loading
With an Ethernet "splitter", you can simultaneously connect two computers (or other network devices) on one Ethernet cable. You can buy Ethernet splitters for approximately $ 20.00 USD but you also can make your own.

Context:
One office, one ethernet jack and two computers, or
One living room, one ethernet jack and one HTPC and one XBox.

If you can't realistically (without tearing apart walls or renting a scissor lift) pull one more ethernet cable from the patch panel to the office / living room etc. you can consider the use of an Ethernet "splitter".

I'm assuming all the four pairs of the ethernet cables are properly connected within the ethernet wallplate and the patch panel.

Step 1: What you need

In order do make your own Ethernet splitters you'll need the following:

  • Two RJ45 Crimpable Plug
  • Four RJ-45 keystone jack
  • Short Ethernet Cable Scrap (approximately 2 feet)
The tools you'll need:

  • RJ45 Crimp Tool
  • Craft knife
  • 110 Punch Down Tool
  • Loctite Super Glue
<p>I made this but I did it a little differently. As seen in the attached image, I made mine to be able to split a CAT5 cable that I ran through the house myself. at both ends of this cable I've attached these guys at the single receiving side. This effectively gives me two cable ports at both ends which I can connect to the internet. I do this by connecting both ports from one end into two Ethernet ports on my router. This essentially supplies two IP addresses through one cable which I directed to my PC and Xbox One in the other room. I didn't follow the same wire splitting diagram as in your DIY, simply because I understood that the long cable run was simply acting as a two signal carrier. It was not directly connecting to any electronics so it didn't matter that I made my own split of 4 and 4. Just as long as I split it correctly at the other end before feeding it into my electronics. </p><p>As you can see in the picture, the two internet connections are going through wires 1-4 and 5-8 in the long cable, and at either end 1-4 breaks out into 1, 2, 3, 6 and 5-8 also breaks out into 1, 2, 3, 6 for the second connection.</p><p>This all makes sense to me... except for the part when I absent mindedly fed the two internet connections into the one cable then plugged that cable directly into my computer. My design makes it so that shouldn't work, however my computer accepted the messed up configuration of two separate internet connections and connected me to the internet! WHY?! Do computers just naturally decode messy signals and grab the ones it wants? Without needing a certain schematic for the connection? I am truly baffled at why I have internet right now through this confused cable... I just hoped maybe someone on here could explain what happened.</p><p>Also I hope that wasn't too confusing :P</p>
<p>Hello Gentlaman,</p><p>The subject is quite old. But I just wanted to share my working example.</p><p>I use this for the cases with limited cable installation for some of the departments.</p><p>This chart is for the installation in the system room.</p><p>You will just use the same on the wall sockets and distribute two ends to two user.</p><p>So briefly,</p><p>1. one and to the patch pannel and two ends are to the main switch to get the line.</p><p>2. with the users room's wall socket, one end to the wall socket and two ends to two users.</p><p>This perfectly works for me without ant signal loss.</p><p>I hope it helps somebody.</p>
<p>Well, I see what you did, but the original wiring diagram is there for a reason. While the cable is SIMPLY transmitting the signal, it is NOT A SIMPLE cable! Ethernet-cables are twisted-pair-cables. That means, the wires inside the cable are twisted in pairs. This is important to minimize crosstalk between the cables (interference so to say). So the pairs in an Ethernet cable are as follows:</p><p>1&amp;2, 3&amp;6, 4&amp;5, 7&amp;8</p><p>The first socket should be using the original wiring of 1&amp;2, 3&amp;6. So the data runs completely through 2 twisted pairs. The other socket should follow the pairing-structure. So from the second port, the 1&amp;2 should go to one twisted pair, and the 3&amp;6 should also go to one twisted pair. As you can see, you have 4&amp;5 and 7&amp;8 left. Therefor you should now connect (from the 2nd socket) 1&amp;2 to 4&amp;5 and 3&amp;6 to 7&amp;8. You could also mix it up totally, e.g. like this:</p><p>1st socket: 1&amp;2 to 4&amp;5, 3&amp;6 to 3&amp;6</p><p>2nd socket: 1&amp;2 to 7&amp;8, 3&amp;6 to 1&amp;2</p><p>It is only important that pairs are again transmitted through pairs. Otherwise you might severely compromise the speed/reliability of your connection.</p><p>I hope my explanations were ok. Otherwise, please ask.</p>
<p>PS: Why the ethernet standard used such a confusing wiring from the beginning (i.e. not aligning the pairs 1&amp;2, 3&amp;4, 5&amp;6, 7&amp;8) is beyond me...</p>
<p>Because one might try to connect a phone device or a phone line into a data jack. An analog phone line rings at 90 Volt AC and it talks at 48 Volt. One can easily see that a user mistakes might blow up an entire cheap switch. since people usually try before they think, this complex wiring scheme has probably saved more than 1 000 000 ethernet switch in 20 years.</p>
<p>Yes your explanation made sense and your recommended connection diagram worked! I didn't realize the twisted pairs were crucial, thanks for clearing that up!</p>
<p>In an Ethernet cable there is 8 wires, but only 4 are being used. let's say the 4 wires being used are the two brown and the two orange. let's also say these 4 wires occupy the slots 1, 2, 3 and 4 on the Ethernet jack. the 4 remaining wires are two green and two blue, which occupy the slots 5, 6, 7 and 8 on the Ethernet jack. What would happen if you have the two brown and the two orange wires and the two green and the two blue wires split at each end. (on each end you would have two groups of wires.) the brown wires are connected to the slots 1, 2, 3 and 4 on the Ethernet jack on each end. and the two green and the two blue wires connected to the slots 1, 2, 3 and 4 on another Ethernet jack at each end. (now you would have two Ethernet jacks on each end of the cable with wires connected to the slots 1, 2, 3 and 4.) Will this work or not? I can't see any reason to why not, but you never know. As the author of this instructable said, this is very similar to power over Ethernet, but only with two data lines instead of one data line and one power line. The fancy picture below should help explain anything confusing (everything). (Sorry for any bad English)</p>
<p>Yes. It works. I have done exactly that 10+ years ago because I couldn't run a 2nd cat5 cable through the tubes (filled with telephone cables already). Make sure you follow the right paring: pairs should end on 1&amp;2 and 3&amp;6 on the wall socket. You will be limited to FastEthernet (100 MBit) though.</p>
<p>It's a little late now. I found my dad's old ethernet splitter from the 80's and it works fine. But thank you for answering my question anyway, it might be useful someday :)</p>
<p>is it possible to use an Ethernet splitter to us on laptop and one line run to wireless router</p>
<p>I wouldn't be surprised. I've never actually tried such a thing but I can't imagine why it wouldn't work. You might get a slower connection because you're basically splitting your internet in half though, presuming both your laptop and your router are on, though I don't really know how overall usage works when multiple sources are using it right from the same line.</p>
<p>This &quot;splitter&quot; works well as long as it is very short and it works only with 10Mbps Ethernet and not 100Mbps (for which you need all the pairs).</p><p>It will not work for long cables because you are affecting the line matching.</p><p>This splitter basically is a good artisanal solution but from an engineering point of view, meh... it's a miracle that it works :-/</p>
<p>That is not correct FrancoM9. The 10/100Mbps Ethernet only uses 2 pairs of the 4 pairs in the cable. It is only Gigabit Ethernet (1Gbps) that needs all 4 pairs. The line matching is not a problem because you are using 2 previously UNUSED pairs. I have successfully used this technique (the splitter/combiner is called an economiser in the UK) over a 30m long Ethernet cable. Of course a switch is easier to use, but if you have the RJ45 connectors and some patch cables on hand the economiser trick is worth trying.</p>
<p>i have tired it. it doesnt work well. actually in my experiment i made two ethernet wire from one. then the one i plug into the laptop and other one to the router.while laptop turned on both (laptop and router) doesnt get any internet access, barely laptop works well with internet access but not the router. </p><p>while laptop turned off router works well. </p>
<p>Hi there,</p><p>I'm going to do this setup: 2 splitter at the start and at the end of ONE wire, in order to connect 2 devices with a single wire. It is possible? At one side there are connected 2 devices, on the other side is connected to the splitter and then to TWO different ports of my switch.</p><p>Thanks.</p>
<p>I want to be able to split an Ethernet cable that has PoE to power 2 PoE devices and both fall well under the 15W max combined. Is this possible? So I can use the 2 wires carrying the 48VDC to power both devices, but that leaves me 6 wires to split the data. Can I do it hub style, like put the same 4 data wires to both devices?</p>
<p>can u just hook it up directly to another wire.......i can't afford the connetctors</p>
<p>splitter 2nd port not working plz help me. 1st &amp; 2nd port use to internet purpus .not use to data &amp; voice .</p>
You said 'This method is similar to PoE (Power over Ethernet) but instead of injecting DC, it is injecting another &quot;data&quot;. ' which is kinda misleading. <br> <br>Power over Ethernet is a negotiated protocol between the device and the switch, while still allowing the use of gigabit speeds using all 4 pairs. <br> <br>You're thinking &quot;Power over Cat5/6&quot; which is where the spare pairs have 5 or 12 or 48 Volts and no negotiation. Don't ever plug anything gigabit into this. <br> <br>These splitters do work, but are more likely to induce crosstalk between the two pairs of twisted pair inside the one run of cable. Yes I have used them as a last resort, but a local switch, or man-up and run some more cable is a far better way to go. <br> <br>Cabling is almost always better than wireless ethernet. <br>
I'm just going to add this as a note: if you are trying to achieve faster speeds with Gigabit Ethernet, this is not going to work, as Gigabit uses all the pairs on its own, if you take away half of them it WILL limit you to 100mbps.
using the following wiring scheme for T568B: <br> <br>RJ45 Plug <br> <br>1 White/Orange <br>2 Orange <br>3 White/Green <br>4 Blue <br>5 White/Blue <br>6 Green <br>7 White/Brown <br>8 Brown <br> <br>Take the other end of the cable, cut it to 9 inches and punch down the four pairs using the following wiring scheme: <br>&bull; Jack #1: T568B <br>1 White/Orange to pin 1keystone jack White/Orange <br>2 Orange to pin 2 keystone jack Orange <br>3 White/Green to pin 3 keystone jack White/Green <br>6 Green to pin 6 keystone jack Green <br>&bull; Jack #2: T568B <br>4 Blue to pin 2 keystone jack (Orange) <br>5 White/Blue to pin 1 keystone jack (White/Orange) <br>7 White/Brown to pin 3 keystone jack (White/Green) <br>8 Brown to pin 6 keystone jack (Green) <br>
is there any way i could jsut buy this from walmart or somthin, i dont feel like doin any big complicated projects
Lol this isnt complicated.
Unless, of course, you don't have any of the required tools for this (which would cost more than making a few of these splitters).<br/>I'll admit, it's not a &quot;big complicated project&quot;, but there's no reason to pick at people.<br/><br/>A simpler option is to just buy a network hub, they're pretty cheap (often $20 or less). This is <em>similar</em> to an un-powered hub, though this is incompatible with PoE and Gigabit.<br/>
A network hub will work as well but will create a <strong>bottleneck</strong>. I guess each solution (network hub vs. splitters) has it's pros and cons.<br/><br/>As for DBLinuxLover's comment, what Instructable has he ever done ? 'nough said...<br/>
How does it create a bottleneck? 2 computers on a hub and 2 computers on this splitter still puts them on the same collision domain. In fact some hubs do exactly the same thing. Both layer 1 devices. Help me understand.
This device does not split the signal... it splits the cable. Normal ethernet on a Cat5 (4-pair) cable only uses half of the wires in the bundle (2 pairs). All this "splitter" does is redistribute signals so that one computer uses 2 pairs and the other computer uses the other two. They are on separate collision domains because they are still connected to two separate ports on the router... The analog to this setup is if you just had two ethernet cables running normally connecting two computers to a router.
Of Course! So simple. I should've read the instructable. Needless to say this won't work with gigabit networks then. Thanks for clearing that up.
It will, but you won't get gigabit speeds.
no, it wont.
No, not 'nough said... A lot of very experienced engineers read here but don't post. Their offering their expertise should be appreciated, not slammed. There's a reason that ethernet hubs have fallen out of favor compared to switches, and you have built a 2 port hub. They do create network bottlenecks and dropped packets and packet collisions. Your instructable is good for a fast 'n nasty, but to split a connection a switch is really the only way to go, especially when it comes to gaming where microseconds can be the difference between success and failure.
... Do they even sell hubs anymore? We tried to find some for our "Intro to Networking" class, to show bottlenecking and signal crossing... and nobody had any in stock anymore... Unless of course you guys are talking about switches...
I dug a hub out of the trash at work a few years ago. It was only 10 Mb, so that's why I assume it was tossed. <br><br>Engineers hoard the things at my new place of work. It's an easy tool to use to sniff network traffic. <br><br>
I haven't seen hubs in stores for awhile either. For those who don't know, a hub shares the available bandwidth among all connections, while a switch typically has a backbone that is much faster than the ports so it can better insure that each connection gets full speed and doesn't have to share. In other words, two 100MB streams via a 100MB hub will get 50MB each. On a switch with a 1GB backbone inside they'd both see 100MB. Switches are so cheap now there is little reason for anyone to market a hub given their shortcomings.
They definitely do, though switches are primarily taking over because they're so cheap to make now. I think I remember finding an un-powered / power-optional hub a few years ago, too. As proof that they still exist, a quick search yielded one from Best Buy for $19. Though a switch with one more port was $22, and was 10/100, not just 10, so there's not much of a reason to go for that one in particular.
Most bottlenecks with home LANs occur at the cable/DSL/whatever modem. With the typical 100MB (or even 1GB) network two computers sharing a cable via a hub or switch will still be orders of magnitude faster than the ISP feed...typically. Unless you are doing a lot of heavy bandwidth stuff within your LAN that doesn't traverse the modem then worries about LAN bottlenecks are usually unwarranted. Unless WiFi is involved. That is an entirely different can of flying monkeys, but isn't relevant to sharing a cable via hub or switch.
Hi <br>I realise this is a couple of years old, but I wondered if I might ask you to check the text against the pictire. <br>Specifically, assuming the top left connector in the pic is pin 1, the colours don't match the text. <br>Your input would be greatly appreciated. <br>Regards, Phil
philhartree -&gt; in the illustration of step 3, jack #1 will be on the right and jack #2 is in the left. The wiring is correct and match the text but it just depends on the type of keystone jack you have.
philhartree is correct the picture has blue in pin 1 and blue/white in pin 2 but your text says the opposite for jack 2
this set up is for B configuation, is there an A? <br> <br>Thanks
Hi, great instructable, but i have a question. If I want to do this, but I want three female ends instead of two, and no male ends, how should I wire the Keystone jack instead of the crimpable plug
They wiring is like this <br><br>1 White/Orange to pin 1<br>2 Orange to pin 2<br>3 White/Green to pin 3<br>6 Green to pin 6<br><br>4 Blue to pin 2<br>5 White/Blue to pin 1<br>7 White/Brown to pin 3<br>8 Brown to pin 6 <br><br>The key is too keep the pairs together. Regards
Your set up is for B wiring configuration, do have the A version. <br> <br>Thanks
DUUUH, I answered my own question. My 'sharer-splitter' adapters worked fine once I determined that BOTH keystone connectors and RJ45 plugs would use only the orange/green pairs. The router keystone connectors and or the DVD/TV cable box inputs must just use one half of the wires, those being the orange/green pairs. <br>The adapters allowed me to operate two separate devices off of a SINGLE Cat 5 cable as long as I had two free router outputs. <br>Thanks to all the comments as in the end they saved me from running an additional cable.
Is it possible to use a SINGLE Cat5 cable to connect two outputs of a cable TV router to a TV cable box AND a DVD (both needing separate ether-net inputs)??????????? I have no specs on any of the installed equipment but the concept of this thread seemed promising.<br><br>The simple solution of using TWO cables is not feasible due to access issues and the DVD/Cable TV converter are NOT wireless.<br><br>I tried simple homemade splitters at BOTH ends of known good SINGLE cable but only the side with the green and orange wires functions. The standard is 56B. I have probably oversimplified my solution but if there is some simple trick short of patch boxes/switches it might save me and other users some money. I can not open the cable box to see how the output and input keystone connectors are wired. Am also not a network guy but did work on vacuum tube TVs back in the 60s so I can follow a wiring diagram. <br><br>Reviewing other comments did not seem to help but since so many had similar issues with one side not working I am led to believe that what I am trying to do is just not that simple. The cable TV company is of no help either as they do not understand why I would not simply drag another cable through the wall.<br><br>Any help most appreciated.
I did all the steps but i cant seem to get it right. after i completed the splitter if i connect only one jack it doesn work but when i enter 2 jack only one works. i tried with the combination of colours you gave and the combination of the rjs i found on the existing set up
I like the idea :D. I haven't tried this, but in theory it would work.
followed your instruction jack #1 works Jack #2 don't wok please advise thank you<br>
i was wounding can you use both the ports at the same time .i have xbox 360 and a internet tv

About This Instructable

883,257views

241favorites

License:

Bio: http://www.christophecaron.com
More by chrismake:MAME Cabinet in 4 key steps Egglift: an automatic LEGO egg cooker Mentos geyser tube: re-Make 
Add instructable to: