Free energy generators

This instructable is my third instructable and it is about making free energy generators. Now, if you are some of those stubborn people that don't think this is true or that it works, GO LOOK AT SOMETHING ELSE because this is not for you. So a little background on the guy I used for a picture: his name is Nikola Tesla, he was born on July 10 1856, he died on January 7 1943, he was born in the Austrian empire. Nikola was also the world's leading scientist and continues to be today despite what anyone else says. Unfortunately, after he died, the big electricity companies almost wiped Nikola from history because of his free electricity inventions. If you want to know more, read the book: Tesla a man out of time.

Step 1 Components and parts

The main components are listed below, take note that the kind of the specific components are listed in the assembly part.

Components:
-electrolytic capacitors
-ceramic capacitors
-diodes
-antenna*
-ground connection

You can assemble these generators on a bread board or solder the pieces.
*the construction of the antenna is the next step, though it has to be built in a certain way

Comments

[benji.abrams]

Look at what device #5 and a plasma ball can do here

[ammush]

gud work.. but not enough for our home supplies.. can u tell me the device which can produce large amount of electricity for our home.

[HiFiMan]

Take a building block of a bridge rectifier.Place high voltage capacitors to the ac input terminals,these will also be your collector inputs .Start with a group of 3.Tesla loved to use multiples of 3.A clue to the power of 3 is
3-6-9
1-2-3 That's all I have to say about that right now other than three is a fundamental number.

On the first bridge + output will go to your load capacitor.
I do not recommend using electrolytic capacitors at all.They just don't have enough electrostatic capabilities.
now connect - bridge1 to + bridge2 and - bridge2 to + bridge3 - bridge 3 will be your - load connection unless you use more blocks,in that case -bridge 3 will connect to module2 + bridge1 and so on.
Remember to place isolation capacitors on all ac in bridges and parallel connect those caps.
You now have a circuit of 3 series connected bridge rectifiers that + comes from bridge 1 and - comes from bridge 3
You can continue to series connect these building blocks in any quantity you choose.The first bridge will always be + output and the last will always be - output.
Although I have not done this, it is said that about 200 of these modules will power a house providing your collector plate is large enough and your dedicated ground is proper.That's 800 individual diodes and 400 individual isolation capacitors plus a load bank of capacitors or batteries, and as large a collector plate as possible,don't forget about the earth ground it's a key element to success.
My plan is to incorporate this into a multi floor(at least 2 story)building with an insulated metal roof.
I have a circuit board I'm developing and maybe one day I will post it.

[paywithlove]

what do you mean by isolation capacitors friend? also , parallel connect those caps? did u get this idea from http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapt7.html? how is your project coming? :)

[techno guy]

Sorry, but this is small scale only.

[jblanchard]

@techno guy -just because you limit yourself why should we
@hifiman- awsome my thoughts exact

[paywithlove]

wasnt there a few people aware of this system by NT knew it was possible to scale it up in power and down in size? i think we all missing something important maybe.

[itsthatsguy]

dude you just stole my ideas and findings, wtf, energy device 4 is described in MY instructable, and energy device 6 is described by me, in the comments of MY instructable, you even posted comments on it asking me questions, you cant just take other peoples ideas and work and say there your own, im reporting you to a moderator.

A link to MY Findings
http://www.instructables.com/id/Tesla-radiant-enrgy-upgraded/
Check the publish dates if you guys dont believe me.

[CirceWelder]

Yes I seen that as well he plagerized what you did, he even says thanks so he can use it in his IBLE. Some people cant think for themselves

[techno guy]

I got energy device 6 off the internet so not from your 'ible.

[itsthatsguy]

lol it doesnt matter who you got it from, it matters that you didnt give credit to anyone.

[techno guy]

There, i gave you credit for number four of the generators, but I´m not giving you credit for number 6 because I didn´t get it from your íble.

[lis.tesla]

Tesla was a genius
I am one of his followers

[blinkyblinky]

Very true...

[Super_Nerd]

Would a spherical antenna do any better.

[Super_Nerd]

PS I like how you started.

"Now, if you are some of those stubborn people that don't think this is true or that it works, GO LOOK AT SOMETHING ELSE because this is not for you."

[sdfgeoff]

In general you want to have the most surface area possible (I think)
A sphere has the lowest surface area to volume size.

So no, a sphere is not the ideal shape.

Instead you want something that has a lot of surface area:
Corrugated iron roof (If it isn't grounded)
Heatsink
Bending the foil into fins, so you can fit more surface area into the same size.
etc.

[Super_Nerd]

Thanks

[sdfgeoff]

Since the sky gets charged, the ground also gets charged oppositely by laws of physics.

Um, explain this one to me.
If the air gets positively charged, then surely the ground also gets positively charged as there is a net decrease in electrons.

What you may be thinking of is if you have a closed system: If you move the electrons to one side, then that will create a positive charge on one side, and a negative one on the other.
This doesn't apply here as there is an addition of the solar wind (not a closed system), which by the way, according to wikipedia, has both protons and electrons, and thus no charge.

I'm not meaning to pick holes in your ible (ok, maybe I am), but would like to point these out, and that I don't agree with this.
I am not a physicist, so I may be wrong but:

My threory:

The facts:
+ve charge in the atmosphere
-ve charge in the ground (I agree with you here, I cannot deny it, because it works)

The Speculation:
The charge difference has to come from somewhere, and you suggested solar wind. I suggest a system similar to thunderstorms: Friction has the ability to knock electrons around. The direction of where the electrons go is determined by the elements electronegativity. Air, made up mostly of nitrogen, with a high electronegativity value of 3.006, and the ground (most other elements, like metals and such making up the ground) would have a much lower overall value.
What all that means is that when the air hits the ground (wind etc) some electrons are knocked out of the air, giving it a positive charge, and the ground a negative charge.

Anyone got any other theories?

[sdfgeoff]

Mind If ask, but how does adding diodes help anything?
Diodes themselves have a resistance (very small, but they do) so they would drop the voltage slightly. Since the capacitor is polar (only works one way around), then surely you don't need them. To me this is just #1 but with two unnecessary components.

If there is someone out there with more electrical knowledge than me, please correct me here.

[Super_Nerd]

Another indoor way. Attach a loop of wire to a sink faucet or metal pipe.

[freethetech]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this the circuit (minus the antenna) used to convert AC to DC? 99% sure it is.

[HiFiMan]

Yes it's called a bridge rectifier.

[freethetech]

Thats what I thought. It seemed fimiliar.

[techno guy]

This is the circuit used to do that, I made the prototype using the converter from a wall adapter, it really works for this.

[rimar2000]

This is VERY interesting.

Years ago I read this article showing some similar.

You can use Google Translator to traduce it to English.

In your case, I think you are using man-generated radio waves, but the experiment is well done.

[techno guy]

It's a good thing that I can read spanish.

[rimar2000]

Yes, I say the same about English.

But that page is Italian, not Spanish!

[techno guy]

I just realized that, now I'm forced to use google translate.

[kelseymh]

Yawn. If you actually knew physics, you could really go far. As Matt wrote, you've trivially reinvented power transfer by radio. It's a well known and low efficiency technology. Just because you can't see radio waves doesn't mean they aren't there, and most certainly doesn't mean you're magically violating the laws of nature.

[techno guy]

Read the last slide to see how the sun makes the free energy part.

[kelseymh]

Uh, huh. You claim (without citing any sources), that the air around us is postively charged, while the ground is negatively charged. How do you know this? Have you measured it? Have you observed the current flowing through your body, electrocuting you, every time you breathe?

[techno guy]

I never said that the power of the particles were that high

[kelseymh]

It's not the "power", it's the number, as you would know if you understood the physics. Separating charges creates a voltage (potential difference). The number of charges separated, which flow through a conductor, determines the current.

[Kiteman]

All I see are drawings and stock images - have you actually done this?

[techno guy]

I have tested all of the generators individually with two tests of 5 minutes each. It took a long time.

[kelseymh]

Perhaps you should add photos taken yourself of the actual generators as you built them (soldered, or breadboarded, or whatever).

[PS118]

First off, ditto to what others have said about the radio thing. Plus, I bet you could get some pretty nice current if you took one of these things next to a microwave tower. ;)

Second, I've read that book. And I have to say that, IMO, Testla gets a lot more sympathy than he deserves. True, he did a lot of cool and imporant stuff,
AND he took an unfair beating from Edison+company, but on the other hand, Testla won and lost a dozen fortunes trying to do things like build gigantic antennas to talk with his Martian friends.

So yeah, a good chunk of the ridicule he experienced was probably well-deserved. Even so, him being an insane genius doesn't actually make me like him any less! ;) ;)

[rickharris]

Hi, Ill give you credit for doing something and as your young a plus mark for trying to reason things out and think about why these things happen.

It is however more than likely that you are rectifying radio waves to produce the electricity. In a sense this is free and with a very long antenna and a good tuned circuit (a coil and capacitor) you can extract significant amounts of power - The radio stations are transmitting mega watts!

BUT if you did that your going to make the radio people very sad as well as annoy your neighbours who can not longer pick up the radio signal because your sucking it all in as power.

For a lot of reasons the idea of free energy as we currently understand the rules of Physics isn't possible -- something has to work to provide it.

It may be that our understanding is wrong or incomplete and the future is very much in the hands of young experimenters like you.

As a last note as yet no one knows why their are rules that physics seems to obey, in some ways there doesn't seem to be any reason for them to exist other than "that's the way it is".

[mattthegamer463]

How do you know these aren't charging by man-made radio waves? Makes more sense to me.

Also, how did you measure current out of the caps? Did you place a load across them and measure with a current meter in series?