3 Simple Ways to
Share What You Make

With Instructables you can share what you make with the world — and tap into an ever-growing community of creative experts.

PhotosPhotos

Share one or more photos of a project, recipe, or whatever you've made, quickly and easily.

Step by StepStep-By-Step

Share your step-by-step photos with text instructions of what you made so others can do it too!

VideoVideo

Share your how-to video. You'll need your embed code from a video site such as YouTube.

How to use an audio mixer (soundboard)

Step 6Buses (subgroups), Main mix, VCA's

Buses (subgroups), Main mix, VCA\
«
  • SOUNDCRAFT_MH2_48_FRONT.jpg
  • 503655.jpg
Almost all decent sized mixers have at least one bus, or subgroup, many have up to 10 or more. Buses are, simply put, a routing system. There will be buttons near the fader on each channel for each subgroup, allowing you to assign that channel to one or more of these subgroups. Think of the buses is mini-mixes.
One very common use of a bus is to assign all the drum channels (floor tom, kick, hi-lo tom, hi-hat, snare, etc.) to one bus. This way, the engineer can change the volume of the drumset in the total mix without having to change each fader on each channel. Other uses include groups of singers (girls, boys; leads, harmony), instruments (main, backup; brass, woodwind, percussion), etc.
Just remember that changing the fader on a bus is NOT equivalent to changing the faders on all of its assigned channels. It simply changes the volume of that particular mix of channels relative to the entire mix. Channels can be assigned to multiple buses, and changing the volume of one bus with channel 6 in it will not change the volume of channel 6 in any other subgroups.

Each of the subgroups also has a button allowing assignment to the main mix. In most cases, you will want everything combined into the main mix so that you can control the total volume of everything with one setting. Sometimes, however, you may leave one subgroup by itself; independent of the main mix, for whatever reason may apply. Usually each subgroup will have a left and a right fader, allowing for individual adjustment of the left and right aspects of that mini-mix. The main mix will also probably be stereo. There will be two outputs on the back of the board for left and right mix.

However, some mixers have another button to assign the main mix and any and all subgroups to a "mono" fader. This is another output on the back that is a single bridged out between the right and left of the mix out. This allows you to have a huge amount of possibilities of setups depending on where you have channels and busses assigned and what you have plugged in to the back. The mono will "bridge" the left and right channels, causing all sounds in each to be played in both. It will also, however, leave alone any left/right settings set before it.

VCA's are confusingly similar to buses. However, it helps to remember that buses route, and VCAs are simply a control mechanism. Contrary to subgroups, a change in a VCA will be exactly like moving the faders of all its assigned channels. Thus, any post-fader outs will be affected: post-fader auxes, the level of that channel in any subgroups, etc. If post-fader auxes are used for other main speakers like subwoofers, than a VCA will allow change in those too; where a subgroup would not.
VCA's are found only in larger boards.
« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
23 comments
Mar 7, 2009. 9:08 AM_Basse_ says:
Can anyone recommend a "begginer" Soundboard ?
May 2, 2012. 7:59 AMzappedelectronics says:
It all depends on what kind of things you are looking for the board to be doing, if you give me some sort of idea what you want and I can give you some recommendations.

Andrew
07511 664218
www.zappedelectronics.co.uk
Jun 14, 2009. 11:54 AMdavidprosser says:
It all depends on what you're using it for. So, how many mics, instruments etc and what it's actual purpose is. Tell me that and I'll give you a recommendation :D
May 9, 2011. 4:25 PMroscoerules says:
Hi,
I would like a 3-input stereo line input mixer (simple and cheap as I can get away with) to combine an mp3 player, my laptop, and a white noise machine. Thanks, I appreciate any and all suggestions you may have.
May 10, 2011. 9:59 AMdavidprosser says:
Depending on the the connection (ie as long as you can get them to quarter inch jacks, you should be fine) then these should be suitable. The first is about as basic as it gets, the second adds a mic channel and some control if you need to get a bit more customized, the third has a few more channels in case you feel the need. These links are for the UK retailers but they'll all be available on global sites. Have a look, hope this helps:

http://www.dv247.com/studio-equipment/behringer-mx400-micromix-compact-line-mixer--34407

http://www.dv247.com/studio-equipment/behringer-xenyx-502-premium-mixer--31558

http://www.dv247.com/studio-equipment/behringer-xenyx-802-premium-mixer--31557
May 10, 2011. 10:17 AMroscoerules says:
Thanks very much!!
Take care,
Earl
Jan 11, 2010. 10:11 PMBuck2190 says:
David, my purpose is home recording of "live" instruments. I have been jamming with some friends and we are now interested in recording our music. We would be connecting an Akai XR-20 drum machine, an electric bass guitar, a MIDI keyboard and possibly a microphone. What is a good mixer or soundboard that you would recommend for that. I have a lead on a Studiomaster Club 2000 14x2 for $200. Is that a good buy?
Jan 12, 2010. 2:58 AMdavidprosser says:
Yeh, that's a good bargain if you can get hold of it. You will need  fair amount of cables too. If you're looking to record digitally (idealy) you will need a way to connect the desk output to the computer sound card for recording. This can be done by connecting the stereo output of the desk into the line input on the computer, and use a simple program like Audacity (free) to record your session. The drum machine outputs in stereo (two channels) so you'll need two jack cables to go into the mixer. The same applies for the keyboard I would think (if it has a stereo ouput). The bass guitar can be run directly into the mixer on a jack cable like the other sources. The microphone will use one XLR cable. Ideally, you want to keep the jack sources on as shorter leads as possible, as they can easily pick up interferenace from other electronic devices, but the mic can be on a long lead.

So yeah, that desk should be fine! The only thing is that you'll be recording on just two tracks, so everything you record will have to be balanced correctly on recording to give a good sound output. You can kind of cheat with multitrack recording, my recording each track one at a time, and then layering them all together on the PC. This can also be done on Audacity.

Good luck!
Apr 10, 2011. 3:39 AMwouternet says:
This may be old, but you can NEVER plug a bass or any other guitar direct to the jacks on the mixer. It will sound horrible! This also applies for Pianos. You have to use a DI-Box (Direct input), converting jack to XLR
Apr 10, 2011. 9:05 AMdavidprosser says:
Hmm, that only applies on instruments and keys that are cheaper and so don't have a "true" line out as far as I know, otherwise there would be no purpose in mixing desk manufacturers having line ins on their desk, no?
Apr 19, 2011. 7:20 AMwouternet says:
Easy, it can be used if you want to plug in an iPod or CD player. You can go from <3.5mm minijack> to 2 (a red and white one) You have to use 2 channels, one for the white (left) and one for the right (=red). Make sure you set the balance for the channels respectively far left and far right.

I've never come across a piano with XLR. After reconsidering, yeah, a piano might be able to plug in directly. But we (my soundcrew) always use XLR because we don't have jack-jack cables that are over 50feet.

Only acoustic guitars with an element with XLR can be plugged directly in a mixer without a DI. (not very common, mostly only jack)
The Jack from a guitar gives a different impedance and voltage, and it will sound very crappy.
A DI is small pre amp converting it to XLR, using a 9Volt battery or the 48volt from the phantom.
Also, an electric guitar draws his current from the amplifier, and if you plug it in your mixer you might blow out some fuses.
Oct 4, 2010. 11:55 PMbrianhoorn says:
If you're going to record separately and layer everything together, you might as well save on the $200 mixer, use a preamp, and do everything on your computer. I'm sure they have some good software for Windows if you're using a PC that isn't as costly as Pro Tools. If you have a Mac, GarageBand works fine, perhaps with a few more programs you can get for free. I use Logic Studio. It has tons of great tools for mixing, and a whole lot more.
Apr 14, 2012. 6:29 PMBraedenb13 says:
Hey, I run a tech booth at church and we want to start recording sermons and putting them on the Church Website for home-bound seniors. We have our computer and we have a 16-channel soundboard. If i wanted to record it, could i but a XLR cable that converts to a 3.5mm Jack and plug it into the microhone jack in the computer, and record it that way in Audacity, and upload it to the Website? I just want to know before i buy the cable.

-Thanks
Oct 29, 2009. 5:48 AMjoeltan111 says:
I love this tutorial....
going to use it for teaching purposes. 
But, i wish to ask if there are any guides or tutorials which detail the operation of a digital board, as this guide is focused on a analogue board.

Jun 2, 2009. 3:43 PMsyme says:
Hi brilliant set of instruction was slightly confused by you saying about set the gain by putting the channel fader to 0 dB and the main and use a uV monitor I thought you could use the pfl button to assign the channels signal to the led volume indicator on the main mix then tune that accordingly till it reaches zero level on that LED indicator or use the zero level light alongside the gain knob of am I incorrect at thinking that also while I'm at it got a mackie CFX 16 mixer however the inbuilt processor's clip is contently overloaded even if no signal is being sent to the processor and if the main effects send and "to main Mix " etc. are all set low it still overloads, am I right in thinking that the clip is something that stores the signal to be processed like some kind of cache or am I totally out by thinking that??
Jun 5, 2008. 3:38 PMinquisitivegoat says:
Congrats on a thorough and well written Instructable. You covered all the basics nicely! I run an MH3 as a freshman at my school regularly. You need to be careful in your definition of Gain, as it is NOT to be confused with a gate. It's not so much to filter out the soft sounds (like a gate) as it is to control preamplification, or in some cases attenuation of the input signal.
Jun 5, 2008. 6:35 PMinquisitivegoat says:
That's a good point, perhaps my argument is flawed. Micing amps is an interesting science. The different response of different microphones can lead to good or bad effects. Perhaps an Instructable on that is in order. Have you ever done any work on a Vi6 or Vi4 console?
Aug 7, 2008. 2:40 PMThe Nate Dawg says:
My dad is actually the pastor at my church, so I get to run the sound board. Not a large church, not a small one either, but a nice board. I would use pfl and monitor the input (see if the singers were on key ;)), but I didn't know that I could monitor the mix with afl. Thanks! It's a help!
Jun 5, 2008. 9:47 PMinquisitivegoat says:
I too am a high schooler, a freshman actually. The thing I miss on the MH2 is the fully parametric EQ on the Hi-Mid and Low-Mid (which the MH3 does have). The MH2 has a sweep bandpass EQ with a fixed Q of 1.5. The ability to adjust the Q in the Mids is very helpful when equalizing almost anything and I rarely leave it set at home. The MH3 has to be by far the best analogue console I have ever used. I don't care for the MH4's nested pots, and the MH2's limited EQ is a drawback. For everything I have ever used an analogue console for I have found the MH3's mix of signal processing and outputs adequate. (although I have found uses for all four matrices and wished for more) At my church we have a MACKIE TT24 which, due to it's extensive DSP power, has fully parametric EQ with an adjustable Q on all four bands. (not to mention the onboard compressors / gates / expanders / patchbay / etc, digital has endless power)
Jun 9, 2008. 7:03 PMinquisitivegoat says:
That's a good thought. My favorite dynamic vocal has got to be the Shure Beta 58, or in the Audio-Technica realm I like the AE6100. I tend to lean towards AT for vocals, my favorite condenser being the AE5400. We have two of those in a 5000-series wireless transmitter at my school. For wired vocals at school I tend to use the Shure Beta 87A. I would love the chance to use a few KSM9's but I don't think we will be getting any new mics in the next year or two because the ones we have now are in excellent condition. As far as instrumental/amp pickup I typically use SM57's for amps and toms. For cymbals, drum overhead, brass/woodwind overhead, grand piano, acoustic guitar, etc. I usually use the SM81. I've used a pair of KSM44's extensively for recording and even for amplification of about 15 vocals in a gospel band. Sometime I think it would be cool to use them to amplify a grand piano or a (very high-quality) guitar amp. Unfortunately the only pair I have access to at the moment belong to a teacher who retired at the end of this year.
Jun 9, 2008. 7:34 PMinquisitivegoat says:
I think heavy bass is pretty common among the Beta series. It is evident between the SM and Beta 58, like you said, and you hear the same thing between the SM and Beta 57. At school we don't have any subs, so really low end stuff becomes really obsolete really fast. Our in-house center cluster sounds like a speaker in a tin can, but for most of the year we had additional cabinets hanging in left and right positions that really enhanced the sound in the room. We had Skillet come in, and they brought their own line arrays and some really low drivers. At church we have a relatively small sanctuary with seating for only about 600. We have a single 18-inch sub hanging center up front which makes bass very evident and has the power to rattle things sitting on the desk in the sound booth. We use all Audio-Technica mic's at church, so I have never gotten to experiment with different Shure sounds where I can hear very low bass response.
Apr 22, 2008. 11:18 AMsoundgod219 says:
Fantastic! Can I use this to teach other people the "how-to's"?
Mar 17, 2008. 8:53 PMRoxieRocksYurChucks says:
Thank you soooo Much! I've been looking for a good tutorial on soundboards. I'm learning the one at my church and have been needing something in writing. Now that I've actually read through it, its really, a lot clearer. Thanks again! Really great. -Roxie

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
9
Followers
1
Author:Markusaurelius