How to be successful (own people) at Halo 3

A helpful handy hint so you or your team can get better at Halo 3.
Finish the Fight
This Is The Way The World Ends
on a wild tangent- upcoming band Stone Halo~www.stone-halo.com

Step 1: Things you will be needing

You will need:
~ a copy of Halo 3
~ an XBOX 360 (with controller etc)
~ headset (optional but recommended)
~ a comfy place to sit and play

Comments

[neo-sky]

why am i reading this? i was hoping 4 something i didn't kno BTW im not being mean jus put sumthin new in it

[justavip]

PRESS 123 IF HALO 3 SHOULD BE ON THE OLD XBOX

[Derin]

PRESS 456 IF HALO SHOULD BE ON PC

[afiq27]

456

[Kwitmeh3]

456

[Derin]

HALO 3

[DJ Radio]

456

[book54321]

456

[joshualater]

press 123 if halo 3 should be made for mac

[robots199]

(removed by author or community request)

[Xander da gr8]

no it cant! it has the best graphics of any game out right now with 1 or 2 exceptions! there is no way the original xbox can handle it!

[Iridium7]

It can't handle the TRUTH!

[Rock Soldier]

That's why he's dead.

[xb0xisbetter]

Yes, like everyone else has said putting halo 3 on the Xbox would be a disaster. Not only would Bungie have to develop a completely different game with the same title in order to keep the original Xbox chugging along without frame rate problems or just complete incompatibility. Then they would most likely have to use the same game engine that Halo 2 had in order to produce both versions in time for the shipping date. No clear, flowing water, no beautiful Havok physics engine rag-doll for the corpses. It would be, in all literal senses, worthless. This then would bring into question the quality of the 360 version that many people purchased their consoles in the for in the first place.

[xb0xisbetter]

Typo in the last sentence there, I'm sure anyone can tell what it was meant to say.

[saisay]

xbox doesn't have good enough graphics...

[Jordan.nave]

No, it shouldn't.... Don't be a cheap ass just go and buy a 360......

[bluenightweasel]

......no.... ok just no

[knjfskdl]

no

[nerfer192]

123

[SeMi_AuToMaTic]

123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 ---- I broke the button. lol.

[buterSBob29]

123

[whatsisface]

Microsoft aren't going to waste money developing the same game for an obsolete console. It's like saying "ROFL GEARS OF WAR SHOULD BE ON PS1!!!!!!!".

[Enemy5802]

(removed by author or community request)

[reedz]

Would you please read your first sentence and tell me what is wrong with it? That hurts my heart.

[whatsisface]

You think the original xbox isn't obsolete in the eyes of the 360?

[reedz]

"Mircrosoft AREN'T going to waste money..." Learn some English please.

[whatsisface]

Wait, you're criticising me over use of English? That's it? At least I bother with proper punctuation and grammar, unlike some people who will happily drop every vowel from a sentence for the added fraction of a second spared.

I do believe the problem here is my "Real English" versus your "American English". The Brits have a strong tendency to use singular nouns with the plural form of verbs, whereas Americans seem to do the opposite.

ref: http://separatedbyacommonlanguage.blogspot.com/2007/07/collective-noun-agreement.html

[brandon borick]

shut up no it all

[whatsisface]

*Know it all.

[Rock Soldier]

lol, nice one.

[brandon borick]

as said shut up

[whatsisface]

Since you asked so nicely :-)

[robots199]

If you want to be mean go to another diy site. We have a be nice policy here!!!

[whatsisface]

I'm not being at all mean, I'm being sarcastic, but he's the one saying shut up without justification.

[Enemy5802]

(removed by author or community request)

[Enemy5802]

oh i meant freaking

[bigjeff5]

It's actually improper (American) English to use plural verbs with singular nouns. If the noun is singular, so is the verb. An entity like Microsoft, while composed of many many people, is still a single entity and thus requires a singular form of the verb "to be", which would be "isn't" in this case. Any time you see an American do what you did, they sound stupid. I can't translate that to how other Brits would treat you though, I know the two versions of English can be very very different. Otherwise your point is spot-on, Cheers!

[drmjj55]

someone payed good attention in english class!!!

[bigjeff5]

Hehe, dumb replying to myself, but I should clarify (especially since your ref mentions it) that "collective" nouns do get plural when you refer to the group as individuals, instead of refering to the entity itself. I.E. when "Microsoft" is actually refering to the thousands of individual employees that make up Microsoft. To put it another way, if you mean "2,000 microsoft employees" when you say "Microsoft" you'd use the plural verb. In that case your comment would be perfectly correct gramatically in American English, though most people would still think you sound stupid, regardless. Most Americans can't speak proper American English (that includes me, btw.)