Fix a stuck pixel on an LCD monitor by Einsteins Circuitry
Featured

Step 5: Enjoy your now flawless monitor!

Enjoy your monitor without those annoying stuck pixels!

And as I said before, this will obviously only work on LCD monitors.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up
MrJLatino says: Dec 3, 2008. 6:12 PM
Hi, i have a question: can stuck pixels be fixed if they are all in a straight line that comes down across the screen? I m trying all these methods on my IMAC but its not working. Can you help me out?
PedroDaGr8 says: Nov 19, 2011. 4:17 PM
As others have mentioned this is either a video card issue or bad/dying LCD column driver. The latter are not fixable (to the best of my knowledge.) while according to the poster above the former are a silent recall issue for the iMac.
Einsteins Circuitry (author) says: Dec 3, 2008. 7:16 PM
Can you describe it more? Is it a vertical or horizontal line, or is it a diagonal line? Is it a solid line, or is it a bunch of stuck pixels that just happen to be in a line-like shape? If it is a solid vertical, or horizontal line, then it is a faulty lcd, and there is nothing you can do. Also, is your iMac the newer one that is aluminum and black? If it is, than the display has a glass/plastic plate over the lcd making method 2 & 3 useless.
Richard_[UK] says: Mar 29, 2009. 3:36 AM
I think he means like screen burn-in...
animaster says: May 20, 2009. 3:00 AM
LCD's can't burn in, he just got a broken LCD screen
underwhelmed says: Jul 24, 2009. 4:23 PM
Actually, he has a video card issue that is well known for iMacs. If you take it to an Apple store they will fix it for you.
Power-Inside says: May 30, 2011. 3:09 AM
I heard someone say to try moving a magnet piece near the stuck pixel..
scistone says: Jun 19, 2011. 2:51 PM
don't use a big one or you need to get a new coputer.
endolith says: Dec 27, 2007. 1:22 PM
"PS: If you don't already know, this will obviously only work on LCD monitors." Should be the first sentence in the Instructable; not the last.
wenpherd says: Jul 18, 2009. 10:56 AM
"PS: If you don't already know, this will obviously only work on LCD monitors." Should be the first sentence in the Instructable; not the last.
iLikeCoolStuf says: Jul 18, 2009. 7:38 PM
twice ???/
arduinoe says: Jul 21, 2009. 3:47 AM
third times the charm
CaffeineHouse says: Dec 28, 2007. 2:52 PM
hurrr.. DS's have LCD screens in them too.
DavidRobertson says: Dec 29, 2007. 12:21 PM
that reminds me. Mine has a stuck pixel.
tanmanknex says: May 28, 2009. 6:20 PM
look at my post further up.
endolith says: Dec 28, 2007. 4:48 PM
DSes?
Einsteins Circuitry (author) says: Dec 27, 2007. 2:12 PM
Good idea. I'm changing it right now...
computer_guy says: May 2, 2009. 6:39 PM
T.T it didn't work I tried all the methods. That is one stubborn stuck pixel.
eggman says: Dec 23, 2007. 6:08 PM
wait, i see a flaw... its a mac
blacksmith1234 says: Feb 24, 2008. 12:00 PM
if you have ever used a mac you would know that if it dosent run an apple OS its not a computer NO EXCEPTIONS (except linux =3 )
macmaniac says: Jan 17, 2008. 9:02 AM
how could you. Kill the non-believer!! sorry. i love macs and hate microsoft
Derin says: May 12, 2008. 10:39 AM
MACS STINK KILL THE MAC LOVER
Ganoderma says: Feb 25, 2008. 11:27 AM
doesn't everyone hate Microsoft :) I mean, we all know windows is bad but we have no choice then to use it if you want to play games or something
thermoelectric says: Aug 6, 2008. 1:26 AM
NO microsoft is soo cool then Linux mac is soooooo boring
darth2o says: Dec 23, 2007. 6:58 PM
There is nothing wrong with Macs. The best computer to run Vista is actually a Mac. YEAH!!!
Swert says: Mar 29, 2008. 5:33 PM
That's not true. Macs are just held to a higher standard than PCs simply because PCs have no standard. You can make a way better PC than a Mac. But the Mac OS is better, but it lacks in third party support.
adamthiede says: Jan 17, 2008. 6:50 AM
Why would you want to run vista anyway... Leopard, or even Tiger (what i have) Is SO much better!
Derin says: Apr 22, 2008. 9:28 AM
leopard was caught red handed
MrPumpernickel says: Jan 3, 2008. 7:55 AM
I don't know if being able to run a flawed and bloated OS is something to be proud about :P
weretater says: Jan 3, 2008. 7:22 PM
Yeah Vista really sucks, but what can i say? I'm not even running on an authentic version of Windows (I have XPTE). I just may have to do this once i get my tri-wing screw driver I ordered so I can fix my DS.
WilderLust says: Dec 23, 2007. 8:51 PM
uummm... correction! the fastest name brand computer to run Vista is a Mac. i have been building my own computers for over 20 years and have consistently blown away any name brand computer every year. for the price you cannot beat a well made computer that you put together yourself.

cheers
WL
djtrailmixxx says: Feb 20, 2008. 2:19 PM
Correct, and if you compare a Dual Xeon Mac Pro to like some Emachines piece of garbage, yeah, I can see what the outcome would be when using Vista. It's funny how many Mac fanatics (not all users, I use one at work) believe that BS. It's been proven time and time again that on the SAME Mac hardware the the PC version of a dual platform app, I.E. Photoshop That App performs better on the Windows platform that is installed on said box............Nuff Said!
bishopdante says: Dec 9, 2010. 7:45 AM
Oh yeah, and by the way i'm rocking i7 in my 17 inch macbook pro, and if I start doing crazy stuff to a photoshop file which measures 10,000 pixels square, it doesn't even bring up bars. At first I thought it must be broken, it was that fast.

I'm not sure that speed is actually an argument, I'd need to upgrade my reflexes to get my work done faster.
bishopdante says: Dec 9, 2010. 7:42 AM
well, I did rather notice that the Adobe stuff stinks on OSX rather a lot.

Photoshop particularly ran a hell of a lot slower than it should. Compared to a true OSX program like Pixelmator, the performance difference was scary.

This is because all of the Adobe stuff was written for an OS that was discontinued a decade ago, and written in C++. Adobe's stuff was even written using Metrowerks, which was also discontinued.

I remember the days when you couldn't get Photoshop on the PC, apple made Adobe what they are today.

_____

I am pleased to report that on the OSX platform, now the adobe apps have been rewritten using something fresh, they actually use the GPU as they should (which they didn't used to), and it's all much less ancient (no more spinning 1-bit 16 pixel watch icon cursor).

I can also report that Flash still sucks for OSX.

_____


OSX is not Mac. It's NeXT. And that stuff leaves your shoddy windows BS in the dust with a true NIX runtime, (not Linux counterfeit), Protected Memory, and a platform-independent system which will allow apple to rapidly migrate to any future hardware architecture they fancy.

This is not apple of the stripey logo, this is something else.

I'm not 100% sure I like it that way, especially the admin jail potential, but y'know, Mac is a serious platform these days, and if you have any critical faculties whatsoever, then you've got to like OSX.

I've run all the MS operating systems in my studio since 1990. I've also run most of the major Linuxes.

Windows is a pit of vipers and shoddiness of heart.

Linux is screamingly fast, but a bit ugly, and certainly not free from buggy behaviour. I reckon that you have to be well into stripping that stuff down, it's not suitable for a casual user yet. But when it gets there, it'll be what I'm using.
dbecker6 says: Dec 24, 2007. 8:27 AM
you are correct Sir! My fav is my AMD Athlon single core 3700,Zalman, 4 GB Ram, Asus A8n-SLI Deluxe, 2 W/D Raptors, OCD'to 3.2 SWEET!
timotat says: Mar 21, 2008. 9:42 PM
Now hold my good man, you have not heard my argument!
Ahem
Bill Gates. Steve Jobs. Binary. Computer Babble. Cthulu. Steampunk. 10010101011, Dancing Russian Bears.

Stuff That up your pipe and smoke it, my good man!
Grmgunner says: Dec 25, 2007. 5:56 PM
are you an amd fanatic or are you willing to go to intel every now and then? if yes then your a good man!! i like both really it all depends on watcha wana do ya kno?
WilderLust says: Dec 25, 2007. 9:19 PM
well... actually there is much more to performance than the CPU. focusing on the CPU only is like buying a ford pinto with a formula engine... you still got a pinto! the type of ram, the mb, the bios, the hd, the gc and many more things are very critical. another often overlooked item is the lowly power supply. too many cheapos messing machines more than most people realize. that is not even mentioning the applications you are looking at. a game machine will not necessarily be a good choice for a development machine or a business machine. just as a formula car would not be very useful for driving around town. anyway... the only thing apple hardware has going for it is that people are willing to pay more for them so they can use better hardware and still make money. people have nickel and dimed the PC makers for decades and have driven them to build chap machines then we complain that they don't have as high a performance. guess what folks... there is no free lunch... you get what you pay for... if you do your homework! i used to tell my student this would happen. when a society becomes so selfish as to not care about the consequences of its greed the fabric of society disintegrates. this goes way beyond computers of course... but i digress! cheers :-)
rocketman221 says: Aug 7, 2008. 4:27 PM
the only way to get a good computer is to build it yourself
djtrailmixxx says: Feb 20, 2008. 2:25 PM
EXACTLY!!!! For example: I have all of my storage on an enterprise class raid controller that costs over $400 alone. Quality does cost you money, thats the way it works. More money doesn't mean something is actually better, testing and experience determine that.
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!