own library parts: http://www.instructables.com/id/ERHQQ180Y3EP286NQY/
modifying the design rules: http://www.instructables.com/id/EZVIGHUBGCEP287BJB/ )
But feedback indicates that a lot of people could probably use an instructable on the
more basic aspects of creating a schematic and board.
This instructable covers creating a schematic, presumably from a printed schematic in
a magazine or image on the web. I'll start with schematic shown, which is from
http://www.bowdenshobbycircuits.info/555light.gif
It's got a "typical" collection of parts, and is vaguely useful as well.
Cadsoft EAGLE generic information:
Cadsoft EAGLE is available from http://www.cadsoftusa.com/
Cadsoft is a German company that is a veritable mecca of software distribution enlightenment. In addition to the reasonably-priced professional PCB design packages ($1200), they have freeware, lite, non-profit, and other intermediate licenses. Their software runs under windows, linux, and MacOSX. It's slightly quirky, with a steep (but not too high) learning curve on the front end, but from most reports it is not any more so than other professional CAD packages. They have online support forums that are active from both the company and other users, the package is under current development and gets better with each release. A number of PCB fabricators will accept their CAD files directly. It's good stuff.
Use it. Propagate it. Buy it when you "go pro."
See also:
Creating PCB from Schematic
Creating Library parts
Design rule modification
Send CAD Files to manufacturers
Remove these ads by
Signing UpStep 1: Create new project
You'll get to name it whatever you want.


















































Visit Our Store »
Go Pro Today »




If I knew anything about UI design (which I don't) then I would probably say that this was a horrible choice for both the placement and naming of the button. I would probably think that it should be changed immediately.
Thanks.
So R-EU basically same with R-US right?
R-EU_0204/7 means 1/8W resistor with 7mm spacing?
How about capacitor? like 3n3 C-7-10/5
-Why yes, that's exactly what I thought and apparently why it's NEVER worked before for 2 years of trying. You'd think they'd something like that on the first page in the manual. I am so angry right now.
Likewise, why is the word "smash" being used for a function that "[s]eparates text variables and attributes from parts or elements." And what does "separate" mean in this context? That the variable or attribute labels can be moved to a different spot around the part symbol as needed to make the drawing more readable. Wouldn't "rearrange labels" or even "detach" be better in the help-file description than "separates."
After I learn and grouse about these little quirks a while, I think Eagle will be very useful, especially since it seems to be a quasi-standard in the low-end (or free) market.
Basically, the 555 is not "rail to rail" on its output, and otherwise would not be sure to turn off the "upper" transistor when in the high state.
Do you have any tips on where to find additional or alternate libraries that are more organized?
I don't know about "more organized", though. I haven't seen any organized attempt to modernize/fix/organize a comprehensive set of component libraries for EAGLE, but it's likely that such a thing would be in the "costs money" realm where I wouldn't notice.)
(there is the recent Element14/Newark/Farnell effort to tie EAGLE directly to parts purchases; I haven't paid much attention to that since they're not one of my preferred dealers.)
Thanks for sharing with us.