It's important that a learning objective be specific and limited to what you are doing in that particular project. If you're building a table, you might WANT your student to "learn carpentry" or even "how to make a table". But that's an awfully general subject, so be specific about what skills or knowledge your student will develop as a result of your project.
The second example includes the component skills involved in creating that table. Measurement, sawing, and safety are the attributes of table-building that comprise the learning objective in this example. There are a TON of possible component skills you could teach, but a good learning objective helps you stay on track while teaching a skill. It's specific and limited to the project at hand. Save your lofty goals for the series of lessons required to fully teach carpentry. For a single project, focus in on the component skills and knowledge someone WILL learn as a result of making it.
Students will be able to make a table.
By building a table, students will be able to correctly use a measuring tape, miter saw, and proper safety equipment.
To do this with any project, you should answer the following questions:
Whom am I teaching?
What is the project I'd like to incorporate into my lessons?
What are the component skills required to complete the project? (measurement, sawing, safety, comparison with other tables, synthesizing a design, embellishing a design, etc.)
Which of those skills should they learn? (You can draw from state standards, your curricula, what you want your kid to learn before he goes to college, whatever.)
Some examples:
By making _____ (project), students will __________ (verb) __________ (specific skill/knowledge).
By making (a table), students will (understand) (how to join two pieces of wood using dovetail joints).
By building a tabletop trebuchet, students will be able to recognize the design features of a common medieval siege weapon and explain how those features work together to launch a projectile.
*Pro tip: Use a learning taxonomy to select a strong verb. "Understand" is a little wishy-washy. Contrast, embellish, analyze, critique, create... these are high-level skills. Understanding is down there with recognition as a low-level skill. Recognizing the word "cartouche" is very different from using it in an analytical essay comparing ancient forms of writing.



































Visit Our Store »
Go Pro Today »




PS
Love the site. In the UK all students form the age of 12 to 14 study Design Technology which involves making and designing in several material areas from wood/metal and electronics to food and textiles and can opt to study an exam in D&T from 14 to 16
I'd note a couple of things :
1. Keep learning objectives measurable and observable. For that reason, I'd take issue with "understand" as a verb since you can't measure understanding, just the products of it. Understanding happens within the brain.
2, We stress to faculty members that learning objectives (and higher-level outcomes like competencies) should be focused on a single behavior. In our system, we'd break out the "recognize" and "explain" parts into two different learning objectives.
Good job. Nice to see this kind of instructable.