loading
Picture of Make Your Own: Black Hole Fabricator!!
This will tell you how to make a real, down to earth black hole. I swear this is a real instructable! Now, if you have the money, I invite you to build this project. Guaranteed that the FBI doesn't blow your house up first. So, I will also tell you that, because I haven't the money, I have not exactly done this. I CAN tell you that it will work theoretically. Multiple physicists and mathematicians have checked this, and it works. Please read all the directions before creating.

Now, I guarantee that this black hole is DANGEROUS!!!!! So please, make at your own discretion.

Please subscribe!! :)

Now, for the fun part.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: Buy a 10000 Terahertz Laser

Picture of Buy a 10000 Terahertz Laser

You can find such lasers at price ranges from $10000 to $10000000. Please, I don't guarantee that all 10000 terahertz lasers will be enough, but THAT, is where you come in. Find the correct laser. Please find a good intensity as well. (More intensity, the better.) You can use lenses to increase intensity. I would prefer you to RENT a laser, because it is cheaper. If you want to, you can buy one. Or make one, if you can be sure they won't implode while you do this work.
Also, buy a beam splitter so you can split the laser to go all around the bead in the reaction chamber. That is why it is so powerful. Consistent energy from all sides.

Step 2: Make a Reaction Bead

Picture of Make a Reaction Bead
This is the most complicated part of this whole instructable. You will need:

-tritium
-deuterium
-hydrogen

One isotope each, you will need to place these in a special vacuum sealed, thin layered glass bead. 

Make sure it is COMPLETELY airtight!! If it is not, your experiment will go POOF!
Also, if your isotopes are not completely alone, I ditto the sentence above /\ /\  and you will be a sad kitty. 



Step 3: Make the Reaction Chamber

Picture of Make the Reaction Chamber
The reaction chamber! Well, this is another complicated step, but if correctly done could mean TONS of time saved. You really don't need to make one, but If that nuclear company will not let you have one, I suggest you make one.


Finding a Chamber

You will need an new, sealed nuclear power plant chamber. (Used in the process of nuclear energy conversion.) To get one of these, you must go up to the owner/company and put on your biggest puppy eye face, and ask him/her if he would like to help with the discovery of something "big". If you are lucky, he/she will say yes. Or, as an alternate option, you can buy one. You will need this for the next step.

Making the Chamber

Go buy (Not find!!!) Lots and lots of concrete. And by lots, I mean about enough to cover your house with it in ten feet thick. All chambers are different sizes, and based on your budget and location you may also have to change this. You will also have to line the inside of the chamber with a pure compressed carbon or also known as RCC (Reinforced carbon-carbon) to withstand the beginning temperatures up to 3000 degrees F. You will now have to inlay the chamber with special material I call "diomonia". It is a mix of pure diamond and ceramic. Well, not PURE PURE diamond, but you get the idea. This should withstand short-term temperatures that are very hot. Since diamonds are made in high temperatures, they can withstand and help structural stability for short times.  Make sure it has a layer about a few inches thick all around. When you are done, the inside should be a gray-ish white-ish color. Unlike the picture below, which is a nuclear chamber, not a black hole chamber. Unfortunately, You will probably have to replace the inner coatings on each black hole fabrication, but I don't encourage that, because I really don't want everybody making black holes all over the place. 

MAKE SURE THE CHAMBER IS VACUUM SEALED!!!! 

Step 4: Dropping the Bead Mechanism and Readying the Laser

Picture of Dropping the Bead Mechanism and Readying the Laser
Place your laser in one spot facing the exact center of the chamber. Now, take a tube and attach it to the ceiling of the chamber. Don't worry about "fireproofing" this or any thing, because this is just to drop the bead in the path of the laser so the bead explodes. Hook up your laser to the correct amount of wattage and a control switch up to the dropping tube, then hook the tube to the computer. (Step 6) This will also be especially difficult because the chamber must remain airtight. 

Step 5: Create a Carbon Launcher

Picture of Create a Carbon Launcher
Basically you have to make a tube that fires a bunch of carbon at the center of the reaction chamber. Do this by buying a tube, (metal, preferably!) and line it with our special "diamonia" mixture. Attach a small laser in a tank on the back, and hook it up to the reaction chamber. Have a nice switch ready so your computer will be able to fire it at the right time. Fill your carbon launcher with, take a guess, pure carbon, and seal it. The carbon will have to be brimming with photons for the laser to clunk it forward.

Step 6: Hook Up the (Super)Computer

Picture of Hook Up the (Super)Computer
When the laser hits the bead, it will create a temporary star.
Take a very fast computation computer (You could grab one from a server room...or from IMB or someone else like that) and program it so it will fire the carbon launcher just as the star starts to die. The connections between the launcher and the computer should be nice and tidy, so there should be no "frayed or fragmented" pieces. Make sure to double check your programming, or else this will create a large pile of useless hydrogen-carbon bonds, instead of a black hole.

Step 7: Fire the Laser

Picture of Fire the Laser

Carefully fire the laser at the reaction bead. When done properly, it should explode, creating a temporary star. The computer should then fire the carbon launcher, taking all the hydrogen away from the star. This will overload the star, and tear a sizable hole in the matter of space-time, creating your very own black hole.

Step 8: Destroying the Black Hole

Picture of Destroying the Black Hole
You will now have to repeat the WHOLE black hole making process up to step 8. The trickiest part will be hanging the reaction bead, so I recommend you just sorta throw it in, and the laser, still aimed at the center, should hit the bead as it gets sucked in. The star should overload the black hole and destroy it with the star. Remember, time slows down the closer you are to the black hole. The black hole itself shouldn't be very big anyway, so it should be easier to destroy. And because it isn't very large, it will be harder to create a stable singularity therefore you may have to try this several times. 

Good luck with your journey, and please, don't destroy the earth!

Thanks for reading, happy building!
1-40 of 296Next »
AravindT4 months ago

Umm... it is a bit confusing when this is read so can you make a video of the whole process. I really want to make it but im really scared because im a bit confused.Thank you

lhdev5 months ago

If the carbon was shot the appropriate angle then I would have a spinning black hole or Kerr black hole. If two BH are bult simultaneously where the tritium, deuterium, hydrogen and carbon is quantum entangled then a wormhole should be created. Accelerate on the of the BH’s. with a particle accelerator, then you have a time machine capable of sending a signal back through time

Since you have a time machine, you should be able to obtain investors, that will make billions on the stock market

BTW is that 10000 Tera hertz Laser or a 10000 Tera watt laser?

DJBLOCKAH6 months ago

the reason for this machine is to stabilize the creation of or the existence of a black hole, since the blackhole con not theoretically just be created, it is a conjunction piece to a "ladder" that connnects all space time, whether it be 3d, 5d, or linear. it would need two ends, with two cosmically occuring wormholes, and this machine would be able to stabilize it and "fine tune" the travel within them, since they already bend their own space/time within specific points in the universe.

DJBLOCKAH6 months ago

black holes exist and are worm hole filters for carbon based atoms. the science behind blackholes are simple and is the same science behind life and all things apparent in our universe. it is a hydrogen gap purely made from a magnetic reaction or "gravity" to condense it in one state being that it is almost impossible to physically collect and stablize pure hydrogen. it can only be done cosmically, or metaphysiclly in which case would create an impacted state of existence between hydrogen molecules in all space time, bringing its awareness that much closer or "enticed" by our own magnetic senses through light sound and smell. just a theory

DJBLOCKAH6 months ago

black holes exist and are worm hole filters for carbon based atoms. the science behind blackholes are simple and is the same science behind life and all things apparent in our universe. it is a hydrogen gap purely made from a magnetic reaction or "gravity" to condense it in one state being that it is almost impossible to physically collect and stablize pure hydrogen. it can only be done cosmically, or metaphysiclly in which case would create an impacted state of existence between hydrogen molecules in all space time, bringing its awareness that much closer or "enticed" by our own magnetic senses through light sound and smell. just a theory

archistrage5 years ago
Clever, but you do realize this won't make a blackhole that is actually dangerous. Even if a star the size of the sun collapsed and became a blackhole, it would only be about half a mile wide. But this would make a blackhole with a maximum size of a DNA molecule. Oh, and btw, that "simple computer" would need to be a supercomputer that could calculate the individual reactions between the dampening effects of the carbon, and the resulting fusion reaction in the Hydrogen molecules.

im not a genious or a a scientist or anything but i would guess the carbon would give it the reaction it need to produce the same magnetism as a real black hole as they are mostly carbon based. without actual carbon, you would not have physical eveidence of its existence and therefore probably couldnt travel through it. the reaction i would call the necessity factor where things created are for purpose, so the rection would be the ned result for the inserted carbon, to return to a "source" pinpointed by the device

And what use is a black hole that just evaporates into x ray's and hawking radiation anyways?
007dna (author)  RollerT4 years ago
What use is a black hole? lol
Well for starters We could use a black Hole to warp the fabric of space Hence making a warp drive since space it self can be bend or warped we could use it to move space around a craft by feeding it small amounts of Ion's in which case the craft could carry large amounts of in a small space the fun part would be slowing down or stopping since we would have to figure out how to shut or make the black hole take a nap but then we would still coast threw space after the warp field shut down but again the ship would not be moving space would ;) ...
This guy know exactly what he is talking about. And due to the irregular bending of space and time after the creation of the black hole cause anything near to be gravatationally pulled in and thus adding to the mass of the hole and in effect increasing the gravatational field? and what about destroying the singularity of the hole anyway?
Destroying a black hole's singularity would be so difficult as to give the most die-hard ("There's no such word as 'impossible!'") optimist the blues...

A singularity is an (almost) infinite mass of (almost) infinite density. There is nothing in this universe - nor, probably, in any other - that does not require more energy to destroy than to maintain, so you'd need practically infinite energy, properly focussed, to destroy it.

But to achieve the required levels, you'd have to harness all the energy in the universe, as well as convert all the universe's mass into energy - which you can't do, partly because the loss of life would be far higher than the Black Hole would ever account for, but you'd also have to convert all the singularities in the universe into energy...

So, the destruction of the singularity you're aiming at (ignoring the fact that you've already converted the mass of your 'gun', along with its guidance systems, and yourself into energy) would require its own mass to be converted to energy, as well as that of everything else - which would then be pointless, as the singularity itself would no longer exist...

And, no, you can't stop at converting the singularity to energy, because that would require almost as much energy as 'simply' destroying it.
just a shot in the proverbial black hole... but wouldn't hawking radiation rather quickly "evaporate" a "small" black hole, provided it's kept from nomming other bits of matter in the mean time?
Well, it might, but that wouldn't really destroy the singularity itself, 'merely' render it inactive - and that possibly only temporarily, given the constant  energy generation state in/of space.
you are right but at the same time you are wrong.because all black holes are same in size nd it is actually a very very small dot....small means about 10^-33....It is called singularity....But what varies is the size of it's gravitational limit....higher the number bigger they look (actually we cant see them)..nd B.H would very bright if they didnt suck any photons....And now you dont really need a super computer for this kind of calculation.....because in the year 2001 IBM made one of the fastest mainframe super computer and it's computing power was 4.5 Tera flops/sec....but now you can get a 4.2 tera flops of computing with a 250$ intel core i7...nd if you use skull trail then bro you will get 8.4 tera flops...hahahaha...wicked right ??.....even a 199$ xbox 360(jasper) got about 3.1 tera flops...............
True, but I have a theory that larger black holes are actually made up on multiple singularities.  I was stating it based off that.

I always enjoy these conversations, because at the end of the day, no matter who agrees with what, no on actually knows.  We're studying an object, like you said, that we can't even see, who's very nature is to prevent any particles from escaping it's field.  I'm always willing to debate these things, but I never put that much faith in them.  

And also, the big problem with the computers, isn't necessarily how fast something can be processed, but how many things can be processed at the same time.  You can't do it in a linear fashion, because your individual reaction calculations will be flawed.  They must all be done at the same time.
 dont you think that those singularity would attract each other with tremendous force ??.....I didnt tell about speed...it was computing power....nd super computer are only used for high number of input nd out put.....to achive that in your pc you gotta use various input hubs............and super computer are also used as a analog to digital converter.......nd yes with the blessing of hyper threading of new intel's chip ur pc will be a super pc....bt mainframe super computers are the boss........I always thought that how it would be to put several 5870 in those monster sc !!!!
countable shams4 years ago
Do you work for Intel? You seem to be singing songs of praise about the i7 when cheaper and more powerful processors already exist...
shams countable4 years ago
cheaper more powerfull ??...can you name one ??
countable shams4 years ago

This is cheaper and faster than everything on this page, except for the Gulftown which is 4 times more expensive and only 300MHz faster.

shams countable4 years ago
http://www.overclock.net/amd-cpus/720800-amd-x6-vs-intel-core-i7s.html
007dna (author)  shams4 years ago
Oh c'mon guys, there ARE better ones out there, but have to be cooled in liquid nitrogen from the heat giveoff. The i5 and i7 are affordable ones that work very well.
shams 007dna4 years ago
just put a nvidia tesla and get cluster level computing !!
sadben shams5 years ago
yeah but a cheaper AMD phenom II @ 3.2 ghz works better than the intel one.
shams sadben5 years ago
 nope it aint.........amd doesnt got that computing power....no hyper threading nd power boost....core i7 870 is 2.9 ghz chip...bt when boost is on then it jumps to 3.6 with out any overclocking or additional cooling...nd its bus speed is much more higher.....
Our sun won't create a black hole, it won't even supernova, its 3 times to small for either.
well then sun will grow and grow and grow and grow and grow until it reaches saturn and shrink and shrink and shrink and shrink and shrink and poof its gone
007dna (author)  archistrage5 years ago
 Yeah, the computer can literally be any computing power, as long as it uses one function...

007dna
I reckon you could make that simple computer out of an old Atari.
I think he was just trying to say not to touch it.
photobomber7 months ago

A word of advice to anyone else who might get sucked into a black hole: look for a bookcase. It will help orient yourself in all those new dimensions, plus if there is anyone on the other side, you can bang on the bookcase to communicate.

Thomasg57 months ago

Hey. I got to the last step, but I decided I would tie a leash around it and keep it as a pet. When I left the chamber it kinda sucked up my dinner and then disappeared. How do I get my dinner back. Seriously. By the way, apparently its illegal to use those lasers. I learned that the hardway. Luckily my black hole could deal with the officiers.

Science.jpg
Captain J1 year ago

I know this is probably an easy question to answer but how does firing carbon at the star make it turn into a black hole?

And, in that bead, when you say that the isotopes have to be completely alone, does that mean that they have to be separate from one another or mixed together? :P

Just curious cuz I don't always have too good an understanding of how the science of certain things work, thanks!

wdash1 year ago
In the directions you said you didn't EXACTLY make this. Then what did you make?
laskman2 years ago
Thanks this really helped me destroy my home planet
i destroyed 8 planets including pluto. Thanks for your theory 007dna
It's a joke people
timlyo2 years ago
oh wow, that was awesome. Although you wouldn't have to worry about destroying your black hole at then end, Hawking radiation would take care of that for you
black holes are formed by gravitational collapse of massive stars, a star this size wouldn't have enough gravity to do anything
007dna (author)  qjhekbejhrbaebhj22 years ago
Massive stars = massive black holes, tiny stars = theoretical micro black holes. In the disclaimer, I did mention this was all theoretical. Just an FYI. :)
1-40 of 296Next »