K'nex Colt Commando

video K'nex Colt Commando

Hello all, this is my latest creation: A Colt Model 733 Commando. It was built as a model, not a shooter, and uses the reciever from MotaBoi's M4 and the carrying handle from Barrax's M4 as well.
Please rate and comment, and in the future i may risk an instructable and/or slideshow for further details!

MiniBr1t says: Dec 4, 2010. 8:42 PM

im thinkin if i should make the arctic warfare (L96A1) and i want to hear wat u say so send a personal message back to me and see wat u have to say

knexpete (author) in reply to MiniBr1tDec 5, 2010. 8:46 AM

look around. There are too many L96s (or variants) on this site. Try another sniper, like say a M21/M14 or a GOL. That'd be good

MiniBr1t in reply to knexpeteDec 13, 2010. 11:23 PM

too late im makin the stock and then the bolt action

black ops says: Sep 14, 2011. 9:54 AM

bf stinks

the vengeful aug says: Dec 12, 2010. 6:55 PM

MOH Better than Black Ops? HA HA HA. The only MOH better than call of duty was made 8 yrs ago. MOH Rising Sun.

tthomasvd in reply to the vengeful augDec 27, 2010. 11:33 PM

battlefield is better then cod 1
battlefield 2 is better then cod 2
battlefield 1943 is better then cod 3
battlefield modern combat is better then cod modern warfare
battlefield bad company is better then cod world at war
battlefield bad company 2 is better then cod modern warfare 2
battlefield bad company 2 vietnam is better then cod black ops

DONE!( there are still some more battlefields but to mutch to place in the versus)

Senior Waffleman in reply to tthomasvdMay 26, 2011. 10:58 PM

BATTLEFIELD SUCKS!!! ALL ABOUT CALL OF DUTY MW3 AND BLACKOPS!!!

knexpete (author) in reply to Senior WafflemanMay 27, 2011. 7:02 AM

And have you ever played any Battlefield game for a decent length of time to make such as judgement?

Senior Waffleman in reply to knexpeteMay 27, 2011. 11:31 AM

Actually, yes i have, i played Battlefield for a good half hour, didnt like it, but the ONLY thing i did like was running and reloading at the same time.

knexpete (author) in reply to Senior WafflemanMay 27, 2011. 11:34 AM

you can't experience true Battlefield gameplay until you have at least played several hours worth of gametime. Then you realise that it is a very good series.

Senior Waffleman in reply to knexpeteMay 27, 2011. 12:56 PM

How do you know ill realize, not everybody is the same, some people like other things then other people, if we all liked the same thing, then life would be boring, nothing to dislike about each other, and nothing to compare anything about.

the vengeful aug in reply to tthomasvdJan 24, 2011. 8:50 PM

Notice how every one of these companies has a game just like the other kinda funny. Countdown to MW3 begins.

tthomasvd in reply to the vengeful augFeb 6, 2011. 4:40 AM

no...countdown to battlefield 3 begins!!

the vengeful aug in reply to tthomasvdFeb 6, 2011. 1:11 PM

What is the theme of this game?

knexpete (author) in reply to the vengeful augFeb 6, 2011. 2:34 PM

nobody (except EA guys) knows yet. But it's safe to assume its gonna be someting similar to the storyline of Battlefield 2.

the vengeful aug in reply to knexpeteFeb 6, 2011. 8:49 PM

I sure it will be a copy o f MW3, unless EA pulls off a shocker.

knexpete (author) in reply to the vengeful augFeb 8, 2011. 1:22 PM

/*facepalm
Same with the BC2: Vientam rant.
BATTLEFIELD 2 was released TWO YEARS before Call of Duty: Modern Warfare was released. TWO YEARS. Bad Company, Bad Company 2 and Battlefield 3 are all based upon the award-winning format of Battlefield 2, NOT copies of the Modern Warfare series which was released AFTER Battlefield 2.
Im getting tired of players thinking that earlier games of mulitiple series are copies of more "successful" series without doing their homework.

Senior Waffleman in reply to knexpeteMay 27, 2011. 11:32 AM

Vietnam, not vientam :P

the vengeful aug in reply to knexpeteFeb 8, 2011. 10:14 PM

Cod is more successful.

lukewilliams010 in reply to the vengeful augJun 25, 2011. 10:17 AM

i dont know why poeple argue theyre the same genre but not the same game they both take implements form each other to try get better , but battlefields is a slower paced game and vehicular based , cod is more twitchy and very fast paced it relies more the individual rather than the team actually working together , cod is more like a action movie and battlefield a documentary , however battleifield 3 in my balanced opinion is better than mw3 but battlefield has alot of community issues and EA are not reliable when it comes to that , however cod is very successful as we know and is in the record books for its advertising campaign and debut selling rate , its the fast paced action and the reliablility that nothing will change this fast pace action, is what keeps the players coming back however it is cods downfall as mw3 has been regarded as the "same thing again" just new things added but in my opinion the "same thing" what is the "same thing" is it the concept of the game? , becuase theyre hardly going to change it to aliens vs predators are they.

knexpete (author) in reply to the vengeful augFeb 8, 2011. 11:34 PM

yeah, but that don't mean every other FPS is a copy of Call of Duty

the vengeful aug in reply to knexpeteFeb 10, 2011. 11:38 AM

Doesn't mean that but pretty much is except for halo.

knexpete (author) in reply to tthomasvdFeb 6, 2011. 11:56 AM

aye, it does. Release in autumn this year!!!!!

knexpete (author) in reply to the vengeful augJan 25, 2011. 10:51 AM

well, that's just life innit. Games companies have a limited range of things they can do with a game. Modern setting, historical setting, futuristic setting, etc., and there is a definate lack of the third due to the success of Halo

mars11 in reply to tthomasvdJan 7, 2011. 3:07 AM

no its not r u mad

knexpete (author) in reply to mars11Jan 7, 2011. 8:11 AM

well, explain this. How come call of duty, which has been going for a similar time to Battlefield, hasn't got the following things in it's games:
Proper Vehicle usage
Destructible environments
Proper particle physics (i.e. smoke not going through walls, bullet drop)
Servers that don't crash
Game lobbies that aren't randomly closed
Smart, team-orientated players.

lukewilliams010 in reply to knexpeteJun 25, 2011. 10:21 AM

smart team oriented players lol this is a game dont get to carried away if they want to play cod let them but the players are the same.the different concept for battlefield than call of duty calls for different strategies, such as the team pulling together but anyone can do this even cod players.i guess thats why they made 'operation metro' and TDM in bf3 so the cod player can have a chance of winning

the vengeful aug in reply to knexpeteJan 25, 2011. 3:25 PM

Seems like destructible environments and bullet drop would get annoying and make me mad =)

knexpete (author) in reply to the vengeful augJan 29, 2011. 12:10 PM

well, I prefer it to the same old RPG hits wall and makes black scorch mark effects on Call of Duty. Wan't a firing point in a building and there aren't any windows? Blow a section of the wall away!

the vengeful aug in reply to knexpeteJan 29, 2011. 4:06 PM

Out of curiosity, how are the killstreaks?

knexpete (author) in reply to the vengeful augJan 30, 2011. 1:22 PM

in which game?
If you're asking about Medal of Honor, the scorechains (acquired by getting score, not kills) are very good. Each scorechain marker has two "support actions", an offensive support action and a defensive support action. The more score that is achieved in one life, the better support actions are unlocked, from Mortar strikes to Cruise Missiles for Offensive, and from Recon Drones to Flak Vests for the Defensive actions

the vengeful aug in reply to knexpeteJan 30, 2011. 2:15 PM

I like "kill" streaks better.

knexpete (author) in reply to the vengeful augJan 31, 2011. 12:24 PM

Nah. Score-based stuff is much better. It rewards players for acting as part of a team, acomplishing both team and personal objectives, as well as killing opposing players.

tthomasvd in reply to knexpeteFeb 6, 2011. 4:42 AM

bf and moh pwn cod

dr. richtofen in reply to tthomasvdJan 13, 2012. 9:32 AM

amnesia: the dark descent > all

knexpete (author) in reply to tthomasvdDec 29, 2010. 12:09 PM

a man who sees sense. You are always welcome on my instructables!

knexpete (author) in reply to the vengeful augDec 13, 2010. 10:18 AM

OK then. Explain this list of features that Black Ops suffers on: Low resolution (554p), Buggy Software, Random freezes in gameplay, Online server lag, random drops in frame rate, disconnection from game servers, contunual closing of game lobbies and shut-down on servers. I have BOTH games, and I'm guessing you only have Black Ops, so on this account, only I can pass judgement on which is a better game. MoH has a better resolution (1080p), less buggy software, no freezes in gameplay whatsoever, proper servers which aren't shut down continually and no drops in frame rate at any point. Plus the online maps are better quality and have more features.

the vengeful aug in reply to knexpeteDec 13, 2010. 3:41 PM

Resolution looks fine to me. I don't really care about the servers. Can you play 2 player online on Moh? Can you customize weapons? Black ops has some of the best maps EVER.

knexpete (author) in reply to the vengeful augDec 14, 2010. 12:38 PM

Yep, you can customise weapons. Three slots for customising: Rail Slot (for optics), Barrel slot (for suppressors, laser targeters, etc.) and ammo slot (for ammunition related stuff). But IMO, MoH's maps are better. They have a higher quality to them, better animations (both map and background animated) and the maps have destruction, which beats Black Ops maps any day.

the vengeful aug in reply to knexpeteJan 24, 2011. 8:53 PM

I mean visual customization like paint and the emblem thingys.