How to refill a "disposable" Brita brand water pitcher filter with activated carbon.

How to refill a \"disposable\" Brita brand water pitcher filter with activated carbon.
Why buy a replacement filter for $6 to $10 (or more) when you can refill your old filter cartridge housing for about 50 cents?!

Refilling is quick, easy and economical. If you can refill a salt shaker, then you should be able to refill a Brita, PuR, or other brand water pitcher cartridges. All that you will need is an old cartridge, some activated carbon, a polyethylene plug, a sharp utility knife or Xacto knife. A 1/2" drill motor and 1/2" drill bit are optional, but can aid in rounding out the hole.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up
 

Step 1A bit about activated carbon and where to buy small quantities.

A bit about activated carbon and where to buy small quantities.
Activated carbon is also known as activated charcoal and is a VERY effective substance at absorbing many unwanted contaminants in drinking water and other liquids.

The History of Activated Carbon

Activated Carbon was first known to treat water over 2000 years ago. However, it was first produced commercially at the beginning of the 20th century and was only available in powder form. Initially activated carbon was mainly used to decolorize sugar and then from 1930 for water treatment to remove taste and odor. Granular activated carbon was first developed as a consequence of WWI for gas masks and has been used subsequently for water treatment, solvent recovery and air purification. The unique structure of activated carbon produces a very large surface area: 1 lb of granular activated carbon typically provides a surface area of 125 acres (1 Kg =1,000,000 sq. m.). Activated carbon can be produced from a variety of carbonaceous raw material, the primary ones being coal, coconut shells, wood and lignite. The intrinsic properties of the activated carbon are dependent on the raw material source. The activated carbon surface is non-polar which results in an affinity for non-polar adsorbates such as organics. Adsorption is a surface phenomenom in which an adsorbate is held onto the surface of the activated carbon by Van der Waal's forces and saturation is represented by an equilibrium point. These forces are physical in nature, which means that the process is reversible (using heat, pressure, etc.) Activated carbon is also capable of chemisorption, whereby a chemical reaction occurs at the carbon interface, changing the state of the adsorbate (dechlorination is an example of a chemisorption process). (You can read more here: http://www.carbochem.com/activatedcarbon101.html )

Activated charcoal is good at trapping other carbon-based impurities ("organic" chemicals), as well as things like chlorine. Many other chemicals are not attracted to carbon at all -- sodium, nitrates, etc. -- so they pass right through. This means that an activated charcoal filter will remove certain impurities while ignoring others. It also means that, once all of the bonding sites are filled, an activated charcoal filter stops working. At that point you must replace the filter. (You can read more here: http://science.howstuffworks.com/question209.htm )

Over 100 years ago Ellen White, a health reformer & pioneer of the Seventh Day Adventist movement strongly advocated the medical uses for charcoal powder. The modern medical establishment has only recently begun to use activated charcoal powder as the preferred method of treating oral poisonings and drug overdoses: "It is thought to bind to poison and prevent its absorption by the gastrointestinal tract. In cases of suspected poisoning, medical personnel either administer activated charcoal on the scene or at a hospital's emergency department. Dosing is usually empirical at 1 gram/kg of body weight, usually given only once. Depending on the drug taken, it may be given more than once. In rare situations activated charcoal is used in Intensive Care to filter out harmful drugs from the blood stream of poisoned patients. Activated carbon has become the treatment of choice for many poisonings, and other decontamination methods such as ipecac-induced emesis or stomach pumps are now used rarely." (From the Wikipedia entry for Activated Carbon)

You can find it at any fish & aquarium supply. If your concerned that the quality of the carbon from an aquarium shop might not be up-to-snuff, then go to a homebrew shop, or some other source that you are comfortable with. The granule size you'll want should be relatively close to 8 x 16 mesh size or smaller, but NOT so small that it falls out of the holes in your filter housing. I purchased the NSF approved carbon I used for my filters through an ebay merchant (here: http://stores.ebay.com/Carbon-Eze ). No, that's not me, & I don't know them. :) They describe their products well and have a good reputation & that's why I've included them here.
« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
206 comments
1-40 of 206next »
Aug 27, 2008. 9:53 PMMark Rehorst says:
Fluoride is put into water to protect teeth. The small quantities added to public water supplies is NOT toxic. Find actual scientific information, not paranoia, here:
http://www.cdc.gov/FLUORIDATION/benefits.htm
Jan 4, 2012. 11:52 PMArtanis_Regnis says:
Yea...Never, ever question the government. They always tell the truth.
As if the government wants to save your teeth. What a laugh.

The fluoride is called a "slow kill".
Jan 11, 2012. 2:49 PMkc8hps says:
YES it is a slow kill, funny how my father was removed from drinking city water due to the affects it could have on kidney functions.
I think all people over 50 should be wise and use good judgement on how much water they consume form municipal water sources.

Just sayin.
Jan 5, 2012. 8:02 AMMark Rehorst says:
Why do you think the government wants to poison you?
Jan 5, 2012. 7:54 AMMark Rehorst says:
Many people subscribe to the conspiracy theory of dentistry- that dentists are out to screw people out of their money by lying to them about their oral health. Yes, there are some dentists who put commerce over health, but they are in the minority. The vast majority of dentists are genuinely concerned about their patients' health and do their best to provide them with quality care.

The unfortunate thing about people who are suspicious of dentists is that their suspicion leads them to avoid dentists which in turn leads to poor oral health which eventually leads to a dentist telling them that they need extensive work, often at a high cost. Their suspicion thus becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

If we start with two basic assumptions
a) pain and infection are undesirable for overall health and quality of life,
b) having teeth is better than not having them
and we look at the disease processes that result in oral pain and loss of teeth, we eventually reach the inescapable conclusion that the mouth requires regular maintenance by highly trained professionals. It is a very rare person whose diet, lifestyle, immune system, anatomy, and genetics all align themselves in favor of perfect oral health.

Finally, the scientific method is unquestionably the greatest invention of the human race. Every other human invention around you exists because the scientific method works, and works well. I've provided links to the science behind the fluoridation of water. I can't force you to read it or believe it. It is up to each individual to choose truth or ignorance. I hope for your own sake that you choose wisely.

Jan 5, 2012. 8:38 PMArtanis_Regnis says:
I certainly can't force you to believe that putting poison in your water is indeed a "slow kill". There is no conspiracy theory. It's a fact. If you think for one second the local water municipality under direction of the federal government, intentions are for better oral, who am I to argue with you. I certainly won't change your mind. Drink all the fluoride laced water you wish.

What's important is people are waking up and they are making choices based off the information of their own research.

For me, I indeed choose truth. Wisely.
Jan 5, 2012. 10:25 PMMark Rehorst says:
I wish you a long, healthy life and the best of luck in all your endeavors.
Jan 14, 2012. 11:44 PMArtanis_Regnis says:
Information is piling in regarding the toxic poisoning and SLOW KILL of the American people through fluoride. New research reveals a startling new finding: fluoride is likely contributing to the epidemic of cardiovascular disease by stimulating calcification of the vascular system, including the coronary arteries.

In a study published in the journal Nuclear Medicine Communications this month (Jan. 2012), researchers assessed fluoride uptake and calcification in the major arteries of 61 patients who were administered sodium fluoride, the active ingredient in most fluoridated toothpastes.

Here is the link to the study;
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/article/there-association-vascular-fluoride-uptake-vascular-calcification-and-coronary-artery-diseas
Jan 15, 2012. 1:36 AMMark Rehorst says:
Articles in medical/engineering/scientific journals are aimed at readers who have the educational background to understand them. It is very easy for people who do not have that educational background to make mistakes interpreting the information presented. The link you posted is a great example of how people misinterpret such articles.

The first clue to the problem is that the linked abstract is for an article published in a journal of nuclear medicine. Why would there be an article about fluoride and arterial plaques in a journal of nuclear medicine? Why not in a journal of cardiology?

The answer is that the article is NOT about a causal relationship between fluoride ingestion and formation of arterial plaques. It is about using a radioactive fluoride compound as a contrast agent to improve image quality on PET/CT scans. The fluoride in question is swallowed or injected into the patient prior to performing the PET/CT scan. The article is saying that the fluoride compound contrast agent appears to be taken up in the plaques rendering them more readily apparent in the PET/CT images.

Here's a link to a reliable site that explains what PET scan and contrast agents are: http://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=pet
Here is another article that explains the use of a fluoride compound as a contrast agent for detecting breast cancer using PET scans (NO, it doesn't imply that fluoride CAUSES breast cancer!):
http://radiographics.rsna.org/content/27/suppl_1/S215.full

The people who posted the link at greenmedinfo.com apparently didn't read or didn't understand the article whose abstract they published. They simply saw the words "fluoride" and "arterial plaque" and leapt to the incorrect conclusion that fluoride causes arterial plaque.
Jan 5, 2012. 11:41 PMArtanis_Regnis says:
Thank you, Mark. You too.
Apr 22, 2009. 10:37 AMstickelt says:
CDC , they are a joke. You need to do your homework. Show ME where Fluoride is GOOD for your teeth with studies.... Good luck chuck. Scam Scam, my wife and her siblings had zero vaccines, zero fluoride and are the healthiest , strongest kids and now adults.. Fluoride is toxic, causes brain damage , causes hypothyroidism .... Mercola.com #1 health site used.
Jun 25, 2009. 6:54 AMbaneat says:
You're using about 5 subjects as basis for your analysis. No offense, but you need way more. Zero vaccines is just a stupid idea.
Apr 23, 2009. 11:41 PMMark Rehorst says:
Here's a web site that has a lot of good information on the science behind fluoridation of water, written in language that is easy to understand by people who are not scientists:
http://fluorideinfo.org/index.html
It also has some information about the sort of nonsense being served up as science at mercola.com and other antifluoride web sites.

Notice that the FIN site doesn't try to scare you then offer to sell you pills/potions/filters that will save you from the thing they were trying to scare you about.

Cheers!

Apr 22, 2009. 3:29 PMMark Rehorst says:
Here's a reference to start with:

Petersen PE, Lennon MA. Effective use of fluorides for the prevention of dental
caries in the 21st century: the WHO approach. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol
2004; 32: 319–21.

The bibliography lists many peer-reviewed scientific papers that will update your knowledge on the subject. I recommend you peruse the Cochrane Collaboration web site (http://www.cochrane.org/#). It is considered the gold-standard for quality, peer-reviewed medical and dental science.

Those healthy, unvaccinated people you mention have the people around them who have been vaccinated to thank (and lady luck!) that they have never come down with the diseases those vaccinations prevent. Look up "herd immunity". I wish them continued luck.

Here's another page to read that may help you in your journey:
http://www.freeinquiry.com/critical-thinking.html

I wish you the greatest of success in your effort to educate your self!

Mar 5, 2009. 3:18 PMriqhowell says:
Tyler, check out the info on fluoride available at mercola.com. Also don't forget that fluoride can be from multiple sources besides tap water, such as toothpaste, green tea etc.
Sep 2, 2008. 6:52 AMthewaytolos says:
Ok last comment on this topic... One word Monsanto.... Oh yea I went there.....
Sep 2, 2008. 6:49 AMthewaytolos says:
lol you quoted actual scientific information and (dot gov link) in the same sentence. That's pretty freaking hilarious. Serious Rofl OMG I just noticed your name Tyler Durden.... Re-read the book and free yourself from the machine which you so openly obey.. No disrespect love you!
Dec 7, 2011. 7:02 AMsusanrm says:
I am with you on not wanting fluoride in my water, but where do you get the idea that PUR puts timed release sodium fluoride in their filters?? I have searched the web, including PUR's own site AND the anti-fluoride sites, and there is nothing saying anything like this. Instead, they just say their filters won't REMOVE fluoride - which is okay with me, since my area doesn't fluoridate the water.

Please provide a source or edit this line out - I would love to know if it's true, but if it's not, it shouldn't be causing alarm to people like me who use PUR-filtered water for me and my pets.

Thanks.
Nov 29, 2011. 5:12 AMBreygon says:
I only had a brief look (I'm on lunch). but would point out that the ion exchange resin also reduces 'scale' problems. I used to live in a chalk area where scale was more of an issue than taste so i still buy the filters new for the resin aspect. the top slits/holes are also for air to escape more easily - thus increasing flow time. most of these products use silver in the activated carbon as a bacteriostat - that is to stop bacteria growing whilst it is in storage and is not a source for treating bacteriological waters. in fact with time these filters can provide very good growth conditions, so if you do reuse old housings you really should disinfect.

nice concept. good for tast and odour issues (and pesticides).
Apr 22, 2011. 10:15 AMRob5i says:
Where do you arrive at the 50 cent figure for refilling a cartridge?

All the activated charcoal I have seen is very expensive. A standard container even from the big box stores is about $8 for 9 ounces. This would maybe fill three Britta filters. One of the links to a bulk charcoal website lists 4 pounds for $52, that's $13 per pound while charcoal for BBQs is about 27 cents per pound. Is there a manufacture of filter grade charcoal that will be in the middle? Please post a source or link or don't make such a claim.
Oct 19, 2011. 10:35 AMjpcflow says:
It not the kind of thing that you're going to save money on re-filling just one cartridge. In the long run, this is the smartest way to save money and keep your water clean. Just searching in google for "bulk activated charcoal" should point you in the right direction. It's pretty easy to find it under $5 per lb.

You could always just find some brita coupons if you want to take the easy way out.
May 14, 2011. 9:58 AMfuzvulf says:
BBQ charcoal can contain heavy metals, toxins and other general nasties. Unless you are planning on using the "all natural" charred sticks that still retain their original shape(of a burned stick) then you would be poisoning your water rather than purifying it.
Sep 15, 2011. 8:06 AMTim Temple says:
Make a wood gas stove! It burns on all the volatile stuff out of the wood, leaving activated charcoal. You just have to put the fire out to save it. Dump it into a paint can with a tiny hole in the lid.
That advice will cost you $3.75.
Apr 24, 2011. 1:31 PMSoscan2062 says:
http://www.buyactivatedcharcoal.com/granular_activated_charcoal_8x16mesh_coconut

Not sure where you're looking but I found this pretty quick. For 5 lbs it's $6.08 per pound. It also says that the density is approximately 28 lbs/cu.ft.

1 cu.ft. = 958 oz.
28 lbs/cu.ft. = .0292 lbs/oz
Using your approximate 3 oz. per filter this gives .0876 lbs per filter.
Using the above cost per pound it gives $.532.

Even if these equations are rough and not including shipping it shows that sources can be found that make $0.50 per filter feasible.
To Rob5i, I ask that you do a little more research and a little more math.
To IAMSatisfied and all ibles authors, I ask that these types of analysis be added to any ible where an efficiency is stated.
Other than that great instructable, I look forward to trying this. Thanks
Jul 10, 2011. 2:38 PMcmastin says:
Thank you for posting this!! I live in Colorado and have great tap water but was looking into this project to utilize with another project I found :

http://www.instructables.com/id/Filtered-Pet-Watering-Bowl/?&sort=ACTIVE&limit=40

I mainly want to refill a filter on a running water pet bowl for cats to cut down on the gelatinous gel layer that forms on the bottom of bowl. I was wondering if the carbon needed would be same with running water being recycled with pump. Would just simply measuring the amount of carbon in existing filter and replacing it with same amount be adequate and safe for my pets? Does anyone have insight? Could there be a hazard in adding tooo much carbon to a filter? Thanks in advance!!
Sep 22, 2011. 2:13 PMnetgrazer says:
The goo on the bottom of the bowl is a buildup of bacteria, I believe. It may be more practical (no refill necessary) to build a UV-C bulb in that system somewhere, away from feline, bovine, kanine and human eyes of course. It would completely sterilize the water, including all the backwash.

I can't guarantee that will take care of any stuff sticking to the bowl, but it seems like it's worth a try.

Oh wait, here's an instructable: http://www.instructables.com/id/LED-Water-Purifier/
Sep 20, 2011. 1:41 PMSkUG says:
I work in a shop that sells brita products, they now have a "bin" where you can recycle your old cartridges, saves on landfill
(still stupidly expensive, as someone says up there, there is silver in them? the price of silver has tripled in the last few years so thats probably why)
I'll shall try this instructable - thank you!
Sep 16, 2011. 11:45 AMsteved5600 says:
in a in a pinch I bet a cork would work. Rubber stopper would work too. Silly putty
Sep 15, 2011. 9:12 PMelvenroi says:
can i use carbon from like the pharmacy? the kind that you use for curbing 'die-rear' and gas.
Apr 9, 2010. 8:04 PMLizQuincy says:
I, too, have had trouble finding the polyethylene plug.  We've already made 2 trips to Home Depot, searching and searching to no avail.  Sigh.
Oct 31, 2010. 9:32 PMAgnis says:
I used corks. No Home Depot necessary.
Sep 15, 2011. 11:08 AMdangerine says:
Cork! Great idea...great way to use part of one of the new style plastic corks, too! Cut to fit!
Apr 23, 2010. 3:33 PMLizQuincy says:
Thanks.  I found them.  Not exactly what was in the picture, but it works. 

Now the issue is with the activated carbon.  We got some from a pet store, but the particles are much too large.  So we tried making them smaller using a coffee grinder, but it didn't make them uniform, so some were the right size, while others were fairly large, and there was a lot of really tiny particles.  So when we soaked the filter, the water kept turning black from all the small particles leaching out of the filter.

I realize I can buy some online that are the exact size I need (which I plan on doing), but I am also wondering if I can still use the carbon I already bought.  I am thinking that if I use it as is (big particles), the filter will just not last as long, and I will have to change it more frequently (because the big particles have less surface area).  Does that sound right?  Or does anyone know of a way to make the particles smaller, but consistent in size?
Jun 14, 2010. 12:05 PMgreenleaf35 says:
i got some activated carbon from walmart in the pet area its a small diameter
FWMAUO1G6MPGP9Z.MEDIUM.jpg
Apr 22, 2010. 1:04 PMhezaharley says:
Hi Liz,

Ace Hardware has them.  Had to buy some for a broken drain on a camp cooler.
Apr 19, 2010. 1:53 PMkelseymh says:
You should find those little red plugs in one of two places at HD -- either in the plumbing components aisle (the sample place you find little elbows, endcaps, and whatnot), or in the nuts-and-bolts aisle (in one of those grey plastic pull-out trays with wacky bits of hardware).

Don't bother asking for help, as I'm sure you've discovered, the staff at HD are lucky if they know how to find their way out of the break room :-(  You might get somewhere by taking a picture of the caps with you to show them.  But no guarantees.
Jun 27, 2011. 10:54 AMMethylPox says:
Respectfully, I think this is a great instructable. Your claims about other things should be edited out, however.
May 14, 2011. 10:07 AMfuzvulf says:
Awesome first Instructable. Very well done.
Oct 31, 2010. 9:35 PMAgnis says:
No need to make the hole really really smooth and then punch holes in the top to ensure water flow into the canister. Make a hole, make sure what you are plugging it with won't come out, but a few little spaces at the edge really don't matter. As I said in the previous comment space, I use corks. Just make sure they are tightly in, so they don't float up and out.
May 31, 2008. 9:07 AMmprove says:
This is a great instructable! I whole-heartedly agree with all the above posters commending you on the thoroughness and high-quality of your guide. My question is: once you empty out the used activated carbon, do you know of any way to reuse/recycle it? A (very brief) Google search brought up mostly industrial options for recycling facilities (i.e. those that cater only to companies producing large amounts of used activated carbon). But I did also glean that it can be recycled to 80% of its original filtration capacity so it seems better to send it somewhere to do that than directly to a landfill after 2-3 months in my water pitcher. Any suggestions would be great.
1-40 of 206next »

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
13
Followers
2
Author:IAMSatisfied