Instructables

Hail Pad Experiments

Contest Winner
Picture of Hail Pad Experiments
The current method that the CoCoRaHS project uses to monitor hail activity, the Hail Pad is a simple but effective way to record the size, number, and directionality of hail stones. Apparently the materials that are being used to construct them however are becoming cost prohibitive.

I conducted 2 experiments attempting to identify methods to reduce the cost of making 1 square foot Hail Pads, my findings are documented in the following steps.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: $.60 Each

Picture of $.60 Each
substrate2.jpg
substrate3.jpg
substrate4.jpg
pad1before2.jpg
pad1after.jpg
Substrate

Buying individual precut pieces of styrofoam is not cost effective in a mass production scenario. A variety of polystyrene bulk sheet products are readily available either from local building supply stores, or online. Cutting polystyrene is easy and can be done using a variety of methods.

Individual Precut 12" X 12" X 1" = $3 to $6 each | Bulk Sheet 32 square feet X 3/4" = $8 = $.25 each

Cutting Methods:

  1. Utility Knife & Straight Edge (rough edges, messy)
  2. Circular Saw, Table Saw, or Band Saw (flat edges, fast, but messy)
  3. Hot Wire Cutter (flat edges, fast, no mess)

Aluminum Foil

When cost per unit is a priority consideration, comparative shopping and a willingness to choose a generic instead of brand name is helpful.

Reynolds rey632 750 square feet = $135 = $.45 each | Generic Extra Heavy Duty Foil 750 square feet = $46 = $.14 (prices don't include S&H)

Packaging Tape

You pay more for convenience, buying small rolls of tape on a disposable dispencer with cutter is not cost effective in a mass production scenario. Bulk rolls can be dispenced by hand, and cut with scissors or a knife.

Disposable Dispencer 66' = $3 = $.05/foot | Bulk Roll  327' = $4 = $.01/foot

Conclusion

The styrofoam that I used for this experiment is bead-type expanded polystyrene which is denser and more rigid than the floral foam that is currently being used. It appears that the floral foam crushes more easily and retains the shape of the impacting object with more resolution than the bead-type polystyrene. The main sensing element however is the malleable aluminum foil surface layer which records the impacts by becoming embossed with a negative of the impacting object.
mathiemom1 year ago
I don't think they really specify how dense the styrofoam must be in the CoCoRaHS project, so I think you have done a great job finding low cost styrofoam and foil. I wonder how dense the foam must be to get accurate hail measurements. Presumably, they are measuring how far into the foam the hail goes. I guess this would vary based upon the density of the foam.
technovative (author)  mathiemom1 year ago
Thank you. I din't find any substrate density requirement, or current materials cost specified. Based on what I was able to deduce from their "how to make a hail pad" instructions I concluded that they are using a more open cell foam, and that the total minimum cost per pad is about $3. Again based on deduction not specification it appears that they primarily measure the diameter of the hail impacts not the impression depth. Ultimately they should be able to calculate a conversion formula that would account for the lower resolution and maintain reasonable accuracy.