Make Your Own: Black Hole Fabricator!!

 by 007dna
Featured
This will tell you how to make a real, down to earth black hole. I swear this is a real instructable! Now, if you have the money, I invite you to build this project. Guaranteed that the FBI doesn't blow your house up first. So, I will also tell you that, because I haven't the money, I have not exactly done this. I CAN tell you that it will work theoretically. Multiple physicists and mathematicians have checked this, and it works. Please read all the directions before creating.

Now, I guarantee that this black hole is DANGEROUS!!!!! So please, make at your own discretion.

Please subscribe!! :)

Now, for the fun part.
 
Remove these adsRemove these ads by Signing Up

Step 1: Buy a 10000 Terahertz Laser

You can find such lasers at price ranges from $10000 to $10000000. Please, I don't guarantee that all 10000 terahertz lasers will be enough, but THAT, is where you come in. Find the correct laser. Please find a good intensity as well. (More intensity, the better.) You can use lenses to increase intensity. I would prefer you to RENT a laser, because it is cheaper.  If you want to, you can buy one. Ore make one, if you can be sure they won't implode while you do this work. 
Also, buy a beam splitter so you can split the laser to go all around the bead in the reaction chamber. That is why it is so powerful. Consistent energy from all sides. 
1-40 of 298Next »
laskman says: Apr 28, 2013. 5:28 PM
Thanks this really helped me destroy my home planet
timlyo says: Feb 27, 2013. 4:06 AM
oh wow, that was awesome. Although you wouldn't have to worry about destroying your black hole at then end, Hawking radiation would take care of that for you
jrd1121 says: Jan 1, 2013. 10:04 AM
black holes are formed by gravitational collapse of massive stars, a star this size wouldn't have enough gravity to do anything
007dna (author) in reply to jrd1121Jan 1, 2013. 1:11 PM
Massive stars = massive black holes, tiny stars = theoretical micro black holes. In the disclaimer, I did mention this was all theoretical. Just an FYI. :)
jrd1121 says: Oct 15, 2012. 6:32 PM
this will not work because a black hole this size would evaporate almost instantly
007dna (author) in reply to jrd1121Jan 1, 2013. 1:09 PM
Now tell me, where did I say it would last infinitely? :P There is a reason theoretical physicists have recently declared micro-black holes "extinct."
jrd1121 says: Jan 1, 2013. 10:46 AM
i have one more thing to say about this.hertz is a unit of frequency not energy, so according to you the laser could be a laser pointer as long as it pulses a trillion times a second.
007dna (author) in reply to jrd1121Jan 1, 2013. 1:07 PM
Yes, but usually the two go hand in hand, in most cases. But laser technology is improving rapidly over the years, so in no time we should be able to select whatever we want in a pointer. :)
Ninjakaib says: Aug 22, 2012. 6:40 PM
A question for 007dna, how big is the black hole?
007dna (author) in reply to NinjakaibAug 22, 2012. 7:19 PM
It really depends, and really quite can't be measured in some aspects. The singularity itself is unimaginably small, while the gravity field and gas disk(s) can be as large(or larger) as hundreds of our solar systems. The cool thing about space is that everything is at an extreme extreme, and will puzzle us for years to come. (Example: Imagine everything in our solar system being pressurized down to the size smaller than a pinhead. That's the power of a singularity. :D )
singapura says: Jun 9, 2012. 12:27 AM
I got to the last stage but my dog accidentally jumped in. How do I retrieve him?
Ninjakaib in reply to singapuraAug 22, 2012. 6:36 PM
I suggest you don't worry about it, your dog is probably gone forever unless you create an anti-black hole device, jump in to save your dog and then when you get him activate your device.
HalMeis says: Mar 21, 2012. 11:01 PM
A large percentage of of what you point out happens to be supprisingly appropriate and that makes me wonder the reason why I had not looked at this with this light before. This article truly did switch the light on for me as far as this specific subject matter goes. Nevertheless at this time there is actually one position I am not really too comfy with and whilst I make an effort to reconcile that with the central idea of the point, let me see exactly what all the rest of your readers have to say.Very well done.

donatr93 says: Oct 3, 2009. 2:58 PM
You can get the same result when dividing by '0' :DD lol btw, You must be a professor of physics or something
GASSYPOOTS in reply to donatr93Mar 20, 2012. 11:51 AM
wait if you have a pizza and noone eats it you still haz 1 pizza >:D aka 1 divided by 0 people= 1 btw .9999...= 1
Nathan08 in reply to donatr93Jan 27, 2012. 12:27 AM
But deviding by zero is imposible
Betelgeus3 in reply to donatr93May 22, 2011. 2:00 PM
Ironically, a singularity in physics terms, is theoretically a division by zero.
Jimmy Proton says: Dec 29, 2010. 7:57 PM
Just to make this clear, grayish-white is the same as silver...
Grey_valentine in reply to Jimmy ProtonFeb 15, 2012. 3:32 PM
Silver isn't a color. If you were, going for for a metallic comparison I think aluminum would fit the bill better.
007dna (author) in reply to Grey_valentineFeb 15, 2012. 4:01 PM
Eh, if you have enough carbon and titanium it will be darker. Oh well. I will update it if you guys want. Haven't needed to in a while. :)
Nathan08 says: Jan 27, 2012. 12:25 AM
HELLP The black hole is making too many wormholes and sending my kitchen objects to space and everything I try to destroy it with
jbouffard says: Sep 28, 2011. 5:34 PM
IMMa FIRINg MAH LAZOR...
BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!!!!!
bglidden1962 says: Sep 8, 2011. 1:15 PM
I followed the instructions precisely. All I got was this big black spot that sucked in all the light in the room and made me miss the finale of "Rescue Me".
экоцюба says: Sep 8, 2011. 5:28 AM
begin hoard for 10000 Terahertz Laser...
jliberman13 says: Sep 3, 2011. 11:42 AM
1. Totally awesome. 2. Probobally wouldn't work in reality, but as you said, in theory you could make your own black hole. Now what you really want to do is use lasers to move single atoms of tritium, deuturium, and hydrogen into the big laser, that way once the black hole has been made, then there will be no other atoms to get sucked in. You don't want more matter sucked in because this would cause the destruction of the black hole. 3. Time to start saving up! :P
007dna (author) in reply to jliberman13Sep 7, 2011. 9:06 PM
Statement 3 = lol

:D
allstarmike577 says: Aug 2, 2011. 7:54 AM
A black hole would be formed on a plutonium flexitator, not a terrahertz laser. A black hole that is formed by plutonium flexitator would turn into dark matter, which wouldinstantly send a beam of dark energy that will instantly kill you and reverse your molecular structure.
tinker234 says: Jun 2, 2011. 5:19 PM
dont try to make a black hole it could swalllow the earth however this will work
rjg0519 says: Sep 29, 2009. 9:56 AM
Great project. But it really didn't work. I'm kind of bummed, though I do believe subtituting deuterium with weapons grade plutonium would be a bit more effective. Also, you're going to need more than the CO2 tank to get the molecules moving beyond lightspeed. Use a mass accelerator with at least 12,000 neodymium magnets. I've done it, and deuterium resulted in a dwarf star, not a black hole. Good instructable!
Betelgeus3 in reply to rjg0519May 22, 2011. 2:09 PM
Deuterium is more effective for fusion reactions. While some suns are thought to have heavier elements at their center, such a small star could only be created with hydrogen isotopes.
Also, universal laws prevent anything of any substantial mass from going past lightspeed. But the neodymium accelerator is essentially a small particle collider, so that's what would be needed.

If you got a dwarf star, the carbon wasn't going fast enough. More voltage in the collider might help.
Bad Maxx in reply to rjg0519Jan 2, 2011. 9:24 AM
Wow....
I am just a bit curious, what do you expect to gain from these comments/statements? I'm wondering what the motivation for this behavior might be..
jonb1985 says: Oct 28, 2009. 5:21 PM

A black whole formed by the collapse of a small number of atoms, will destroy it'self within seconds.  It's mass so tiny, that it could simply not be dangerous for anything oher than a microbe.  The length of time of black hole lives, is directly proportional to it's mass. 

Now, a black hole formed by the collapse of the supergiant star, 100 times the size of our sun, would destroy galaxies and live for thousands of years 

Doubleblades85 in reply to jonb1985Apr 26, 2010. 11:26 AM
....destroy galaxies? I think you mean solar systems, you do realize that there is a super massive black hole at the center of our galaxy, right? I'm pretty sure that we haven't been destroyed by it yet. and a black hole the size of a few atoms wouldn't hurt a microbe, atoms are very very VERY small.
king kolton9 in reply to Doubleblades85Aug 28, 2010. 6:05 AM
well..... we are in one of the outer spirails (spelling error??) but in the middle when stars collide there is a massive amount of power on absorbs the energy one looses its energy the one with the energy shoots out into the galixey (im 11 give me a break) the other gets sucked up. now when the black hole has no fuel (aka stars, planets, ect) it implodes (is that even possible??) or explodes (that sounds right) with the equivelent of (1000000? 100000000? 100000000000000?) pounds of TNT sending everything is sucked up out at light speed for a fraction of a second (1/1000 of a second i think. for those of you that don't understand thats 1 milisecond) and then its gone. but when two collide they both fuse into each other and their mass is the combined mass of the each one of them. black holes are so dense that not even light can escape them and if you got sucked in feet first your entire upper body (or is it your legs???) would implode from the massive amount of preesure
Betelgeus3 in reply to king kolton9May 22, 2011. 2:04 PM
Black holes don't use matter as fuel. And you can't really measure explosions in space in terms of TNT. They aren't explosions in the classic term, because an explosion on earth is a giant change in air pressure over a small area. No air pressure in space.
apard7 in reply to Doubleblades85Jul 1, 2010. 8:29 AM
No It Would Destroy Galxys Because It Would Be HUGE! like 7 billion earths big
itsthatsguy in reply to apard7Jul 6, 2010. 1:09 PM
7 billion earths is the size of 7 suns, which in cosmic terms, isn't a whole lot
Bad Maxx in reply to itsthatsguyJan 2, 2011. 10:35 AM
Everything else aside, we have a bit of a math dilemma here, the Sun's diameter is 864,938 miles while the Earth's diameter is 7,926 miles. That means approximately 1 million* Earths would fit in the Sun. Not a billion as your description would indicate. So we are talking about 7000 Suns.. Which in cosmic terms is still not "a whole lot", but it certainly is when we are talking about the difference between a star the size of 7 Suns collapsing and a star the size of 7000 Suns collapsing!
* (The Sun's diameter is approximately 100 times the diameter of the Earth. Diameter is the distance around at one point, so being we live in a 3 dimensional universe we take 100x100x100 to get 1 million.)
Jerry66 in reply to Bad MaxxSep 1, 2011. 1:29 AM
This answer for the volume question is about 9 months too late, but there are about 1,300,000 earth volumes within the sun's volume. 4/3*Pi*r3 for the volume of a sphere.
Arano in reply to Doubleblades85May 7, 2010. 4:50 PM
as increasing gavitation slows time it may be that we are considered 'destroyed' by some alien race living far outside our galaxy (if they exist)
1-40 of 298Next »
Pro

Get More Out of Instructables

Already have an Account?

close

PDF Downloads
As a Pro member, you will gain access to download any Instructable in the PDF format. You also have the ability to customize your PDF download.

Upgrade to Pro today!