AM
That's really fantastic.

Will this work around the world or its limited to some countries?
sdobbie (author) in reply to billgeoAug 27, 2012. 8:52 AM
It works anywhere.
CShaffer212 says: Aug 26, 2012. 3:55 PM
What's the reason to close the laptop?
dan.berry in reply to CShaffer212Aug 27, 2012. 5:03 AM
I believe the author suggested this because LCD panels emit strong spikes across a number of frequencies as they operate (thanks to harmonic distortion).

Given that he has taken the step of wrapping the SDR dongle in foil, I'm assuming he's further doing this to minimize any noise interference.
conmac863 in reply to CShaffer212Aug 26, 2012. 7:14 PM
I think it is so you can stick it under your arm but that is a guess.
CShaffer212 in reply to conmac863Aug 27, 2012. 3:31 AM
Ah, yes. That does make sense.
sdobbie (author) in reply to CShaffer212Aug 27, 2012. 8:51 AM
That is the reason, so I can put it under my arm. I am now using an Iconia Tab W500 which is much lighter.
TheBlackSharpie says: Aug 26, 2012. 5:07 PM
Is this legal?
t.rohner in reply to TheBlackSharpieAug 26, 2012. 10:19 PM
In most countries it's perfectly legal.

(As far as i know, in the U.S. you're allowed to receive anything that's "on the air".
When i remember correctly, it is linked to the "freedom of speech".)

srutkowski says: Aug 26, 2012. 8:26 AM
Very interesting!

Having worked with GOES, Meteosat, and weather radar processing for over 30 years I can assure you that getting involved with this can be extremely rewarding.

For you next project, I challenge you to get this data accurately overlaid onto a high resolution ground map.

Spherical trigonometry is your friend.. :o)
darkbain says: Aug 26, 2012. 7:59 AM
This is extra koo, I never thought about catching satellite signals. This has been put on the wishlist. Thanks for posting.
shaunak says: Aug 26, 2012. 7:12 AM
Thanks for sharing this. It is very interesting. I cant want to get my hands on a software controlled radio.

Shaunak
amandaghassaei says: Aug 20, 2012. 12:20 PM
this is awesome! I'm going to have to try sometime. I'd love to see a few more pics of your setup to see exactly how everything is connected. is there a good link to find out when these satellites will fly over?
sdobbie (author) in reply to amandaghassaeiAug 20, 2012. 1:56 PM
The link is on this page. It takes you to a site where you can see a live map.
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!