loading
Hi frnds!

Here I am at my attempt to give you more information about powering engine using water.
This instructable is a part of my previous one. Do visit that one to get a clear idea.

I am posting a video on how to build a HHO generator which will produce HHO gas to power your car's engine.
The video has part 2 for details. It leads you to a site and wants you to buy the guide.

I am posting my version and giving you a detailed information on how to do it.

Let's start!

Step 1: Things we need

Things we need.

Parts:
1. Glass jar with plastic lid
2. Pet/squeeze bottle
3. 1000mm long braided wire
4. 500mm long water pipe
5. 1000mm long electric wire
6. CD case or thick plastic sheet
7. 2 screws with nut
8. Hollow screw with nut
9. Cheap pen without refill
10. Fuse

Tools:
1. Drill machine with bits
2. Screw driver set
3. Saw
4. Ruler
5. Plase
Sodium Bicarbonate (Sodium hydroxide take caution this is very caustic) <br> <br>A teaspoon of Baking Soda in a glass of water is good for reducing an Acidy Stomach, good for a bloated Stomach as well. Been taking it for years &amp; so did my father. Never did any harm only good.
Why 6-12V you can put as much as you want (i do this with 21V DC voltage) you can put as much as you have....
Dear Falcore, I am not a pro at this and i cannot comment much on your query... all i can inform u is that i tried using 9v battery to perform the electrolysis but i wasn't successful. i want to be honest with all you guys. there was some reaction taking place but it wasn't that big that i get a HHO gas flowing from one container to another. in short, i failed and i didn't go ahead with further analysis due to personal limitations... but do give it a try... i am confident about it... if not vehicles it can be used for various other purposes... do let me know when u succeed... best of luck!
What JJ said.
I was successful a while ago with a 21V 3A transformer (the amps are probably not important) to separate enough to blow a pen filled with H in thousands of little pieces...I can post a pic of a test i did with it at the beginning (i an ashtray).... the time it took to make that hydrogen was about 30sec-1min (i blew half of it away)...
Just so you know amps are important, very important, that looks really cool.
I know they are but when i did this with the transformer from my soldiering gun that was 6V 20A ( i made it go through a bridge, cap, coil and other things a basic power supply has) and the result was less HOH... A while later when i made my next power supply it was 25V around 10A and 35V again around 10A the results were EXPLOSIVE and the coil was different, but due to school and other things i haven't been able to continue... When i finish this grade (8-th, in Bulgaria this is where you get your first degree of education.and after that there's 2 more than the Master's, PHD's and other crap) i will continue my research. I will continue in my free time but till now i haven't had time i'v been doing a lot of other projects and have just forgotten about this... So as soon as i can i will post my version of my Hydrogen separator. probably will be an instructable... Sorry if i was writing like a dumbass :)...
Nice... good to see someone trying atleast! i would recommend u to post ur method of doing it... maybe u can post ur instructable. Best of luck!
(I'm Falcore) I will post a instructable with this acc... But it won't be soon because my transformer burned out and i don't have the part to fix it and i won't be able to get it for at least 2-3 days (the closest store is about 10-15KM from me and i have some work now) i will post a comment as soon as i make the instructable...
ok... All The Best!
The problem is that a 9v battery has an extremely low current flow compared to 6v and 12v batteries. (low amps)
understand that this has been around since 1890, ask yourself why are we using oil as fuel. $$$$$$$ Now with solar cell true clean fuel. I challange all who read this. build something we must get off fossil fuels, the government will NOT help the fear is world economy collaspe.
Mar 30, 2012. 1:39 PMlloydrmc says:<br>The government dropped north of half a Billion-with-a-B dollars on Solyndra. Though that wasn't fuel research, per se, one presumes that one could charge an electric or plug in hybrid vehicle with their product, had they had a commercially viable product.<br><br>The 'net is all over the place as to how much the electrical energy equivalent is in a gallon of gas. Suffice to say that about $20 worth of gas in a gas tank that may have cost about the same sum to manufacture, will take an equivalent vehicle the same or greater distance than a $20,000 battery will.<br><br>Sure, an electric motor is a lot cheaper and easier to manufacture than a modern automotive engine, and the prevalence of vehicles that one may buy brand new for less than $15,000 (sometimes a lot less), also underlines the economics of transportation.
Now i'm working on an Hydrogen heater that you just plug in the wall, pour some watter inside, start heating (The power consumption of the prototype is MINIMAL i don't think it even has 20W. And it's heating good but the transformer's bridge is also heating a lot.) and the problem is the separation is giving off some H and O i still have to figure out how to fix that so i don't get poisoned in some way i will post the pictures of the HHO separator and heater as soon as possible.
G'Day Gents and Ladies,<br /> <br /> I'll keep this shortish and stick to what I know as fact from my own experimentation and studies over the years.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> Can you produce a fuel from tap water? Yes, Hydrogen and Oxygen in different ratios.<br /> <br /> How much current is needed to do it? Very little to achieve a minimal result (few bubbles on an electrode), quite a bit to generate meaningful quantities.<br /> <br /> Is 14volts at 10amps enough to generate meaningful quantities? So you want to generate it from a running cars electrics? Stop. Yes you can do this. You can be very efficient in your electrodes and add a real catalyst (please, not baking soda) and actually draw 10 amps, but the bottom line here is you're taking a load from your electrics, which the alternator needs to replenish, which is driven by your engine, which will need more fuel to meet the increased load. Can you see the counter productivity creeping in? The more you generate, the more it costs you.<br /> <br /> What if I add solar panels to my car to run the O2 H generator? Seriously, stop. I've done the math and built a scale test unit years ago. The average car would needs panels covering every surface several times over to generate enough.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> What if I have a second set of batteries in the boot just for this generator? The weight of the batteries has to be taken into account - until they run flat, then they will become dead weight until recharged - costing you power.<br /> <br /> Okay, what if I generated this gas safely at home, and then feed it into the engine? This is where things get interesting. Yes, if you generate enough to use as a fuel source, of course you can run a car on it - with modifications of course. But once said, it is not as simple as running a hose to the air intake. It depends on if your car has a carbi, air flow type efi computer, or map sensor type efi computer. Carbi: Yes, it works the easiest. With flash arrestors of course. &nbsp;EFI with air flows: Forget it. The computer isn't expecting a gas to be the fuel, so your computer will try to add enough fuel to match the air flow reading - which it can never do - circular logic applies. Add a custom ecu and yes you can do it a little easier. EFI with maps: This is a little easier, but you need to reduce the air flow coming in by the amount of 'gaseous fuel' you're adding. Again, a custom ecu will make life easier. But please note! You will kill your engine! Engines are designed to run at a certain mixture - the fuel is also a lubricant (not going into detail here), but for a start you'll burn valves real quick without engine modification to prevent it.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> What if I run my car on petrol, but supplement it with large amounts of my home generated fuel? Look, it will work. But it won;t be an efficient use of the fuel. Before you ask, think about it, then read on and see if you were right.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> Also of note is the energy generated by the fast exploding gases verses the slow burning air fuel mix and the power delivering properties of each. Remember, low octane fuel burns faster than high octane fuel (read that again if you didn't catch it the first time.) In all cases however, engine damage will occur as you are leaning out the mixture once you modify the air fuel mix - car engines are not designed to run on gas (and before you ask about lpg conversions, look at the properties of lpg before you do). <br /> <br /> If you're NOT running the car lean by adjusting the mix and are simply just adding the gaseous fuel, then you're nowhere near using your fuel efficiently - simply because the car will add the same amount of petrol fuel as before, now however you are increasing the combustibility of the air-fuel mix only. This will give you more bang for your buck of course, but you have new problems... Assuming you can stop your highly volatile gas mix from igniting before it even reaches the combustion chamber, by increasing the combustibility of your air-fuel mix (which is partly where the modified carbi comes in), you become more prone to pre-ignition (engine pinging) which, a) damages the engine, and b) results in wasted energy. You can change the timing of the engine, to remove some of this, but the H O2 gas mix is extremely volatile, more so than a petrol air-fuel mix.<br /> <br /> The ultimate bottom line/s are therefore:<br /> <br /> Can you use water as a source of fuel by electrolysis? Yes, but only efficiently if your engine and car is modified and if you are creating the fuel outside of the enclosed space that is the car. <br /> <br /> You can of course do it very inefficiently, just to prove it can be done - but seriously, what's the point? We are aiming for efficiency here, note a fuel source that will cost us money in different ways.&nbsp;<br /> <br /> Have you thought of generating oxygen only and adding that to your engine? It will generate its own problems, but not as severely as the above will. One major downside is your engine will run a lot hotter, which has it's own noteworthy issues! Another is it's clean and cheap generation. But hey, where's the challenge if it's all easy?<br /> <br /> Cheers,<br /> <br /> DM<br /> <br /> DM holds two degrees and is considering a third. He is a friend to all except those who don't want to learn and the ignorant. He runs a company by day and is a closet inventor pretty much the rest of the time - his wife has adjusted, finally.<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
Hello You might want to have a read. This conflicts with some key elements you have stated. I oftem see cooments I agree with in part. Being that you are aware of many issues this might balance out some where you might be overstated or missing the spot. Solar Panels maybe in a few more years as the out put per sq in becomes more effective. Till then lets experiment. <br> <br>Have Fun with it and learn <br> <br> <br>What about the leaner air/fuel mixture and the possibility of burning valves? <br>A. Exhaust Gas Temperature, Lean Mixtures, and Burning Valves <br> <br>Will operating my vehicle at a leaner mixture with Hydrogen-Boost, cause damage to my valves? <br> <br>With Hydrogen-Boost seeking to run on the leanest air/fuel mixture that has acceptable torque and power, in pursuit of the best possible gas mileage, we have had repeated questions from misinformed customers concerning whether they would burn their valves by running the extra lean mixture. <br> <br>I am sure the misinformation comes from the aviation field. Being an aviator until last year's near fatal experimental aircraft accident, I know that piston engine aircraft take off and climb at maximum power, and cruise at a leaner mixture, watching the EGT gauge to insure a safe temperature. Of course we all assume that safe temperature means a temperature that doesn't burn the valves. <br> <br>This information gets us to assume that an electronic fuel injected engine runs at the rich mixture that is cool enough to protect the valves from burning. Most also assume that if we lean out the mixture we will be in danger of burning the valves. A too hot exhaust gas temperature also would indicate a too hot combustion temperature that happens to produce NOx, the oxides of nitrogen that are considered as toxic pollution. <br> <br>What most of us don't know is that during warm up and acceleration the EFI (electronic fuel injection) engine does indeed run with a rich mixture, but during cruise the engine control unit (ECU) runs in what is called closed loop operation, which targets a 14.7 to 1 air fuel ratio. This ratio is called stoichiometric, meaning that there is a perfect mixture of air and fuel to insure complete combustion. This also happens to be the perfect mixture to get the highest temperature of combustion, and therefore the highest exhaust gas temperature (EGT). Any leaner (more air) mixture will cause a cooler combustion, and any richer (more fuel) mixture will also cause a cooler combustion. <br> <br>The following quote was obtained from http://www.sdsefi.com/techegt.htm and is chemically accurate: <br> <br>Some gauge manufacturers say you should tune to achieve maximum or peak EGT for maximum performance. This is incorrect. Peak EGT generally occurs at an AFR of around 14.7- 15.0 to 1 on gasoline. This is far too lean for maximum power and is dangerous under continuous WOT conditions. Many people think that the leaner you go, the higher the EGT gets. This is also incorrect. Peak EGT occurs at stoichiometry- about 15 to 1 for our purposes. If you go richer than 15 to 1, EGT will drop and if you go leaner than 15 to 1 EGT will ALSO drop. It is VERY important to know which side of peak EGT you are on before making adjustments. It is safe to say that peak power will occur at an EGT somewhat colder than peak EGT. <br> <br> As you can probably figure out by now, leaning the mixture from the target 14.7 to 1 will NOT cause a hotter exhaust nor will it cause you to burn your valves. This is not to say that leaning the ECU's program under all conditions will cause a cooler exhaust. There is one condition that could be hotter and that would be running at WOT (wide open throttle) at 14.7 to 1 instead of the programmed 13 to 1. A continuous running at this condition might indeed burn your valves. <br> <br>But how often would a mileage conscientious driver equipped with Hydrogen-Boost want to run at WOT for extended periods of time at 14.7 to 1 mixture? First of all a conscientious driver would be following the driving tips in the manual which discourages WOT driving all together, say nothing about an extended WOT operation. Also if a Hydrogen-Boost system is adjusted properly, it will be running at a much higher (leaner) mixture than 14.7 to 1, even at full throttle. <br> <br>Being a research scientist, I don't like to take anyone's word for anything so I have ordered two EGT gauges, both of which can read the temperatures of two sensors. I will verify all that has been written in this newsletter and will report the results in a later issue. <br> <br>So to answer the original question: Will operating my vehicle at a leaner mixture with Hydrogen-Boost, cause damage to my valves? NO. <br> <br>Verification: <br> <br> On June 11th I finally installed one of my EGT gauges. The probe had a rather short lead so I ended up running with the EGT gauge on top of my hood, rubber banded to the windshield wiper. I had to drill and tap a hole for the threaded probe, which worked out fine. It was a little tight for space inside the engine compartment so I used a right angle portable drill and a socket and ratchet on the tap. <br> <br> Once the probe was warmed up I cruised at a constant speed and throttle setting and dialed in a leaner fuel mixture while watching the gauge. What is claimed above regarding EGT and fuel ratio was indeed verified. At cruise the EGT was about 10 degrees cooler at 13:1 air/fuel ratio than it was at 14.7:1. At 17:1 it was also 10 degrees cooler. At 19:1 it was 20 degrees cooler, and at 21:1 it was 30 degrees cooler. The temperature really had more to do with the throttle setting than anything else. At high throttle settings the EGT was in the 900s, at high cruise in the 800s, at medium cruise in the 700s, at low cruise in the 600s, and at idle in the 500s. With this large range of temperatures the small change due to fuel ratio was insignificant. <br> <br> One thing that is notable is the fact that any set power output typically produced the same or similar temperatures, regardless of the fuel ratio. Even though the higher fuel ratio caused a lower temperature at a set throttle position, to keep the same power it took a slightly more open throttle, which caused the temperature to rise back to the same reading as the lower ratio and throttle setting that produced the same power. Of course this was not quite true with those full throttle, rich ratio conditions when the EGT is hot but not as hot as it would be at 14.7:1 fuel ratio. <br> <br> The throttle setting determined more than just the EGT, it determined the amount of temperature drop that was caused by the increasing fuel ratio. At idle there was only a 5-10 degree drop, but at higher throttle settings there was more than a 40 degrees of drop. <br> <br> What does all this mean in relation to the question that started this discussion? Will operating my vehicle at a leaner mixture with Hydrogen-Boost, cause damage to my valves? To answer that question we would determine the condition that causes the highest EGT. This would be at full throttle and 14.7:1 fuel ratio. Neither a stock vehicle nor a Hydrogen-Boost system equipped vehicle would run at this condition. The stock vehicle would run at 12 or 13 to 1, and a Hydrogen-Boost equipped vehicle would run at the same 12 or 13 to 1, for those using the old electronic control circuit, or 18 or 20 to 1, for those with the new electronic control circuit. Of course any Hydrogen-Boost equipped vehicle would not likely be seen at full throttle for extended periods of time. So to conclude, the EGT that causes valves to burn would never be encountered with a Hydrogen-Boost equipped vehicle <br>
Thank you for the thoughtful, well-reasoned post, with empirical data to boot. on another 'able about an HHO system, I have been maligned, accused of fraud and illegal acts, of being crazy (literally), been spammed, been accused of being a spammer...<br><br>You get the idea.<br><br>So I appreciate that you took the time and trouble, and that you are capable of having an adult, reasoned discussion.
Great, extensive comment. Thanks a lot. One question though: How did you manage &quot;the wife&quot; to adjust? This is the greatest trouble I run into with all projects.
Longest comment?
Hahaha - that was the brief version =) <br>Cheers!
Nice Job on the instructable!&nbsp; I have a question.&nbsp;&nbsp; What is the purpose of the water bubbler in the process.&nbsp; Is this so that there is no accidental back flash explosion that would blow your HHO generator?<br />
it is just a safety device. it avoids flash back as u hav correctly mentioned.<br />
the set up is going to cause a flash back Hydrogen is lighter but floats up, you can't compress h or you go Boom. however. little water 9v-16v , don't forget amps, be careful. produce lots of gas.
the hydrogen and oxygen inst supposed to power your car, it is used as a fuel aditive that helps the fuel burn more completely, it also reduces carbon build-up in engines and allows the engine to run cooler. you should only draw between 10 and 20 amps with your cell.
Mythbusters were closest to actually proving this 'Hydrogen Car' thing, even though many people said they hadn't built the generator properly. If they re-tested the idea of the generator using the improvements people have stated online, then this phenomenon could be conclusively proved or disproved. To put my two cents in, it doesn't look practical to run a car off hydrogen using the currently available generators, whether they be homemade or not. People online could only fill a shopping bag's worth of hydrogen in five minutes. It could however improve the efficiency and mileage of a car, like some users have said. Finally, I agree with that other guy, there is NO SUCH THING as HHO. It is simply hydrogen (H2) and oxygen (O2). It could also be the oxygen from this system that makes the internal combustion work better, instead of the hydrogen.
<strong>If they re-tested the idea of the generator using the improvements people have stated online, then this phenomenon could be conclusively proved or disproved.</strong><br/><br/>No need: it was disproved over 60 years ago.<br/>
Who disproved it 60 years ago?
I have only heard HHO used when talking about the gasses; two Hydrogens for every oxygen (but they are diatomic, so it becomes 4 hydrogens for every two oxygens, but the idea is the same). So, HHO means 2 parts hydrogen, one part oxygen, but some people are probably stupid and misuse this.
I completely agree with the misuse thing, but then again, I've heard too many people talk about 'HHO' as if it is a new chemical.
Most of us have built our 'boosters' or 'generators' not to run it exclusively on HHO / hydroxy... I built mine to help the incredibly inefficient gasoline burn more efficiently thereby increasing my mpg--and it does... People have said it doesn't work--which I laugh at--and with each fillup I'm glad my extra mileage goes right back into my pocket... I'm sorry some people have the inability to see the truth--but in the right environment (like my 93 mitsubishi) it does work well and gives me an extra 20+%... Just because they can't get it to work (if they've even bothered to try) doesn't mean it doesn't work...
IM sorry to burst any ones bubble. but you can run a car or truck on a HHO Generator. the only thing you have to realize is that after electrolysis it already has its own oxygen. if you let 'air' in to the mixture it will lean out the HHO mixture a cause the vehicle to stale. straight HHO can run any vehicle and stop the use of fossil fuels. I've been doing my own research and development on this topic. the praticle applications of a HHO generator are possible, in theory and praticle application. there are many designs for a HHO generator but they all work. some produce more than others but all work. just go to youtube and look at several designs. I'm currently construction on of my own to install on my 1987 Ford Bronco 2. 12 cells, three bubblers, and one drying unit. I'll post specs and schematics at a l8ter date. to also answer some of the other questions that have been posted. one HHO generator producing 20 liters a minute with a storage tank for the HHO can run a car completely with out gasoline. the HHO mixture also helps the engine run smoother, cleaner and adds some extra horse power.
<strong>Here I am at my attempt to give you more information about powering engine using water.</strong><br/><br/>That is, of course, impossible.<br/>
This will do nothing to help fuel economy, in fact, it'll make it worse. It takes MUCH more energy to electrolyse hydrogen from water than you get back when you burn it. This device will consume more energy than it can replace, much less create more energy than you put in it. The device you propose will be limited in the amount of hydrogen it can produce by the limits of the current sourcing capacity of the car's alternator. An 80 amp current source will be able to make about 2L of hydrogen per hour. A 2 litre 4-stroke auto engine running at 3000rpm is shifting 90,000 litres per hour of air volume through it. Hydrogen combines with oxygen at a 2:1 stoichometric ratio, so to supply 90,000 litres of fuel/air mix per hour would require 60,000L of oxygen at STP and 30,000L of hydrogen at STP. Worst of all, if you electrolyse hydrogen and oxygen from water and you do not separate the H from the O, as your system does, you have a small bomb. Your device does not have a flashback suppressor. It is possible for an engine backfire to follow the mix of hydrogen and oxygen back to your plastic bottle and ignite the mix. BAM! This is wasteful and dangerous.
is it possible to run entire car on HOH?
It is possible if enough Hydrogen is released. Unfortunately, most people aren't using the correct energy levels to accomplish this. It is completely possible and shortly I'll be selling the assembled device on eBay. This device will allow a car to go as fast as it can. Hydrogen on demand in almost unlimited quantities.
If you generated enough, but only since current cells generate so little, only small appliances can be run (generators, lawn mowers, etc)
For all the nay sayers out there why don't you try it before you start spewing anti rederic. HHO is totally possible and can run your car a 100%. If any body wants to bother looking first at the burn ratios hydrogen is hotter than gas (i.e. you need less for combustion). Next figure out how much gas is actually injected into a cylinder/cycle. You will find if you can make around one and a half to two liters of HHO you can run just about any car you want. You can do this by high voltage or high current. And if you know about power supplies creating the electronics for it is possible. Try it if nothing else it's fun. Check out you tube, lots of people "unable to do it."
<em>&quot;For all the nay sayers out there why don't you try it before you start spewing anti rederic. (sic)&quot;</em><br/><br/>I'm sorry, I don't understand you. Do you mean &quot;Andy Rodderick&quot; or &quot;empty rhetoric&quot;?<br/><br/><em>&quot;HHO is totally possible&quot;</em><br/><br/>No, it isn't. Ask any chemist. H2O comes in only one form: HOH.<br/><br/>HHO is a name devised by scammers to give people the impression that they've discovered a new compound when in reality they've done no such thing.<br/><br/><em>&quot;and can run your car a 100%. (sic)&quot;</em><br/><br/><strong>Hydrogen</strong> can run a car with enough modifications, sure. But you you can't run a car on hydrogen made from water without some outside power source. That's absolutely ridiculous when you give it the least amount of critical thought. It's like thinking you can fly just by tugging up on your belt.<br/><br/><em>&quot;You will find if you can make around one and a half to two liters of HHO you can run just about any car you want.&quot;</em><br/><br/>Yeah, for two whole cycles.<br/>
<em>Hydrogen can run a car with enough modifications, sure. But you you can't run a car on hydrogen made from water without some outside power source. That's absolutely ridiculous when you give it the least amount of critical thought. It's like thinking you can fly just by tugging up on your belt.</em><br/><br/>Where there two types of hydrogen discovered that the rest of us arent knowing about?<br/><br/><em>Yeah, for two whole cycles.</em><br/><br/>Apparently you've never experienced a flashback...<br/>
the only amount of power needed to make this work comes of the battery or the alternator and I know this works because I have this same exact system supplementing the gas in my car and it tripled my gas mileage and I used a really small rig if I wanted to I could have a creaking aquarium powering my car and as for recharging the battery because I know that would come up all you need to do is hook it up to a tire and have the rotation recharging the battery or I would just prefer the supplementing stem. so stick that in your pipe and smoke it you creaking lizard you gone tell me its not possible I have the rig in my car as I am typing this and guess what....... iv saved 900 dollars this past 5 months ajparag good ible but just for future you might wanna try an anode and cathode that is a little more stable than mesh. with what you got the screen will corroed and dissolve, which don't get me wrong is cool to watch but there's always that chance of spark and it can really mess up your day I have the singed eyebrows to prove it dam flashback sucks
Nren2k5 at least you have some sense in you, i'm sick of all these misinformed 12 year olds on this site.
you two are extremely close minded maybe its people like you that are the reason we have to try to find new fuel sources. I know for a fact that this works I put this system into my ford 2000 and my gas mileage had tripled. and while were on the subject how do you know it doesn't work???? do you believe everything you read ?????? just because a bunch of close minded fossils(like you)think something is impossible just because of something another old fossil said is impossible. doesn't make it impossible. if you got out more and maybe tried this yourself in your car. maybe you wouldn't seem so quick to judge and disrespect other people.
would you please send this site a picture of your Hydrogen generator cell that you have been experimenting with..... someone with your outstanding knowledge would be a great benefit to us dummies who are using this gas to power a portion of our vehicles and would love to see how you have come to your interesting conclusions and don't forget to post your data as well. and yes it could be Rodderick or it could be rhetoric.either way most understood the meaning and most understand your meaning as well. now don't forget to post you data ............ DO IT NOW
sorry, but HHO gas is not ment to run your car! HHO is supposed to be an additive to your fuel to increase mileage and efficiency. if your generator can run your car, i wish to see it.
thanks for correcting me.....u guys do pay attention on the content. Still, someday i will like to prove u wrong!!! Hav a nice day!
"Still, someday i will like to prove u wrong!!!" The laws of physics already proved the "HHO" cult clowns wrong.
The mythbusters ran a car on pure hydrogen. On TV. They hosed hydrogen right into the carb and it ran no problems until they had a flashback...

About This Instructable

57,030views

123favorites

License:

More by ajparag:Track your location without using GPS (using LAC and CID) How to make Linux simple and easy Herbal cigarette 
Add instructable to: