Print PDF
Favorite
Email
Step 13Show and Tell
Strange that this technology has been around since the 1800's and yet its not common knowledge with the general public.
Anyway heres a pic and the video of a hydroxy flame burning underwater.
The water has to be heated somewhat as cold water merely extinguishes the flame. Pictures of melted glass panes and glazed pebbles probably wont be that interesting, its one of those have to be there things :)
I've also included an excel spreadsheet to calculate millilitres per minute per watt which is a nice way of comparing different cells outputs.
Flat plate series cells are mostly 7MMW and up, I've never built a parallel cell so I cant say too much about them.
Some facts from me:
This tube version is 5.75MMW at the moment with probably another week of conditioning left, I expect it to easily get to 6.5MMW.
Flow rate is 600ml per minute which I expect to double seeing as it has double the square area of my flat plate series 7 cell which puts out 600ml at full chat.
Temp after 4hrs is 66ºC on the outer tube and 73ºC inside electrolyte.
Lastly a mod which appeared to drop the power requirements by ± 1A , is to apply shrink wrap to the inner spacer locknuts.
It appears that the open nuts contribute to current leakage which means additional unwanted heat
Pic attached for clarity.
Anyway heres a pic and the video of a hydroxy flame burning underwater.
The water has to be heated somewhat as cold water merely extinguishes the flame. Pictures of melted glass panes and glazed pebbles probably wont be that interesting, its one of those have to be there things :)
I've also included an excel spreadsheet to calculate millilitres per minute per watt which is a nice way of comparing different cells outputs.
Flat plate series cells are mostly 7MMW and up, I've never built a parallel cell so I cant say too much about them.
Some facts from me:
This tube version is 5.75MMW at the moment with probably another week of conditioning left, I expect it to easily get to 6.5MMW.
Flow rate is 600ml per minute which I expect to double seeing as it has double the square area of my flat plate series 7 cell which puts out 600ml at full chat.
Temp after 4hrs is 66ºC on the outer tube and 73ºC inside electrolyte.
Lastly a mod which appeared to drop the power requirements by ± 1A , is to apply shrink wrap to the inner spacer locknuts.
It appears that the open nuts contribute to current leakage which means additional unwanted heat
Pic attached for clarity.
MMW_calc.xls14 KB| « Previous Step | Download PDFView All Steps | Next Step » |
If you want more/functional output then you need to think bigger and upgrade your hardware, then the following will hold true...12V adapters typically only deliver 1A, and you need in the region of 10-20Amps.
A heavy duty car batt charger would work if its capable of 12Amps plus, then you control the amount of current that the lyzer wants from the power supply(charger) but varying the strength of the electrolyte, ie more NaOh or KoH would make a stronger solution and use more amps. A 23% NaOh electrolyte is about right using brute force DC electrolysis, I haven't tried any resonance electrolysis, so I can't help you there.
Do you know of any duplicators? If so how do the
duplications compare to the efficiency of yours?
Any voltage/amps or MPG measurements?
Thank you for sharing this amazing work!
e7
Canadian inventor, designed and patented a device to transform internal
combustion engines to run on hydrogen. He later affirms: "A small amount
of hydrogen added to the air intake of a gasoline engine would enhance the
flame velocity and thus permit the engine to operate with leaner air to
gasoline mixture than otherwise possible. The result, far less pollution
with more power and better mileage."
I could carry on ad nauseum with research from the 1974 John Houseman and D.J/Cerini of the Jet Propulsion Lab, California
Institute of Technology report for the Society of Automotive
Engineers entitled "On-Board Hydrogen Generator for a Partial Hydrogen
Injection Internal Combustion Engine""
Vosper's right, but he's not talking about onboard hydrogen generation. Nice try there.
Houseman is wrong.
"However it does become laborious to quote sources, if you don't want to believe it, that's your choice most likely my comments aren't going to make any difference."
You're projecting.