How to make your iMac easier to use by projectsugru
Featured
finished resize.jpg
finished close resize.jpg
MAIN IMAGE resize.jpg
aaaargh, every time I need to plug headphones or a USB device into my iMac I have to climb over it or fumble blind !!!!

This is a bit of a pain but super simple to solve, I made this ible to show you how to put your ports exactly where you need them, on the front of your iMac. Just see what a difference a bit of sugru can make :)

 
WHAT YOU NEED:
sugru
Headphone extension cable
USB extension cable (male to female) (these are easy to find online or in a local store - I bought 25cm (10") cables - they are the perfect length for this project)
Scissors
Tissue
Masking tape


Why sugru is good for this:
1: bonds to Aluminium brilliantly :)
2: bonds to most other materials
3: you can remove sugru from most non porous surfaces without leaving any marks - take a look at this ible to see how
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: TRUST IN THE TAPE

UNBELIEVABLY IMPORTANT TIP.

The success of this instructable depends a lot on the use of tape. 

To ensure that the inputs stay straight and do not move while the sugru is curing, it is important to tape the wire in place on the back of the computer.

Also, once the inputs are sugru'd in place, it is important to tape them in place, as the wires often offers resistance and try to pull the inputs out of place. Use tape to help hold the hack in place while it cures.

We found a strong masking tape worked best. It may not be as strong as duct tape but it wont leave marks on your beautiful iMac.
1-40 of 84Next »
criggie says: Apr 15, 2012. 6:03 PM
Sugru your cables to a magnet, then put the magnet somewhere comvenient. Likely the steel chassis has to be just on the other side of the aluminium to work.

Ram shouldn't be affected by a static magnetic field, but the speakers might.
The magnetic hard drive is high up towards the middle in those things, and SSDs wouldn't be affected either.

Possibly stick a bit of felt or cork to the underside of the magnet to stop scratching.

Did I miss anything?
Pe-ads says: Apr 16, 2012. 10:40 AM
Nice idea :) On my mother's Mac, the remote sticks to the side in about the place where this hack is located. Plus I've heard that magnets don't actually do anything to a magnetic hard drive: only electromagnets with an oscillating field do. I guess if you swept the magnet all over it it might work!
projectsugru (author) says: Apr 16, 2012. 5:55 AM
I like this idea, a good way to keep your cables tidy, in fact, you could have these mounted at the back of the monitor and pull them into view to insert your devices and then just pop them back once connected, it's a nice way to keep the front of your Mac looking pristine, I think I will give this one a whirl and post the results here. 10/10 Would you like some sugru to try this yourself ?...
jamwaffles says: Apr 16, 2012. 3:08 AM
Yes; the fact that plugging anything in to a magnet-attached connector will push it off. Even with a neodinium magnet, it'll still slide as the plugging force is perpendicular to the magnet's
thegeeke says: Apr 13, 2012. 8:25 AM
Nice ible... but it just points out another reason I hate macs... ;)
astroboy907 says: Apr 14, 2012. 8:32 AM
lol you get used to it after a while. I can switch out thumb drives like no other on a mac. Headphones are easy enough to get it.

*though a USB hub works too* :)
Just wish apple would get on the stupid USB 3 bandwagon by now. Feeling the need for speed here. Though on my 6 year old mac its not going to make much of a difference...
spiceyweasel says: Apr 15, 2012. 10:13 AM
Thunderbolt makes USB 3 look slow by comparison.
Pe-ads says: Apr 16, 2012. 10:37 AM
Yes, but Thunderbolt is useless as it only works for Apple products :-P
astroboy907 says: Apr 15, 2012. 11:36 AM
as thunderbolt is on every computer today I see how that is true...

And exactly how useful is thunderbolt when there are only a handful of drives that have it?
thegeeke says: Apr 14, 2012. 1:19 PM
Hmmm... I didn't even realize that they didn't use 3.0 yet... I guess that is my new reason #300561 that I don't like macs...

My point of accessibility is that you shouldn't have to get used to it... Although hubs do work well, if I spend that much on a computer, I expect it to have a well thought out design, be faster than any computer that costs less, and be able to do anything I throw at it. Mac fails all of those. I spent $400 on a new laptop for my niece, $50 on more RAM, and I spent 2 hours getting it fine tuned for her. It now runs faster than all of her friend's MacBook pros. Just sayin... ;)
spiceyweasel says: Apr 15, 2012. 10:26 AM
So your Windows machine runs all of Macs pro apps, does it? I use Macs because they have the best software for what I do. Making movies and music is a pain on PC's.
thegeeke says: Apr 15, 2012. 8:09 PM
My windows does not run any Mac software... But since I do media production as a side job, I know that windows computers seem to have a bad rap in media production. I use after effects, premier, Vegas, and power director on my windows with no problems. Actually, a friend of mine who does media production for a living and I did a test... Both he and I made the exact same movie using after effects (just a basic video... Nothing too fancy), he did it on his MacBook pro that even had slightly better specs than my windows, then we both started rendering in HD at the same time to see who's computer was faster... Mine won by 17 minutes. It all depends on how well the computers are configured... No matter what system you use.
astroboy907 says: Apr 18, 2012. 9:01 PM
I wonder if processors have superchargers nowadays.... *random question of the day*
waterlubber says: Jun 5, 2012. 1:28 PM
It's called overclocking. You can make an arduino do 2 billion lines of code a second...but you'd have to like, run freon through the thing.
astroboy907 says: Jun 5, 2012. 1:52 PM
Oh, really? Freon? Sweet, I saw some at wal-mart. I'll go pick it up tomorrow..
thegeeke says: Apr 19, 2012. 5:01 AM
When math co-processors came out I guess you could say they were considered "superchargers". Some people call overclocking (which I strongly recommend against) "supercharging". *random answers of the day* ;)
spiceyweasel says: Apr 16, 2012. 7:11 AM
Perhaps. I guess it is just a matter of personal tastes at the end of the day.
thegeeke says: Apr 16, 2012. 7:03 PM
Agreed. :)
astroboy907 says: Apr 14, 2012. 2:00 PM
(and this laptop would be...? :) )

My top 5 reasons to not like apple products:

1. Price- really, apple could be doing much better on this part, as nowhere but apple does it cost $200 to upgrade RAM.

2. Expandability. Apple products are designed to look nice, but not really user expandable.

3. Lockdown- really, get on the open source vibe apple.... grr.

4. Late getting standards- blu ray and USB 3 are becoming the norm on computers- apple thinks thunderbolt will do but it just cant..

5. Not supported half as much as PC's. Self explanatory.

What I would consider a nice apple product (I really want a laptop so this is all gonna be for it)- Low-ish price, some nice post i7 processor, support for an unhealthy amount of RAM (I would max out 16gb), and a good video card.

And I dont even play hardcore 3d games. More like angry birds. Oh and X-plane 10.
waterlubber says: Jun 5, 2012. 1:30 PM
I HATE LOCKDOWN! They nickel and dime you for everything nowadays...Windows, hackable. Android, practically open source. Apple, takes six ours to get it in DFU mode. And no, you can't change the batteries.
astroboy907 says: Jun 5, 2012. 1:53 PM
Actually, I see some problems with that answer. I actually bought myself a macbook pro... Fixed everything up, and surprisingly, replacement parts are super easy to find. Sure, if you go in for repair its 6x more, but I got a display assembly for $80 that apple sells for $400. Works great.

Why would you want to put a working mac in DFU? :O the horrors...
I'd just use something like a restore disc and disk utility.
scottjl says: Apr 16, 2012. 3:50 AM
your "top" reason for disliking apple products is the price they charge for RAM? really? like Dell or HP offers you any better of a deal? you do know you can buy ram for a mac from plenty of 3rd parties, at far better prices. right?

your second is they aren't "expandable"? hmm. i have plenty of devices plugged into my USB and Thunderbolt ports.

third, "Lockdown- really, get on the open source vibe apple" perhaps you aren't aware of OS X's open-source roots, apple's contributions to BSD or many other projects. try http://www.apple.com/opensource/

standards like blu ray? really? when everyone else is moving to digital delivery. usb3 hardly has much traction, and apple isn't the only one behind thunderbolt, intel is pushing it hard too. PS. you can plug an external blu-ray drive into your mac and it will work just fine. mine is plugged into my "non-expandable" USB2 port.

"no supported half as much as pcs" really? what does this statement even mean. supported, by who?
astroboy907 says: Apr 16, 2012. 7:15 AM
oh s*** I started a war :(

Not just for ram- why do you think apple has $60 BILLION in revenue? Because they charge so much. An 8gb ram upgrade is $200 on apple and less than $50 from crucial. As for hardware, why should it cost $2500 for a laptop with the EXACT SAME SPECS as a $500 one? Surely, apple is not using some space age polymer for their products that costs the world to produce.

Expandability as in 3rd party upgrades. Upgrading a hard drive on a mac is harder than you think. As for any other parts, they are only produced BY APPLE, so good luck finding a replacement...

Heard of iOS? Its in major lockdown. I would also be in heaven if apple decided users might actually want to change settings...

Everyone else is moving to digital delivery? Yeah, in like 5 years when the rest of us have the bandwidth for it and everyone is connected. That idea sucks when you go outside. Sure, apple can get rid of the drive- most people dont use em anymore. They should at least be SUPPORTING standards with external products. Thunderbolt, while being pushed by intel, I havn't really seen it on any PCs lately0

Not supported half as much as PCs? Try and find software. I can find LOADs of FREE great working software for a PC, but try it on a mac and youre gonna end up with nothing or $50 out of pocket.

I really dont want to start this war about apple and macs. I do know my stuff when it comes to mac pricing, and theirs sucks. Many times, for a consumer, the decision comes to spending $2000 for $400 for a nice windows laptop. Most people are not going to spend $2000 on something they see is equivalent to a PC
scottjl says: Apr 16, 2012. 10:35 AM
apple has $60B in revenue, apparently a lot of people agree their products are worth their prices, even if you do not. so how is apple wrong?

everyone knows apple doesn't use "space age polymer". they use fairy dust.

do you walk into a BMW dealership and tell them you can buy a chevy for 1/2 the price and demand they price match? after all they both sell cars with 4 wheels and use gasoline! the "EXACT SAME SPECS"!

erm, i've upgraded hard drives on macs since the early 80's. if you're competent with a screw driver you won't have much trouble. yes, i pulled the glass off my 24" imac to upgrade the 500G drive to a 1TB. wasn't that hard. certainly not for most of the people who probably hang out on instructables. ;) as for spare mac parts, there are plenty of 3rd party suppliers. try ifixit, ebay, owc, etc.

iOS. lockdown. maybe you didn't know you could download xcode for free from apple and write your own apps. and then there's this little thing called jailbreaking. there's also a settings app that lets you change plenty of settings. ohhh, wait, do you mean obnoxious themes? yeah. jailbreak and you can do those too.

sorry you won't have decent bandwidth for 5 more years. still on your dial-up aol account? and this is apple's fault how? maybe you can move to somewhere that you can get broadband. what isn't apple supporting with external products? i already mentioned that you can hook up a blu-ray drive via usb. speaking of, you didn't see it on too many PC's when the iMac was first released, it took PC's a while to catch up to Apple on that one. along with the 3.5" floppy. heck, even the mouse. Macs had been using mice since 1984, took PC's more than a few years to catch up, all that DOS ya'knkow.

oh yes. the billions of apps argument. well, we know how many of those LOADs of apps are quality software. there's a reason people pay a few hundred dollars for MS Office vs. using Notepad.

"you get what you pay for"

well, you've already admitted you don't want to pay for hardware, no surprise you won't pay for software either. but again, how is this apple's problem and not your own? infact most of your arguments seem to be centered around the fact that you won't pay for apple products, but as you opened with, apple has $60billion in revenue. so apparently there are quite a few people who believe that their products are worth the price paid. whatever Apple is doing wrong, they're taking it all the way to the bank!
mrElliot says: Sep 1, 2012. 4:22 AM
wow you guys should watch this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njos57IJf-0

haha
waterlubber says: Jun 5, 2012. 1:33 PM
Wow. So much for the "be nice" comment policy...o3o.
astroboy907 says: Apr 16, 2012. 7:20 AM
ad for the record, I love macs! I grew up with pcs and find a mac easier to use. But I also see some huge flaws with apple and their products. Given the choice I would choose mac (If I had the money). Im not trying to convince you apple sucks at stuff, I'm just trying to say that there is stuff apple could work on.
omarruffo says: Apr 15, 2012. 6:57 PM
I'm not a fan of apple computers either, but

1. You can easily upgrade ram from newegg, $45 for 8gig.

2. Their looks are not the only thing they excel in, apple computers are the standard for video editing, sound recording and image alteration.

3. Windows is just as locked if not more.

4. Apple is known for having standards before PCs, USB, SATA, DVI, Displayport, and now Thunderbolt. Intel is pushing Thunderbolt. PCs are slow at adapting to new standards because of legacy components many companies use for manufacturing and old mission critical software.

5. All file standards are compatible with apple products. If you need to run PC only software all macs are more that capable of running a virtual machine and sandbox windows7.
waterlubber says: Jun 5, 2012. 1:33 PM
Yeah, Windows is locked. I hacked it, like 1,000,000,000 times!
astroboy907 says: Jun 5, 2012. 1:55 PM
And which OS has more security issues? Oh, windows :)
Not that OSX isnt impenetrable..
astroboy907 says: Apr 15, 2012. 7:15 PM
I just used Crucial for memory ands its $4 cheaper (and probably more reliable). No offense to you, I just don't like newegg much :)

response to 4.
Apple usually creates a new standard- I believe the thunderbolt connector was a direct collaboration with intel. And as for connections- mini displayport is apple only. Yes, adapters are available, but just slap and HDMI on the thing- much more compatible and good until 4k comes to consumers. With all the design aspects of apple using an adapters is just... ugly :(

To me, I am on both sides- I prefer macs for computing, as they are reliable and good for design (which I like to do). Pc's are great for other stuff, but given a choice I would do mac.

As for smartphones, I have an android phone and an ipod touch. I use the touch more because I had it for years before the droid and built an app library for it. Android though, has a much better browser, bigger screen, and is a lot more universal (plus it has a micro hdmi!)

So really, inside I'm a mac lover but I am definitely not a hardcore mac preacher.
spiceyweasel says: Apr 15, 2012. 10:23 AM
Thunderbolt is three times faster than USB 3 AND you can daisy chain devices. Disc drives are so 2010....who needs one anymore, really? Price? Yeah....they are not cheap, but they DO run a superior OS. Expandability.....Mac Pro can utilize 128GB of RAM and has four on board HD slots that can handle 4TB each. It also has room for two video cards, a raid card, and more. Did I mention it's 12 core processing? If you buy it in it's cheapest configuration....allowing for the best processors, naturally, you'll pay just south of $6k. You can them max it out for about $3k more....vs. loading it on their site and paying close to $20k for it. If you want a Ferrari....you have to be ready to pay for it.
waterlubber says: Jun 5, 2012. 1:35 PM
You do know that 128 GB of ram is useless, right?
astroboy907 says: Jun 5, 2012. 1:55 PM
Not for a high-end, 3d rendering company. A nice 12 core Mac Pro would do better probably than a medium sized server farm.
astroboy907 says: Apr 15, 2012. 11:38 AM
Ah, but you can get a pc just as expandable for less :) around 3k less.

Thunderbolt is proprietary. As its not anywhere close to universal, usb 3 is the best its gonna get. Just because its fast doesnt mean its functional
And really, how many of us NEED 12 core processing??
spiceyweasel says: Apr 15, 2012. 12:09 PM
Actually, you are correct....Thunderbolt IS proprietary to Intel. PC's will have it soon enough, too. I haven't seen any PC's with 128GB of RAM, yet, either.
astroboy907 says: Apr 15, 2012. 12:42 PM
hopefully, but its definitely not going to happen overnight (whereas USB 3 is a few years old).

Anyways, I havnt seen anything short of a huge budget graphics department use that much RAM.
spiceyweasel says: Jun 5, 2012. 3:59 PM
Intel just shipped some Thunderbolt ready PC MoBos.
spiceyweasel says: Apr 15, 2012. 1:29 PM
That's because you don't have an Ubergeek like me living next door. I am proud of my nerddom.
astroboy907 says: Apr 15, 2012. 1:38 PM
lol probably so, as the nerds per square mile here is about 2. :]
1-40 of 84Next »
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!