Knex famas contest entry

 by silentassasin21
DSCN0224.JPG
DSCN0225.JPG
This is my entry it shot 55 feet with exellent acuracy and it had an internal mag pusher but sadly it was dropped and then went into surgery it didnt go so well so pic two happened
1-40 of 121Next »
Knarez says: Sep 3, 2009. 8:47 AM
It doesn't shoots 55 feet... Look. The trigger is damn infront of the system. There's a lot of barrel for the shot to travel through to get out of the gun. And looking at it, it doesn't even have a far pull back. It wouldn't shoot over 35, I'd say.
ashchetm in reply to KnarezSep 21, 2009. 1:26 PM
Ram behind the trigger works VERY well in knex guns, VERY efficient. the gun goes like this: FRONT-TRIGGER-BULLET-RAM-BACK the ram has LOTS of room to to push the bullet.
~Meme~ in reply to ashchetmApr 12, 2012. 5:12 PM
Do you know what a FAMAS is genius?
Hiyadudez in reply to ashchetmJan 25, 2010. 12:26 PM
Seriously, who do you think knows more? You, or The Mighty Zak?

Obvious answer.
The Nomlack in reply to HiyadudezMar 18, 2011. 11:19 AM
LOLOLOLOL
silentassasin21 (author) in reply to HiyadudezJan 25, 2010. 6:36 PM
The newer verion did until i destroied it. It had less barrel and a trigger behind the mag
RMConstruction in reply to silentassasin21Oct 24, 2010. 10:47 AM
'Version' and 'Destroyed' I think you'll find.
Knarez in reply to ashchetmSep 23, 2009. 4:34 PM
No, it doesn't. The pin needs room to accelerate fast before hitting the projectile. With this, its pushed right against it. This is also why when you fire a simple single shot, you don't push the ammo by the trigger, but near to where the pin comes to a stop. To get the full momentum.
Loosewire; SOE Operative in reply to KnarezOct 1, 2009. 2:51 PM
Yeah, after all Force = Momentum/Time thus the smaller the time the greater the force and so a greater range an muzzle velocity.
ashchetm in reply to Loosewire; SOE OperativeOct 1, 2009. 3:11 PM
Where did you get that equation?
yerjoking in reply to ashchetmOct 2, 2009. 8:52 AM
Basic math/physics.
ashchetm in reply to yerjokingOct 2, 2009. 12:30 PM
Ah, ok, I'm 2 years off for that.
Loosewire; SOE Operative in reply to ashchetmOct 8, 2009. 11:50 AM
Yup it is derived from:             Force = Mass x Acceleration

and because  Acceleration is:  Velocity (Distance/Time) / Time
it means that

Force=Mass x Velocity (Momentum)
             _______________________
                            Time
I_am_Canadian in reply to Loosewire; SOE OperativeNov 14, 2009. 2:37 PM
Yup. When I built Ipod Killer's sniper I only got 10 feet tops because it used this system.
Storm950 in reply to ashchetmOct 4, 2009. 9:44 AM
LMFAO!
Kinetic in reply to KnarezSep 30, 2009. 5:28 PM
But by what I can see, the firing pin is contained in sort of a rail and not a barrel formed by the center of connectors, so he has complete control over how far the pin can move forward, which can allow the ammo to move forward at high velocities as well, since it is accelerating at the same speed as the firing pin. Also, no need to swear about the trigger when it is almost right in front of the mag, not at the front-it reaches back. This is a good system because it separates the bullet being fired from the other bullets, decreasing friction.
ashchetm in reply to KineticOct 4, 2009. 5:51 PM
Yay! One person agrees with me!
ashchetm in reply to KnarezSep 23, 2009. 5:23 PM
Think a little bit more. The pin striking the bullet is MUCH less efficient. Lots of energy is wasted while the ram speeds up. Sure the ram is going much faster by the time it hits the bullet, but sudden dissipation of the energy is less efficient than a longer contact with the bullet. Even if your suggestion is more efficient, there is no way its so much more efficient that it matters what order you put them in. Also "bullet behind the trigger" setups are more accurate than a ram suddenly hitting a bullet and sending it tumbling. In light of "There's a lot of barrel for the shot to travel through to get out of the gun." The majority of knex guns have fake barrels that do not effect the bullet in any way.
razzlekunai in reply to ashchetmSep 28, 2009. 2:28 PM
Go build a TDS and a kkc, and see which one shoots further.
DJ Radio in reply to razzlekunaiOct 15, 2009. 2:30 PM
The TDS didn't go that far for me, only about 15 feet.
yerjoking in reply to DJ RadioOct 22, 2009. 10:43 AM
That's what he means.
DJ Radio in reply to yerjokingOct 22, 2009. 4:24 PM
I'm just supporting Raz's argument.
yerjoking in reply to DJ RadioOct 23, 2009. 8:53 AM
And I was supporting yours, lol.

When I read your comment about the TDS, I was unsure what you meant, but assumed you meant the KKC shoots much further, so my comment is to inform those that you are agreeing with Raz.
DJ Radio in reply to yerjokingOct 23, 2009. 9:39 AM
Ohhh ok.
ashchetm in reply to razzlekunaiSep 28, 2009. 3:22 PM
but that takes effort. I'm not going to go as far as that to prove something. I just don't have time.
yerjoking in reply to ashchetmOct 1, 2009. 12:01 PM
If you went to a proper school you'd realise how silly your comment is.
ashchetm in reply to yerjokingOct 1, 2009. 1:33 PM
Notice the "be nice" policy. I do go to a proper school, and thats why I don't watn to put effort into it, I am having to stay kept up with school so I cant put time and effort into knex guns. Realy think before you post.
yerjoking in reply to ashchetmOct 2, 2009. 8:50 AM
Do you know the laws of physics? The ram hitting the bullet at the end of the pin strike will give maximum range. You should of learned that when you were 6. Really, think before you post. P.S I was being nice.
ashchetm in reply to yerjokingOct 2, 2009. 12:42 PM
Which law of physics would that be? Btw when I was six, I was learning what 3x4 was, most schools don't teach the laws of physics until 6'th grade. PS: Maybe they don't teach manners in proper schools, or what ever the hell a proper school is. I'm done talking with you. You don't think before you post, you just blurt out whats on your mind. People have excuses for that sort of thing when talking, because the instant you think of a reply, you say it, but when typing, some people go back and re-read to see if they made sence, or were offensive. If I said that you didn't go to a proper school, would you be upset? Lol, my "PS:" Was bigger than my post.
yerjoking in reply to ashchetmOct 2, 2009. 6:38 PM
Go google them. In response to your "P.S" saying you were done talking to me, if you were done talking to me, why start your reply with a question? It doesn't look rhetorical.
Bartboy in reply to KnarezSep 4, 2009. 1:43 PM
Duh... Silentassasin always overestimates....
DJ Radio in reply to BartboySep 6, 2009. 3:27 PM
Or shoots at a 45 degree angle.
Bartboy in reply to DJ RadioSep 6, 2009. 4:51 PM
Yup, or shoots jammy style.
DJ Radio in reply to BartboyNov 2, 2009. 8:19 PM
Looking back, Jammy was the one who created the "Overexaggerated ranges" stereotype.
Bartboy in reply to DJ RadioNov 3, 2009. 4:12 AM
Where did that happen?
DJ Radio in reply to BartboyNov 3, 2009. 1:28 PM
The argument between Jammy and Zak.
Bartboy in reply to DJ RadioNov 3, 2009. 2:48 PM
Don't know what one you're talking about...
But shooting Jammy style is getting fired out of a cannon and shooting the gun when you're in the air.. :P
DJ Radio in reply to BartboyNov 3, 2009. 3:58 PM
That wouldn't get similar results.  I think its just inserting the gun into the cannon and firing it 90 feet.
silentassasin21 (author) in reply to BartboySep 4, 2009. 3:38 PM
what do you know
RMConstruction in reply to silentassasin21Sep 28, 2011. 12:06 PM
Plenty.
1-40 of 121Next »
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!