Knitted Edible Underwear

 by Carleyy
Featured
CandyUnderwear.jpg
Make this Valentines Day unforgettable.  Combine your love of sweets with lingerie by knitting a pair of edible underwear to wear for that special someone.

Don't know how to knit?  I have posted a series of basic knitting tutorials.

 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: Materials

candy 008.jpg
All you need is Licorice Laces.  You can find them in most specialty candy shops.  I bought 1/2 lb. worth of candy laces, between eating the candy as I worked and messing up a couple times this was more than enough.

I could only find laces that were 36" long so in order to knit them I had to fuse them together (next step.)



1-40 of 63Next »
maltesergr8 says: Aug 15, 2012. 10:34 PM
Like how to lengthen the "laces" in warm pan, great idea! Fun 'ible ;)

Wanted to mention, if you can't knit, this could probably be crocheted.

ethiran says: Mar 7, 2012. 1:46 AM
bad picture
Advar says: Jan 23, 2012. 2:43 AM
Cool, kinky fun...
Gotta try this (for both of us)!
usherkid says: May 25, 2011. 8:02 PM
it looks delicious
Vinsu says: Mar 23, 2011. 8:55 AM
Sweet:D
inventor72 says: Mar 19, 2011. 4:49 PM
goood (antonym)
mistercow.pnoy says: Feb 8, 2011. 12:59 PM
Doesn't leave much to the imagination, huh?
static in reply to mistercow.pnoyFeb 15, 2011. 11:13 PM
Personally, I think leaving it to the imagination is over rated. :)
chello2k9 in reply to staticFeb 26, 2011. 7:53 AM
indeed
Sunbanks says: Feb 18, 2011. 10:50 PM
You could probably make a top in the same way... That would be pretty cool too!
aeray says: Feb 8, 2011. 3:02 PM
It's pretty cold where I live. How about a felted cotton-candy union suit as a follow-up?
chabias in reply to aerayFeb 13, 2011. 12:16 PM
Yes!!! Fantastic idea!
canida in reply to aerayFeb 10, 2011. 3:04 PM
Best comment suggestion EVER!
kellyhogaboom in reply to canidaFeb 11, 2011. 4:17 PM
Agreed.
aeray in reply to canidaFeb 10, 2011. 6:17 PM
I eagerly await the follow-through. It warmed up to freezing today from 11 below. It had warmed up to -11 from -18. It should be warmer tomorrow, but then get cold again.
Warlrosity says: Feb 12, 2011. 10:02 PM
Oh, good. I've been looking for these.
Desttroy4 says: Feb 12, 2011. 7:29 PM
lol nice :D
AngryRedhead says: Feb 8, 2011. 2:31 PM
Sugar-free candy laces might be preferable considering various horrible things that might happen otherwise...
Kinnishian in reply to AngryRedheadFeb 10, 2011. 9:03 AM
Generally i agree you should make it sugar free candy laces. In reality, this probably isn't something that you'd wear all day before whatever it's intent is. But generally, sugar+humidity fuels bacterial growth. Not "horrible" things but unpleasant infection, yes.
Lithium Rain in reply to KinnishianFeb 12, 2011. 2:08 PM
:\ Have you ever *had* a yeast infection?
Kinnishian in reply to Lithium RainFeb 12, 2011. 4:55 PM
Ok, very valid point I humbly admit.. but I would argue the list of "horrible things" ranges from 'dismembered by axe murderer' to yeast infection. In that sense, some clarification is of value.
Lithium Rain in reply to KinnishianFeb 12, 2011. 6:54 PM
Heh. Well, sure, the scale you're using does matter...but unless we're including genocides or war crimes or something, (especially if we're going by personal, subjective pain! D: ) I'd place a yeast infection somewhere in the middle, definitely not the low end. :-P
Kinnishian in reply to Lithium RainFeb 12, 2011. 7:15 PM
:-P, honestly I think you're probably right.


NOTICE: **Yeast Infection are bad :-(. Use sugar-less licorice laces.**
AngryRedhead in reply to KinnishianFeb 11, 2011. 7:35 AM
Yeast infections aren't generally the end of the world, but they can certainly ruin a weekend of fun and be quite horrible depending on the ferocity.  If the infection spreads to a partner, then it's just that little bit worse.  I hope no one would wear this all day cos that would be kinda ick and odd.  And you neglected the issue that saliva starts breaking down sugars right away which is why saving a ring pop is nasty - it turns all gummy and horrible.  And then there are all the other activities that might be happening in addition to the consumption which complicate matters further and make a yeast infection almost inevitable.
t.rohner in reply to AngryRedheadFeb 13, 2011. 12:13 AM
Sugar, fat, (light) products?

Eat less of it and you'll be fine. (It's not very much in this case...)
In this very nice instructable, it's about teasing, not eating. (Those calories will be "worked" away later...)
From my perspective, yeast "infection" is the goal. Or how would you produce a decent beer / champagne / bread otherwise ? ;-)
AngryRedhead in reply to t.rohnerFeb 13, 2011. 7:02 AM
t.rohner in reply to AngryRedheadFeb 13, 2011. 12:15 PM
Yes, i know the difference. That's why the ;-) is there and i brew beer and bake bread.
AngryRedhead in reply to t.rohnerFeb 13, 2011. 2:18 PM
Ya....  that kinda makes it gross though...  My husband also brews beer, and he worries about "wild yeast" getting into his "batch".  Ew.
t.rohner in reply to AngryRedheadFeb 13, 2011. 10:57 PM
Yes, in both cases, the candida-type of yeast is unwanted.
Kinnishian in reply to AngryRedheadFeb 13, 2011. 3:15 PM
Yeah, I don't know what thats about. Over and out on this comment chain. In our bodies that kind of wild yeast is not the same as the wild yeast that you can gather from certain grains in the actual wild.
Kinnishian in reply to KinnishianFeb 13, 2011. 3:15 PM
But I suppose each to their own??
Pentacle in reply to KinnishianFeb 13, 2011. 10:14 PM
I suppose this is done already, but.... A yeast infection is a fungus. Not a bacteria. O_o
Kinnishian in reply to PentacleFeb 14, 2011. 5:43 AM
I think AngryRedhead's link was addressing that, but to be honest, I didn't notice. thanks
pdub77 says: Feb 10, 2011. 2:42 PM
Very well done and very classy. I see nothing pornographic about this. Suggestive? Yes. But most television programs will garner more innuendos than this ever would. Most of the comments aren't even from PRO members. . .
pyro515 in reply to pdub77Feb 11, 2011. 4:21 AM
Whats wrong about not being a "pro" member?
Lithium Rain in reply to pyro515Feb 12, 2011. 2:10 PM
Absolutely nothing. PRO does not denote better quality of comments, better quality of instructables, professional aptitude, special privileges, higher status on this website, or anything else other than disposable income.
pdub77 in reply to Lithium RainFeb 12, 2011. 6:32 PM
I agree and misspoke. I apologize.
Sl0whand says: Feb 12, 2011. 6:53 AM
Delicious!
Thank you for sharing!
Sequimania says: Feb 11, 2011. 5:33 PM
Please, oh please post this on Ravelry.com - the largest knitting site in the world.

This Instructable started me thinking of the possible uses for fruit leather, fruit leather combined with licorice laces, cotton candy, wow! The possibilities!
rush2ady says: Feb 10, 2011. 11:43 AM
Ooooh!!! I should ask my mother-in-law make one for me!! She looooooves to knit.... this would be way cooler than the grandma sweaters she makes....
1-40 of 63Next »
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!