3 Simple Ways to
Share What You Make

With Instructables you can share what you make with the world — and tap into an ever-growing community of creative experts.

PhotosPhotos

Share one or more photos of a project, recipe, or whatever you've made, quickly and easily.

Step by StepStep-By-Step

Share your step-by-step photos with text instructions of what you made so others can do it too!

VideoVideo

Share your how-to video. You'll need your embed code from a video site such as YouTube.

Energy

video Energy
"Energy" is an electric car that relies on the sun, wind, and water for battery power. To be noted: It can also be plugged in. The car is painted with sensitive nano-technology-built solar panels that can absorb most of the suns rays. It has a collecting device under the hood that extracts water from the air and can collect rainwater as weather permits. That water is converted to steam, generating its own power for electricity and added thrust. Once the car is in motion, wind generates enough force to turn high-velocity, high-output fans creating additional power for the vehicle. All of these components come together to create electricity that is channeled down to charge bacteria-grown batteries, housed under the vehicle. "Energy" is the ultimate green vehicle that utilizes renewable non-polluting energy resources.

Energy will eliminate the messy carbon footprint that most vehicles make on the road today. It aspires to be a fully functioning reliable green vehicle that can take its passengers hundreds of miles in between charges while essentially relying on non-polluting renewable energy sources to power it along its course. Developing more cars like Energy would greatly reduce dependence on foreign and domestic oil. Severing ties with oil, and being a limited CO2-producing resource, will improve overall air quality and be a positive step towards reversing the effects of global warming.

Citizens who live in densely populated areas with poor air quality would receive the most benefits from Energy. Cities such as New York, Paris, London, Los Angeles, and Houston would see vast improvements in overall air pollution rates, translating into overall human health improvements (ex: asthma rates would drop). These cities could introduce Energy as a taxi alternative and then transpose the technology to busses and everyday passenger vehicles. Energy would also improve noise pollution, which is a huge problem in cities where streets are narrow and space is limited. Energys success in the long run would hopefully encourage developing nations like China and India to adopt it as viable transportation option.

The first few steps involve contacting the companies who currently hold patents on the above mentioned technologies and acquire permission to move forward (i.e. nano-solar panels, high-efficiency high-output fans, moisture/rain water collecting hydro unit and bacteria grown batteries). Those companies, combined with specific educational environmental research institutions could help bring Energy to life. It would also be important to raise capital investments either through individual investors and/or corporate sponsors. Lastly, the car should be tested through individual eco-marathons, which would help flush out potential problems and modify the idea for improved efficiency and reliability.

This project is successful if the vehicle passes all road challenges for reliability and crash standard safety tests, and also outlasts current green vehicles on the market. Energy should be cheap enough to build on a mass scale. It should be financially attainable to most working class citizens. It shouldnt be just a concept vehicle, but seen as a fully functional everyday car. Ultimately, the success of Energy will be shown by general public acceptance and procurement.
15 comments
May 6, 2009. 4:47 PMlemonie says:
The solar aspect is something that a lot of people are working on. But rather than enter a discussion upon "greener cars" - I think not using cars is a better alternative. For example, developing nations like China and India already use green transport like "feet" and "bicycles" - is this not the way to go? (people's aspirations for higher standards of living acknowledged)

L
May 7, 2009. 9:32 AMdchall8 says:
I commute from a town of 17,000 to the next town over, 45 miles away, population of 2,000. Both towns are the largest communities in their respective county. There is nothing in between but empty prairie and three livestock yards. I am absolutely not trying to start a debate, but do you have suggestions for how Middle America can become more green with transportation? I could move to the little town but trips to the larger communities are routinely required for groceries, clothing, pharmacy, furnishings, etc. The little town has no schools either. This region has 30 mph winds at least once a week which makes bicycling impractical/hazardous but not impossible. Snow in the winter makes bicycles impossible for at least part of the time. Again, no debate please, but do you have some green suggestions?
May 7, 2009. 11:11 AMlemonie says:
Yes, that's what has happened from the country growing around car ownership. The original comment was meant with that in mind - specifically, while America has developed to be heavily dependent on cars, is it such a good idea to be thinking about developing nations to go the same way (but with greener cars)?

Novel suggestions for your particular area I don't have at the moment

L
May 6, 2009. 1:51 PMchrisla says:
Your thoughts on wind energy are flawed. There is no free lunch, it takes energy to create that "wind" in the first place. The amount you get back out will be the same minus losses from friction.
May 6, 2009. 3:01 PMchrisla says:
I'd say maybe read up on this, or consult an expert. The problem with your theory is that due to drag it will cost you more energy to turn the fans then you will get back out. The only exception may be as a regenerative brake, but doing that as it is done today with the wheels is going to be more efficient. You're running up against fundamental laws of conservation of energy here. The energy that is turning the fans has to come from somewhere, you're just transferring it from whatever is powering the car. If you want a ripe source of energy to tackle, look at waste heat.
May 6, 2009. 4:42 PMlemonie says:
You fundamentally misunderstand the energy systems in this To propel the vehicle forwards through air requires energy. If the propulsion of the vehicle through the air is forcing air through the fans, it is the energy driving the vehicle forwards that is providing the force to drive the fans.: It's not "free energy" L
May 6, 2009. 4:10 PMchrisla says:
The problem is drag is not a constant, it varies with the aerodynamics of the vehicle. Let's create a simple example. You have a bullet shaped car, with a battery powering a motor. Picture the air flowing over it as it is going down the road. Now if you cut holes in it and install turbines, it will have more drag (fans inside or out) and it will be slowed by turning the fans. You're saying you'll capture that energy and put it in the battery, but really you are just putting it back in the battery. It seems like it is waste energy, but it's not. One thing to keep in mind is use of the word "wind". You don't really have wind (created by a differential in temperature). You have the energy you already put in. The best way to conserve energy is not to use it in the first place. I'll be curious to hear what your professor has to say. :)
May 7, 2009. 1:07 AMPresman says:
Put simply anywhere you put them on a car where air would flow past them they will increase the drag on the car and are better off not being there. For example if you where to substitute the grill of a car for you fans. To get any energy from the fans you would have to get air flow meaning an opening behind the engine compartment about where the firewall is. Now think about it wouldn't there be less drag without the fans than with. No matter how you look at it you change the aerodynamics of the car adding "turbines" that will turn with the airflow. The definition of a wind turbine is a device that generates electricity to by using aerodynamic drag. Using straight solar energy, and having a place to store it should be more than enough if they can increase the amount received by a solar cell as much as the nano cells promise.
May 9, 2009. 12:13 AMARVash says:
a sail could be utilized .
May 6, 2009. 12:44 PMlemonie says:
"It aspires to be-" but it won't I'm afraid. The section on "Once the car is in motion, wind generates enough force to turn high-velocity, high-output fans creating additional power for the vehicle" just isn't right for one. However, the aspiration and some of the ideas are good. Have you any plans to make anything like this? L

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
0
Followers
1
Author:krdebacker