MAKE a VOLUMETRIC PROJECTOR from JUNK

MAKE a VOLUMETRIC PROJECTOR from JUNK
A Volumetric Projector is ... what R2-D2 used to show Princess Leia in Star Wars.

This is an old project that seemed halted by refusal by DLP to provide a DMD chip
to vastly increase the 3D resolution. This project has not changed at all since
before HDTV even existed. I suppose after people realize the world isn't flat, this is what
they will watch when 1800's movie technology finally gets "old".

It is simple enough to have been built entirely by not more than 2 people, in a very short
total amount of time.
It actually does project animated 3D bitmapped images into the air.
It can be made by anyone who is good at PIC programming and mechanically inclined.
It cost us NOTHING, and has potential beyond most high budget 3D display research.
It contains no parts that were not available in 1980. All were scavenged from a junk pile.
Most or All of it's 3D animations were sent 100 miles over a 14400 baud modem.
It does not stop if the modem hangs up.
It looks the same from all angles.
It has no mirrors, just one lens, which doesn't have the size limitation of a parabolic mirror.
It's a hunk of junk, but it works.

IT IS PUBLIC-DOMAINED (cc-share alike)

And, should the info be updated, a solution to the failure to acquire DLP may be included.
As well as some more of the animations that are stored in it.

That's an old 80286 laptop, used as a TTY on the right.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up
 

Step 1Go to this website

All of the currently available notes for this project are here and may be updated in the future.

http://holodeck.virand.com
Build a Holodeck ]
http://holodeck.virand.com

Electronic Parts used:
9-pin serial (DB9) connector
MAX232C serial data voltage level converter
INTEL 8031 PROCESSOR (with 11.092 Mhz clock crystal)
4K EPROM
256 LED's latched by...
32 of 74HC574 selected by...
2 of 74LS154
32K bytes of RAM used as 60 3D Frame buffers
OPTICAL SENSOR for vertically syncing Lens Piston via interrupt to the processor
5Volt power supply...when all LEDs are on they draw about 7 amps.

Unnecessarily ridiculous and heavy piston mechanism pushing an eyeglass lens up and down.

Protocol: Simple ASCII RS-232C at up to 19200 baud... just a couple of control commands.

A DLP-less solution will use an ancient hi-res mechanical television projection mechanism instead of LED's.
The mechanism is called a "Mirror Screw" and works differently than the helical mirror in an old 3D project on the site,
but is a cheap and low-tech alternative to DLP chips for this project.

« Previous StepDownload PDFView All StepsNext Step »
67 comments
1-40 of 67next »
Jul 22, 2011. 11:26 AMtechnoguy94 says:
OK, I'll admit a lot of this I don't understand, but from what I do understand the image is created using a grid of LEDs. If that's true, couldn't the LED grid be replaced with a small LCD screen to boost resolution and add full color support? Assuming the frame rate is high enough, that is.
May 23, 2011. 9:04 AMtinker234 says:
nice hard to see in the light look at this http://www.amazon.com/Mirage-3-D-Instant-Hologram-Maker/dp/B0002W3J7M and combioned together valle
Jul 13, 2010. 8:04 PMpaulinohio says:
It would have been nice to see a link for a 2D demo of the device in action. Maybe I wasn't reading close enough. So I will keep an eye, well both eyes, on this one. Also I was wondering has anyone ever used fiber optics for any sort of surround vision or 3D? If so, how big was it? It seems like you could do amazing things these days with fiber optics and video images. Then again I bet a scanning projection system is more practical...
Nov 23, 2009. 11:08 AMmburchell says:
Does anyone know of a way to contact the creator of this project.
Sep 7, 2009. 4:10 AMProLogicCustoms says:
I Need this Light for my Light Shows How much for you too make one for me ..........
Aug 18, 2008. 10:59 PMconrad2468 says:
could you..uhhh make this again only do an instructable "for dummies"?
Aug 23, 2009. 9:03 PMktalex says:
i agree with u i still dont know what it is.
Mar 14, 2009. 4:58 PMnotachihuahua says:
Awesome. This is too cool. can you pls upload an insturctable for dummies??? :D abt the connections and stuff. It might sound stupid but alot of ppl who are interested cant compile junk too artfully :( lemonade rox:P
Aug 21, 2008. 6:05 AMAzurial says:
Have you tried an increased memory cache and/or a small LCD screen/512 LED set up?
Aug 16, 2008. 8:57 AMblckthng says:
So what exactly does this do again?
Sep 8, 2006. 10:17 AMstarthorn says:
"IT IS PUBLIC-DOMAINED (cc-share alike)" Just a note, there is actually a very significant difference between Public Domain and the Creative Commons Share Alike license. Placing something in the Public Domain means you are relinquishing all claims of ownership and copyright from the work in question. Anyone can do anything they want, including slapping their name on it and claiming they wrote it. The CC Share Alike license means that anyone can copy and use it provided they continue releasing it under the same license (See their site for further details).
Jul 29, 2008. 1:53 AMthermoelectric says:
how do u make purple lemonade? I'm thirsty
Feb 13, 2008. 4:30 PMthermoelectric says:
Thanks
Sep 9, 2006. 3:06 PMhollasch says:
To respond to your last sentence, "public domain" means that a work is completely given over to the public, and that you surrender all rights of control over that work. In that sense, everyone (including you) has the right to make a copy of that work, in part or in whole, and to use it for whatever purpose they desire. Also, while they can attempt to claim that they wrote it, they cannot impose any future restrictions on it (trying to control future copies) or legally claim ownership of the work. This may or may not sound scary to you. For me, I vastly prefer to put my work in the public domain than to try to rule everyone's use of it (the approach taken by the Gnu license, Creative Commons licenses, and so forth).
Nov 6, 2007. 9:12 PMkingkewl says:
True Steampunk ... Too Kewl !!!
Jul 16, 2008. 11:44 AMA good name says:
It isn't steampunk....
Mar 19, 2008. 2:28 PMjak06 says:
whats the estimated cost?
Nov 27, 2007. 6:11 PMPyrotechnik says:
Very nice. Try to imitate the starwars thing with the princess and crap. that'd be awesome
Nov 18, 2007. 11:42 PMthread_soul says:
I must admit, your reflective approach to persistence of vision volumetric projection is pretty neat, seems more promising in certain areas than most of the direct emittance and opaque media illumination methods currently in commercialization. What are your thoughts on radial / rotational methods vs. translational in order to gain an increase in vertical volume?
Nov 23, 2007. 5:00 AMthread_soul says:
I was thinking of something along the lines of projecting vertically downwards onto something akin to a coreless mirror screw of pitch = 1. Based on the video, the height appeared not more than 1/2 or 1 voxel at most... if in reality the system is operating at 2 voxel height or more, the question is a moot point; having to cope with synchronization and ripping issues wouldn't serve the effort required.
Nov 3, 2007. 11:05 PMandymac says:
I saw your video and was just thinking, if you had a modified subwoofer that was capable of making a 20 hz tone, that could create 40 fps (1 fps for the subwoofer going up, 1 for it going down again) for your projector, this is below the levels of human hearing so you could have a "silent" projector and 40fps is more than enough. Also is it true if you have a lens that is net concave even if only one side is concave, because that would mean that you could possibly make your image larger than the led array if you curve the lens out enough and are you aiming to replace the led array with something like an ipod sceen, but with about 100x more fps fps and about 100x more brigtness
Nov 3, 2007. 11:09 PMandymac says:
ignore the first paragraph, you've already answered it
Sep 22, 2007. 11:11 PMendolith says:
Public domain and CC-sharealike are not the same thing.
Sep 23, 2007. 2:01 PMendolith says:
Yeah just pointing it out. CC-sharealike means people who modify your design have to share it too. Public domain means people who modify your design can make that modified design proprietary.
Sep 15, 2007. 7:57 PMJohn McKenna says:
Damn. Whicked pissa ( that means I like it very much). I had a daydream once about building a volumetric projector. I'm so impressed that you really did it. My daydream came from one of those crappy LED toys you see around Xmass and new years. You know, the ones with the ring of LEDs in this plastic ball shaped thing that spinn around and blink, sort of like the sphere thing at radio-shack and Brookfields that is a sphere shaped lighning board (it's a spinning ring of LEDs). My daydream was to build a spinning ring of RGB LEDs with 180deg light diffusers, so that you get this 3D (spherical surface) that is really a matrix of pixlels organized by timing of the ring position and the blinking LEDs. It's not a true XYZ pixle thing like what you've got going on, but it should give you that 3D freaky feeling because it is an image occupying a volume. I remember this haunted house gag that projected a face onto a bug-screen that was mashed into a bowl shape roughly the length and width of a face. The projected details on the 3D surface looked like a damn face! Lesson: a rough 3D surface can take you a long way if you have decent resolution. I was daydreaming about a four foot high scary haloween face/head, rotating around in a spherical volumetric projection, and saying nasty stuff. scary. The head would be imaged by blinking the LEDs on the ring. All you need is like 44 frames a second (60's better), a three or four foot diameter ring with like 1" hemisphere diffusers (the pixles) containing HB RGB LEDs, and .... Well OK, I've never done any of that. You are an inspiration.
Jul 28, 2007. 9:35 AMiwantacuracy says:
to bad im not good with electronics or stuff like that. BUT THAT IS SO GOOD!!!
May 22, 2007. 6:24 PMJames (pseudo-geek) says:
what exactly does this thing do? is it a holograph?
Apr 26, 2007. 1:53 AMMad Cat says:
WOW... Can't believe it took me so long to see this...
Mar 2, 2007. 9:45 AMMerleCorey says:
This is incredible! Im sure you could quiet it down a bit and mabey use a bigger lens...i dont know mabey an actuator instead of whatever motor you use for the up and down.
1-40 of 67next »

Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

All Steps Viewing
View all steps of an Instructable on the same page when you're a Pro Member.

Upgrade to Pro today!
56
Followers
12
Author:VIRON
I'm a figment of my own imagination. ---- To Win the war on Terra Means to END the WORLD. How about a nice game of Chess? ---- I'm chilling, but forgive me for sometimes believing I invented everythi...
more »